[Asterisk-Users] IAX compatible phones

2005-08-17 Thread Dr. Marios Moutzouris
Hello,

I would like to know which phones are IAX compatible. 

Thank-you
Marios Moutzouris

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.7/70 - Release Date: 11/8/2005
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: [Asterisk-Dev] X101P register map data please?

2005-08-17 Thread Mark Burton

Hi Newbie, or would you prefer to be called VoIP(y)? :-)

Thanks for the advice, It's great to hear from somebody that has 
suffered in the same way :-)


I've cc'd in the dev and user lists mostly so that others looking for 
the same issue (FXO PCI Master Abort) can find some info! - hope you 
dont mind...



On the card itself.
	I am assured by the vendor that they had the card up and running in a 
machine. Indeed, the vendor has taken one home, called me through it, 
and then given it to me... so I'm reasonably sure that under SOME 
situations, these cards work and I now have 2 of these cards!


I'd be interested to know, are all the 3 cards you have had identical 
in terms of how they look? Do you still have them? Can we compare notes 
- (off list)?


On the Zaptel driver...
	There are clearly inconsistencies in the driver, which I feel should 
be sorted out However, they are in code which people with working 
systems say is never reached. So.. yes, the driver should be cleaned up 
in order to handle the IRQ's better, but the question remains, why am 
I/you getting the Master Aborts in the first place...


If the patch that I've done to the driver is the right thing to do, 
then maybe thats an answer for me/you/others. I still seem to have some 
problems, so I need to understand those first (see other post). At 
least the Master Abort doesn't bring the whole machine down.


What I can't tell is why WE get the Master Aborts in the first place
Speculation would be good! Any ideas?

Cheers

Mark.


On 17 Aug 2005, at 07:16, VoIP Newbie wrote:


Dear Mark,

I got 3 X101P clone cards from 3 different vendors. One of them has
the same problem like yours. Another one has echo issue. Only one from
www.broad-tel.com works fine for me.

You may want to contact the vendor and get one for yourself instead of
modifying ZAPTEL software.

Newbie

On 8/16/05, Mark Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi, I've been trying to debug the problem with the X101P  giving FXO
PCI Master Aborts... I'm doing this blind, and I really need some info
on the X101P's register map - or best of all, the conditions under
which it can generate an IRQ with a mask of 0x10.

I have so far set up the mask for the IRQ's in the interrupt handler
(so the poor thing doesn't keep getting them)[as per previous post],
then patched ztcfg so it actually starts the watchdog (which is 
assumed

by the driver, but in reality doesn't happen - of course it doesn't
need to, because under normal conditions there is no need for the
watchdog - I guess?)

That much gives me a system which runs, hits a PCI Master abort (or at
least an IRQ with a mask of 0x10), and then stops the dma, masks the
IRQ... then the watchdog starts the dma again, unmasks the IRQ, at
which point  it gets another IRQ before the next watchdog beat so
the watchdog can't help.

I have tried being a bit more brutal with the activities in the
watchdog routine I just caused myself some kernel panic's :-)

Again, any help appreciated!

Cheers

Mark.

___
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev





___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAX compatible phones

2005-08-17 Thread Bohuslav Coufal
For example TEK SIP-IAX 323.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dr. Marios
Moutzouris
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 8:18 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] IAX compatible phones

Hello,

I would like to know which phones are IAX compatible. 

Thank-you
Marios Moutzouris

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.7/70 - Release Date: 11/8/2005
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voipbuster blocking Asterisk/IAX connections?

2005-08-17 Thread Mark Burton


On 17 Aug 2005, at 02:26, Don Fanning wrote:


I've surmized that it's Voipbuster having issues.  Paid up another euro
on the second account and it works fine.  When their support gets
better, I'll have them work on the other account.



I've had similar flakyness with Voipbuster. Sometimes the call goes 
through a dream, next time I either get no authority found or invalid 
extension/context. For me it's 50/50


This seems odd.. I put it down to their free service ...

[Though, whats worse, If Voipbuster fails, then voipjet fails too, 
in the same way, and that I REALLY dont understand! But I haven't got 
on that case to Voipjet yet - so i dont know what the problem is...]


Cheers

Mark.



-Don


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don
Fanning
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 4:39 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voipbuster blocking Asterisk/IAX
connections?

I added in a second account that does not have the 1 Euro deposit and 
it

goes through.
What would make things so different?
(this time the number is to the NIST Atomic Clock)
---

*CLI iax2 debug
IAX2 Debugging Enabled
-- Executing SetCallerID(SIP/100-d2c1, jfalcon) in new stack
-- Executing Dial(SIP/100-d2c1,
IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/0013034997111) in new stack
Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass:
NEW
   Timestamp: 00013ms  SCall: 00010  DCall: 0 [213.61.187.146:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : 0013034997111
   CALLING NAME: jfalcon
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: jfalcon
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 63490
   ADSICPE : 2
   DATE TIME   : 185631973

-- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]/0013034997111
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass:
ACK
   Timestamp: 00013ms  SCall: 00691  DCall: 00010 [213.61.187.146:4569]
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass:
AUTHREQ
   Timestamp: 4ms  SCall: 00691  DCall: 00010 [213.61.187.146:4569]
   AUTHMETHODS : 3
   CHALLENGE   : 188826810
   USERNAME: jfalcon

Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass:
AUTHREP
   Timestamp: 00186ms  SCall: 00010  DCall: 00691 [213.61.187.146:4569]
   MD5 RESULT  : 95fd16ba91a429b62028fc1ec6aa9cb5

Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 002 Type: IAX Subclass:
ACK
   Timestamp: 00186ms  SCall: 00691  DCall: 00010 [213.61.187.146:4569]
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 002 Type: IAX Subclass:
ACCEPT
   Timestamp: 00188ms  SCall: 00691  DCall: 00010 [213.61.187.146:4569]
   FORMAT  : 2

-- Call accepted by 213.61.187.146 (format gsm)
-- Format for call is gsm
Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 002 Type: IAX Subclass:
ACK
   Timestamp: 00188ms  SCall: 00010  DCall: 00691 [213.61.187.146:4569]
Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 002 Type: IAX Subclass:
LAGRQ
   Timestamp: 10014ms  SCall: 00010  DCall: 00691 [213.61.187.146:4569]
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 003 Type: IAX Subclass:
LAGRP
   Timestamp: 10014ms  SCall: 00691  DCall: 00010 [213.61.187.146:4569]
Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 003 ISeqno: 003 Type: IAX Subclass:
ACK
   Timestamp: 10014ms  SCall: 00010  DCall: 00691 [213.61.187.146:4569]
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 003 ISeqno: 003 Type: IAX Subclass:
LAGRQ
   Timestamp: 10002ms  SCall: 00691  DCall: 00010 [213.61.187.146:4569]
Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 003 ISeqno: 004 Type: IAX Subclass:
LAGRP
   Timestamp: 10002ms  SCall: 00010  DCall: 00691 [213.61.187.146:4569]
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 004 ISeqno: 004 Type: IAX Subclass:
ACK
   Timestamp: 10002ms  SCall: 00691  DCall: 00010 [213.61.187.146:4569]
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 004 ISeqno: 004 Type: IAX Subclass:
HANGUP
   Timestamp: 10729ms  SCall: 00691  DCall: 00010 [213.61.187.146:4569]
   Unknown IE 042  : Present

Ignoring unknown information element 'Unknown IE' (42) of length 1
Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 004 ISeqno: 005 Type: IAX Subclass:
ACK
   Timestamp: 10729ms  SCall: 00010  DCall: 00691 [213.61.187.146:4569]
-- Hungup 'IAX2/voipbuster/10'
  == No one is available to answer at this time
-- Executing NoOp(SIP/100-d2c1, DIALSTATUS=NOANSWER) in new
stack
-- Executing NoOp(SIP/100-d2c1, HANGUPCAUSE=0) in new stack
-- Executing Dial(SIP/100-d2c1,
IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/0013034997111) in new stack
Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass:
NEW
   Timestamp: 00018ms  SCall: 5  DCall: 0 [213.61.187.147:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : 0013034997111
   CALLING NAME: jfalcon
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: jfalcontwo
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 63490
   ADSICPE : 2
   DATE TIME   : 185631979

-- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]/0013034997111
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- 

[Asterisk-Users] Re: [Asterisk-Dev] X101P register map data please?

2005-08-17 Thread Mark Burton

Hi Newbie, or would you prefer to be called VoIP(y)? :-)

Thanks for the advice, It's great to hear from somebody that has 
suffered in the same way :-)


I've cc'd in the dev and user lists mostly so that others looking for 
the same issue (FXO PCI Master Abort) can find some info! - hope you 
dont mind...



On the card itself.
	I am assured by the vendor that they had the card up and running in a 
machine. Indeed, the vendor has taken one home, called me through it, 
and then given it to me... so I'm reasonably sure that under SOME 
situations, these cards work and I now have 2 of these cards!


I'd be interested to know, are all the 3 cards you have had identical 
in terms of how they look? Do you still have them? Can we compare notes 
- (off list)?


On the Zaptel driver...
	There are clearly inconsistencies in the driver, which I feel should 
be sorted out However, they are in code which people with working 
systems say is never reached. So.. yes, the driver should be cleaned up 
in order to handle the IRQ's better, but the question remains, why am 
I/you getting the Master Aborts in the first place...


If the patch that I've done to the driver is the right thing to do, 
then maybe thats an answer for me/you/others. I still seem to have some 
problems, so I need to understand those first (see other post). At 
least the Master Abort doesn't bring the whole machine down.


What I can't tell is why WE get the Master Aborts in the first place
Speculation would be good! Any ideas?

Cheers

Mark.


On 17 Aug 2005, at 07:16, VoIP Newbie wrote:


Dear Mark,

I got 3 X101P clone cards from 3 different vendors. One of them has
the same problem like yours. Another one has echo issue. Only one from
www.broad-tel.com works fine for me.

You may want to contact the vendor and get one for yourself instead of
modifying ZAPTEL software.

Newbie

On 8/16/05, Mark Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi, I've been trying to debug the problem with the X101P  giving FXO
PCI Master Aborts... I'm doing this blind, and I really need some info
on the X101P's register map - or best of all, the conditions under
which it can generate an IRQ with a mask of 0x10.

I have so far set up the mask for the IRQ's in the interrupt handler
(so the poor thing doesn't keep getting them)[as per previous post],
then patched ztcfg so it actually starts the watchdog (which is 
assumed

by the driver, but in reality doesn't happen - of course it doesn't
need to, because under normal conditions there is no need for the
watchdog - I guess?)

That much gives me a system which runs, hits a PCI Master abort (or at
least an IRQ with a mask of 0x10), and then stops the dma, masks the
IRQ... then the watchdog starts the dma again, unmasks the IRQ, at
which point  it gets another IRQ before the next watchdog beat so
the watchdog can't help.

I have tried being a bit more brutal with the activities in the
watchdog routine I just caused myself some kernel panic's :-)

Again, any help appreciated!

Cheers

Mark.

___
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev





___
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail file permissions

2005-08-17 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:40:36PM -0400, hugolivude wrote:
 I'm running RedHat 9 with a TDM400 (2FXO, 2FXS).  
 
 I'd like to give my Asterisk users the option of cleaning up their
 voicemail mailbox from their Windows PCs.  I set up Samba and added
 all the users with restricted access to their mailbox only, but here's
 the problem:
 
 The voicemail .wav files that Asterisk creates have root as both owner
 and group.  
 Since the users do not have root privileges, they can't do
 much with the files.  BTW I'm not sure why the voicemail .wav files
 have root as both owner and group because I followed the instructions
 for running Asterisk other than root (see
 http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+non-root).

Which is a good thing regardless.

 
 Is there a way around this w/o giving everyone root privileges!

Do you want to allow every user to delete another user's voicemail?

If not, how do you sync voicemail users and samba users?

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |   | a Mutt's  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   |  best
ICQ# 16849755 |   | friend
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P + SPANDSP fax problem

2005-08-17 Thread Roger Schreiter

Ma Zhiyong schrieb:

...
Trace shows that the fax is received successfully.
 
Aug 17 12:01:10 VERBOSE[19571]: -- Executing RxFAX(Zap/94-1,



Hi,

sorry, I don't know the solution to your problem, but I would like
to know, how did you get that trace?

I'm looking for a reliable way to determine, whether TxFax did send
a fax completely. I also tried the option debug, but never saw
such a trace.
Which version of spandsp are you using?

Roger.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] problems with eyebeam - video phone

2005-08-17 Thread asterisk
Thank you for your answer.
I didn't register on the domain of the Eyebeam software, actually I don't
understand how to do that!
I bouught 5 eyebeam activation keys and I am trying with the first 2 of
them

On the Eyebeam side (both eyebeam), I only enabled the Basic H.263 codec,
no other.

If, on the asterisk side in sip.conf, I put the gsm codec BEFORE h263, the
two video phone speak without any problem (but without any video)
If, on the asterisk side in sip.conf, I put the gsm codec AFTER h263, the
first video phone call the second, the second answer and immediately
the call ends.

If Ilook at /var/log/asterisk/full, I see:

Aug 17 08:37:06 VERBOSE[14731]: -- AGI Script dialparties.agi
completed, returning 0
Aug 17 08:37:06 VERBOSE[14731]: -- Executing Dial(SIP/551-eac0,
SIP/552|25|tr) in new stack
Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[14731]: SIMPLE DIAL (NO URL)
Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[14731]: Setting NAT on RTP to 0
Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[14731]: Setting NAT on VRTP to 0
Aug 17 08:37:06 WARNING[14731]: Don't know any of 0x8 formats
Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[14731]: Outgoing Call for 552
Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[14731]: Call from user '552' is 1 out of 0
Aug 17 08:37:06 VERBOSE[14731]: -- Called 552
Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[13529]: (Provisional) Stopping retransmission (but
retaining packet) on '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Request 102: Found
Aug 17 08:37:06 VERBOSE[14731]: -- SIP/552-ff46 is ringing
Aug 17 08:37:10 DEBUG[13529]: Acked pending invite 102
Aug 17 08:37:10 DEBUG[13529]: Stopping retransmission on
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' of Request 102: Found
Aug 17 08:37:10 DEBUG[13529]: build_route: Contact hop:
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
Aug 17 08:37:10 VERBOSE[14731]: -- SIP/552-ff46 answered SIP/551-eac0
Aug 17 08:37:10 WARNING[14731]: No path to translate from SIP/551-eac0(2)
to SIP/552-ff46(524288)
Aug 17 08:37:10 WARNING[14731]: Had to drop call because I couldn't make
SIP/551-eac0 compatible with SIP/552-ff46
Aug 17 08:37:10 DEBUG[14731]: update_user_counter(552) - decrement outUse
counter


It seems the problem documented in bug
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0003709
but actually it is not exactly the same.

moreover: is there any way to put the patch described in
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0003709 (enable H263p in *)
in asterisk 1.0.9 and not asterisk CVS HEAD ?

