I guess the market failure would be one of capital markets not being able to
respond fast enough and offering high interest loans to the poor and infirm in
N.O. so that they could pay to evacuate within a day or two. Possibly, the
market for information failed in that people in N.O. did not fully understand
the expected cost of staying... or did they and they simply got bitten by being
on the wrong end of an expected value calculation? Given the high cost of
evacuating entire hospitals, I would have to say that both of the above
contributed to the demand side of the non-evacuation disaster.
-Jeff
Alexander Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/6/2005 6:32 PM
It is necessary, at least too me, to get details of what you consider market
failure in this case, assuming the hurricane of this class could be
considered a 'public' good.
Regards
AG
_
From: ArmChair List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
Giesbrecht
Sent: martes, 06 de septiembre de 2005 16:49
To: ARMCHAIR-L@mail04.GMU.EDU
Subject: Katrina and the Evacuation of the Poor and Infirm: Market Failure?
The government (local, State, and Federal) appropriated responsibility for
the Mississippi River levy system, the drainage systems, the pumping
systems, the road ways, and the bridges, but apparently, they left it to the
market to provide the service of evacuating the poor and the infirm. Since
they poor and infirm were not, to any great extent, evacuated, is this an
example of market failure?
Best regards,
Michael Giesbrecht