Hi Patrick, I have done a quick test with the pre-983 temperature Jacobian and it now looks the same.
Cheers, Stuart -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Eriksson <patrick.eriks...@chalmers.se> Sent: 19 November 2018 20:38 To: Fox, Stuart <stuart....@metoffice.gov.uk>; arts_dev.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de <arts_dev...@mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de> Subject: Re: [arts-dev] Change to temperature Jacobians Hi Stuart, Richard and I have now worked on iyEmissionStandard, and the temperature Jacobian produced by this method now considers if effects due to hydrostatic equilibrium shall be added or not. We have compared to perturbation calculations (though so far only for stokes_dim=1) and all look OK. But we have not compared to pre version 983. Your control file should now hopefully work. If not, tell us. If you compare to pre-983, please inform us about the outcome. Sorry for this mishap in the development. I have now created a test that will catch this in the future. And I will try to add even more tests. Bye, Patrick On 2018-11-15 17:08, Fox, Stuart wrote: > Hi all, > > I have just noticed that there has been relatively large changes to > some calculated temperature Jacobians with "recent" versions of ARTS. > The differences appeared with arts-2-3-983. Attached is an example set > of controlfiles/data that will show the differences when run with > versions > pre- and post-983. Is this something specific that I've done wrong in > the set-up of the Jacobians, or is it something that was meant to > happen, and if so then why? > > Cheers, > > Stuart > > > _______________________________________________ > arts_dev.mi mailing list > arts_dev.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de > https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_dev.mi > _______________________________________________ arts_dev.mi mailing list arts_dev.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_dev.mi