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Andrea



   
 Carlos Alperin  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 om.netTo 
 Sent by:  'Asterisk Users Mailing List - 
 asterisk-users-bo Non-Commercial Discussion' 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk-users@lists.digium.com   
 m.com  cc 
   
   Subject 
 16/08/2005 20.48  RE: [Asterisk-Users] problems with  
   eyebeam - video phone   
   
 Please respond to 
  Asterisk Users   
  Mailing List -   
  Non-Commercial   
Discussion 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 ists.digium.com  
   
   




Hi,

I get Eyebeam working with an older version of Asterisk 1.0.2(I believe). I
only use H.263 and SIP. (G.729)

Now, the more important question is if you register on the domain on the
Eyebeam software. I found that this was the full secret about this.

Let me know your configuration on the Eyebeam side.

Regards,

Carlos Alperin

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 11:28 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] problems with eyebeam - video phone

I am trying to connect two Xten eyeBeam Video Phone

No problems in voice connecting.

I tryed to modify my sip.conf

[general]
language=it
videosupport=yes
; enable Asterisk video support

port = 5060   ; Port to bind to (SIP is 5060)
bindaddr = 0.0.0.0; Address to bind to (all addresses on machine)
disallow=all
allow=h263
allow=gsm

[Asterisk-Users] Can not dial more then 23 calls

2005-08-17 Thread Pudenz, Duane
We are testing our Asterisk server prior to deployment.  The server has
a 4 port T1 Digium adapter (WCT4XXP) with 3 Long Distance (LD) T1s and
one PRI for local calls.

We are using sipp from two different stations routing a test number out
the LD lines and another test number out the PRI line.

We can not get more then 23 total active calls to connect to the test
numbers, the test numbers terminate to another PBX that we can monitor.
We have dialed out using cell phones to this other PBX while the test is
happening and it connects, meaning it has more then 23 active calls on
it.

If we place more then 23 calls then it seems to 'queue' the extra calls,
though not all of the extra calls complete after we stop adding new
calls.  They seem to get stuck in a queue or lost.  We will send 200
calls through the Asterisk server and all but about 20 do eventually
complete.  Those 20 or so are stuck as Asterisk thinks the channels are
busy with the calls when in fact there are no 'real' calls on the
server.

We can send 30 calls through the LD or PRI and only 23 are actually
connected at a time.  We can send 30 calls to both LD and PRI at the
same time and still only a mixture of 23 calls are actually active at
one time.

So our issue seems to be located in our Asterisk server.  Is there a way
to limit or throttle an Asterisk server so that it will not place more
then 'x' calls?  

We need to be able to support 48 calls.

Any ideas?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Issue with DTMF Tones - Codec Issues

2005-08-17 Thread maka
I took a look at the NEAX brochures available from NEC's website. I
may be wrong but I don't think you could change the way dtmf tones are
sent from the PBX, but you should be able to send them out of band
(with RTP, as per RFC 2833) from the cisco to the asterisk box.

Generally, out of band dtmf is always better (when available) and more
reliable than inband dtmf. Bear in mind that certain phones, such as
grandstreams, do not work well with rfc2833 dtmf relaying, but work
well with dtmf sent in SIP INFO messages.

cheers

On 8/16/05, Aaron W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks I give give that a try.  One follow up question.  If the call
 is coming in via the PSTN, and going through the NEAX (PBX) then to
 the Cisco, can I control the way the PBX sends the DTMF, or is the
 cisco some how able to split out the DTMF tones from everything else?
 
 I was assuming that becuase I am going through the PBX, the cisco
 would recieve the DTMF inband, and therefore it would have to send it
 out also as inband.
 
 Thanks again
 Aaron
 
 On 8/16/05, maka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  just a suggestion, but why don't you try using RFC2833 dtmf relay
  between the cisco and the asterisk box.
 
  use dtmfmode=rfc2833 in sip.conf, and you can also set the dtmf mode
  per peer in sip.conf
  also, if you use inband dtmf, this would only work with u-law and
  a-law, and not g729.
 
  on the cisco, enter
  Router(config-dial-peer)# dtmf-relay rtp-nte
  in dial-peer configuration mode.
 
  I recently had problems with a cisco gw forwarding pstn dtmf digits to
  my asterisk box, and rfc2833(which is what rtp-nte stands for in
  cisco's terms) solved it successfully.
 
 
  cheers
 
  On 8/16/05, Aaron W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Topology:
   PSTN-T1 PRI-NEAX2400-T1 PRI-Cisco 3825-Ethernet- Asterisk VoIP 
   server
  
   When I make a call to a VoIP user from the PSTN, the call gets routed
   through the PBX, and Cisco.  Because of that the DTMF tones are passed
   inband, which I can hear on the VoIP end of the call. However, I have
   one extension on asterisk set up so that I can check voice mail when
   away from my phone.  When I call that number again via the PSTN, and I
   am prompted to enter my extension number Asterisk never hears the
   dtmf tones.  I have done some digging around, and my guess is that the
   issue relates to the codec being used messing up the tones.
  
   Am I on the right track? Is there a ideal way to handle this?  what do
   others do?
  
   I have posted my sip.conf below.
  
   Thanks,
   Aaron
  
   [general]
   port = 5060 ; Port to bind to
   bindaddr = 0.0.0.0  ; Address to bind to
   context = default   ; Default for incoming calls (default
   context has no routing for security purposes)
   ;dtmfmode=rfc2833
   dtmfmode=inband
   srvlookup = yes
   disallow=all; Disallow all codecs
   ;allow=g729  ; Codecs that we allow (in order of 
   preference)
   allow=ulaw
   ;allow=alaw
   allow=g729
   ;allow=ulaw
   ;allow=all
  
  
   [3120]
   callerid=Aaron Walsh 3120
   type=friend
   host=dynamic
   canreinvite=no
   qualify=yes
   nat=yes
   setvar=LDPREFIX=199
   context=XXX
   secret=X
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ___
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
 
 
  --
  I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired...
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


-- 
I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired...
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voipbuster blocking Asterisk/IAX connections?

2005-08-17 Thread Don Fanning
They're using the same hosted servers with different billin schemes.
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
Burton
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 11:29 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voipbuster blocking Asterisk/IAX
connections?


On 17 Aug 2005, at 02:26, Don Fanning wrote:

 I've surmized that it's Voipbuster having issues.  Paid up another 
 euro on the second account and it works fine.  When their support gets

 better, I'll have them work on the other account.


I've had similar flakyness with Voipbuster. Sometimes the call goes
through a dream, next time I either get no authority found or invalid
extension/context. For me it's 50/50

This seems odd.. I put it down to their free service ...

[Though, whats worse, If Voipbuster fails, then voipjet fails too,
in the same way, and that I REALLY dont understand! But I haven't got on
that case to Voipjet yet - so i dont know what the problem is...]

Cheers

Mark.


 -Don


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don 
 Fanning
 Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 4:39 PM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voipbuster blocking Asterisk/IAX 
 connections?

 I added in a second account that does not have the 1 Euro deposit and 
 it goes through.
 What would make things so different?
 (this time the number is to the NIST Atomic Clock)
 ---

 *CLI iax2 debug
 IAX2 Debugging Enabled
 -- Executing SetCallerID(SIP/100-d2c1, jfalcon) in new stack
 -- Executing Dial(SIP/100-d2c1,
 IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/0013034997111) in new stack
 Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass:
 NEW
Timestamp: 00013ms  SCall: 00010  DCall: 0
[213.61.187.146:4569]
VERSION : 2
CALLED NUMBER   : 0013034997111
CALLING NAME: jfalcon
LANGUAGE: en
USERNAME: jfalcon
FORMAT  : 2
CAPABILITY  : 63490
ADSICPE : 2
DATE TIME   : 185631973

 -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]/0013034997111
 Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass:
 ACK
Timestamp: 00013ms  SCall: 00691  DCall: 00010
[213.61.187.146:4569]
 Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass:
 AUTHREQ
Timestamp: 4ms  SCall: 00691  DCall: 00010
[213.61.187.146:4569]
AUTHMETHODS : 3
CHALLENGE   : 188826810
USERNAME: jfalcon

 Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass:
 AUTHREP
Timestamp: 00186ms  SCall: 00010  DCall: 00691
[213.61.187.146:4569]
MD5 RESULT  : 95fd16ba91a429b62028fc1ec6aa9cb5

 Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 002 Type: IAX Subclass:
 ACK
Timestamp: 00186ms  SCall: 00691  DCall: 00010
[213.61.187.146:4569]
 Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 002 Type: IAX Subclass:
 ACCEPT
Timestamp: 00188ms  SCall: 00691  DCall: 00010
[213.61.187.146:4569]
FORMAT  : 2

 -- Call accepted by 213.61.187.146 (format gsm)
 -- Format for call is gsm
 Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 002 Type: IAX Subclass:
 ACK
Timestamp: 00188ms  SCall: 00010  DCall: 00691
[213.61.187.146:4569]
 Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 002 Type: IAX Subclass:
 LAGRQ
Timestamp: 10014ms  SCall: 00010  DCall: 00691
[213.61.187.146:4569]
 Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 003 Type: IAX Subclass:
 LAGRP
Timestamp: 10014ms  SCall: 00691  DCall: 00010
[213.61.187.146:4569]
 Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 003 ISeqno: 003 Type: IAX Subclass:
 ACK
Timestamp: 10014ms  SCall: 00010  DCall: 00691
[213.61.187.146:4569]
 Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 003 ISeqno: 003 Type: IAX Subclass:
 LAGRQ
Timestamp: 10002ms  SCall: 00691  DCall: 00010
[213.61.187.146:4569]
 Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 003 ISeqno: 004 Type: IAX Subclass:
 LAGRP
Timestamp: 10002ms  SCall: 00010  DCall: 00691
[213.61.187.146:4569]
 Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 004 ISeqno: 004 Type: IAX Subclass:
 ACK
Timestamp: 10002ms  SCall: 00691  DCall: 00010
[213.61.187.146:4569]
 Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 004 ISeqno: 004 Type: IAX Subclass:
 HANGUP
Timestamp: 10729ms  SCall: 00691  DCall: 00010
[213.61.187.146:4569]
Unknown IE 042  : Present

 Ignoring unknown information element 'Unknown IE' (42) of length 1
 Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 004 ISeqno: 005 Type: IAX Subclass:
 ACK
Timestamp: 10729ms  SCall: 00010  DCall: 00691
[213.61.187.146:4569]
 -- Hungup 'IAX2/voipbuster/10'
   == No one is available to answer at this time
 -- Executing NoOp(SIP/100-d2c1, DIALSTATUS=NOANSWER) in new 
 stack
 -- Executing NoOp(SIP/100-d2c1, HANGUPCAUSE=0) in new stack
 -- Executing Dial(SIP/100-d2c1,
 IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/0013034997111) in new stack
 Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- 

Re: [Asterisk-Users] florz patch for bristuff breaks compile on x86_64?

2005-08-17 Thread Remco Barende

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:


On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 06:57:19AM +0200, Remco Barende wrote:

After upgrading a CentOS 3.x box to CentOS 4.1 (both x86_64 with an
Athlon64) I also wanted to get the latest bristuff. Unfortunately
bristuff without florz causes the box to kernel panic within hours
(console will complain about bad frame received something).


Then merge the fix into the bristuff patch if it has not been merged
yet!


That's what I did when I patched bristuff :)


It seems however that the florz patch will not work for x86_64 arch.
Bristuff -0.2.0-RC8j compiles fine without the florz patch, but after
applying the patch zaphfc will not compile anymore (the patch applies
cleanly).


Latest bristuff is RC8n, BTW. What exactly is the florz patch? It seems
to have been onchanged since January or so.


I have never ever been able to keep a bristuffed box up for more than a 
few hours or 2 days at best without the florz patch. It seems that KPJ is 
trying various approaches to solve timing problems but I guess it's not 
stable yet.


Florz fixes a lot of timing issues, reduces interrupt load and makes 
bristuff stable.


You can find more info here:
http://zaphfc.florz.dyndns.org/



Anyone managed to get bristuff with florz working on x86_64 arch?


It is part of the debian packages and they are built on amd64 as well.

http://packages.debian.org/zaptel
http://packages.debian.org/libpri
http://packages.debian.org/asterisk


I would guess thet are without bristuff and/or florz?

Bristuff compiles without florz, but zaphfc doesn't after applying florz.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Nikotel issues

2005-08-17 Thread Christoph Eicke
Hi!

I've read in the archives that there are problems concerning Nikotel calls 
being disconnected after two minutes. I had the same problem yesterday. Is 
there a fix? There was only a giving up statement after the last e-mail in 
the archive, I'm about to do that too.
Here's my sip.conf entry for Nikotel (left out the register stuff 'cause it's 
working):

[nikotel]
type=friend
host=calamar0.nikotel.com
username=user
secret=pass
fromuser=user
fromdomain=nikotel.com
qualify=yes
context=nikotel-incoming
insecure=very
canreinvite=no
promiscredir=yes
diallow=all
allow=alaw
allow=ulaw
allow=gsm

extension.conf:

[nikotel-incoming]
exten = 3740525,1,NoOp(Invoming call via nikotel-us)
exten = 3740525,2,Dial(IAX2/christophSIP/30${CONSOLE},30)
exten = 3740525,3,VoiceMail(u30)
exten = 3740525,4,Hangup

Thanks for any help,
Christoph
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax - RxFax on same machine hangs

2005-08-17 Thread Bartek Kania

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:

Roger Schreiter wrote:

How can I enable asterisk to fax to itsself?
Well, it won't be the normal operation, but when allowing clients
to fax, it can happen by chance, that someone faxes to another
user on the same machine without knowing it.
Thanks for any hints!

If the call really dialed out through a PSTN port and back in it
should work.  It is was a pure internal connection between 2
processes it will not. The timing for these programs comes from the
received data. No data, no work.


I can confirm that this problem appears on a call through the PSTN.
My setup is:
TxFax - Asterisk - E1 - Asterisk (same box) -RxFax

Asterisk version 1.0.9 and spandsp version 0.0.2pre18 on debian woody (3.0).

I sent you an email about it with some debug information a week or so ago.
If you need it again, or need some other info I'll be happy to provide it.

/B
- -- 
* GPG-Key: http://evil.gnarf.org/mrbk.pgp


A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?
- -- http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDAui2ckvkFeO3ANARAuJPAKC00b+lEeHz+mOfb8J/zOF7+YAwggCeLFrG
KGkJxLFGCeBY6foyDqC1xGM=
=J6zk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Can not dial more then 23 calls

2005-08-17 Thread Adam Goryachev
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 23:53 -0700, Pudenz, Duane wrote:
 We are testing our Asterisk server prior to deployment.  The server has
 a 4 port T1 Digium adapter (WCT4XXP) with 3 Long Distance (LD) T1s and
 one PRI for local calls.
 
 We are using sipp from two different stations routing a test number out
 the LD lines and another test number out the PRI line.
 
 We can not get more then 23 total active calls to connect to the test
 numbers, the test numbers terminate to another PBX that we can monitor.
 We have dialed out using cell phones to this other PBX while the test is
 happening and it connects, meaning it has more then 23 active calls on
 it.

Include more info like your extensions.conf zaptel.conf and zapata.conf
(not the comments) and we might be able to offer some hints...

Also, some output from the CLI might be helpful that would probably
tell you why the calls are failing already

Regards,
Adam

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] How to change RINGING style for internal calls

2005-08-17 Thread Chris Coulthurst



I'd like to have the ringing a caller hears to be 
more like a 'british' ring when I am calling an internal extension. The 
phones I'm calling already do this, now I'd like to find a way to make the same 
thing happen for the caller who waits...

Any ideas?

Chris Coulthurst
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Voicemail Retrival

2005-08-17 Thread Sharadindu Mohanty
Hi,
 I am very new to Asterisk. I wanted to know how to retrive the Voicemails. I could see some voicemails assosiated with some extensions.

Any ideas??
		How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos. Get Yahoo! 
Photos___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] 1-800 number

2005-08-17 Thread Christoph Eicke
Hi!

I'm searching for a 1-800 number that simply plays music for a long time 
(3mins) and no one picks up. I've bothered the ATT lines so far when trying 
out my SIP-PSTN connection but then always someone answered :-)
Anyone have a number?

Christoph
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail Retrival

2005-08-17 Thread Christoph Eicke
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 10:29, Sharadindu Mohanty wrote:
 Hi,
Hi!

 Any ideas??
Yes, I do it in the following way. In extension.conf add this line:

exten = ,1,VoiceMailMain(s${CALLERIDNUM})
exten = ,2,Hangup()

Here any extension can call  and then automatically gets directed to their 
voicemail where they have some options.

I hope this helps,

Christoph
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail Retrieval

2005-08-17 Thread Wei Kun



Take 
this as an example


[from-sip]
exten 
= 2000,1,Dial(SIP/2000,20)
exten 
= 2000,2,Voicemail(u2000)
exten 
= 2000,102,Voicemail(b2000)
exten 
= 2000,103,Hangup

exten 
= 2001,1,Dial(SIP/2001,20)
exten 
= 2001,2,Voicemail(u2001)
exten 
= 2001,102,Voicemail(b2001)
exten 
= 2001,103,Hangup

exten 
= 2999,1,VoicemailMain(${CALLERIDNUM})

you then dial 2999 to retrieve 
it.

Kun

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Sharadindu 
  MohantySent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 4:30 PMTo: 
  asterisk-Users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail 
  Retrival
  Hi,
   I am very new to Asterisk. I wanted to know how to retrive 
  the Voicemails. I could see some voicemails assosiated with some 
  extensions.
  
  Any ideas??
  
  
  How much free photo storage do you get? Store your 
  holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos. Get 
  Yahoo! Photos
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] 1-800 number

2005-08-17 Thread Wei Kun
try bankone, their 1800 waiting is long


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christoph
Eicke
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 4:34 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] 1-800 number


Hi!

I'm searching for a 1-800 number that simply plays music for a long time
(3mins) and no one picks up. I've bothered the ATT lines so far when
trying
out my SIP-PSTN connection but then always someone answered :-)
Anyone have a number?

Christoph
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1-800 number

2005-08-17 Thread Michael K. Rodriguez
More info


On 8/17/05 3:34 AM, Christoph Eicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi!
 
 I'm searching for a 1-800 number that simply plays music for a long time
 (3mins) and no one picks up. I've bothered the ATT lines so far when trying
 out my SIP-PSTN connection but then always someone answered :-)
 Anyone have a number?
 
 Christoph
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1-800 number

2005-08-17 Thread Christoph Eicke
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 10:45, Michael K. Rodriguez wrote:
 More info

I don't quiet understand your mail ;-)
Do you want more info from me?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] 8 FXS in Asterisk Server

2005-08-17 Thread Roland Zagler
Thanks for the hint, do you know where to buy it (cheap) and the
price for it?

Thanks,
Roland

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of VoIP
Newbie
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 6:53 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 8 FXS in Asterisk Server

Get a 8-port FXS gateway from www.broad-tel.com. That is the single
box you need.

On 8/16/05, Roland Zagler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello everyone,
 
 I want to build an Asterisk Box where i need 8 FXS interfaces
 to connect 8 phones to. The problem is, that there is only one
 PCI slot available. What i have is 4 USBs 2.0 interfaces free
 (if this helps).
 
 So here's my question: how am i going to do this?
 
 i tried to find any PCI cards supporting 8 FXS interfaces, but
 without success. does anyone know such hardware?
 
 Thanks in advance,
 Roland
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] FW: Asterisk-panel

2005-08-17 Thread Jaco vd Westhuizen

I am running asterisk at home but have a strange phenomena that is going on
with my flash panel I am using two ips an internal and an external public ip
address on my box. If I go to the page on my asterisk external ip address
the displays the flash panel everything is fine, but on the internal ip wich
used to display the page correctly all the names of my panel users is there
but the panel just flashes red and green does anyone knows why or how I can
fix it?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk (multiple) + Ser

2005-08-17 Thread Ronald Voermans
I have several Asterisk servers installed and one SER server which will
act as a gateway to PSTN, en redirect server.

I was thinking to implement it the following way:

- Register all the * servers at SER (is this neccessary?) - this works
via register=asterisk:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in sip.conf
- Setup aliases in SER for the telephonenumbers to the appropiate *
server: serctl alias add [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mailaddress

This way, when one SIP phone behind a * server calls for example
016234567, the * server forwards the request to SER, SER looks up the
alias en then forwards it to the destined * server. If a number cannot
be handled, SER will forward it to the PSTN gateway.

Now my problems:
I'm a totaly newby on SER. I managed to get the * server register
themselves with SER, and setup Aliases. However I cannot get ser.conf
configured so that it does what i've explained before. Is anybody
willing to help me out, if possible with a sample ser.conf?

TIA,

Ronald Voermans

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Automatic start with SuSe linux

2005-08-17 Thread laine . marko
Hi!
I'm trying to start asterisk at boottime. Since SuSe has no rc.local like in
Redhat linux, I need asterisk starting script to /etc/init.d/rc3.d -directory
(I assume it is like that if i want automated asterisk startup).
Do you have any experience how this is implemented in SuSe, and if you have some
useful script for starting asterisk, I would be very, i mean VERY pleased?

Thank you all in advance!



This mail sent through L-secure: http://www.l-secure.net/

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] zaphfc ptp did problems

2005-08-17 Thread Harald Klein

Hi All,

i have a HFC card running in ptp mode. I set overlapdial to yes and
immediate to no in /etc/zaptel.conf. DID works, but the timeout for
immediate=no is much to low. Calls from GSM or via Speed Dial work fine,
but you hardly can dial the digits fast enough to reach the extension
(im using 777, most of the time im placed in the s context, sometimes 7
or 77)

Is there a way to increase the timeout or any other workaround?

regards,
Hari


mfg, Harald Klein
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail Retrival

2005-08-17 Thread Sharadindu Mohanty
I did the same way but it is asking for some password and mailbox. I think mail box is extension no but what abt password?

Can i overide this procedure?

ThanksChristoph Eicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 10:29, Sharadindu Mohanty wrote: Hi,Hi! Any ideas??Yes, I do it in the following way. In extension.conf add this line:exten = ,1,VoiceMailMain(s${CALLERIDNUM})exten = ,2,Hangup()Here any extension can call  and then automatically gets directed to their voicemail where they have some options.I hope this helps,Christoph___Asterisk-Users mailing listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersSharadindu Mohanty
		To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre.___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] zaphfc ptp DID problems

2005-08-17 Thread Harald Klein

Hi All,

so i have a better description: DID does not work with match as you go
dialing, all at once is ok..

have a nice time,

Hari

Am 17.8.2005 schrieb Harald Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Hi All,

i have a HFC card running in ptp mode. I set overlapdial to yes and
immediate to no in /etc/zaptel.conf. DID works, but the timeout for
immediate=no is much to low. Calls from GSM or via Speed Dial work fine,
but you hardly can dial the digits fast enough to reach the extension
(im using 777, most of the time im placed in the s context, sometimes 7
or 77)

Is there a way to increase the timeout or any other workaround?

regards,
Hari


mfg, Harald Klein)

mfg, Harald Klein
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail Retrival

2005-08-17 Thread Rudolf Ladyzhenskii



Hi,

This procedure will work under one condition -- 
your user names are same as your extension numbers. I have same problem. I was 
giving phones alphanumeric user names, like "phone1".
When VoicemailMain is called with ${CALLERIDNUM}, 
it is actually called as VoiceMailMain("phone1"). As a result, voice mail is 
asking for a mailbox number which is same as your extension number. (BTW, is 
there a way to extract extension number rather than phone name?).

As I am experimenting with *, I will rename phones 
to match their extensions.

Rudolf

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Sharadindu Mohanty 
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - 
  Non-Commercial Discussion 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 8:32 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail 
  Retrival
  
  I did the same way but it is asking for some password and mailbox. I 
  think mail box is extension no but what abt password?
  
  Can i overide this procedure?
  
  ThanksChristoph Eicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 
Wednesday 17 August 2005 10:29, Sharadindu Mohanty wrote: 
Hi,Hi! Any ideas??Yes, I do it in the following way. In 
extension.conf add this line:exten = 
,1,VoiceMailMain(s${CALLERIDNUM})exten = 
,2,Hangup()Here any extension can call  and then 
automatically gets directed to their voicemail where they have some 
options.I hope this 
helps,Christoph___Asterisk-Users 
mailing 
listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo 
UNSUBSCRIBE or update options 
visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersSharadindu 
  Mohanty
  
  
  To help you stay safe and secure online, we've 
  developed the all new Yahoo! 
  Security Centre.
  
  

  ___Asterisk-Users 
  mailing 
  listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo 
  UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: 
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail file permissions

2005-08-17 Thread hugolivude
Great idea, thanks!  I'd never heard of externnotify.  I shudder to
think of how many other cool features I'm missing!  I'll let u know
how it goes.

Cheers,
Hugh

On 8/16/05, Chris Coulthurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 My suggestion would be, use the externnotify=/usr/bin/myapp feature in
 voicemail.conf to chown the permissions to something else.  Since they are
 root, asterisk should have no problem deleting and moving them around with
 less privileges.
 
 Chris Coulthurst
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 - Original Message -
 From: hugolivude [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 11:40 AM
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail file permissions
 
 
 I'm running RedHat 9 with a TDM400 (2FXO, 2FXS).
 
 I'd like to give my Asterisk users the option of cleaning up their
 voicemail mailbox from their Windows PCs.  I set up Samba and added
 all the users with restricted access to their mailbox only, but here's
 the problem:
 
 The voicemail .wav files that Asterisk creates have root as both owner
 and group.  Since the users do not have root privileges, they can't do
 much with the files.  BTW I'm not sure why the voicemail .wav files
 have root as both owner and group because I followed the instructions
 for running Asterisk other than root (see
 http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+non-root).
 
 Is there a way around this w/o giving everyone root privileges!
 
 Thanks,
 Hugh
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail file permissions

2005-08-17 Thread hugolivude
  Is there a way around this w/o giving everyone root privileges!
 
 Do you want to allow every user to delete another user's voicemail?
 
 If not, how do you sync voicemail users and samba users?

I want each user to see, read and write (delete) their own voicemail
ONLY (i.e. a user shouldn't be able to listen to someone elses
voicemails).  I gave each user an account on the Asterisk box and
limited their access to their mailbox folder only.

Hugh
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 5 way calling?

2005-08-17 Thread hugolivude
 I'd not bother with using the flash based 3 way calling. Instead I'd
 setup an account with an ITSP and make the outbound calls via IP,
 preferabbly via IAX2. That way to can reach out to as many people as
 your bandwidth allows. Simply. Conveniently.
 
 Add one IP based DID and you can let others call in to your conference
 via IP.

I've been thinking about getting some IP DIDs for other reasons
anyway, so thanks for the suggestion.  There's a bandwidth issue
however and this client is simply more comfortable keeping things on
copper, especially con-calls.  As I mentioned the client's paying for
3-way calling from Bell, so is there no way to take advantage of this
and establish a three way call on a single FXO line through Asterisk? 
I've opened another thread on this issue as it's more fundamental than
my original 5 way calling problem.

Thanks,
Hugh
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk + chan_mISDN = undefined symbol: ast_pickup_call

2005-08-17 Thread Christian Wengel

Hi!

