Re: [ARMedslack] Seagate Dockstar device questions

2012-07-11 Thread Richard Lapointe


On 07/10/2012 11:46 PM, Gregg Levine wrote:

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Rich  wrote:

On 07/10/2012 03:50 PM, Stuart Winter wrote:

Is this device completely supported by the ARM Slackware port?

I guess Stuart would say: "it's not a case of "porting" - it's just
adding support".

Not to answer *that* question I wouldn't.

The dockstar is supported in the way that a kernel is supplied that runs
on that device.

Much to my disgust, someone on this list used one of those pointless
devices ;-)
See-

http://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=dockstar&l=armedslack%40lists.armedslack.org

Well you would be really disgusted with me.  I've got three Dockstars all
running ARMedSlack 13.37.  And to make it worst, I've got two Pogoplugs E02
running current.  On all of these devices I loaded Jeff Doozan uboot, so no
real problem with hacking the boot loader.

Rich Lapointe


___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack

Hello!
Rich is this the article that you followed?http://projects.doozan.com/debian/
Yes, but I don't use the Debian install.   I use the uboot installation 
instructions that are linked to in the first line of your reference 
link.  Here the direct link. http://projects.doozan.com/uboot/. The 
uboot that this installs was recently updated to work with kernels 3.1 
and greater. I also installed Jeff's Rescue System, 
http://forum.doozan.com/read.php?4,7915. I find it easier to use for 
installing ARMedSlack than stock firmware.

  Granted he is talking about that cluster of Penguins in back of our
group and slightly to the left of he router community. But for my
efforts that one makes sense. I'm leaning towards putting a
Slackware-13.37 system on it, but, ah, what space requirements should
I take into consideration?
I use USB hard drives (anywhere between 80G to 600G) with all my 
Dockstars and Pogoplugs, so i don't have to worry about space 
requirements.  I recall installing on a 4 G flash drive without problems.

My general partition scheme is as follows:

sda1/   ext3 ( can be anywhere between 2 to 20 G)
sda2swap(i still follow the old rule of thumb of 2x ram)
sda3   /home   ext4 (size depends on what i planning to do with it)
sda4-  logical disk to take up the reaming disk space if any

In order not to have to screw with the uboot variables, the root file 
systems needs to be on sda1.  Although most instruction indicate the the 
root files system need to be ext2, ext3 works fine.
To install ARMedSlack I just untar the mini root file system in sda1, 
edit fstab to work with the partitioning scheme and add the following 
sym links to /boot

ln  -s uinitrd-kirkwood uInitrd
ln -s uImage-kirkwood uImage

As Stuart said your going to need to to install ntp and make the 
appropriate changes in ntp.conf.  The network is setup to run dhcp, but 
I suggest that you set up a static ip so that you will not have to hunt 
for the ip address to ssh in after the first boot.


Rich Lapointe





-
Gregg C levinegregg.drw...@gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."



___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack


Re: [ARMedslack] Seagate Dockstar device questions

2012-07-11 Thread Davide
I had a slimmed version of the mini root working on the dockstar (that 
initially ran on an external usb flashdisk untill I slimmed it enough to fit in 
the docstar) ... but I subsequently spent a lot of time on an old project I had 
back 2004 (Clash). Currently my dosckstar runs on that but if you need new 
kernel feautres the project has been dormant since I changed job, so you might 
like to look for a kernel elsewhere.

Anyway, being a slackware enthusiast, I did my best to leave a slackware 
feeling to ClashNG while keeping things in a fairly small footprint.
All the work I did is on sourceforge (bclash.sourceforge.net)

Regards
David




 Da: David Madden 
A: Slackware ARM port  
Inviato: Mercoledì 11 Luglio 2012 5:00
Oggetto: Re: [ARMedslack] Seagate Dockstar device questions
 
On 7/10/2012 20:46, Gregg Levine wrote:
> what space requirements should
> I take into consideration?

I spent a fair amount of time trying to put together a tiny system that
would fit into the Flash on a Dockstar, but ended up with a more
conventional installation (system on USB disk).  More recently, I built
a GuruPlug system to take over the Dockstar's duties, and was able to
fit Linux-3.4.4, Apache, PHP, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and a fair amount of
other stuff into the 507MB flash, with ... let's see ... almost 100MB
left.  (This is using a UBI compressed filesystem.)

For the GuruPlug install, I started with Arch Linux, rather than
Slackware.  I'm not up on the politics of the various distros, but it
seemed like Arch made it easier to pick & choose individual packages.

I plan to rebuild the Dockstar after the GuruPlug has a few weeks to get
the bugs shaken out, and I'll probably try to fit an Arch Linux
installation into the 128MB flash.  I doubt I can fit a complete LAMP
setup, but I really only need NFS, CUPS and maybe a basic web server.

You should make sure you can access the TTL-level serial port on the
Dockstar before you get too fancy with it!
-- 
Mersenne Law LLC  ·  www.mersenne.com  ·  +1-503-679-1671
- Small Business, Startup and Intellectual Property Law -
1500 SW First Ave. · Suite 1170 · Portland, Oregon  97201


___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack


Re: [ARMedslack] Seagate Dockstar device questions

2012-07-11 Thread David Madden
On 7/10/2012 20:46, Gregg Levine wrote:
> what space requirements should
> I take into consideration?

I spent a fair amount of time trying to put together a tiny system that
would fit into the Flash on a Dockstar, but ended up with a more
conventional installation (system on USB disk).  More recently, I built
a GuruPlug system to take over the Dockstar's duties, and was able to
fit Linux-3.4.4, Apache, PHP, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and a fair amount of
other stuff into the 507MB flash, with ... let's see ... almost 100MB
left.  (This is using a UBI compressed filesystem.)

For the GuruPlug install, I started with Arch Linux, rather than
Slackware.  I'm not up on the politics of the various distros, but it
seemed like Arch made it easier to pick & choose individual packages.

I plan to rebuild the Dockstar after the GuruPlug has a few weeks to get
the bugs shaken out, and I'll probably try to fit an Arch Linux
installation into the 128MB flash.  I doubt I can fit a complete LAMP
setup, but I really only need NFS, CUPS and maybe a basic web server.

You should make sure you can access the TTL-level serial port on the
Dockstar before you get too fancy with it!
-- 
Mersenne Law LLC  ·  www.mersenne.com  ·  +1-503-679-1671
- Small Business, Startup and Intellectual Property Law -
1500 SW First Ave. · Suite 1170 · Portland, Oregon  97201


___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack


Re: [ARMedslack] Seagate Dockstar device questions

2012-07-10 Thread Gregg Levine
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Rich  wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 03:50 PM, Stuart Winter wrote:

 Is this device completely supported by the ARM Slackware port?
>>>
>>> I guess Stuart would say: "it's not a case of "porting" - it's just
>>> adding support".
>>
>> Not to answer *that* question I wouldn't.
>>
>> The dockstar is supported in the way that a kernel is supplied that runs
>> on that device.
>>
>> Much to my disgust, someone on this list used one of those pointless
>> devices ;-)
>> See-
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=dockstar&l=armedslack%40lists.armedslack.org
>
>
> Well you would be really discussed with me.  I've got three Dockstars all
> running ARMedSlack 13.37.  And to make it worst, I've got two Pogoplugs E02
> running current.  On all of these devices I loaded Jeff Doozan uboot, so no
> real problem with hacking the boot loader.
>
> Rich Lapointe
>
>
> ___
> ARMedslack mailing list
> ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
> http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack

Hello!
Rich is this the article that you followed? http://projects.doozan.com/debian/
 Granted he is talking about that cluster of Penguins in back of our
group and slightly to the left of the router community. But for my
efforts that one makes sense. I'm leaning towards putting a
Slackware-13.37 system on it, but, ah, what space requirements should
I take into consideration?

-
Gregg C Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack


Re: [ARMedslack] Seagate Dockstar device questions

2012-07-10 Thread Rich

On 07/10/2012 03:50 PM, Stuart Winter wrote:

Is this device completely supported by the ARM Slackware port?

I guess Stuart would say: "it's not a case of "porting" - it's just
adding support".

Not to answer *that* question I wouldn't.

The dockstar is supported in the way that a kernel is supplied that runs
on that device.

Much to my disgust, someone on this list used one of those pointless
devices ;-)
See-
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=dockstar&l=armedslack%40lists.armedslack.org


Well you would be really discussed with me.  I've got three Dockstars 
all running ARMedSlack 13.37.  And to make it worst, I've got two 
Pogoplugs E02 running current.  On all of these devices I loaded Jeff 
Doozan uboot, so no real problem with hacking the boot loader.


Rich Lapointe

___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack


Re: [ARMedslack] Seagate Dockstar device questions

2012-07-10 Thread Gregg Levine
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:16 PM, David Madden  wrote:
> On 7/10/2012 13:09, Stuart Winter wrote:
>> so anything that is of low spec doesn't interest me at all -
>> especially when there are better machines out there.
>
> The Dockstar is such a cute form factor, though.  Especially when you
> put one of the 2.5" drives in it.  But you're right, only 128MB is
> painful.  (Although I did have one running MySQL, Postgresql, Lighttpd,
> PHP, Gallery, Wordpress, git and Davical!  But I recently moved all that
> stuff over to a GuruPlug because the image processing for Gallery was
> just painfully slow.)
>
> --
> Mersenne Law LLC  ·  www.mersenne.com  ·  +1-503-679-1671
> - Small Business, Startup and Intellectual Property Law -
> 1500 SW First Ave. · Suite 1170 · Portland, Oregon  97201
>
>
> ___
> ARMedslack mailing list
> ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
> http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack

Hello!
I agree folks. Really. I've already got a black Pogoplug here doing
all of that with two drives attached. I originally wanted to track
down of them (the Seagate Dockstar) about a year or so earlier, when
there was talk of stuffing one of the others on it, OpenWRT in fact.
That also included the serial port on the device which has its pins
the  front.

Someone else had gotten the thing to talk to a screen via one those
VGA to USB translation devices as well.

But for me that platform is perfect for exploring the world of running
Linux on non-Intel platforms.

Oh and thank you Stuart for creating this port.
-
Gregg C Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack


Re: [ARMedslack] Seagate Dockstar device questions

2012-07-10 Thread David Madden
On 7/10/2012 13:09, Stuart Winter wrote:
> so anything that is of low spec doesn't interest me at all -
> especially when there are better machines out there.

The Dockstar is such a cute form factor, though.  Especially when you
put one of the 2.5" drives in it.  But you're right, only 128MB is
painful.  (Although I did have one running MySQL, Postgresql, Lighttpd,
PHP, Gallery, Wordpress, git and Davical!  But I recently moved all that
stuff over to a GuruPlug because the image processing for Gallery was
just painfully slow.)

-- 
Mersenne Law LLC  ·  www.mersenne.com  ·  +1-503-679-1671
- Small Business, Startup and Intellectual Property Law -
1500 SW First Ave. · Suite 1170 · Portland, Oregon  97201


___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack


Re: [ARMedslack] Seagate Dockstar device questions

2012-07-10 Thread Stuart Winter
> Hello!
> Okay, what about them bothers you?

I always think about using the machines as either 'desktops' or build
machines, so anything that is of low spec doesn't interest me at all -
especially when there are better machines out there.

The dockstar has no RTC and only 128MB RAM.  IMO if you were going to
spend any money on a Kirkwood machine, buy a SheevaPlug.  More costly but it's 
*supposed* to be
developed on so it's completely open (rather than sold as an appliance for
a particular application and having to be hacked) and has 512MB RAM.


