Issue with relationship data exchange after upgrade of Atrium from 2.1.00 to 7.6.04

2013-08-14 Thread Maynard,Tor T.
ARListers:

We've recently upgraded from the following:
ARSystem 7.1.00 Build 200708221849
Atrium 2.1.00 Patch 5
AIE 7.1.00 Patch 006
Asset Mgmt 7.0.03
OS - MS Windows Server 2003 Std Edition SP2
DB - MS SQL Server 9.0.5266

To the following:
ARSystem 7.6.04 Patch 4
Atrium 7.6.04 Patch 4
AIE 7.6.04 Patch 4
Asset Mgmt 7.6.04 Patch 4
OS - MS Windows Server 2008 R2 Std
DB - MS SQL Server 10.50.4270

When we performed the upgrade, we performed many steps, but in simple terms, we 
installed ARSystem, then a couple of patches of Asset to enable the 
installation of Atrium, then Atrium, then Asset Mgmt, and then, because AIE 
didn't work correctly (fields were missing on the EIE:MappingInfo form), BMC 
Support directed us to uninstall and reinstall just AIE.  After we did that, 
data exchanges seemed to work, and most of them still do, but unfortunately, 
all relationship data exchanges where we do not Restrict to DatasetId in the 
mapping do not work.  

The following is an excerpt from the log showing normal counts (when it was 
running before the upgrade):
[Tue Apr 23 2013 20:39:33.4100] - TID: 001 STATE  Session statistics: 
Relationship class requests: 3077, Class1-Class2 requests: 3707
[Tue Apr 23 2013 20:39:33.4100] - TID: 001 STATE  Session statistics: 
Requests added: 0, updated: 3076, deleted: 1, errors: 0, warnings: 0

The following is an excerpt from the first run of this same exchange after the 
upgrade:
[Thu May 02 2013 08:10:26.2530] - TID: 001 STATE  Session statistics: 
Relationship class requests: 6152, Class1-Class2 requests: 3597, ByPassed: 0 
Class1 Records
[Thu May 02 2013 08:10:26.2530] - TID: 001 STATE  Session statistics: 
Requests added: 0, updated: 0, ByPassed: 0, deleted: 6152, errors: 0, warnings: 
0 ,ignored: 0

The following is an excerpt from the next run of that same exchange (all 
subsequent runs have similar counts):
[Mon May 06 2013 13:09:06.1220] - TID: 001 STATE  Session statistics: 
Relationship class requests: 0, Class1-Class2 requests: 3610, ByPassed: 0 
Class1 Records
[Mon May 06 2013 13:09:06.1220] - TID: 001 STATE  Session statistics: 
Requests added: 0, updated: 0, ByPassed: 0, deleted: 0, errors: 0, warnings: 0 
,ignored: 0


I've entered an issue with BMC, but they/we still can't determine what to do to 
get exchanges like this to work.  I did spend some time with an Atrium expert 
on a webex, and he explained that we're not doing things the way he would do 
them, but it would be a significant change to our design.  Our goal is to 
somehow get these data exchanges to work, but he didn't have an explanation for 
this immediate issue.  He did say, maybe that having the data on a flat file 
than in a database table might help.  I did try that, but unfortunately, got 
the same results (did not create the relationships).  

Mapping details:
Relationship source = External Data Store
Direction = External Data into CMDB
External Data Store = SqlServer
Table Name = dbo.Application_Server
Restrict to DatasetId = NULL
If a record is deleted from source = Mark as deleted
Namespace = BMC.CORE
Relationship Class Name = BMC_Dependency
Primary Class = BMC_ComputerSystem
Secondary Class = BMC_Application


If anyone has encountered similar behavior, please let me know what you did to 
fix it.  I can supply more details.  

Thanks!
Tor Maynard
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: Sorting issue on WUT 7.1p3

2008-08-18 Thread Maynard,Tor T.
We have this same problem, and reported it to BMC.  Here's a excerpt
from their knowledge base:

==
This issue has been registered via several defects:
SW00276920 - For sorting on Selection / Integer fields 
SW00288363 - For sorting on Date/ Time fields 
SW00296911 - For sorting on Real fields
The current workaround for this issue is to not use these fields as the
first column in the result list. If a character field is used as the
first column, sorting on the other columns will be enabled as well.

Please note: The fact that LONG CHAR fields (i.e. character fields above
255 characters) cannot be sorted in the result list is 'As Designed' -
the initial 7.x User Tool allowed this, but this was corrected in the
7.1 User Tool.