Then I get compile-errors.

Greets, Christian

Johann Steinwendtner schrieb:


Christian Wengel schrieb:


Hi!

I tried install-misdn.tgz from http://www.beronet.com/download/ , 
some minutes ago. Also I switched to an older kernel (2.6.8), but I 
get the same error.
I think that I made the correct changes in the Makefiles, but I will 
attach them to this e-mail, maybe you see something wrong.



Is there a change when you uncomment this flag ?


# ASTERISK Version
# If you are using a asterisk version above from stable (v1-0)
# then comment the following line out (good luck)
#
#CFLAGS+=-DASTERISK_STABLE



Best regards

Hans

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom 501 dialing problem

2005-08-17 Thread Craig Bruenderman
Are you referring to the sip.conf setting or something in the phone's
config? Sip.conf already reflects rfc2833.

Craig Bruenderman
Network Advocates, Inc.
300 Envoy Circle
Suite 300
Louisville, KY  40299

Main:  502-412-1050
DID:   502-992-5929
Fax:   502-412-1058
Mobile:  502-548-1100
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Coulthurst
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 8:09 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom 501 dialing problem

Sounds like you have a DTMF mode problem.  Check that you are using
RFC2833
for dtmf signaling.  I had the same thing happen with my dialing of
*98
to
check voicemail..It would transpose it in to 9*8, as if the * was
being
some
sort of a tab key.

Chris Coulthurst
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message -
From: Craig Bruenderman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 11:55 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom 501 dialing problem


When I want to pick up a ringing line, I dial *8 and hit New Call
softkey on my Poly 501. For some reason, if I pick up the hand set and
dial *8, it seems to ignore or drop the 8 digit. I've confirmed that
this happens with all of my 12 Polycom 501s. Does anyone know what
would
cause this or how to fix it?

Craig Bruenderman
Network Advocates, Inc.
300 Envoy Circle
Suite 300
Louisville, KY  40299

Main:  502-412-1050
DID:   502-992-5929
Fax:   502-412-1058
Mobile:  502-548-1100
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Echo cancellation again ...

2005-08-17 Thread Alan Bunch
I have been reading with great interest the posts on trouble shooting 
echo cancellation with *.  Is it just coincidence that all of this 
discussion has been with analog lines.  Are PRI's susceptible to echo 
problem like POTS lines.


Thanks for clearing this up.

Alan
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] X100P dial out problem

2005-08-17 Thread Piero Baudino
Hi all!

I'm new to asterisk and I'm trying a simple config with:
- Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
- last version of Asterisk
- a X100P card

I have a problem with dial out from a SIP software phone (XLITE) to a
public number (ex. my mobile phone), asterisk start the call, but nothing
happen...
If I run ztmonitor 1 I can see the right RX level and if I try to make a
call with an analog standard phone connected to the second plug of the
X100P, I can see the RX level going UP and down normally, and I can also
hear my voice during a call.
Otherwise, when I try to dial out from XLITE, when I start the call the
RX level go to 0 and I can only hear the numbers of che called number but
I can hear nothing on RX and the line is locked until I remove the
wcfxo kernel module; in Italy we must wait for a tone before starting the
call

Is there anyone here with an idea for my problem ?

Thanks in advance.
Piero Baudino


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Echo cancellation again ...

2005-08-17 Thread Craig Bruenderman
I have a PRI with quite a nasty echo problem that I cannot seem to get
rid of. I've tried all of the echo cancellation settings and tweaked
gains to hell and back but still get echo. I am convinced it can only be
addressed by hardware echo cancellation but that's not an option unless
I replace my TE110P.

Craig Bruenderman
Network Advocates, Inc.
300 Envoy Circle
Suite 300
Louisville, KY  40299

Main:  502-412-1050
DID:   502-992-5929
Fax:   502-412-1058
Mobile:  502-548-1100

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Bunch
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 8:18 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Echo cancellation again ...

I have been reading with great interest the posts on trouble shooting
echo cancellation with *.  Is it just coincidence that all of this
discussion has been with analog lines.  Are PRI's susceptible to echo
problem like POTS lines.

Thanks for clearing this up.

Alan
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail Retrieval

2005-08-17 Thread Rudolf Ladyzhenskii



In addition to my previos e-mail.

'callerid' filed in sip.conf or iax.conf 
(depends where user is defined) must be set to"
callerid "User Name" EXT
Where EXT is a number that will be picked up by 
VoiceMailMain and will be used as a mailbox number.

Rudolf

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Wei Kun 
  
  To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - 
  Non-Commercial Discussion' 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 6:37 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail 
  Retrieval
  
  Take 
  this as an example
  
  
  [from-sip]
  exten 
  = 2000,1,Dial(SIP/2000,20)
  exten 
  = 2000,2,Voicemail(u2000)
  exten 
  = 2000,102,Voicemail(b2000)
  exten 
  = 2000,103,Hangup
  
  exten 
  = 2001,1,Dial(SIP/2001,20)
  exten 
  = 2001,2,Voicemail(u2001)
  exten 
  = 2001,102,Voicemail(b2001)
  exten 
  = 2001,103,Hangup
  
  exten 
  = 2999,1,VoicemailMain(${CALLERIDNUM})
  
  you then dial 2999 to retrieve 
  it.
  
  Kun
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
Sharadindu MohantySent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 4:30 
PMTo: asterisk-Users@lists.digium.comSubject: 
[Asterisk-Users] Voicemail Retrival
Hi,
 I am very new to Asterisk. I wanted to know how to retrive 
the Voicemails. I could see some voicemails assosiated with some 
extensions.

Any ideas??


How much free photo storage do you get? Store your 
holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos. Get 
Yahoo! Photos
  
  

  ___Asterisk-Users 
  mailing 
  listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo 
  UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: 
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Echo cancellation again ...

2005-08-17 Thread Doug Lytle

Alan Bunch wrote:

I have been reading with great interest the posts on trouble shooting 
echo cancellation with *.  Is it just coincidence that all of this 
discussion has been with analog lines.  Are PRI's susceptible to echo 
problem like POTS lines.



Alan,

I have experienced echo on our PRI with EC turned off.  Granted, it was 
Asterisk server 1 connecting via IAX to server 2, connecting via a PRI 
to call my cell phone.  Turning on EC removed this echo.


Doug

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax - RxFax on same machine hangs

2005-08-17 Thread Steve Underwood

Bartek Kania wrote:


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:


Roger Schreiter wrote:


How can I enable asterisk to fax to itsself?
Well, it won't be the normal operation, but when allowing clients
to fax, it can happen by chance, that someone faxes to another
user on the same machine without knowing it.
Thanks for any hints!


If the call really dialed out through a PSTN port and back in it
should work.  It is was a pure internal connection between 2
processes it will not. The timing for these programs comes from the
received data. No data, no work.



I can confirm that this problem appears on a call through the PSTN.
My setup is:
TxFax - Asterisk - E1 - Asterisk (same box) -RxFax

Asterisk version 1.0.9 and spandsp version 0.0.2pre18 on debian woody 
(3.0).


I sent you an email about it with some debug information a week or so 
ago.
If you need it again, or need some other info I'll be happy to provide 
it.


Did you put txfax in caller mode?

Steve

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] iaxcomm huge latency

2005-08-17 Thread Juraj Bednar
Hello,

   I use iaxcomm-latest from the iaxclient.sf.net page (binary
release) on linux, also tried Mac OS X version with the same result
and Asterisk 1.0.9 from Debian. Iaxcomm has a huge latency -- tens of
seconds, constantly changing over time. It was run on two different
machines, always to a SIP phone (which otherwise works correctly even
with VoipBuster, which also uses IAX with no latency and other SIP
phones). Is it a known bug?


  Juraj.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] XORCOM RAPID Asterisk - Suggestions?

2005-08-17 Thread Sharadindu Mohanty
Hey Guys,
 Wanted a Suggestion..Howz this Xorcom Asterisk?I am using it and till now its fine as currently it is in testing stage with 3-4 users.

Any Ideas???

ThanksSharadindu Mohanty
		How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos. Get Yahoo! 
Photos___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] ASTCC astcc-config.conf card length question

2005-08-17 Thread Bernard Cresencia
I've done this without any problems. I changed from 10
digits to 11 digits and I'm still able to use all of
the cards.


--- Nate Kapi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I currently have my astcc databases card lenghts at
 7 digits long. I
 would like to expand this to 10 digits now though.
 Will I screw things
 up if I leave the old 7 digit long pins in there and
 start
 using/generating 10 digit pins?
 
 Thanks
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Echo cancellation again ...

2005-08-17 Thread Tom Hayden
I have experienced pretty nasty echo on my PRI w/TE110P. The echo was
only coming from other POTS lines, because cell phones already have
echo cancellation, and other PBX's had the same.  I resolved the
problem by turning on the AGGRESSIVE option and it works fine now, and
we haven't noticed a severe degradation in sound quality - most of my
operators were just happy the echo was gone :)

--
Tom Hayden
Astoria Telecom, LLC
www.astoriatelecom.net

On 8/17/05, Doug Lytle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Alan Bunch wrote:
 
  I have been reading with great interest the posts on trouble shooting
  echo cancellation with *.  Is it just coincidence that all of this
  discussion has been with analog lines.  Are PRI's susceptible to echo
  problem like POTS lines.
 
 Alan,
 
 I have experienced echo on our PRI with EC turned off.  Granted, it was
 Asterisk server 1 connecting via IAX to server 2, connecting via a PRI
 to call my cell phone.  Turning on EC removed this echo.
 
 Doug
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


-- 
Tom
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Automatic start with SuSe linux

2005-08-17 Thread Angus Comber

You could just add the line asterisk to /etc/init.d/boot.local

Angus

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 11:27 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Automatic start with SuSe linux


Hi!
I'm trying to start asterisk at boottime. Since SuSe has no rc.local like in
Redhat linux, I need asterisk starting script to 
/etc/init.d/rc3.d -directory

(I assume it is like that if i want automated asterisk startup).
Do you have any experience how this is implemented in SuSe, and if you have 
some

useful script for starting asterisk, I would be very, i mean VERY pleased?

Thank you all in advance!



This mail sent through L-secure: http://www.l-secure.net/

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] XORCOM RAPID Asterisk - Suggestions?

2005-08-17 Thread brent clements
We like it alot. It makes rapid deployment of asterisk boxes a breeze.

Brent


On 8/17/05, Sharadindu Mohanty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hey Guys,
   Wanted a Suggestion..Howz this Xorcom Asterisk?I am using it and till now
 its fine as currently it is in testing stage with 3-4 users.
  
 Any Ideas???
  
 Thanks
 
 Sharadindu Mohanty
 
 
 How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE
 with Yahoo! Photos. Get Yahoo! Photos 
 How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE
 with Yahoo! Photos. Get Yahoo! Photos 
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] realtime caching

2005-08-17 Thread Matthew Boehm

We have a web interface where users can update their dialplan online
(not in production yet). The web page modifies the mySQL record.

It seems that some options are not re-read when caching is on, for
example, changing the caller ID value in the sip table has no effect
until a reload (or expiration), so at least in some cases rtcahcefriends
makes realtime notsorealtime.


	No. It is doing exactly what it says it will, cacheing. If you have 
rtcachefriends turned on, when a peer/user registers the info is pulled 
from DB and added to the internal (a la 'in memory') list that chan_sip 
maintains. If you change something in DB after this occurs then your 
changes won't take affect because chan_sip has no need to re-lookup your 
phones info since the info is already present in memory.


	What you can do is use sip prune realtime name to remove just the 
single peer/user from memory. And you can force a reload of that peer 
from realtime by using sip show peer name load.


	If you want pure realtime where chan_sip always pulls from db, then 
turn caching off. Keep in mind that turning caching off will remove MWI 
and NAT functionality.


-Matthew

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] is this possible with asterisk?

2005-08-17 Thread jr

Hello Everyone!

I'm wondering if the following is possible with asterisk...

What i'm trying to do is find a program or a solution that can help me set
appointments for a delivery company...

the program should call a person asking them if the following time is suitable
for a delivery... if they agree, they press one and the system logs it... if
they don't agree they press two, etc...

Also, another thing the system would do, would be to call the person and ask
them a couple of questions and have them rate the service by pressing 1, 2, 3,
etc...

If anybody can point me in the right direction, it would be highly
appreciated...

Thanks!

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] snom hint

2005-08-17 Thread Gerd Mueller
Hi list,

anybody any example how to use it? I did not find any hint in the wiki
nor in the mailinglist archive :-(. 

I want to use one button showing my agents the actual state (logged in
or logged off)

Thank you

Gerd

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] OT: PC network down if plugged in Polycom IP600

2005-08-17 Thread Alexandre Leclerc
Hi all,

I dont know why, but if I plug my PC inside the 'PC' slot on my polycom,
this is not working. (Polycom IP600 is online on the net.)

I'm using normal network cables. (I see jumpers behind the phone... do I
need to play arround with that?)

Any help would be appreciated.

-- 
Alexandre Leclerc

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] is this possible with asterisk?

2005-08-17 Thread Jonathan k. Creasy
Yes, you could do that with Asterisk and Cepstral/Festival.

-Jonathan

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 6:36 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] is this possible with asterisk?

Hello Everyone!

I'm wondering if the following is possible with asterisk...

What i'm trying to do is find a program or a solution that can help me
set
appointments for a delivery company...

the program should call a person asking them if the following time is
suitable
for a delivery... if they agree, they press one and the system logs
it... if
they don't agree they press two, etc...

Also, another thing the system would do, would be to call the person and
ask
them a couple of questions and have them rate the service by pressing 1,
2, 3,
etc...

If anybody can point me in the right direction, it would be highly
appreciated...

Thanks!

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] is this possible with asterisk?

2005-08-17 Thread Tim Pushor
Yes, its possible and not too difficult. You can start here to see what 
you can do with Call Files:


http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+auto-dial+out

And a simple example of this in action is the perl wake up call application:

http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+tips+wake-up

Good luck!
Tim


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hello Everyone!

I'm wondering if the following is possible with asterisk...

