Re: [ARTIQ] FW: initial specification of the project

2016-04-11 Thread Sébastien Bourdeauducq
On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 1:55:45 AM HKT Slichter, Daniel H. (Fed) wrote:
> On the DSP/"Sayma" boards, a hard SoC could have use for reducing the time
> it takes to perform feedback calculations (e.g. shifts of output signal
> frequency based on ADC readings).  

Can't this be done on the Metlino (where it *might* make more sense to have a 
MPSoC) or with gateware? What are those feedback calculations exactly?

> My comment in the previous email about "users" wanting this also pertains to
> the idea that people not using ARTIQ might want to buy these boards and use
> them for their own purposes.  For many of them, having a hard SoC on board
> may make it faster/easier for them to get the boards doing what they
> want.  Again, it's not totally necessary to have this but would enable more
> applications and a broader group of potentially interested customers.  

There is no shortage of general purpose FPGA boards for Zynq users. Do we 
really want to compete in this market?

Sébastien

___
ARTIQ mailing list
https://ssl.serverraum.org/lists/listinfo/artiq


Re: [ARTIQ] FW: initial specification of the project

2016-04-11 Thread Slichter, Daniel H. (Fed)
> On Saturday, 9 April 2016 6:10:36 PM HKT Grzegorz Kasprowicz wrote:
> > Why do you think that CPUs have negative value? You don't have to use
> > them at all.
> 
> I already explained that the MPSoC has to be dealt with and cannot be
> completely ignored. If we have two SDRAM systems, maybe we can to a
> reasonable extent, but then it does complicate the board.

On the DSP/"Sayma" boards, a hard SoC could have use for reducing the time it 
takes to perform feedback calculations (e.g. shifts of output signal frequency 
based on ADC readings).  

My comment in the previous email about "users" wanting this also pertains to 
the idea that people not using ARTIQ might want to buy these boards and use 
them for their own purposes.  For many of them, having a hard SoC on board may 
make it faster/easier for them to get the boards doing what they want.  Again, 
it's not totally necessary to have this but would enable more applications and 
a broader group of potentially interested customers.  
___
ARTIQ mailing list
https://ssl.serverraum.org/lists/listinfo/artiq