[asdf-devel] clisp 2.49 still fails tests ...

2013-02-04 Thread Robert Goldman
On Mac OS X I get:

BAD: Loading ASDF on clisp produces messages
make[1]: *** [test-clean-load] Error 1
make: *** [test-all-noupgrade] Error 1

But I think it passes all the actual tests:

-#---
Using clisp
Ran 44 tests:
  44 passing and 0 failing
all tests apparently successful
-#---

Maybe makefile testing needs to be modified to ignore these messages for
clisp?  IIRC you were saying they were not avoidable...

best,
r

___
asdf-devel mailing list
asdf-devel@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel


[asdf-devel] More test failures on Mac OSX

2013-02-04 Thread Robert Goldman
1.  ecl

ECL (Embeddable Common-Lisp) 12.12.1
-#---
Using ecl
Ran 44 tests:
  42 passing and 2 failing
failing test(s):  test-multiple.script test-run-program.script
-#---

2.  abcl
Armed Bear Common Lisp 1.1.0.2
-#---
Using abcl
Ran 44 tests:
  42 passing and 2 failing
failing test(s):  test-encodings.script test-logical-pathname.script
-#---


I ran ccl clisp sbcl ecl abcl allegro allegromodern

For allegro, I tested both 8.2 and 9.0.

So this is pretty darn good!

Best,
Robert


___
asdf-devel mailing list
asdf-devel@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel


Re: [asdf-devel] clisp 2.49 still fails tests ...

2013-02-04 Thread Robert Goldman
On 2/4/13 Feb 4 -5:58 PM, Faré wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
 On Mac OS X I get:

 BAD: Loading ASDF on clisp produces messages
 make[1]: *** [test-clean-load] Error 1
 make: *** [test-all-noupgrade] Error 1

 But I think it passes all the actual tests:

 Maybe makefile testing needs to be modified to ignore these messages for
 clisp?  IIRC you were saying they were not avoidable...

 I fixed the test scripts to be more robust so CLISP is doesn't fail this way.

Works like a charm, thanks.  Just tested and clisp is now happy.

Best,
r



___
asdf-devel mailing list
asdf-devel@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel

[asdf-devel] can't run quicklisp with asdf 2.28 on CCL (upgrage issue?)

2013-02-04 Thread Anton Vodonosov
I placed new asdf.lisp into quicklisp and changed (defvar 
*required-asdf-version* 2.28)
in quicklisp/setup.lisp to the lates version - 2.28.



lisps/ccl-1.8/lx86cl --no-init --load quicklisp-patched2/setup.lisp
 Error: Error while trying to load definition for system quicklisp from 
 pathname /home/testgrid/quicklisp-patched2/quicklisp/quicklisp.asd: Undefined 
 function #:|ASDF::COMPONENT-VERSION| called with arguments (2012112500 
 #SYSTEM quicklisp) .
 While executing: (:INTERNAL ASDF/FIND-SYSTEM:LOAD-ASD), in process 
 listener(1).
 Type :GO to continue, :POP to abort, :R for a list of available restarts.
 If continued: Retry applying #:|ASDF::COMPONENT-VERSION| to (2012112500 
 #SYSTEM quicklisp).
 Type :? for other options.

___
asdf-devel mailing list
asdf-devel@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel


Re: [asdf-devel] can't run quicklisp with asdf 2.28 on CCL (upgrage issue?)

2013-02-04 Thread Faré
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Anton Vodonosov avodono...@yandex.ru wrote:
 I placed new asdf.lisp into quicklisp and changed (defvar 
 *required-asdf-version* 2.28)
 in quicklisp/setup.lisp to the lates version - 2.28.

This looks like the bad interaction of files compiled with a previous
ASDF and files compiled with the new one. Did you clean your fasl
cache after you upgraded? I'll investigate tomorrow.

It's also possible that my upgrade tricks don't work so well on CCL, and I need
to punt like I do on CLISP. However, CCL does pass all my automated
upgrade tests so far, so if that's the case I need to improve those tests.

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •ReflectionCybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
Pournelle's Iron Law of Bureaucracy states that in any bureaucratic
organization there will be two kinds of people: those who work to further
the actual goals of the organization, and those who work for the organization
itself. Examples in education would be teachers who work and sacrifice to
teach children, vs. union representative who work to protect any teacher
including the most incompetent. The Iron Law states that in all cases, the
second type of person will always gain control of the organization, and will
always write the rules under which the organization functions.


 lisps/ccl-1.8/lx86cl --no-init --load quicklisp-patched2/setup.lisp
 Error: Error while trying to load definition for system quicklisp from 
 pathname /home/testgrid/quicklisp-patched2/quicklisp/quicklisp.asd: 
 Undefined function #:|ASDF::COMPONENT-VERSION| called with arguments 
 (2012112500 #SYSTEM quicklisp) .
 While executing: (:INTERNAL ASDF/FIND-SYSTEM:LOAD-ASD), in process 
 listener(1).
 Type :GO to continue, :POP to abort, :R for a list of available restarts.
 If continued: Retry applying #:|ASDF::COMPONENT-VERSION| to (2012112500 
 #SYSTEM quicklisp).
 Type :? for other options.

___
asdf-devel mailing list
asdf-devel@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel

Re: [asdf-devel] can't run quicklisp with asdf 2.28 on CCL (upgrage issue?)

2013-02-04 Thread Anton Vodonosov


05.02.2013, 07:44, Faré fah...@gmail.com:
 On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Anton Vodonosov avodono...@yandex.ru wrote:

  I placed new asdf.lisp into quicklisp and changed (defvar 
 *required-asdf-version* 2.28)
  in quicklisp/setup.lisp to the lates version - 2.28.

 This looks like the bad interaction of files compiled with a previous
 ASDF and files compiled with the new one. Did you clean your fasl
 cache after you upgraded? I'll investigate tomorrow.

Yes, I did  rm -r .cache/common-lisp/

___
asdf-devel mailing list
asdf-devel@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel