Re: [ARTIQ] getting the 3rd Urukul to work
Hi David, and thanks for your reply. Quoting David Nadlinger: Is the third Urukul correctly defined in the gateware build? I've seen hangs like this when there wasn't actually an SPI core at the specified RTIO address. That sounds very reasonable, I will further investigate in that direction. Cheers, Nico ___ ARTIQ mailing list https://ssl.serverraum.org/lists/listinfo/artiq
Re: [ARTIQ] getting the 3rd Urukul to work
Hi Nico, On 31 Jan 2019, at 15:42, Nico Pulido via ARTIQ wrote: If we try to use the third one, the experiment just keeps running and the Urukul does not respond. Is the third Urukul correctly defined in the gateware build? I've seen hangs like this when there wasn't actually an SPI core at the specified RTIO address. Best, David ___ ARTIQ mailing list https://ssl.serverraum.org/lists/listinfo/artiq
[ARTIQ] getting the 3rd Urukul to work
Dear all, I would like to kindly ask for your help with a little problem that we are encountering at the IQO in Hannover. We are playing around with a crate that has a Kasli SN 14. Everything works fine but for one thing: We have 3 Urukuls and we cannot get the third one to work (the other two are working fine). If we try to use the third one, the experiment just keeps running and the Urukul does not respond. Here is our device_db.py: https://pastebin.com/fq1eQscC At first we thought it might be a problem with the channels. But if we rearrange them, nothing changes: it is the third card the one the gives trouble always. If someone has an idea of what could possibly be the problem it would be awesome. Cheers, Nico ___ ARTIQ mailing list https://ssl.serverraum.org/lists/listinfo/artiq
