Re: [arts-users] ReadHITRAN problem
Hi Richard, I followed your suggestion and installed 2.5.13 through Pre compiled binaries. How do I proceed with testing? Do I still need to build from source and install dependency packages? Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! Best wishes, Jiaan He At 2023-12-07 14:47:26, "Richard Larsson" wrote: Hi Jiaan. I recommend using the arts-cat-data package we provide. It is available at https://www.radiativetransfer.org/tools/ under the heading ARTS Catalog Data. I have added Zeeman effect and line mixing of O2 to those lines (the exact changes are in my repository at https://github.com/atmtools/arts-cat). They should be otherwise very similar as to what HITRAN provides. It might only work on a newer version of ARTS (which you can install easily if you use conda-forge following our guide at https://atmtools.github.io/arts-docs-master/installation.html). //Richard Den tors 7 dec. 2023 kl 07:33 skrev suifengbenpao2023 : Hi Richard, Thank you for your careful explanation. I do want to consider the Zeeman splitting effect (especially oxygen) and accelerate the calculation speed. According to your explanation, I need to consider quantum numbers. Is there a way for me to consider quantum numbers? Can we set the global quantum numbers and local quantum numbers for ReadHITRAN? I have tried this and found that the definition format of quantum numbers seems to be different from before? It seems that it cannot be set to： localquanta="J Omega F" upperglobalquanta="S 1/2 Lambda 1 parity 1 kronigParity 102 v1 0 ElectronState 88" lowerglobalquanta="S 1/2 Lambda 1 parity -1 kronigParity 102 v1 0 ElectronState 88" He reported an error saying that there cannot be numbers such as 2/1, 1, etc. Do I have any other options? Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! Best wishes, Jiaan He At 2023-12-07 13:16:42, "Richard Larsson" wrote: Hi Jiaan, qns' and qns'' contain HITRAN quantum numbers (mostly based on VAMDC). There is some quantum number definition in the pure 150-char par-line, but we do not parse it as it is generally not possible with the information available (the paper-published format doesn't always agree with what is actually published in data). Your LBL calculations should not be affected by just reading or not reading the qns' and qns''. If you want more accurate LBL results, say you want to activate Zeeman effect or need line mixing, you will need the quantum numbers to do that. Likewise, if you want to speed up your calculations then having the quantum numbers also helps with that since it is easier to throw away bands. So you are just limiting what you can do, not what the results of doing nothing extra will bring. //Richard Den tors 7 dec. 2023 kl 04:17 skrev suifengbenpao2023 : Hi Oliver， Thank you for your help! However, I have a doubt. I compared the extracted data with the data in the directory/home/zc/arts XML data-2.4/spectoscopy/Hitran. Their respective results are as follows: （1） 9021534521.6108 2.9232326101396e-22 3.16646203680995e-20 26 26 8.491e-11 nan nan 88761.6455958549 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 (HITRAN2020) （2） 9021534521.6108 2.9232326101396e-22 3.16646203680995e-20 26 26 8.491e-11 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 23/2 1/2 25/2 23/2 1/2 25/2 In terms of labels and values, there are differences in their results, so I would like to ask if the results I extracted in this way are correct? Will it affect the line by line absorption calculation? Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! Best wishes, Jiaan He At 2023-12-05 14:52:23, "Lemke, Oliver" wrote: >Hi Jiaan, > >All parameters ARTS can us are included in the .par line (including >broadening). ARTS will not utilize any other parameters besides what's >contained in the .par line, qns' and qns''. Adding other parameters will also >most likely break our reading routine. > >Cheers, >Oliver > > >> On 5. Dec 2023, at 02:30, suifengbenpao2023 >> wrote: >> >> >> Hi Oliver， >> >> Thank you for your help! Thank you for providing the online screenshot. May >> I ask if you need to add any other parameters that can be obtained to define >> the new output format according to your screenshot? For example, self >> widening, external widening, etc. >> >> Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! >> Best wishes, >> Jiaan He >> >> At 2023-12-04 21:26:59, "Lemke, Oliver" wrote: >> >Hi Jiaan, >> > >> >"Online" is the recommended way. You also need to define a custom output >> >format to include the .par line and the quantum numbers qns' and qns''. >> >Here is a screenshot with the configuration from the HITRAN online page: >> > >> >https://attachment.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/97c802f4/Screenshot-2023-12-04-at-14.04.57.png >> > >> >Cheers, >> >Oliver >> > >> > >> >> On 4. Dec 2023, at 13:33, suifengbenpao2023 >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Dear ARTS community, >> >> >> >> When I
Re: [arts-users] ReadHITRAN problem
Dear Richard， Thank you for your prompt response and assistance! I have reviewed the GitHub repository you provided at https://github.com/atmtools/arts-cat. I would like to clarify whether HITRAN2020 data is already considered in this dataset. If so, can I directly use the data provided in the "ARTS Catalog Data" section on the Radiative Transfer website (https://www.radiativetransfer.org/tools/) to perform calculations involving HITRAN2020 for Line-By-Line (LBL), Seeman effects, and line mixing effects within the ARTS framework based on version 2.4? I appreciate your guidance on this matter. Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! Best wishes, Jiaan He At 2023-12-07 14:47:26, "Richard Larsson" wrote: Hi Jiaan. I recommend using the arts-cat-data package we provide. It is available at https://www.radiativetransfer.org/tools/ under the heading ARTS Catalog Data. I have added Zeeman effect and line mixing of O2 to those lines (the exact changes are in my repository at https://github.com/atmtools/arts-cat). They should be otherwise very similar as to what HITRAN provides. It might only work on a newer version of ARTS (which you can install easily if you use conda-forge following our guide at https://atmtools.github.io/arts-docs-master/installation.html). //Richard Den tors 7 dec. 2023 kl 07:33 skrev suifengbenpao2023 : Hi Richard, Thank you for your careful explanation. I do want to consider the Zeeman splitting effect (especially oxygen) and accelerate the calculation speed. According to your explanation, I need to consider quantum numbers. Is there a way for me to consider quantum numbers? Can we set the global quantum numbers and local quantum numbers for ReadHITRAN? I have tried this and found that the definition format of quantum numbers seems to be different from before? It seems that it cannot be set to： localquanta="J Omega F" upperglobalquanta="S 1/2 Lambda 1 parity 1 kronigParity 102 v1 0 ElectronState 88" lowerglobalquanta="S 1/2 Lambda 1 parity -1 kronigParity 102 v1 0 ElectronState 88" He reported an error saying that there cannot be numbers such as 2/1, 1, etc. Do I have any other options? Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! Best wishes, Jiaan He At 2023-12-07 13:16:42, "Richard Larsson" wrote: Hi Jiaan, qns' and qns'' contain HITRAN quantum numbers (mostly based on VAMDC). There is some quantum number definition in the pure 150-char par-line, but we do not parse it as it is generally not possible with the information available (the paper-published format doesn't always agree with what is actually published in data). Your LBL calculations should not be affected by just reading or not reading the qns' and qns''. If you want more accurate LBL results, say you want to activate Zeeman effect or need line mixing, you will need the quantum numbers to do that. Likewise, if you want to speed up your calculations then having the quantum numbers also helps with that since it is easier to throw away bands. So you are just limiting what you can do, not what the results of doing nothing extra will bring. //Richard Den tors 7 dec. 2023 kl 04:17 skrev suifengbenpao2023 : Hi Oliver， Thank you for your help! However, I have a doubt. I compared the extracted data with the data in the directory/home/zc/arts XML data-2.4/spectoscopy/Hitran. Their respective results are as follows: （1） 9021534521.6108 2.9232326101396e-22 3.16646203680995e-20 26 26 8.491e-11 nan nan 88761.6455958549 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 (HITRAN2020) （2） 9021534521.6108 2.9232326101396e-22 3.16646203680995e-20 26 26 8.491e-11 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 23/2 1/2 25/2 23/2 1/2 25/2 In terms of labels and values, there are differences in their results, so I would like to ask if the results I extracted in this way are correct? Will it affect the line by line absorption calculation? Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! Best wishes, Jiaan He At 2023-12-05 14:52:23, "Lemke, Oliver" wrote: >Hi Jiaan, > >All parameters ARTS can us are included in the .par line (including >broadening). ARTS will not utilize any other parameters besides what's >contained in the .par line, qns' and qns''. Adding other parameters will also >most likely break our reading routine. > >Cheers, >Oliver > > >> On 5. Dec 2023, at 02:30, suifengbenpao2023 >> wrote: >> >> >> Hi Oliver， >> >> Thank you for your help! Thank you for providing the online screenshot. May >> I ask if you need to add any other parameters that can be obtained to define >> the new output format according to your screenshot? For example, self >> widening, external widening, etc. >> >> Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! >> Best wishes, >> Jiaan He >> >> At 2023-12-04 21:26:59, "Lemke, Oliver" wrote: >> >Hi Jiaan, >> > >> >"Online" is the recommended way. You also need to define a custom output
Re: [arts-users] ReadHITRAN problem
Hi Jiaan. I recommend using the arts-cat-data package we provide. It is available at https://www.radiativetransfer.org/tools/ under the heading ARTS Catalog Data. I have added Zeeman effect and line mixing of O2 to those lines (the exact changes are in my repository at https://github.com/atmtools/arts-cat). They should be otherwise very similar as to what HITRAN provides. It might only work on a newer version of ARTS (which you can install easily if you use conda-forge following our guide at https://atmtools.github.io/arts-docs-master/installation.html). //Richard Den tors 7 dec. 2023 kl 07:33 skrev suifengbenpao2023 < suifengbenpao2...@163.com>: > Hi Richard, > > Thank you for your careful explanation. I do want to consider the Zeeman > splitting effect (especially oxygen) and accelerate the calculation speed. > According to your explanation, I need to consider quantum numbers. Is there > a way for me to consider quantum numbers? Can we set the global quantum > numbers and local quantum numbers for ReadHITRAN? I have tried this and > found that the definition format of quantum numbers seems to be different > from before? It seems that it cannot be set to： > localquanta="J Omega F" upperglobalquanta="S 1/2 Lambda 1 parity 1 > kronigParity 102 v1 0 ElectronState 88" lowerglobalquanta="S 1/2 Lambda 1 > parity -1 kronigParity 102 v1 0 ElectronState 88" > He reported an error saying that there cannot be numbers such as 2/1, 1, > etc. > > Do I have any other options? > > > Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! > > Best wishes, > > Jiaan He > > > > At 2023-12-07 13:16:42, "Richard Larsson" wrote: > > Hi Jiaan, > > qns' and qns'' contain HITRAN quantum numbers (mostly based on VAMDC). > There is some quantum number definition in the pure 150-char par-line, but > we do not parse it as it is generally not possible with the information > available (the paper-published format doesn't always agree with what is > actually published in data). > > Your LBL calculations should not be affected by just reading or not > reading the qns' and qns''. If you want more accurate LBL results, say you > want to activate Zeeman effect or need line mixing, you will need the > quantum numbers to do that. Likewise, if you want to speed up your > calculations then having the quantum numbers also helps with that since it > is easier to throw away bands. So you are just limiting what you can do, > not what the results of doing nothing extra will bring. > > //Richard > > Den tors 7 dec. 2023 kl 04:17 skrev suifengbenpao2023 < > suifengbenpao2...@163.com>: > >> Hi Oliver， >> >> Thank you for your help! However, I have a doubt. I compared the >> extracted data with the data in the directory/home/zc/arts XML >> data-2.4/spectoscopy/Hitran. Their respective results are as follows: >> >> （1）> mirroringtype="None" populationtype="LTE" normalizationtype="None" >> lineshapetype="VP" T0="296" cutofffreq="7.5e+11" linemixinglimit="-1" >> localquanta="" upperglobalquanta="" lowerglobalquanta="" >> broadeningspecies="SELF AIR" temperaturemodes="G0 T1 T1 D0 T5 T5"> >> 9021534521.6108 2.9232326101396e-22 3.16646203680995e-20 26 26 8.491e-11 >> nan nan 88761.6455958549 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 >> 0.66 0 0 (HITRAN2020) >> （2）> mirroringtype="None" populationtype="LTE" normalizationtype="None" >> lineshapetype="VP" T0="296" cutofffreq="0" linemixinglimit="-1" >> localquanta="J Omega F" upperglobalquanta="S 1/2 Lambda 1 parity -1 >> kronigParity 101 v1 0 ElectronState 88" lowerglobalquanta="S 1/2 Lambda 1 >> parity 1 kronigParity 102 v1 0 ElectronState 88" broadeningspecies="SELF >> AIR" temperaturemodes="G0 T1 T1 D0 T5 T5"> >> 9021534521.6108 2.9232326101396e-22 3.16646203680995e-20 26 26 8.491e-11 >> 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 >> 0 23/2 1/2 25/2 23/2 1/2 25/2 >> >> In terms of labels and values, there are differences in their results, so >> I would like to ask if the results I extracted in this way are correct? >> Will it affect the line by line absorption calculation? >> >> Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Jiaan He >> >> At 2023-12-05 14:52:23, "Lemke, Oliver" wrote: >> >Hi Jiaan, >> > >> >All parameters ARTS can us are included in the .par line (including >> >broadening). ARTS will not utilize any other parameters besides what's >> >contained in the .par line, qns' and qns''. Adding other parameters will >> >also most likely break our reading routine. >> > >> >Cheers, >> >Oliver >> > >> > >> >> On 5. Dec 2023, at 02:30, suifengbenpao2023 >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Oliver， >> >> >> >> Thank you for your help! Thank you for providing the online screenshot. >> >> May I ask if you need to add any other parameters that can be obtained to >> >> define the new output format according to your screenshot? For example, >> >> self widening, external widening, etc. >> >> >> >> Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! >> >> Best
Re: [arts-users] ReadHITRAN problem
Hi Richard, Thank you for your careful explanation. I do want to consider the Zeeman splitting effect (especially oxygen) and accelerate the calculation speed. According to your explanation, I need to consider quantum numbers. Is there a way for me to consider quantum numbers? Can we set the global quantum numbers and local quantum numbers for ReadHITRAN? I have tried this and found that the definition format of quantum numbers seems to be different from before? It seems that it cannot be set to： localquanta="J Omega F" upperglobalquanta="S 1/2 Lambda 1 parity 1 kronigParity 102 v1 0 ElectronState 88" lowerglobalquanta="S 1/2 Lambda 1 parity -1 kronigParity 102 v1 0 ElectronState 88" He reported an error saying that there cannot be numbers such as 2/1, 1, etc. Do I have any other options? Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! Best wishes, Jiaan He At 2023-12-07 13:16:42, "Richard Larsson" wrote: Hi Jiaan, qns' and qns'' contain HITRAN quantum numbers (mostly based on VAMDC). There is some quantum number definition in the pure 150-char par-line, but we do not parse it as it is generally not possible with the information available (the paper-published format doesn't always agree with what is actually published in data). Your LBL calculations should not be affected by just reading or not reading the qns' and qns''. If you want more accurate LBL results, say you want to activate Zeeman effect or need line mixing, you will need the quantum numbers to do that. Likewise, if you want to speed up your calculations then having the quantum numbers also helps with that since it is easier to throw away bands. So you are just limiting what you can do, not what the results of doing nothing extra will bring. //Richard Den tors 7 dec. 2023 kl 04:17 skrev suifengbenpao2023 : Hi Oliver， Thank you for your help! However, I have a doubt. I compared the extracted data with the data in the directory/home/zc/arts XML data-2.4/spectoscopy/Hitran. Their respective results are as follows: （1） 9021534521.6108 2.9232326101396e-22 3.16646203680995e-20 26 26 8.491e-11 nan nan 88761.6455958549 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 (HITRAN2020) （2） 9021534521.6108 2.9232326101396e-22 3.16646203680995e-20 26 26 8.491e-11 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 23/2 1/2 25/2 23/2 1/2 25/2 In terms of labels and values, there are differences in their results, so I would like to ask if the results I extracted in this way are correct? Will it affect the line by line absorption calculation? Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! Best wishes, Jiaan He At 2023-12-05 14:52:23, "Lemke, Oliver" wrote: >Hi Jiaan, > >All parameters ARTS can us are included in the .par line (including >broadening). ARTS will not utilize any other parameters besides what's >contained in the .par line, qns' and qns''. Adding other parameters will also >most likely break our reading routine. > >Cheers, >Oliver > > >> On 5. Dec 2023, at 02:30, suifengbenpao2023 >> wrote: >> >> >> Hi Oliver， >> >> Thank you for your help! Thank you for providing the online screenshot. May >> I ask if you need to add any other parameters that can be obtained to define >> the new output format according to your screenshot? For example, self >> widening, external widening, etc. >> >> Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! >> Best wishes, >> Jiaan He >> >> At 2023-12-04 21:26:59, "Lemke, Oliver" wrote: >> >Hi Jiaan, >> > >> >"Online" is the recommended way. You also need to define a custom output >> >format to include the .par line and the quantum numbers qns' and qns''. >> >Here is a screenshot with the configuration from the HITRAN online page: >> > >> >https://attachment.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/97c802f4/Screenshot-2023-12-04-at-14.04.57.png >> > >> >Cheers, >> >Oliver >> > >> > >> >> On 4. Dec 2023, at 13:33, suifengbenpao2023 >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Dear ARTS community, >> >> >> >> When I directly use the data downloaded from hitranonline (without >> >> changing the data format), I can run the ReadHITRAN method to extract >> >> lines data. I used the "Post2004" and "Online" methods, and the results >> >> are the same. Is this correct? >> >> >> >> Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Jiaan He >> > > > > > >
Re: [arts-users] ReadHITRAN problem
Hi Jiaan, qns' and qns'' contain HITRAN quantum numbers (mostly based on VAMDC). There is some quantum number definition in the pure 150-char par-line, but we do not parse it as it is generally not possible with the information available (the paper-published format doesn't always agree with what is actually published in data). Your LBL calculations should not be affected by just reading or not reading the qns' and qns''. If you want more accurate LBL results, say you want to activate Zeeman effect or need line mixing, you will need the quantum numbers to do that. Likewise, if you want to speed up your calculations then having the quantum numbers also helps with that since it is easier to throw away bands. So you are just limiting what you can do, not what the results of doing nothing extra will bring. //Richard Den tors 7 dec. 2023 kl 04:17 skrev suifengbenpao2023 < suifengbenpao2...@163.com>: > Hi Oliver， > > Thank you for your help! However, I have a doubt. I compared the extracted > data with the data in the directory/home/zc/arts XML > data-2.4/spectoscopy/Hitran. Their respective results are as follows: > > （1） mirroringtype="None" populationtype="LTE" normalizationtype="None" > lineshapetype="VP" T0="296" cutofffreq="7.5e+11" linemixinglimit="-1" > localquanta="" upperglobalquanta="" lowerglobalquanta="" > broadeningspecies="SELF AIR" temperaturemodes="G0 T1 T1 D0 T5 T5"> > 9021534521.6108 2.9232326101396e-22 3.16646203680995e-20 26 26 8.491e-11 > nan nan 88761.6455958549 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 > 0.66 0 0 (HITRAN2020) > （2） mirroringtype="None" populationtype="LTE" normalizationtype="None" > lineshapetype="VP" T0="296" cutofffreq="0" linemixinglimit="-1" > localquanta="J Omega F" upperglobalquanta="S 1/2 Lambda 1 parity -1 > kronigParity 101 v1 0 ElectronState 88" lowerglobalquanta="S 1/2 Lambda 1 > parity 1 kronigParity 102 v1 0 ElectronState 88" broadeningspecies="SELF > AIR" temperaturemodes="G0 T1 T1 D0 T5 T5"> > 9021534521.6108 2.9232326101396e-22 3.16646203680995e-20 26 26 8.491e-11 0 > 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 > 23/2 1/2 25/2 23/2 1/2 25/2 > > In terms of labels and values, there are differences in their results, so > I would like to ask if the results I extracted in this way are correct? > Will it affect the line by line absorption calculation? > > Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! > > Best wishes, > > Jiaan He > > At 2023-12-05 14:52:23, "Lemke, Oliver" wrote: > >Hi Jiaan, > > > >All parameters ARTS can us are included in the .par line (including > >broadening). ARTS will not utilize any other parameters besides what's > >contained in the .par line, qns' and qns''. Adding other parameters will > >also most likely break our reading routine. > > > >Cheers, > >Oliver > > > > > >> On 5. Dec 2023, at 02:30, suifengbenpao2023 > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi Oliver， > >> > >> Thank you for your help! Thank you for providing the online screenshot. > >> May I ask if you need to add any other parameters that can be obtained to > >> define the new output format according to your screenshot? For example, > >> self widening, external widening, etc. > >> > >> Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! > >> Best wishes, > >> Jiaan He > >> > >> At 2023-12-04 21:26:59, "Lemke, Oliver" > >> wrote: > >> >Hi Jiaan, > >> > > >> >"Online" is the recommended way. You also need to define a custom output > >> >format to include the .par line and the quantum numbers qns' and qns''. > >> >Here is a screenshot with the configuration from the HITRAN online page: > >> > > >> >https://attachment.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/97c802f4/Screenshot-2023-12-04-at-14.04.57.png > >> > > >> >Cheers, > >> >Oliver > >> > > >> > > >> >> On 4. Dec 2023, at 13:33, suifengbenpao2023 > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Dear ARTS community, > >> >> > >> >> When I directly use the data downloaded from hitranonline (without > >> >> changing the data format), I can run the ReadHITRAN method to extract > >> >> lines data. I used the "Post2004" and "Online" methods, and the results > >> >> are the same. Is this correct? > >> >> > >> >> Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! > >> >> Best wishes, > >> >> Jiaan He > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [arts-users] ReadHITRAN problem
Hi Oliver， Thank you for your help! However, I have a doubt. I compared the extracted data with the data in the directory/home/zc/arts XML data-2.4/spectoscopy/Hitran. Their respective results are as follows: （1） 9021534521.6108 2.9232326101396e-22 3.16646203680995e-20 26 26 8.491e-11 nan nan 88761.6455958549 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 (HITRAN2020) （2） 9021534521.6108 2.9232326101396e-22 3.16646203680995e-20 26 26 8.491e-11 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 11834.8860794473 0.66 0 0 0 0.66 0 0 23/2 1/2 25/2 23/2 1/2 25/2 In terms of labels and values, there are differences in their results, so I would like to ask if the results I extracted in this way are correct? Will it affect the line by line absorption calculation? Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! Best wishes, Jiaan He At 2023-12-05 14:52:23, "Lemke, Oliver" wrote: >Hi Jiaan, > >All parameters ARTS can us are included in the .par line (including >broadening). ARTS will not utilize any other parameters besides what's >contained in the .par line, qns' and qns''. Adding other parameters will also >most likely break our reading routine. > >Cheers, >Oliver > > >> On 5. Dec 2023, at 02:30, suifengbenpao2023 >> wrote: >> >> >> Hi Oliver， >> >> Thank you for your help! Thank you for providing the online screenshot. May >> I ask if you need to add any other parameters that can be obtained to define >> the new output format according to your screenshot? For example, self >> widening, external widening, etc. >> >> Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! >> Best wishes, >> Jiaan He >> >> At 2023-12-04 21:26:59, "Lemke, Oliver" wrote: >> >Hi Jiaan, >> > >> >"Online" is the recommended way. You also need to define a custom output >> >format to include the .par line and the quantum numbers qns' and qns''. >> >Here is a screenshot with the configuration from the HITRAN online page: >> > >> >https://attachment.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/97c802f4/Screenshot-2023-12-04-at-14.04.57.png >> > >> >Cheers, >> >Oliver >> > >> > >> >> On 4. Dec 2023, at 13:33, suifengbenpao2023 >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Dear ARTS community, >> >> >> >> When I directly use the data downloaded from hitranonline (without >> >> changing the data format), I can run the ReadHITRAN method to extract >> >> lines data. I used the "Post2004" and "Online" methods, and the results >> >> are the same. Is this correct? >> >> >> >> Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Jiaan He >> > > > > > >
Re: [arts-users] ReadHITRAN problem
Hi Jiaan, All parameters ARTS can us are included in the .par line (including broadening). ARTS will not utilize any other parameters besides what's contained in the .par line, qns' and qns''. Adding other parameters will also most likely break our reading routine. Cheers, Oliver > On 5. Dec 2023, at 02:30, suifengbenpao2023 wrote: > > > Hi Oliver， > > Thank you for your help! Thank you for providing the online screenshot. May I > ask if you need to add any other parameters that can be obtained to define > the new output format according to your screenshot? For example, self > widening, external widening, etc. > > Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! > Best wishes, > Jiaan He > > At 2023-12-04 21:26:59, "Lemke, Oliver" wrote: > >Hi Jiaan, > > > >"Online" is the recommended way. You also need to define a custom output > >format to include the .par line and the quantum numbers qns' and qns''. Here > >is a screenshot with the configuration from the HITRAN online page: > > > >https://attachment.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/97c802f4/Screenshot-2023-12-04-at-14.04.57.png > > > >Cheers, > >Oliver > > > > > >> On 4. Dec 2023, at 13:33, suifengbenpao2023 > >> wrote: > >> > >> Dear ARTS community, > >> > >> When I directly use the data downloaded from hitranonline (without > >> changing the data format), I can run the ReadHITRAN method to extract > >> lines data. I used the "Post2004" and "Online" methods, and the results > >> are the same. Is this correct? > >> > >> Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! > >> Best wishes, > >> Jiaan He > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[arts-users] ReadHITRAN problem
Dear ARTS community, When I directly use the data downloaded from hitranonline (without changing the data format), I can run the ReadHITRAN method to extract lines data. I used the "Post2004" and "Online" methods, and the results are the same. Is this correct? Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! Best wishes, Jiaan He