What i'm trying to do is find a program or a solution that can help me 
set

appointments for a delivery company...

the program should call a person asking them if the following time is 
suitable
for a delivery... if they agree, they press one and the system logs 
it... if

they don't agree they press two, etc...

Also, another thing the system would do, would be to call the person 
and ask
them a couple of questions and have them rate the service by pressing 
1, 2, 3,

etc...

If anybody can point me in the right direction, it would be highly
appreciated...

Thanks!

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Any one using the new Digium echo cancellation cards

2005-08-17 Thread Alan Bunch
THe wiki doesn't seem to have any user reports. 

If your using them, how are the working, better, worse about the same. 


Also what hardware seems to be stable with them installed.

Alan
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax - RxFax on same machine hangs

2005-08-17 Thread Bartek Kania

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:

Bartek Kania wrote:

If the call really dialed out through a PSTN port and back in it
should work.  It is was a pure internal connection between 2
processes it will not. The timing for these programs comes from the
received data. No data, no work.

I can confirm that this problem appears on a call through the PSTN.
My setup is:
TxFax - Asterisk - E1 - Asterisk (same box) -RxFax
Asterisk version 1.0.9 and spandsp version 0.0.2pre18 on debian woody 
(3.0).

I sent you an email about it with some debug information a week or so ago.
If you need it again, or need some other info I'll be happy to provide it.

Did you put txfax in caller mode?


Yes I did.
This is a snippet from 'show channel' for the two channels:
   Name: Zap/3-1
   Type: Zap
   ...
  Frames in: 5249
 Frames out: 265
 Time to Hangup: 0
   Elapsed Time: 0h1m45s
...
Application: RxFAX
   Data: /tmp/1123753288.12.tif
  Stack: 1
Blocking in: ast_waitfor_nandfds

and

   Name: Zap/28-1
   Type: Zap
   ...
  Frames in: 3123
 Frames out: 430
 Time to Hangup: 0
   Elapsed Time: 0h1m3s
...
Application: TxFAX
   Data:
/usr/local/asterisk/var/spool/asterisk/faxspool//ff-psbj1x.tif|caller|debug
  Stack: 0
Blocking in: ast_waitfor_nandfds

The console seems to indicate that the faxes start to communicate using
the slow modems, and then hang after switching to a fast modem.
Log is attached.

/B
- -- 
* GPG-Key: http://evil.gnarf.org/mrbk.pgp


A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?
- -- http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDA0I5ckvkFeO3ANARAjLJAJ0eXELd2WjzGOy59ptkFEE3kiUJcQCgxF9P
3WgYpTG5b1BfA3yOVk3w9wc=
=lNab
-END PGP SIGNATURE-Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 CSI: 40 35 38 33 20 30 30 30 36 2d 30 34 2d 36 34 2b 20 20 20 20 20
CSI without final frame tag
Remote fax gave CSI as: +xx-xx- xxx
 DIS: 80 00 ce f4 80 80 81 80 80 80 18
DIS with final frame tag
In state 10
DIS:
  Prefer 256 octet blocks
  Can receive fax
  Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29
  R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
  2D coding
  Scan line length: 215mm
  Recording length: Unlimited
  Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
  R8x15.4lines/mm
  Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
  North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm)
  North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm)
DCS:
  Can receive fax
  Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
  2D coding
  Scan line length: 215mm
  Recording length: A4 (297mm)
  Minimum scan line time: 20ms
  Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
Start sending document
Start tx document
Changed from phase 2 to 4
 DCS: 83 00 c6 80 80 80 00
HDLC underflow in state 3
Changed from phase 4 to 6
DCS with final frame tag
In state 9
Coarse carrier frequency 1699.85 (66)
Training error 0.506731
Training succeeded (constellation mismatch 0.703194)
Changed from phase 6 to 3
Slow carrier up
T4 timeout in state 4
Start rx document
Start rx page - compression 2
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: PC network down if plugged in Polycom IP600

2005-08-17 Thread Chris Mason (Lists)

Alexandre Leclerc wrote:


Hi all,

I dont know why, but if I plug my PC inside the 'PC' slot on my polycom,
this is not working. (Polycom IP600 is online on the net.)

I'm using normal network cables. (I see jumpers behind the phone... do I
need to play arround with that?)

Any help would be appreciated.

 

Try a different phone. I have one Polycom IP300 that will take down the 
whole network switch when attached for a few days. I have to return it 
to Polycom.


--
Chris Mason
NetConcepts
(264) 497-5670 Fax: (264) 497-8463
Int:  (305) 704-7249 Fax: (815)301-9759 
Cell: 264-235-5670
Yahoo IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] gnugk and asterisk

2005-08-17 Thread Vedran Dakic








Hello there.



Does anyone have idea how to setup these two to work
together? I'm really going insane with this

combination... Any .conf files or something?



Cheers,

Vedran.






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] SIP message 183 and in band info

2005-08-17 Thread Tomáš Komárek
Hello, I have such a problem. I have an * configured as a peer connected 
to the gateway to PSTN.


While calling to the switched off cell phone, the gateway sends to the * 
the SIP message 180 with the SDP part, and also a lot of rtp packets 
containing the operator's in band info.


But * forwards the 180 to the UAC without the sdp part and also without 
the rtp stream.


Is there any way, how to setup the * dialplan to translate all incoming 
180 SIP messages to 183 with the SDP part and also to forward the rtp 
stream to the UAC??


Thanks for advices...

Tomas
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] is this possible with asterisk?

2005-08-17 Thread Derek Whitten
There is a .php wakeup agi on voip-info too. I don't think it would be
that difficult to modify it to your needs



On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 06:54, Tim Pushor wrote:
 Yes, its possible and not too difficult. You can start here to see what 
 you can do with Call Files:
 
 http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+auto-dial+out
 
 And a simple example of this in action is the perl wake up call application:
 
 http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+tips+wake-up
 
 Good luck!
 Tim
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hello Everyone!
 
  I'm wondering if the following is possible with asterisk...
 
  What i'm trying to do is find a program or a solution that can help me 
  set
  appointments for a delivery company...
 
  the program should call a person asking them if the following time is 
  suitable
  for a delivery... if they agree, they press one and the system logs 
  it... if
  they don't agree they press two, etc...
 
  Also, another thing the system would do, would be to call the person 
  and ask
  them a couple of questions and have them rate the service by pressing 
  1, 2, 3,
  etc...
 
  If anybody can point me in the right direction, it would be highly
  appreciated...
 
  Thanks!
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS/GIT d-@ s+:+ a? C+++ BLHIS$ U+++ P+ L+++ !E W+++$ N++ o+ K w--
PS+++ PE@ Y+ PGP++ t 5? X !R tv+ b- DI-- D G e+ h r+++ y 
 --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail Retrival

2005-08-17 Thread Derek Whitten
you could declare the phone names as variables..

PHONE1=SIP/phone1
PHONE1VM=12345


On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 03:31, Rudolf Ladyzhenskii wrote:
 Hi,
  
 This procedure will work under one condition -- your user names are
 same as your extension numbers. I have same problem. I was giving
 phones alphanumeric user names, like phone1.
 When VoicemailMain is called with ${CALLERIDNUM}, it is actually
 called as VoiceMailMain(phone1). As a result, voice mail is asking
 for a mailbox number which is same as your extension number. (BTW, is
 there a way to extract extension number rather than phone name?).
  
 As I am experimenting with *, I will rename phones to match their
 extensions.
  
 Rudolf
 - Original Message - 
 From: Sharadindu Mohanty
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 8:32 PM
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail Retrival
 
 I did the same way but it is asking for some password and
 mailbox. I think mail box is extension no but what abt
 password?
  
 Can i overide this procedure?
  
 Thanks
 
 Christoph Eicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wednesday 17 August 2005 10:29, Sharadindu Mohanty
 wrote:
  Hi,
 Hi!
 
  Any ideas??
 Yes, I do it in the following way. In extension.conf
 add this line:
 
 exten = ,1,VoiceMailMain(s${CALLERIDNUM})
 exten = ,2,Hangup()
 
 Here any extension can call  and then
 automatically gets directed to their 
 voicemail where they have some options.
 
 I hope this helps,
 
 Christoph
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 Sharadindu Mohanty 
 
 
 __
 To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the
 all new Yahoo! Security Centre.
 
 
 __
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 __
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS/GIT d-@ s+:+ a? C+++ BLHIS$ U+++ P+ L+++ !E W+++$ N++ o+ K w--
PS+++ PE@ Y+ PGP++ t 5? X !R tv+ b- DI-- D G e+ h r+++ y 
 --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] gnugk and asterisk

2005-08-17 Thread Jason Penton
Hey Vedran 

I did this a while ago but to put you on the write track you have to
register your gatekeeper (gnugk) with Asterisk as a gateway specifying a
prefix, let's say for arguments sake '0'. Then any numbers dialled on your
GK-managed H.323 network, that start with a zero, are routed to the gateway
(in this case asterisk)

If you still have problems I may be able to dig up some configs for you??

Cheers
Jason

Jason Penton
PhD Candidate
Department of computer Science
Rhodes University

Tel: +27 46 603 8640
Mobile: +27 82 376 6811
VoIP: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Vedran Dakic
 Sent: 17 August 2005 04:03 PM
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] gnugk and asterisk
 
 Hello there.
 
  
 
 Does anyone have idea how to setup these two to work 
 together? I'm really going insane with this
 
 combination... Any .conf files or something?
 
  
 
 Cheers,
 
 Vedran.
 
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] gnugk and asterisk

2005-08-17 Thread Vedran Dakic
Man, I would really be grateful if you could put me out of my misery and
send me something, I don't know where's anything anymore in the config files
or anything. Too much editing those in the past 16 hours, I guess..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Penton
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 4:19 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] gnugk and asterisk

Hey Vedran 

I did this a while ago but to put you on the write track you have to
register your gatekeeper (gnugk) with Asterisk as a gateway specifying a
prefix, let's say for arguments sake '0'. Then any numbers dialled on your
GK-managed H.323 network, that start with a zero, are routed to the gateway
(in this case asterisk)
If you still have problems I may be able to dig up some configs for you??



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail Retrival

2005-08-17 Thread Damon Estep
There is a different approach to this;

Put a priority 'a' in the extension dialplan that goes to
Voicemmailmain(${EXTEN})

Users then dial there own extension from any location and press the *
key once voicemail picks up.

This method seems to emulate what most people are already used to.

If you have a voicemail button on the phone the other method works as
well, you can use both.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derek Whitten
 Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 8:16 AM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail Retrival
 
 you could declare the phone names as variables..
 
 PHONE1=SIP/phone1
 PHONE1VM=12345
 
 
 On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 03:31, Rudolf Ladyzhenskii wrote:
  Hi,
 
  This procedure will work under one condition -- your user names are
  same as your extension numbers. I have same problem. I was giving
  phones alphanumeric user names, like phone1.
  When VoicemailMain is called with ${CALLERIDNUM}, it is actually
  called as VoiceMailMain(phone1). As a result, voice mail is asking
  for a mailbox number which is same as your extension number. (BTW,
is
  there a way to extract extension number rather than phone name?).
 
  As I am experimenting with *, I will rename phones to match their
  extensions.
 
  Rudolf
  - Original Message -
  From: Sharadindu Mohanty
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
  Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 8:32 PM
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail Retrival
 
  I did the same way but it is asking for some password and
  mailbox. I think mail box is extension no but what abt
  password?
 
  Can i overide this procedure?
 
  Thanks
 
  Christoph Eicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Wednesday 17 August 2005 10:29, Sharadindu
Mohanty
  wrote:
   Hi,
  Hi!
 
   Any ideas??
  Yes, I do it in the following way. In extension.conf
  add this line:
 
  exten = ,1,VoiceMailMain(s${CALLERIDNUM})
  exten = ,2,Hangup()
 
  Here any extension can call  and then
  automatically gets directed to their
  voicemail where they have some options.
 
  I hope this helps,
 
  Christoph
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
  Sharadindu Mohanty
 
 
 
__
  To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the
  all new Yahoo! Security Centre.
 
 
 
__
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
__
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 --
 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
 Version: 3.1
 GCS/GIT d-@ s+:+ a? C+++ BLHIS$ U+++ P+ L+++ !E W+++$ N++ o+ K w--
 PS+++ PE@ Y+ PGP++ t 5? X !R tv+ b- DI-- D G e+ h r+++ y
  --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] OH323 call leg and IAX call leg

2005-08-17 Thread CM Rahman Jr.
Hi,

I am having a strange problem. When ever I made a call, one leg is IAX and 
other leg is OH323. The call establish fine but anybody talking from OH323 leg 
side, I hear broken sound in IAX side. Something is wrong with RTP. Is it 
something do with FRAME set in OH323? if so, what will be the correct set? I am 
using Codec 729 for both call legs. Anybody has any idea on this issue?

Thanks

CM Rahman Jr.
CCS Internet
www.ccsi.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] realtime caching

2005-08-17 Thread Damon Estep
  It seems that some options are not re-read when caching is on, for
  example, changing the caller ID value in the sip table has no effect
  until a reload (or expiration), so at least in some cases
rtcahcefriends
  makes realtime notsorealtime.
 
   No. It is doing exactly what it says it will, cacheing. If you
 have
 rtcachefriends turned on, when a peer/user registers the info is
pulled
 from DB and added to the internal (a la 'in memory') list that
chan_sip
 maintains. If you change something in DB after this occurs then your
 changes won't take affect because chan_sip has no need to re-lookup
your
 phones info since the info is already present in memory.
 
   What you can do is use sip prune realtime name to remove
just
 the
 single peer/user from memory. And you can force a reload of that peer
 from realtime by using sip show peer name load.
 
   If you want pure realtime where chan_sip always pulls from db,
then
 turn caching off. Keep in mind that turning caching off will remove
MWI
 and NAT functionality.
 
 -Matthew
 
What would it take (you, $) to add functionality that is a cross between
caching and not, that is it caches with a flag in the extension, so if
the flag is present realtime will be queried even though the extension
is in cache when a new call comes IN TO that extension.

Outgoing calls would not really need a re-query unless something about
the provisioning of the phone changes, at which point it would
re-register anyways, right?

The goal is caching for MWI and NAT but realtime for calling, so the
database is checked on every inbound call in case the dialplan changed,
and the cache updated accordingly.

Maybe a TTL flag, and when the TTL expires the cache entry stays, but is
re-queried when a dialplan match is found. The admin could then tune the
performance by setting different TTLs, maybe 15 minutes for lightly
loaded systems, 4 hours for heavy loaded systems.

Dynamic updates take place in whatever timeframe is specified on the TTL
or less.

Have I missed something, is this functionality already present?

Damon
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] realtime caching

2005-08-17 Thread Damon Estep
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Damon Estep
 Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 9:00 AM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] realtime caching
 
   It seems that some options are not re-read when caching is on, for
   example, changing the caller ID value in the sip table has no
effect
   until a reload (or expiration), so at least in some cases
 rtcahcefriends
   makes realtime notsorealtime.
 
  No. It is doing exactly what it says it will, cacheing. If you
  have
  rtcachefriends turned on, when a peer/user registers the info is
 pulled
  from DB and added to the internal (a la 'in memory') list that
 chan_sip
  maintains. If you change something in DB after this occurs then your
  changes won't take affect because chan_sip has no need to re-lookup
 your
  phones info since the info is already present in memory.
 
  What you can do is use sip prune realtime name to remove
 just
  the
  single peer/user from memory. And you can force a reload of that
peer
  from realtime by using sip show peer name load.
 
  If you want pure realtime where chan_sip always pulls from db,
 then
  turn caching off. Keep in mind that turning caching off will remove
 MWI
  and NAT functionality.
 
  -Matthew
 
 What would it take (you, $) to add functionality that is a cross
between
 caching and not, that is it caches with a flag in the extension, so if
 the flag is present realtime will be queried even though the extension
 is in cache when a new call comes IN TO that extension.
 
 Outgoing calls would not really need a re-query unless something about
 the provisioning of the phone changes, at which point it would
 re-register anyways, right?
 
 The goal is caching for MWI and NAT but realtime for calling, so the
 database is checked on every inbound call in case the dialplan
changed,
 and the cache updated accordingly.
 
 Maybe a TTL flag, and when the TTL expires the cache entry stays, but
is
 re-queried when a dialplan match is found. The admin could then tune
the
 performance by setting different TTLs, maybe 15 minutes for lightly
 loaded systems, 4 hours for heavy loaded systems.
 
 Dynamic updates take place in whatever timeframe is specified on the
TTL
 or less.
 
 Have I missed something, is this functionality already present?
 
 Damon
 ___


I may have answered my own question, is it true that realtime extensions
are still queried every call, and only chan_sip is effected by
rtcachefriends?

Damon
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax - RxFax on same machine hangs

2005-08-17 Thread Craig Guy
Hi Bartek, I posted the exact same problem last week - I found that if I 
connected two Asterisk systems together via a PRI crossover cable and talk 
txfax to rxfax then you get a T4 state timeout.  I tried connecting ports 
one and two together on a TE410p and also connecting a TE410p to a TE110p, 
and a TE110p to a TE110p on different machines.  I also found this when 
looping back via the PSTN.  I read up a bit on what T4 actually is, and it 
seems to be a pretty high level state, where the faxes are transferring or 
about to transfer the tiff image data between themselves.  The faxes will 
eventually hangup on each other - if you do a zap destroy channel to force 
hangup then you will sometimes get a segfault and asterisk will crash.


I haven't found a solution for it, but it's not a big problem for me as I 
was only going txfax to rxfax as part of testing something else and I am 
using a hardfax attached to a SIP ata instead that works just fine against 
both rxfax and txfax.


Craig

- Original Message - 
From: Bartek Kania [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax - RxFax on same machine hangs



-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:

Bartek Kania wrote:

If the call really dialed out through a PSTN port and back in it
should work.  It is was a pure internal connection between 2
processes it will not. The timing for these programs comes from the
received data. No data, no work.

I can confirm that this problem appears on a call through the PSTN.
My setup is:
TxFax - Asterisk - E1 - Asterisk (same box) -RxFax
Asterisk version 1.0.9 and spandsp version 0.0.2pre18 on debian woody
(3.0).
I sent you an email about it with some debug information a week or so 
ago.
If you need it again, or need some other info I'll be happy to provide 
it.

Did you put txfax in caller mode?


Yes I did.
This is a snippet from 'show channel' for the two channels:
   Name: Zap/3-1
   Type: Zap
...
  Frames in: 5249
 Frames out: 265
 Time to Hangup: 0
   Elapsed Time: 0h1m45s
 ...
Application: RxFAX
   Data: /tmp/1123753288.12.tif
  Stack: 1
Blocking in: ast_waitfor_nandfds

and

   Name: Zap/28-1
   Type: Zap
...
  Frames in: 3123
 Frames out: 430
 Time to Hangup: 0
   Elapsed Time: 0h1m3s
 ...
Application: TxFAX
   Data:
/usr/local/asterisk/var/spool/asterisk/faxspool//ff-psbj1x.tif|caller|debug
  Stack: 0
Blocking in: ast_waitfor_nandfds

The console seems to indicate that the faxes start to communicate using
the slow modems, and then hang after switching to a fast modem.
Log is attached.

/B
- -- 
* GPG-Key: http://evil.gnarf.org/mrbk.pgp


A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?
- -- http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDA0I5ckvkFeO3ANARAjLJAJ0eXELd2WjzGOy59ptkFEE3kiUJcQCgxF9P
3WgYpTG5b1BfA3yOVk3w9wc=
=lNab
-END PGP SIGNATURE-







___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Automatic start with SuSe linux

2005-08-17 Thread James Oakley
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 7:27 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi!
 I'm trying to start asterisk at boottime. Since SuSe has no rc.local like
 in Redhat linux, I need asterisk starting script to /etc/init.d/rc3.d
 -directory (I assume it is like that if i want automated asterisk startup).
 Do you have any experience how this is implemented in SuSe, and if you have
 some useful script for starting asterisk, I would be very, i mean VERY
 pleased?

To make it start on boot:

insserv asterisk

Start it immediately with:

rcasterisk start

-- 
James Oakley
Engineering - SolutionInc Ltd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.solutioninc.com

++
This e-mail is CONFIDENTIAL and contains information intended only for the
person(s) named. Any other distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me
immediately at 902 420 0077 or reply by e-mail to the sender and destroy
the original communication.
Thank You.
++
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] PLEASE REPLY, are you using an X101P

2005-08-17 Thread Douglas Logan
If you don't mind sharing, what was the vendor that worked great? Thanks!

On 8/17/05, VoIP Newbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I bought 3 from 3 different vendors. One of them has echo issue.
 Another one has an issue regarding PCI master abort. Only one really
 works fine for me. These 3 cards use AMBIENT chip but with different
 layouts and SLICs.
 
 On 8/4/05, Mark Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  X101P with Ambient md3200 chip on it, with the zaptel wcfxo driver
  Just an indication of how many people have got this to work would be
  useful.
 
  Cheers
 
  Mark.
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] realtime caching

2005-08-17 Thread Jimmy Smith
pruning breaks asterisk on high loads

at least on all 5 of our servers.

all using different versions and custom.




What you can do is use sip prune realtime name to remove just the
single peer/user from memory. And you can force a reload of that peer
from realtime by using sip show peer name load.



On 8/17/05, Damon Estep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   It seems that some options are not re-read when caching is on, for
   example, changing the caller ID value in the sip table has no effect
   until a reload (or expiration), so at least in some cases
 rtcahcefriends
   makes realtime notsorealtime.
 
No. It is doing exactly what it says it will, cacheing. If you
  have
  rtcachefriends turned on, when a peer/user registers the info is
 pulled
  from DB and added to the internal (a la 'in memory') list that
 chan_sip
  maintains. If you change something in DB after this occurs then your
  changes won't take affect because chan_sip has no need to re-lookup
 your
  phones info since the info is already present in memory.
 
What you can do is use sip prune realtime name to remove
 just
  the
  single peer/user from memory. And you can force a reload of that peer
  from realtime by using sip show peer name load.
 
If you want pure realtime where chan_sip always pulls from db,
 then
  turn caching off. Keep in mind that turning caching off will remove
 MWI
  and NAT functionality.
 
  -Matthew
 
 What would it take (you, $) to add functionality that is a cross between
 caching and not, that is it caches with a flag in the extension, so if
 the flag is present realtime will be queried even though the extension
 is in cache when a new call comes IN TO that extension.
 
 Outgoing calls would not really need a re-query unless something about
 the provisioning of the phone changes, at which point it would
 re-register anyways, right?
 
 The goal is caching for MWI and NAT but realtime for calling, so the
 database is checked on every inbound call in case the dialplan changed,
 and the cache updated accordingly.
 
 Maybe a TTL flag, and when the TTL expires the cache entry stays, but is
 re-queried when a dialplan match is found. The admin could then tune the
 performance by setting different TTLs, maybe 15 minutes for lightly
 loaded systems, 4 hours for heavy loaded systems.
 
 Dynamic updates take place in whatever timeframe is specified on the TTL
 or less.
 
 Have I missed something, is this functionality already present?
 
 Damon
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Voicemail crashes asterisk

2005-08-17 Thread Hall, Eric M.
When a user dial voicemail and just hangs up or enters the wrong
password 3 times asterisk will crash.

We are using Cisco 7960G with SIP 
My asterisk is CVS-HEAD built on 2005-08-02 23:47:59 UTC

Any help would be great!!!


Thanks

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: PC network down if plugged in Polycom IP600

2005-08-17 Thread Alexandre Leclerc
Chris Mason (Lists) a écrit :
 Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
 
 Hi all,

 I dont know why, but if I plug my PC inside the 'PC' slot on my polycom,
 this is not working. (Polycom IP600 is online on the net.)

 I'm using normal network cables. (I see jumpers behind the phone... do I
 need to play arround with that?)

 Any help would be appreciated.

  

 Try a different phone. I have one Polycom IP300 that will take down the
 whole network switch when attached for a few days. I have to return it
 to Polycom.
 

I only bought one to test before buying some more... :) But thanks for
this hint. I'll contact Polycom.

Regards.

-- 
Alexandre Leclerc
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] snom hint

2005-08-17 Thread Tom Hayden
It's in the wiki:
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20phone%20snom

About halfway down the page where it says:  SNOM SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY
support for monitoring extension states

--
Tom Hayden
Astoria Telecom, LLC
www.astoriatelecom.net

On 8/17/05, Gerd Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi list,
 
 anybody any example how to use it? I did not find any hint in the wiki
 nor in the mailinglist archive :-(.
 
 I want to use one button showing my agents the actual state (logged in
 or logged off)
 
 Thank you
 
 Gerd
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


-- 
Tom
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail crashes asterisk

2005-08-17 Thread Damon Estep
It was fixed a while ago, download new code. There is a bug in the
tracker on it.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hall, Eric M.
 Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 9:23 AM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail crashes asterisk
 
 When a user dial voicemail and just hangs up or enters the wrong
 password 3 times asterisk will crash.
 
 We are using Cisco 7960G with SIP
 My asterisk is CVS-HEAD built on 2005-08-02 23:47:59 UTC
 
 Any help would be great!!!
 
 
 Thanks
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] problems with eyebeam - video phone

2005-08-17 Thread Jimmy Smith
quickly this looks like a incompatible codec.. or unrecognized..

show codecs on CLI

show show 
 262144 (1  18)  (0x4)  videoh261   (H.261 Video)
 524288 (1  19)  (0x8)  videoh263   (H.263 Video)
1048576 (1  20) (0x10)  video   h263p   (H.263+ Video)
does it ?

On 8/17/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thank you for your answer.
 I didn't register on the domain of the Eyebeam software, actually I don't
 understand how to do that!
 I bouught 5 eyebeam activation keys and I am trying with the first 2 of
 them
 
 On the Eyebeam side (both eyebeam), I only enabled the Basic H.263 codec,
 no other.
 
 If, on the asterisk side in sip.conf, I put the gsm codec BEFORE h263, the
 two video phone speak without any problem (but without any video)
 If, on the asterisk side in sip.conf, I put the gsm codec AFTER h263, the
 first video phone call the second, the second answer and immediately
 the call ends.
 
 If Ilook at /var/log/asterisk/full, I see:
 
 Aug 17 08:37:06 VERBOSE[14731]: -- AGI Script dialparties.agi
 completed, returning 0
 Aug 17 08:37:06 VERBOSE[14731]: -- Executing Dial(SIP/551-eac0,
 SIP/552|25|tr) in new stack
 Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[14731]: SIMPLE DIAL (NO URL)
 Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[14731]: Setting NAT on RTP to 0
 Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[14731]: Setting NAT on VRTP to 0
 Aug 17 08:37:06 WARNING[14731]: Don't know any of 0x8 formats
 Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[14731]: Outgoing Call for 552
 Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[14731]: Call from user '552' is 1 out of 0
 Aug 17 08:37:06 VERBOSE[14731]: -- Called 552
 Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[13529]: (Provisional) Stopping retransmission (but
 retaining packet) on '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Request 102: Found
 Aug 17 08:37:06 VERBOSE[14731]: -- SIP/552-ff46 is ringing
 Aug 17 08:37:10 DEBUG[13529]: Acked pending invite 102
 Aug 17 08:37:10 DEBUG[13529]: Stopping retransmission on
 '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' of Request 102: Found
 Aug 17 08:37:10 DEBUG[13529]: build_route: Contact hop:
 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
 Aug 17 08:37:10 VERBOSE[14731]: -- SIP/552-ff46 answered SIP/551-eac0
 Aug 17 08:37:10 WARNING[14731]: No path to translate from SIP/551-eac0(2)
 to SIP/552-ff46(524288)
 Aug 17 08:37:10 WARNING[14731]: Had to drop call because I couldn't make
 SIP/551-eac0 compatible with SIP/552-ff46
 Aug 17 08:37:10 DEBUG[14731]: update_user_counter(552) - decrement outUse
 counter
 
 
 It seems the problem documented in bug
 http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0003709
 but actually it is not exactly the same.
 
 moreover: is there any way to put the patch described in
 http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0003709 (enable H263p in *)
 in asterisk 1.0.9 and not asterisk CVS HEAD ?
 
 Any help will be greatly appreciated.
 
 Andrea
 
 
 
 
 Carlos Alperin
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 om.netTo
 Sent by:  'Asterisk Users Mailing List -
 asterisk-users-bo Non-Commercial Discussion'
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 m.com  cc
 
   Subject
 16/08/2005 20.48  RE: [Asterisk-Users] problems with
   eyebeam - video phone
 
 Please respond to
  Asterisk Users
  Mailing List -
  Non-Commercial
Discussion
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ists.digium.com
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I get Eyebeam working with an older version of Asterisk 1.0.2(I believe). I
 only use H.263 and SIP. (G.729)
 
 Now, the more important question is if you register on the domain on the
 Eyebeam software. I found that this was the full secret about this.
 
 Let me know your configuration on the Eyebeam side.
 
 Regards,
 
 Carlos Alperin
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 11:28 AM
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] problems with eyebeam - video phone
 
 I am trying to connect two Xten eyeBeam Video Phone
 
 No problems in voice connecting.
 
 I tryed to modify my sip.conf
 
 [general]
 language=it
 videosupport=yes
 ; enable Asterisk video support
 
 port = 5060   ; Port to bind to (SIP is 5060)
 bindaddr = 0.0.0.0; Address to bind to (all addresses on machine)
 disallow=all
 allow=h263
 allow=gsm
 allow=ulaw
 allow=alaw
 ; H.263 is our video codec
 ; allow=h263p
 ; H.263p is the enhanced video codec
 context = from-sip-external ; Send unknown SIP callers to this context
 callerid = Unknown
 
 #include sip_nat.conf
 #include sip_custom.conf
 #include sip_additional.conf
 
 And I left only H.263 basic in codec's configuration in Video Phone.
 No chance to get the communication 

Re: [Asterisk-Users] problems with eyebeam - video phone

2005-08-17 Thread Jimmy Smith
Aug 17 08:37:06 WARNING[14731]: Don't know any of 0x8 formats

is from what you pasted btw..

Don't know any of 0x8 formats 

is
524288 (1  19)  (0x8)  videoh263   (H.263 Video)

meaning it downst understand it or find it



On 8/17/05, Jimmy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 quickly this looks like a incompatible codec.. or unrecognized..
 
 show codecs on CLI
 
 show show
  262144 (1  18)  (0x4)  videoh261   (H.261 Video)
 524288 (1  19)  (0x8)  videoh263   (H.263 Video)
1048576 (1  20) (0x10)  video   h263p   (H.263+ Video)
 does it ?
 
 On 8/17/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thank you for your answer.
  I didn't register on the domain of the Eyebeam software, actually I don't
  understand how to do that!
  I bouught 5 eyebeam activation keys and I am trying with the first 2 of
  them
 
  On the Eyebeam side (both eyebeam), I only enabled the Basic H.263 codec,
  no other.
 
  If, on the asterisk side in sip.conf, I put the gsm codec BEFORE h263, the
  two video phone speak without any problem (but without any video)
  If, on the asterisk side in sip.conf, I put the gsm codec AFTER h263, the
  first video phone call the second, the second answer and immediately
  the call ends.
 
  If Ilook at /var/log/asterisk/full, I see:
  
  Aug 17 08:37:06 VERBOSE[14731]: -- AGI Script dialparties.agi
  completed, returning 0
  Aug 17 08:37:06 VERBOSE[14731]: -- Executing Dial(SIP/551-eac0,
  SIP/552|25|tr) in new stack
  Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[14731]: SIMPLE DIAL (NO URL)
  Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[14731]: Setting NAT on RTP to 0
  Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[14731]: Setting NAT on VRTP to 0
  Aug 17 08:37:06 WARNING[14731]: Don't know any of 0x8 formats
  Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[14731]: Outgoing Call for 552
  Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[14731]: Call from user '552' is 1 out of 0
  Aug 17 08:37:06 VERBOSE[14731]: -- Called 552
  Aug 17 08:37:06 DEBUG[13529]: (Provisional) Stopping retransmission (but
  retaining packet) on '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
  Request 102: Found
  Aug 17 08:37:06 VERBOSE[14731]: -- SIP/552-ff46 is ringing
  Aug 17 08:37:10 DEBUG[13529]: Acked pending invite 102
  Aug 17 08:37:10 DEBUG[13529]: Stopping retransmission on
  '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' of Request 102: Found
  Aug 17 08:37:10 DEBUG[13529]: build_route: Contact hop:
  sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
  Aug 17 08:37:10 VERBOSE[14731]: -- SIP/552-ff46 answered SIP/551-eac0
  Aug 17 08:37:10 WARNING[14731]: No path to translate from SIP/551-eac0(2)
  to SIP/552-ff46(524288)
  Aug 17 08:37:10 WARNING[14731]: Had to drop call because I couldn't make
  SIP/551-eac0 compatible with SIP/552-ff46
  Aug 17 08:37:10 DEBUG[14731]: update_user_counter(552) - decrement outUse
  counter
 
 
  It seems the problem documented in bug
  http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0003709
  but actually it is not exactly the same.
 
  moreover: is there any way to put the patch described in
  http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0003709 (enable H263p in *)
  in asterisk 1.0.9 and not asterisk CVS HEAD ?
 
  Any help will be greatly appreciated.
 
  Andrea
 
 
 
 
  Carlos Alperin
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  om.netTo
  Sent by:  'Asterisk Users Mailing List -
  asterisk-users-bo Non-Commercial Discussion'
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
  m.com  cc
 
Subject
  16/08/2005 20.48  RE: [Asterisk-Users] problems with
eyebeam - video phone
 
  Please respond to
   Asterisk Users
   Mailing List -
   Non-Commercial
 Discussion
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ists.digium.com
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Hi,
 
  I get Eyebeam working with an older version of Asterisk 1.0.2(I believe). I
  only use H.263 and SIP. (G.729)
 
  Now, the more important question is if you register on the domain on the
  Eyebeam software. I found that this was the full secret about this.
 
  Let me know your configuration on the Eyebeam side.
 
  Regards,
 
  Carlos Alperin
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 11:28 AM
  To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
  Subject: [Asterisk-Users] problems with eyebeam - video phone
 
  I am trying to connect two Xten eyeBeam Video Phone
 
  No problems in voice connecting.
 
  I tryed to modify my sip.conf
 
  [general]
  language=it
  videosupport=yes
  ; enable Asterisk video support
 
  port = 5060   ; Port to bind to (SIP is 5060)
  bindaddr = 0.0.0.0; Address to bind to (all addresses on machine)
  disallow=all
  allow=h263
  

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Automatic start with SuSe linux

2005-08-17 Thread Stefan Tichy
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 02:11:09PM +0100, Angus Comber wrote:
 You could just add the line asterisk to /etc/init.d/boot.local

Excerpt from /etc/init.d/boot.local


# Here you should add things, that should happen directly after
# booting
# before we're going to the first run level.


Do not attempt to start asterisk here.


There is some SuSE asterisk rpm available for SuSE 9.3.
It is asterisk 1.0.6, but you can extract the boot script without
installing anything else.

rpm2cpio asterisk-1.0.6-4.i586.rpm | cpio -i -d -v './etc/init.d/asterisk'


Modify the script and copy it to /etc/init.d/. SuSE program insserv
can be used to add the symlinks to /etc/init.d/rc3.d/ directory.


-- 
Stefan Tichy   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] DID on TDM400P Question?

2005-08-17 Thread Howard Leadmon

 Does anyone know if the current TDM400 card can take DID digits from the LEC?
If so is there any reference to how to set this all up?  As I get my current
service from my LEC over an IAD, so would be sweet to just have trunks, not
each channel specific to a number.

 Also if the above is possible, if the line is being used for DID, then is
this only workable for inbound, or can I also seize the line and use it for
outbound calls.  I know with PRI's that is easy, but never had to play with
this on an analog port level.  Just having a PRI at home isn't practical, so
not something I can really do.

 Any input, or ideas on this would be most appreciated..   Thanks...


---
Howard Leadmon
http://www.leadmon.net



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] realtime caching

2005-08-17 Thread Matthew Boehm

Damon Estep wrote:


I may have answered my own question, is it true that realtime extensions
are still queried every call, and only chan_sip is effected by
rtcachefriends?

Damon


	True. RealTime Exensions are queried every time. There is no caching of 
extensions.


If you turn on debug log, you can watch each query.

-Matthew

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] realtime caching

2005-08-17 Thread Matthew Boehm

Jimmy Smith wrote:

pruning breaks asterisk on high loads

at least on all 5 of our servers.

all using different versions and custom.


	You should bug report this if you have a backtrace. Kevin and I worked 
on the pruning stuff (well, he coded and i tested) for a while and 
seemedly got it working.


-Matthew

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP agent phone w/ headset

2005-08-17 Thread Colin Stefani
Thanks for the feedback

Just for a background, one of the reasons for redundancy (notice the
quotes ;-) is that the PC is setup as a kiosk style application in which
we do a shell replacement with the Windows Explorer, so instead of a
desktop, the user gets a dedicated application which is very thin
client like. The reason we're wary of integrating voice in this
application, which is certainly doable with one of the various SDK's out
there, is that we also host an Oracle forms client interface as part of
this and this thing is a big ol' pig and screws up the PC on a regular
basis (it's not my product so there's not much I can do but cope with
it).

Anyway, the users are very low level users and do not know much about
PC's, so at the slightest hint of an issue they just punch the reset
button on the pc and reboot it (or unplug it, or...you get the idea).

Yes, your assumptions are correct in that these agents are in a
receive only situation, with very limited call function capabilities.
The end goal is that the software client running on the PC will be able
to control the extension and act like a manager for that phone unit. I'm
probably asking to stretch what is out in the market right now, but I'd
be remiss for not looking.

Most likely, we'll end up with a soft phone embedded in the client
software, but I'm not looking forward to dealing with USB headsets.


Colin Stefani
Tideworks Technology

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michiel
van Baak
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 4:23 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP agent phone w/ headset

On 16:01, Tue 16 Aug 05, Colin Stefani wrote:
 I have a call center where we're looking at converting it from a
 traditional PBX w/ digital phone agent sets (keyless phones) that
have
 headsets to a SIP based environment.
 
 I am having trouble finding anything on the market that resembles this
 in the VoIP world.
 
 For reference, we're currently using Inter-Tel Agent Sets, which are
 basically a digital phone with out any keypad, buttons or handset,
just
 a line input and a headset jack. I need the equivalent.
 
 I know the first thing you think is why don't you use the agent's PC
as
 the VoIP client and do a softphone, however I need to protect the
caller
 from getting cut off should the PC crash/die/etc. While paranoid it's
 something where a regular endpoint like an ATA or SIP phone would be
the
 best option.

SIP phones and ATA's can die too.
* can die too
heck even your power can go down (hurricane, terrorist
attack, etc, etc)

A properly configured pc with a softfone can be as stable as
a normal phone, it all depends what the users are doing with
it (I have had bad experience with pc's where users can
install their own stuff etc).
I have a workstation with an uptime of over 500 days. This
email was written on it.

The problem will be the 'without keyped, buttons or
handset'. I'm not aware of a SIP device that has only a line
button and a headset and nothing else.
Judging on the setup you outlined, the agents are not able
to transfer the call to admin/other_user/parking_slot. They
are only able to receive calls, and that's all.

If so, you can create them as 'user' only in sip.conf
That way they are only able to receive calls, but not make
calls. The interface to * is something you choose.
Of course phones/ATA's are less error-sensitive as pc's,
cause you can configure them. Just make sure noone can guess
the username/password for the ATA/phone config interface.

Hope this helps,
-- 
Michiel van Baak
http://michiel.vanbaak.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x7E0B9A2D

Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called
users?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Avaya 4602 SIP Internal Dial Plan

2005-08-17 Thread Leonardo Gomes Figueira

Hi,

I'm trying to disable the internal dial plan of an Avaya 4602 with SIP 
firmware 1.1 but couldn't find how to do it.


Even if I configure a custom Dial Plan it keeps adding other builtin 
rules to my dial plan.


Ex:

Configured dial plan:

DialPlan19xx|7[8-9]xx|0xxx+

Reboot. On the syslog it shows:

Aug 17 12:42:12 192.168.0.115 DigitMap: 
19xx|7[8-9]xx|0xxx+|xx+*|xx+#|*0[1-9]|*1[0-9]|*2[0-5]|*6[0189]|*7[0-35]|*74


The phone mix my dial plan with this rules:

xx+*|xx+#|*0[1-9]|*1[0-9]|*2[0-5]|*6[0189]|*7[0-35]|*74

Anyone knows how to disable this ?

No info on Administrator's Guide about this hardcoded dial plan :)


Thanks,

Leonardo

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] New Astmanproxy Mailing List, and New Version 1.11

2005-08-17 Thread David C. Troy


Greetings --

Many of you have downloaded and tried out Astmanproxy, a multi-threaded 
C-based proxy for Asterisk's Manager Interface.  It has been under 
development since April 2005 and was presented at the Madrid Astricon in 
June, and will also be presented at Astricon in Anaheim in October.


There has been interest in setting up an Astmanproxy mailing list 
specifically devoted to discussion of astmanproxy and general Asterisk API 
topics.  This list is now ready to use!


Astmanproxy Mailing List

Subscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Post message:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Additionally, a new version of Astmanproxy (1.11) is now available from 
www.popvox.com/astmanproxy .  A couple of small bugs are fixed, and a few 
new features have been added.


Astmanproxy can communicate with multiple Asterisk servers, and can act as 
a single point of contact for your applications to communicate with 
Asterisk.  Multiple input/output formats are supported, including 
Standard, XML, HTTP, and CSV.  All I/O handlers are implemented via 
an extensible interface to allow for easy support of new formats.


Long term, astmanproxy is intended to serve as a central piece of glue 
between Asterisk servers and applications, and is a good structure in 
which to implement new APIs.  Astmanproxy takes load off of Asterisk by 
communicating with your applications and leaving Asterisk free to do what 
it does best, telephony.


Please join in the Astmanproxy discussion and let us know what features 
you'd like to see added!


Regards,
David Troy

--
David C. Troy
President/CEO
popvox, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Any success with Polycom DHCP VLAN discovery?

2005-08-17 Thread Tim Nyce

Greetings.

Has anyone made this work with BootROM 2.6.2 and app 1.5.2?

I've tried sending DHCP options 128, 144, 157 and 191 containing a 
single digit (the VLAN ID) with the phone's 'Fixed' setting for DHCP VLAN 
discovery. Different DHCP data types don't seem to help, as I've tested 
with raw bytes, ASCII and 16-bit unsigned ints to no avail.


Setting the phone's option to 'Custom' and using option 129 hasn't worked, 
nor has enabling the CDP option (totally different, I realize).


Any suggestions?

Thanks,
Tim
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] canreinvite in sip.conf

2005-08-17 Thread Giordano Grandis








Hi,

Im using asterisk 1.0.6 and I would let media path be connected directly between the
phones without going through Asterisk. I have to it with an AtCom320 (with
pa168s chip).

I just saw and tryied to
do what this page http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk:%20Letting%20SIP%20clients%20connect%20directly
says.

Before going on (with
sniffer eth traffic between * and two phones) Id like to known if it can
works. Does anyone just did it?



Thanks in advance



Gio








___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Iaxy Distinctive Ring

2005-08-17 Thread Clint Guillot

Is there a way to cause an Iaxy to do distinctive ring?

Clint

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Can not dial more then 23 calls

2005-08-17 Thread Tarpo, Louie
It looks like you are sending calls out over one port.  To help you out, we 
will need to look at your extensions.conf and zapata.conf.  My hunch is that 
you are dialing out using something like 
Dial(zap/g3/${EXTEN},20,) where the group of channels you're using is on one 
port of your Digium card.

If my math is right, you should be able to send 69 calls long distance, and 23 
local calls at a time with no failover.

Louie Tarpo
Adam Aircraft

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pudenz,
Duane 
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 12:53 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Can not dial more then 23 calls


We are testing our Asterisk server prior to deployment.  The server has
a 4 port T1 Digium adapter (WCT4XXP) with 3 Long Distance (LD) T1s and
one PRI for local calls.

We are using sipp from two different stations routing a test number out
the LD lines and another test number out the PRI line.

We can not get more then 23 total active calls to connect to the test
numbers, the test numbers terminate to another PBX that we can monitor.
We have dialed out using cell phones to this other PBX while the test is
happening and it connects, meaning it has more then 23 active calls on
it.

If we place more then 23 calls then it seems to 'queue' the extra calls,
though not all of the extra calls complete after we stop adding new
calls.  They seem to get stuck in a queue or lost.  We will send 200
calls through the Asterisk server and all but about 20 do eventually
complete.  Those 20 or so are stuck as Asterisk thinks the channels are
busy with the calls when in fact there are no 'real' calls on the
server.

We can send 30 calls through the LD or PRI and only 23 are actually
connected at a time.  We can send 30 calls to both LD and PRI at the
same time and still only a mixture of 23 calls are actually active at
one time.

So our issue seems to be located in our Asterisk server.  Is there a way
to limit or throttle an Asterisk server so that it will not place more
then 'x' calls?  

We need to be able to support 48 calls.

Any ideas?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Iaxy Distinctive Ring

2005-08-17 Thread Andrès Tello Abrego
I will answer you, the same somebody told me at IIRC. 
 
A watch has more processor power than a Iaxy... 
 
So, in few words: No. 
 
I already tried to have a lot ot things (callpickup, distinctive ring, 
changing the time of flash pulse) and nothing... 

El Miércoles, 17 de Agosto de 2005 11:33, Clint Guillot escribió:
 Is there a way to cause an Iaxy to do distinctive ring?

 Clint

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Iaxy Distinctive Ring

2005-08-17 Thread Yoann Le Bihan
2005/8/17, Andrès Tello Abrego [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 I will answer you, the same somebody told me at IIRC.
 
 A watch has more processor power than a Iaxy...

Uuuuh... well, I feel stupid but... what is the meaning of laxy ?
'cause... a watch... ;o)))
sorry for my ignorance...

Best regards,

YLB.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP agent phone w/ headset

2005-08-17 Thread Tom Rymes

Colin,

Is there any reason why you couldn't just set up a T1 card and  
channel banks (as many as needed) and use your exisiting agent  
phones via zap channels?


Tom

On Aug 17, 2005, at 11:59 AM, Colin Stefani wrote:


Thanks for the feedback

Just for a background, one of the reasons for redundancy (notice the
quotes ;-) is that the PC is setup as a kiosk style application in  
which

we do a shell replacement with the Windows Explorer, so instead of a
desktop, the user gets a dedicated application which is very thin
client like. The reason we're wary of integrating voice in this
application, which is certainly doable with one of the various  
SDK's out
there, is that we also host an Oracle forms client interface as  
part of

this and this thing is a big ol' pig and screws up the PC on a regular
basis (it's not my product so there's not much I can do but cope with
it).

Anyway, the users are very low level users and do not know much about
PC's, so at the slightest hint of an issue they just punch the reset
button on the pc and reboot it (or unplug it, or...you get the idea).

Yes, your assumptions are correct in that these agents are in a
receive only situation, with very limited call function capabilities.
The end goal is that the software client running on the PC will be  
able
to control the extension and act like a manager for that phone  
unit. I'm
probably asking to stretch what is out in the market right now, but  
I'd

be remiss for not looking.

Most likely, we'll end up with a soft phone embedded in the client
software, but I'm not looking forward to dealing with USB headsets.


Colin Stefani
Tideworks Technology

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michiel
van Baak
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 4:23 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP agent phone w/ headset

On 16:01, Tue 16 Aug 05, Colin Stefani wrote:


I have a call center where we're looking at converting it from a
traditional PBX w/ digital phone agent sets (keyless phones) that


have


headsets to a SIP based environment.

I am having trouble finding anything on the market that resembles  
this

in the VoIP world.

For reference, we're currently using Inter-Tel Agent Sets, which are
basically a digital phone with out any keypad, buttons or handset,


just


a line input and a headset jack. I need the equivalent.

I know the first thing you think is why don't you use the agent's PC


as


the VoIP client and do a softphone, however I need to protect the


caller


from getting cut off should the PC crash/die/etc. While paranoid it's
something where a regular endpoint like an ATA or SIP phone would be


the


best option.



SIP phones and ATA's can die too.
* can die too
heck even your power can go down (hurricane, terrorist
attack, etc, etc)

A properly configured pc with a softfone can be as stable as
a normal phone, it all depends what the users are doing with
it (I have had bad experience with pc's where users can
install their own stuff etc).
I have a workstation with an uptime of over 500 days. This
email was written on it.

The problem will be the 'without keyped, buttons or
handset'. I'm not aware of a SIP device that has only a line
button and a headset and nothing else.
Judging on the setup you outlined, the agents are not able
to transfer the call to admin/other_user/parking_slot. They
are only able to receive calls, and that's all.

If so, you can create them as 'user' only in sip.conf
That way they are only able to receive calls, but not make
calls. The interface to * is something you choose.
Of course phones/ATA's are less error-sensitive as pc's,
cause you can configure them. Just make sure noone can guess
the username/password for the ATA/phone config interface.

Hope this helps,
--
Michiel van Baak
http://michiel.vanbaak.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup? 
op=getsearch=0x7E0B9A2D


Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called
users?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] (no subject)

2005-08-17 Thread chawki hammoud
Hi:

I was running TDM12B. Both FXS and FXO were working
fine. Then all of the sudden FXS had problems. When I
pick-up the phone and dial any number, FXS doesn't
respond. I just keep hearing the normal signaling line
tone comming from the FXS. I changed the FXS module
and it had the same problem. I changed the the TDM
card and installed different FXS and nothing changed.

I appreciate any suggestions.






Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Xten Digum TDP FXO card: No sound

2005-08-17 Thread Andrès Tello Abrego
I have a tdm 3xfxs and 1xfxo, aslo I have a setting with 1 snom 190 and 2 xten 
line. 
 
I can call from the snom to the ptsn line at the fxo port ok.
I can call from the ptsn to the xten lite phone.
I can call from the xten lite to snom 
but 
what I CAN`T do is; 
Call from xten to ptsn. When I dial from the xten, I can hear the dialed 
party, but he cannot hear me... 
 

Tips? Help? 
What I'm doing wrong? 
 
TIA
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Does intel 865 board works fine with Asterisk

2005-08-17 Thread jonny hashem
Hi:

I would like to know what are the issues I need to
look for in a chipset board so I can make sure it
works fine with digium cards and Asterisk . Is intel
board 865 fits the description?

Regards;


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Iaxy Distinctive Ring

2005-08-17 Thread Andrès Tello Abrego
A iaxy, is a CPE device that provides VOIP capabilities to normal phones, 
using the iax protocol... 
 
So is a little hardware, for telephony usages, which doesn't have a lot of 
features, and is't so cheap... 


El Miércoles, 17 de Agosto de 2005 11:54, Yoann Le Bihan escribió:
 2005/8/17, Andrès Tello Abrego [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  I will answer you, the same somebody told me at IIRC.
 
  A watch has more processor power than a Iaxy...

 Uuuuh... well, I feel stupid but... what is the meaning of laxy ?
 'cause... a watch... ;o)))
 sorry for my ignorance...

 Best regards,

 YLB.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] FXO port trhoug optimum voice VOIP service

2005-08-17 Thread Carlos Trallero
Sorry it took me so long to keep on this thread. But I
got a quation Rich. Can the impedance missmatch kill
the dial tone completely?

 This is, when I plug my X100p clone card to my line
the dial tone just goes away. I check this by using an
analog phone that is also on the line.

 Is it possible to fix this by using the rx/tx in the
zaptel configuration?

 Maybe I need a different signalling since I'm
actually behind an VoIP - analog adapter?

 Any help would be appreciated.

 Carlos

--- Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Based on research that I did some time ago, there
 are multiple versions
 of the MD3200 chipset. One targeted for use in US
 telephone systems, and
 another targeted for non-US systems (that have
 different impedence matching
 requirements). Sounds like you have one of each.
 
 
  I have 2 OEM X100P. The one from www.broad-tel.com
 works fine.However,
  the other one has echo. Both use MD3200 chips. Any
 one knows why it is
  so??
  
  On 8/13/05, Madhawa Jayanath
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Carlos Trallero wrote:
   
   Hello,
   
I have asterisk running on Fedora Core 3 with
 a x100p
   (oem). After some time I got asterisk with some
 soft
   extensions working (u gotta love open source),
 but I'm
   stuck with outbound dialing. This is the
 diagnose:
   
   - detect 1 wcfxo channel.
   - when trying to make an outside call I get
 unable to
   create channel of type Zap. Everyone is
 busy/congested
   at this time
   - When I plug the x100p to the phone jack, the
 dial
   tone in all of my phones die.
   
Because of the later I'm suspecting that there
 is
   some problem with the signaling or voltage
 detection.
   
My PSTN line is actually from a VoIP modem
 that runs
   over the Cablevision network (known as Optimum
 Voice).
   
Thanks everyone.
Carlos
   
   
   
   
   
   __
   Do you Yahoo!?
   Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new
 enhanced search.
   http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
   ___
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
  

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   
   
   
   
   
   Hello,
   Where did u get that OEM X100P? Is it MD3200
 chip?
   
   Cheers,
   ~Madhawa
   
   
   ___
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
  

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:


http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:


http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
 
 ---End of Original
 Message-
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Port

2005-08-17 Thread Innocent Evil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# netstat -naptu | grep asterisk
tcp0  0 0.0.0.0:20000.0.0.0:*
LISTEN  9231/asterisk
udp0  0 0.0.0.0:27270.0.0.0:*
9231/asterisk
udp0  0 0.0.0.0:45200.0.0.0:*
9231/asterisk
udp0  0 xx.yy.zz.ww:50600.0.0.0:*
9231/asterisk
udp0  0 0.0.0.0:45690.0.0.0:*
9231/asterisk


Hi,

My asterisk server is listening to the above ports.
would somebody explain, what  ports are for what.
Is there any security issue with these ports?
what firewall messure you do regarding these open ports?

Thanks___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail file permissions

2005-08-17 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 07:48:29AM -0400, hugolivude wrote:
   Is there a way around this w/o giving everyone root privileges!
  
  Do you want to allow every user to delete another user's voicemail?
  
  If not, how do you sync voicemail users and samba users?
 
 I want each user to see, read and write (delete) their own voicemail
 ONLY (i.e. a user shouldn't be able to listen to someone elses
 voicemails).  I gave each user an account on the Asterisk box and
 limited their access to their mailbox folder only.

So don't waste your time on saving the voicemail on Asterisk. Save it on
a specific folder in an imap server on the user's home directory.

If you use a decent mail client, getting notifications for new mails in
that folders, deleting them, playing them, and whatever should be easy.

On the Asterisk side you only need to keep voicemail config in sync.
Maybe it would be easier to just forward every mailbox nnn to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and use an aliases file to do the real forwarding. That
way you keep the emails away from Asterisk's config.

The downside: no message-waiting indicator.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |   | a Mutt's  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   |  best
ICQ# 16849755 |   | friend
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Does intel 865 board works fine with Asterisk

2005-08-17 Thread Angus Comber
I have one Asterisk system working with a Junghanns BRI card and another 
working with a Digium TDM card with an Intel D865 motherboard.


Angus



- Original Message - 
From: jonny hashem [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 6:14 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Does intel 865 board works fine with Asterisk


Hi:

I would like to know what are the issues I need to
look for in a chipset board so I can make sure it
works fine with digium cards and Asterisk . Is intel
board 865 fits the description?

Regards;


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] FXS on TDM12B suddenly stopped working Properly

2005-08-17 Thread chawki hammoud
Hi:

I was running TDM12B. Both FXS and FXO were working
fine. Then all of the sudden FXS had problems. When I
pick-up the phone and dial any number, FXS doesn't
respond. I just keep hearing the normal signaling line
tone comming from the FXS. I changed the FXS module
and it had the same problem. I changed the the TDM
card and installed different FXS and nothing changed.

I appreciate any suggestions.









Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   >