The current status of the above defects can be monitored by logging into
the support website and then follow these instructions:
* Select - View/Update under Issue Management
* Select - Defect/RFE/CAR tab
* Select - Search
 
This will be fixed in the next 7.1 user tool patch.  Most likely patch
006.
==

The defect associated with our issue, SW00276920, has a status of
Closed, and Classification of Fixed, so I'm guessing it's in that new
patch.  We have not installed that patch yet.  

HTH
Regards,

Tor Maynard 
Computer Aid, Inc.  




-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drew Shuller
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 10:39 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Sorting issue on WUT 7.1p3

Yes, that's a user tool bug I think.

Drew Shuller
Tulsa, OK

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Frank Caruso
wrote:

 ARS 6.3p20
 Solaris
 WUT 7.1p3
 Sybase 12.5

 We are finding that if the first column of a results list is the 
 Status field (actually, any enumerated field) clicking on the column 
 heading to sort does not work.
 If you take that same column and drag it any other location the 
 sorting does work. We are all seeing this with data time fields. If 
 you take a date time field and make it the first column in the results

 list the sorting does not work.

 This is not happening in MidTier 7.0.1 p7

 Anybody else seen this?

 Frank

 __
 _ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org 
 Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Tomcat lockups under Windows (7.0.1 p6)

2008-05-22 Thread Maynard,Tor T.
Now we're on ARS 7.1, but at the time of the issue we were on 7.0.1 (but
not sure what patch).  
We had (what I think is) a similar issue, and did get a response from
BMC.  
I'm going to copy it here.  Hope it helps:
 

You need to allocate more memory for tomcat, here are the details.
 
P R O B L E M:
The Tomcat application server crashes or a user finds an Out of memory
error in the log.
 
S O L U T I O N:
Boost the memory settings using one of the following solutions:
 
On Windows:
Choose Start  All Programs  Apache Tomcat 5.5  Configure Tomcat.
In the dialog box that appears, click the Java tab.
Set the Initial Memory Pool option to 1024 MB.
Set the Maximum Memory Pool option to 1024 MB.
Restart Tomcat.

On Linux: 
Change the minimum and maximum heap size using the -Xms and -Xmx JVM
parameters, which are available in the catalina.sh file.  The new value
for CATALINA_OPTS should be as follows:
Set CATALINA_OPTS=-Xms1024m -Xmx1024m
Restart Tomcat.



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ankur Gulati
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 12:42 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Tomcat lockups under Windows (7.0.1 p6)


** 
Hi Rick,
 
We had same issue with ARS 7.0.1 P5  and midtier 7.0.1 P5. We have an
open ticket with BMC and they don't seem to have a clue about it.
Downgraded midtier to P4, since then Tomcat is running smooth.
 
 
--
Ankur 




From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of VanAartsen, Christopher
Sent: 22 May 2008 05:25 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Tomcat lockups under Windows (7.0.1 p6)


** 

Having similar issues on 6.3 with Tomcat, but restarting our
Tomcat service fixes the problem.  Have you checked your Java Heap size?
That's my next move, looks to be the problem in the log files.

 

 





From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Westbrock
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 6:40 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Tomcat lockups under Windows (7.0.1 p6)

 

Hi all- 

Today for the second time in a two week span Tomcat on my
mid-tier has seemingly hung for no obvious reason. In each case the
login page would not even come up so I restarted the Tomcat service but
to no avail. Restarting the IIS service resolved the issue both times.
We had been running this environment for about two months with no issues
until a couple of weeks ago and the only change has been to deploy a new
web service that allows one of our portal applications to submit a
ticket into Remedy but there is no activity on the production server yet
since we're still testing in our development environment (where we
haven't seen this error at all). I have about a dozen users on the
mid-tier off and on during the day.

I searched the list and the Remedy KB but haven't seen anyone
with similar problems. Environment details are below, any suggestions
about where to start troubleshooting would be much appreciated.

 

Thanks, 

Rick 

 

Single Remedy application server: 
Windows Server 2003 SP 2 
IIS 6.0 
ARS 7.0.1 patch 6 
E-mail Engine 7.0.1 p6 
Mid-Tier 7.0.1 p6 
Tomcat 5.5 

Remote Database Server: 
Windows Server 2003 SP 2 
SQL Server 2000 (8.0.76 SP 3 Standard Edition) 

_ 
Rick Westbrock 
PETCO Telecom Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

 

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the
Answers Are html___ 
This e-mail message and any attachments may contain 
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary Information, or 
information otherwise protected by law of ArvinMeritor, Inc., 
its affiliates, or third parties. This notice serves as marking
of 
its Confidential status as defined in any confidentiality 
agreements concerning the sender and recipient. If you are 
not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent 
responsible for delivery of this message to the intended 
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message 
from your computer.


__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the
Answers Are html___

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
html___