-- 
Stuart Winter
Slackware ARM: www.armedslack.org
___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack


Re: [ARMedslack] Seagate Dockstar device questions

2012-07-10 Thread Brennan Newman
No hardware clock, have to use ntp to sync the time.  This is a problem if
it is not connected to the "internet"

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Gregg Levine wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Stuart Winter 
> wrote:
> >
> >> > Is this device completely supported by the ARM Slackware port?
> >>
> >> I guess Stuart would say: "it's not a case of "porting" - it's just
> >> adding support".
> >
> > Not to answer *that* question I wouldn't.
> >
> > The dockstar is supported in the way that a kernel is supplied that runs
> > on that device.
> >
> > Much to my disgust, someone on this list used one of those pointless
> > devices ;-)
> > See-
> >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=dockstar&l=armedslack%40lists.armedslack.org
> >
>
> Hello!
> Okay, what about them bothers you?
>
> -
> Gregg C Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.com
> "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
> ___
> ARMedslack mailing list
> ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
> http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack
>
___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack


Re: [ARMedslack] Seagate Dockstar device questions

2012-07-10 Thread Gregg Levine
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Stuart Winter  wrote:
>
>> > Is this device completely supported by the ARM Slackware port?
>>
>> I guess Stuart would say: "it's not a case of "porting" - it's just
>> adding support".
>
> Not to answer *that* question I wouldn't.
>
> The dockstar is supported in the way that a kernel is supplied that runs
> on that device.
>
> Much to my disgust, someone on this list used one of those pointless
> devices ;-)
> See-
> http://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=dockstar&l=armedslack%40lists.armedslack.org
>

Hello!
Okay, what about them bothers you?

-
Gregg C Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack


Re: [ARMedslack] Seagate Dockstar device questions

2012-07-10 Thread Tyler T
The Dockstar has an identical processor ("Kirkwood") to the
SheevaPlug, which is supported.

It takes some extra effort to "hack" the bootloader on the Dockstar,
but once I had that sorted, running Slackware on my Dockstar was no
problem.

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Gregg Levine  wrote:
> Hello!
> Before I start doing something with this device and probably ruin it I
> have a question.
>
> Is this device completely supported by the ARM Slackware port?
>
___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack


Re: [ARMedslack] Seagate Dockstar device questions

2012-07-10 Thread Stuart Winter

> > Is this device completely supported by the ARM Slackware port?
>
> I guess Stuart would say: "it's not a case of "porting" - it's just
> adding support".

Not to answer *that* question I wouldn't.

The dockstar is supported in the way that a kernel is supplied that runs
on that device.

Much to my disgust, someone on this list used one of those pointless
devices ;-)
See-
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=dockstar&l=armedslack%40lists.armedslack.org



-- 
Stuart Winter
Slackware ARM: www.armedslack.org
___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack


Re: [ARMedslack] Seagate Dockstar device questions

2012-07-10 Thread Ottavio Caruso
On 10 July 2012 19:58, Gregg Levine  wrote:

> Is this device completely supported by the ARM Slackware port?

I guess Stuart would say: "it's not a case of "porting" - it's just
adding support".

-- 
Ottavio
___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack


Re: [ARMedslack] Seagate Dockstar device questions

2012-07-10 Thread Brennan Newman
In my experience, yes.  You may have to update the uboot in it so it will
boot off USB device.  That is what I had to do to get my dockstar running
On Jul 10, 2012 1:58 PM, "Gregg Levine"  wrote:

> Hello!
> Before I start doing something with this device and probably ruin it I
> have a question.
>
> Is this device completely supported by the ARM Slackware port?
>
> -
> Gregg C Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.com
> "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
> ___
> ARMedslack mailing list
> ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
> http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack
>
___
ARMedslack mailing list
ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack