Re: [Assp-test] Request to add whitelist functionality to message viewer
Good point. I'm careful to only copy addresses or surrounding text. Thanks for the pointer though. On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com wrote: I already do, just copying to a notepad window Never use 'notepad'! As long as you only copy and past email addresses or IP's it would be OK to use notepad, because they contain anyway only ASCII characters. But if the text you copied contains any UTF-8 characters a later action of assp on this text could fail - assp assumes that all files,hashes and regexes contains UTF-8 characters! Thomas Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: 25.06.2010 17:41 Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] Request to add whitelist functionality to message viewer Thomas- Good thought, but I wouldn't bother coding that - you've got better things to do :) . What you promose is essentially what I already do, just copying to a notepad window. It works when I'm working with multiple messages just fine. What I find my self more typically doing is discovering ONE wrong email in the daily reports. I open the message window directly from the report. I don't have any other ASSP gui open. I resend it, copy it to correctednotspam and then sometimes want to whitelist some stuff. That means copying, then opening the gui, going to the whitelist and pasting. it's not like this is the toughest task in the world to do, so if it needs to stay that way, so be it. Is it not feasable (and easy - because there can't be too many people who are working this way and I don't want to waste your time) to mimic the HTML that puts the form on the /lists screen of the gui say right below the message text and just be able to submit right from there? Maybe an ajax div so that form submission only affects that div and not the rest of the page? Thanks so much for considering all of this. -- ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test DISCLAIMER: *** This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no known virus in this email! *** -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] Add to Black List email interface
1.7.1.4 -Original Message- From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 12:23 AM To: ASSP development mailing list Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Add to Black List email interface What version of assp do you use? Thomas Von:Scheck, Doug dsch...@frontrunnernetworks.com An: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: 29.06.2010 22:01 Betreff:[Assp-test] Add to Black List email interface Just configured my address for the (EmailAdminReportsTo) and (EmailAdmins) Configured (blackAddresses) to file:files/blackaddresses.txt Configured (blackListedDomains) to file:files/blackdomains.txt When I try to forward an email to assp-bl...@assp.local mailto:assp-bl...@assp.local I receive the following as the Blacklist Addition report error: blackListedDomains is misconfigured (missing file: ida...@ups.com mailto:ida...@ups.com) - unable to add ida...@ups.com mailto:ida...@ups.com error: blackListedDomains is misconfigured (missing file: ida...@ups.com mailto:ida...@ups.com) - unable to add ida...@ups.com mailto:ida...@ups.com Douglas Scheck IT Manager Frontrunner Network Systems 585-899-4507 585-899-4490 fax -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test DISCLAIMER: *** This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no known virus in this email! *** -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Re: [Assp-test] Feature request
Thanks Thomas ! On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 07:25 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote: Paul, for now set 'baysConf' to 0 . This is a general logical mistake inside ASSP V2 - if the Bayes check has switched on the '[lowconfidence]' flag, there is no reason to pass the message, if the last spam detection flag does not belong to the Bayes check - for example 'messagescore'. This will be changed in 2.0.2_1.1.14. Thomas Von:Paul Schutte p...@it.up.ac.za An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: 29.06.2010 17:05 Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] Feature request Hi. I see messages in the maillog.txt that looks like this: 2010-06-29 16:52:07 23121-19670 [Worker_15] [MessageLimit][lowconfidence] 67.195.8.63 fan...@att.net to: patr...@it.up.ac.za [spam found] and possibly passing because of low confidence, otherwise blocked (MessageScore 89, limit 80) [Thank you for using Western Union] It seems like we could use a switch like: Block messages with Low confidence but High Score This is just a wish. It is already doing a great job and thank you very much for that. Regards Paul On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 20:34 +0200, Paul Schutte wrote: Hello again. Fritz, thank you for your advice about the (switchTestToScoring) setting. However, I stil see messages above (PenaltyMessageLimit) being delivered to the users. These messages are tagged as spam (score 40-80 should be tagged). Messages with scores above 80 should be blocked. I would like to block these no matter how the score arrived at 81 and above. The messages that slip through always seems to involve the bayesian uncertainty factor. I have none of the testmodes enabled. It automatically goes into testmode for scores from 40-80 and because of the Bayesian uncertainty. This IS what I want, but I would want to drop messages with scores above 80. Here are the ASSP headers of 2 of these messages: X-Assp-Version: 2.0.2(1.1.13) on spamcontrol.up.ac.za X-Assp-Message/IP-Score: 25 (DNSBL: neutral, 109.187.25.5 listed in ix.dnsbl.manitu.net) X-Assp-DNSBL: neutral, 109.187.25.5 listed in (ix.dnsbl.manitu.net-127.0.0.2; ) X-Assp-Message/IP-Score: 15 (PTR invalid 'h109-187-25-5.dyn.bashtel.ru') X-Assp-Message/IP-Score: 20 (URIBL: neutral, listed in studynextrumultisurblorg) X-Assp-URIBL: neutral, listed in studynextrumultisurblorg X-Assp-Message/IP-Score: 39 (Bayesian Probability: 1.) X-Assp-Tag: Bayesian X-Assp-ID: spamcontrol.up.ac.za 99307-19376 X-Assp-Redlisted: Yes (bounces are not collected) X-Assp-Spam: YES (Probably) X-Assp-Block: NO (testmode) X-Assp-Spam-Reason: Bayesian X-Assp-Message-Totalscore: 99 X-Assp-Tag: MessageLimit X-Assp-Spam-Reason: MessageScore 99, limit 80 X-Assp-Version: 2.0.2(1.1.13) on spamcontrol.up.ac.za X-Assp-Message/IP-Score: 20 (No Spoofing Allowed 'n...@ccnet.up.ac.za') X-Assp-Message/IP-Score: 30 (PTR invalid '109-93-66-75.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs') X-Assp-Message/IP-Score: 39 (Bayesian Probability: 1.) X-Assp-Tag: Bayesian X-Assp-ID: spamcontrol.up.ac.za 52413-00543 X-Assp-Spam: YES (Probably) X-Assp-Block: NO (testmode) X-Assp-Spam-Reason: Bayesian X-Assp-Message-Totalscore: 89 X-Assp-Tag: MessageLimit X-Assp-Spam-Reason: MessageScore 89, limit 80 Regards Paul On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 21:12 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: The easiest to explain this is that had I turned Bayesian off, the score would have been 110 and the message blocked. Now with Bayesian on, the score is 129.5,but message only gets tagged and passed on because of Bayesian uncertainty. What version are you running? Is -Switch Testmode to Message Scoring (switchTestToScoring) set? -- ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit
