Re: Assembly Listing headers
I'm currently looking at fixing some old problems with the USING map and Active Using headers which give incorrect information if a dependent USING base address is not the start of a section. While I'm working on this area, I'm planning to omit the range value (X'') in the Active Using list for a dependent USING with a positive offset from the first base register if the range is simply to the end of the base registers, as for an ordinary USING. That might help tidy up the Active Using headers a bit. Jonathan Scott, HLASM IBM Hursley UK
Re: Assembly Listing headers
Sigh. Well, thanks for looking. I appreciate it. Dave dbc...@gmail.com (personal) dbc...@colesoft.com (business) 540-456-6518 (cell) At 11/8/2021 06:21 AM, Jonathan Scott wrote: David Cole writes: >Is there a way to increase the assembly listing header lines limit >past 8? I looked recently but didn't find anything. Sorry, but I've just had a look at the heading routine, and the limit of 4 lines of USING headers cannot easily be changed. It isn't even a simple constant; there are predefined work fields for each of the USING lines. Jonathan Scott, HLASM IBM Hursley, UK
Re: Assembly Listing headers
David Cole writes: >Is there a way to increase the assembly listing header lines limit >past 8? I looked recently but didn't find anything. Sorry, but I've just had a look at the heading routine, and the limit of 4 lines of USING headers cannot easily be changed. It isn't even a simple constant; there are predefined work fields for each of the USING lines. Jonathan Scott, HLASM IBM Hursley, UK
