Re: [asterisk-users] OT Astricon/Digium Beach Ball Mailing

2008-07-19 Thread randulo
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 5:48 AM, Steve Totaro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Cool, but I tried to blow up the beach ball and the the seam where the
 part opens to inflate the ball was not connected to the ball
 whatsoever, so it went right in the trash.

Steve,

It is with great sadness that I read your message. Yes, we just had a
thread about the Digium Tweaker (tm), the Digium Pen (tm) and the
Digium Mouse Pag (tm) and darn it, they've always provided the best
swag of any tech company. Now this news. The world has become a sad
place indeed!

removing tongue from cheek you're right to tell them about this,
though,  for the reason you stated. Thanks for sharing :)

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] OT Astricon/Digium Beach Ball Mailing

2008-07-19 Thread Alex Balashov
Steve Totaro wrote:
 Just an FYI for Digium.  I received a mailing today from you guys
 which was nice.  The price of mailing was ~$1.60 and inside was an
 inflatable beach ball.
 
 Cool, but I tried to blow up the beach ball and the the seam where the
 part opens to inflate the ball was not connected to the ball
 whatsoever, so it went right in the trash.
 
 I wonder if the sick heat had anything to do with it, was mine just
 bad, or should Digium get a refund from the promotion company for
 providing garbage?
 
 Anyone else get one?  Was it OK or junk?
 
 I post this not to put down Digium, the thought was nice, I wish I
 could play with my Digium beach ball, but Digium should know about it
 if it was common.  Postage alone was costly.

I mean this without a hint of sarcasm or derision toward you or Digium, but:

Award for ... most bewildering asterisk-users list post ever!  :-)

-- Alex

-- 
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4.21.1 SIP failing, requiring reboot

2008-07-19 Thread David Nedved
 Interestingly enough, I've had my Grandstream suffering
 from the same 
 problem since I upgraded to 1.4.20, although my config is
 static rather 
 than realtime.  I'd actually written it off to typical 
 Grand-heap-of-$#!+-stream behaviour.  :)

I didn't say because I wanted my original email to limit itself to facts I was 
sure of, but I think my SIP problems started with 1.4.20 as well.  I'm fairly 
sure 1.4.19 was solid... going back today.


  

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Explication for ast_safe_system

2008-07-19 Thread Eric Dantie
Can someone please explain the reason on the following code (in
asterisk.c, function ast_safe_system()):

/* Close file descriptors and launch system command */
for (x = STDERR_FILENO + 1; x  4096; x++)
close(x);


Why to close so many descriptors?

Thanks in advance
Éric

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Explication for ast_safe_system

2008-07-19 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Saturday 19 July 2008 06:41:04 Eric Dantie wrote:
 Can someone please explain the reason on the following code (in
 asterisk.c, function ast_safe_system()):

 /* Close file descriptors and launch system command */
 for (x = STDERR_FILENO + 1; x  4096; x++)
 close(x);


 Why to close so many descriptors?

There's no way to know how many file descriptors are actually open, and every
file descriptor that is open when a process is forked is duplicated in the new
process.  Also, if the process being forked is long running (such as an AGI),
then there could be side effects to not closing all descriptors in a child
process (such as receiving a SIGPIPE when the other end closes).

Eventually, we could probably start registering the highest file descriptor to
a central function, ensuring that we close all of them.  It is admittedly a
hack to pick an arbitrary number like this.

-- 
Tilghman

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] OT Astricon/Digium Beach Ball Mailing

2008-07-19 Thread Conrad Wood
On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 03:40 -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
 Steve Totaro wrote:
  Just an FYI for Digium.  I received a mailing today from you guys
  which was nice.  The price of mailing was ~$1.60 and inside was an
  inflatable beach ball.
  
  Cool, but I tried to blow up the beach ball and the the seam where the
  part opens to inflate the ball was not connected to the ball
  whatsoever, so it went right in the trash.
  
  I wonder if the sick heat had anything to do with it, was mine just
  bad, or should Digium get a refund from the promotion company for
  providing garbage?
  
  Anyone else get one?  Was it OK or junk?


I didn't get one? Where do I sign up to receive these balls (preferrably
working ones) and pens? I keep buying digium stuff already ;)

Conrad


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Beginner Questions part II

2008-07-19 Thread John Koenig
I should start with a thank you to the list for helping me getting up 
and running with Asterisk about a week ago.  I have been happily 
fiddling with Asterisk since then :).

I am working on adding a couple features to my dialplan.  My setup 
involves my asterisk box connecting to another third party sip 
provider.  I configured the extra trunk and there are no issues passing 
calls through their systems.  As it stands right now, I setup a calling 
rule that matches the pattern 9-XXX-XXX-, stripes off the 9, and 
then passes the call through to the third party.  I would like to just 
dial XXX-XXX- without having to dial the extra 9.  Is there a way 
that I can configure asterisk so that I check to see if the extension 
exists on my box first, if it does then pickup and if it doesn't then 
forward the call onto the third party?  If so, how?

The other feature I am looking to add is *67 caller id blocking.  Am I 
right in thinking that I first would configure an incoming call rule 
that matches to *67-whatever and then pass unknown as the caller id 
from there?

Any help is greatly appreciated.  Even if it is just pointing me in the 
right direction in regards to reading material.

Thanks,

John

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Not a valid SIP contact - Asterisk 1.4.21.1 Mitel SIP phones

2008-07-19 Thread Mark Wiater
Hi,

I have a client using Mitel 5212 phones in SIP mode with a 1.4.21.1 
Asterisk server (and a couple of previous 1.4 versions). They're 
mostly happy with the combination except for this one issue.

For incoming calls only, either originating from other local SIP 
phones or from a PRI, calls won't get bridged (remote party get's 
hung up) if the call is answer too quickly on the Mitel. Or so it 
seems. The receiving Mitel phone thinks the call is in session though.

Oh... this does not happen all of the time, maybe 50%.

Asterisk is reporting errors like:

[Jul 19 10:46:41] NOTICE[2466]: chan_sip.c:8068 
set_address_from_contact: '72.16.1.20;tag=as7b9f4bfb' is not a 
valid SIP contact (missing sip:) trying to use anyway
[Jul 19 10:46:41] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:8097 
set_address_from_contact: Invalid host name in Contact: (can't 
resolve in DNS) : '72.16.1.20'
[Jul 19 10:46:41] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:5839 set_destination: 
Can't find address for host '72.16.1.20'
[Jul 19 10:46:41] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:5839 set_destination: 
Can't find address for host '72.16.1.20'

or

[Jul 19 10:45:03] NOTICE[2466]: chan_sip.c:8068 
set_address_from_contact: '172.16.1.20;tag=as4a1b11c8' is not a 
valid SIP contact (missing sip:) trying to use anyway
[Jul 19 10:45:03] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:8097 
set_address_from_contact: Invalid host name in Contact:  can't 
resolve in DNS) : '172.16.1.20'
[Jul 19 10:45:04] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:5839 set_destination: 
Can't find address for host '172.16.1.20'
[Jul 19 10:45:04] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:5839 set_destination: 
Can't find address for host '172.16.1.20'

or

[Jul 19 10:52:18] NOTICE[2466]: chan_sip.c:8068 
set_address_from_contact: 'nt-Length:0' is not a valid SIP contact 
(missing sip:) trying to use anyway
[Jul 19 10:52:18] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:8097 
set_address_from_contact: Invalid host name in Contact: (can't 
resolve in DNS) : 'nt-Length'
[Jul 19 10:52:18] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:5839 set_destination: 
Can't find address for host 'nt-Length'
[Jul 19 10:52:18] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:5839 set_destination: 
Can't find address for host 'nt-Length'
--  SIP/517-09215fb0 answered SIP/512-09258c78
  -- Native bridging SIP/512-09258c78 and SIP/517-09215fb0
[Jul 19 10:52:18] WARNING[22054]: chan_sip.c:5839 set_destination: 
Can't find address for host 'nt-Length'
-- Got SIP response 416 Unsupported URI Scheme back from 172.16.1.157
[Jul 19 10:52:18] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:5839 set_destination: 
Can't find address for host 'nt-Length'

So it seems that the Mitel phone is sending a bad contact field in 
SIP. I've confirmed via tcpdump that this is what's in the SIP 
packet on the wire.

I wanted to try a different version of SIP on the Mitel but that 
doesn't seem to be an option, it's not available for download and 
the local Mitel vendor can't seem to get his hands on anything newer 
than 6.0.0.something, though there is supposedly 7.1.x available. 
These phones are running 06.00.00.19.

The Asterisk server has a pretty standard sip.conf,

bindaddr=0.0.0.0
pedantic=no;
bindport=5060
srvlookup=no
tos_video=af41
notifyringing=yes
notifyhold=yes
allowsubscribe=yes
limitonpeer=yes
localnet=172.16.1.0/255.255.255.0

Polycom phones on this same asterisk server do not display this 
behavior.

I'm wondering if there is a workaround for this apparent Mitel issue 
in Asterisk's configuration. Anyone using this combination with success?

Thanks in advance for any thoughts

Mark


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Changinf Polycom-501 config server from remote?

2008-07-19 Thread Robert McNaught
I contacted Polycom support about this a few weeks ago - their answer
was that is was not possible.

We found that hand-configured phones had to be reset by reset device
setting in the Polycom phone menu then Option 66 in a DHCP server
would override whatever was hand-configured and allow you to
auto-provision.

Robert

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,

  Our Polycom-501 phones are set to retreive their config for the server by a
 static configuation defined at the phones (boot servers). Is there any way to
 change it remotely? I found no relevant field in the internal WEB browser, nor
 anything in the configuration files (sip.conf and phone1.conf).

  Thanks! __Yehavi:

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Not a valid SIP contact - Asterisk 1.4.21.1 Mitel SIP phones

2008-07-19 Thread Matt Watson
On July 19, 2008 11:22:08 am Mark Wiater wrote:
 Hi,

 I have a client using Mitel 5212 phones in SIP mode with a 1.4.21.1
 Asterisk server (and a couple of previous 1.4 versions). They're
 mostly happy with the combination except for this one issue.

 For incoming calls only, either originating from other local SIP
 phones or from a PRI, calls won't get bridged (remote party get's
 hung up) if the call is answer too quickly on the Mitel. Or so it
 seems. The receiving Mitel phone thinks the call is in session though.

 Asterisk is reporting errors like:

 [Jul 19 10:46:41] NOTICE[2466]: chan_sip.c:8068
 set_address_from_contact: '72.16.1.20;tag=as7b9f4bfb' is not a
 valid SIP contact (missing sip:) trying to use anyway
 [Jul 19 10:46:41] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:8097
 set_address_from_contact: Invalid host name in Contact: (can't
 resolve in DNS) : '72.16.1.20'
 [Jul 19 10:46:41] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:5839 set_destination:
 Can't find address for host '72.16.1.20'
 [Jul 19 10:46:41] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:5839 set_destination:
 Can't find address for host '72.16.1.20'


Might want to post a sip debug of one of the sessions from the Mitel phone.


-- 
Matt Watson
http://www.mattgwatson.ca

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Echo Issue

2008-07-19 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I am being told by the users on a purely sip based setup that when an
inbound sip call is first answered, they here an echo on their greeting
and then the conversation stabilizes and it works well.

Any ideas where to look to start curing this?

Thanks!
jlc

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] OT Astricon/Digium Beach Ball Mailing

2008-07-19 Thread Alex Balashov
I've asked a number of others I know in real life who got the beach 
balls and all are reported as being fully functional.

-- 
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk-users Digest, Vol 48, Issue 56

2008-07-19 Thread ruth
Hola,

Estoy de vacaciones hasta el 1 de Agosto. 

Para dar soporte sobre la centralita de telefonia:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Perdonen las molestias.

Ruth Llaneza Lapausa - Tecnico de VoIP.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tlf: 902 199 384
Mildmac SA � www.mildmac.es � [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C/ Hnos. Garc�a Noblejas 41, 6� planta.
28037 - Madrid
Tlf: +34 91 501 33 02
Fax: +34 91 501 57 45



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Changinf Polycom-501 config server from remote?

2008-07-19 Thread Michael Graves

There are many parameters that cannot be defined via the web GUI. These
must be defined in the config files. Uptake of the configs is only done
at boot time. I recall that the www.voip-info.org wiki has a Perl
script for remote forcing a reboot of Polycom phones.

Michael

On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:27:41 -0700, Robert McNaught wrote:

I contacted Polycom support about this a few weeks ago - their answer
was that is was not possible.

We found that hand-configured phones had to be reset by reset device
setting in the Polycom phone menu then Option 66 in a DHCP server
would override whatever was hand-configured and allow you to
auto-provision.

Robert

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,

  Our Polycom-501 phones are set to retreive their config for the server by a
 static configuation defined at the phones (boot servers). Is there any way to
 change it remotely? I found no relevant field in the internal WEB browser, 
 nor
 anything in the configuration files (sip.conf and phone1.conf).

  Thanks! __Yehavi:

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.1/1559 - Release Date: 7/17/2008 6:08 
PM



--
Michael Graves
mgravesatmstvp.com
http://blog.mgraves.org
o713-861-4005
c713-201-1262
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype mjgraves
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk-users Digest, Vol 48, Issue 56

2008-07-19 Thread Bill Michaelson





Message: 1
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:35:47 -0700
From: Dave Platt [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I'm preparing for a client install of * by doing a fresh one in-house.  
Unlike my earlier installation that runs asterisk as superuser, my 
current experimental box runs without such privilege.  This is causing 
it to moan that it can't set TOS.  I absolutely don't want to install it 
on the client LAN without this capability.  If need be, I'll set the 
binary to run setuid root.


But I'm looking for something more elegant.  While googling, I found a 
suggestion to use iptables mangle rules to set TOS for all packets going 
out of the box on ports like 5060 and 1:2.  Not a bad hack, but 
indiscriminate and this box will be handling other traffic besides the 
RTP.  I'd like to do better.
  


It is possible for an iptables filter/rule to match packets in the
OUTPUT chain based on the UID or GID of the process which created
them, if you have the owner module loaded.  You should be able to
add a rule to the OUTPUT chain of the mangle table which will set the
TOS properly for any and all outbound packets generated locally by the
non-root user ID which you're using to run Asterisk.
  
I've used LARTC and I'm aware of the capability, but keying on UID did 
not occur to me. Thank you - it's a good solution.

Come to think of it, I think I need to do this myself.  I'm using the
ultimate Linux traffic conditioning configuration (modified very
slightly) to prioritize my system's outbound traffic into multiple
queues by TOS, and it's probably mis-queueing the RTP traffic because
my Debian install of Asterisk is running under a non-root UID.
  

Glad to be of assistance.
  
I thought of using POSIX access control to enable asterisk to do TOS 
setting without being root (would this be CAP_NET_RAW?), which sounds 
perfect, but so far I'm operating with stock ubuntu hardy, and I would 
like to avoid a kernel build to add this capability.


Any other ideas?



Seems like iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -m owner --uid-owner $ASTERISK
would be along the lines of what you want?  Mark the packets with the
TOS you want... and then consider using the Linux traffic-shaping
system to make sure that they really do get transmitted ahead of
non-urgent packets:
  
Traffic-shaping in the box would probably be overkill for my purpose 
because the nature of the routing in this box will limit the contention 
from this source. I think I just need to have the packets treated well 
once they hit the local network. But this is also a worthwhile 
consideration, and probably useful in other circumstances. Again, thanks 
for the reply - it's right on target and solves my problem nicely.




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] OT Astricon/Digium Beach Ball Mailing

2008-07-19 Thread randulo
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Alex Balashov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've asked a number of others I know in real life who got the beach
 balls and all are reported as being fully functional.

So this is not a case for the bug tracker? Perhaps a bounty...

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Not a valid SIP contact - Asterisk 1.4.21.1 Mitel SIP phones

2008-07-19 Thread Mark Wiater
Matt Watson wrote:
 On July 19, 2008 11:22:08 am Mark Wiater wrote:
 Hi,

 I have a client using Mitel 5212 phones in SIP mode with a 1.4.21.1
 Asterisk server (and a couple of previous 1.4 versions). They're
 mostly happy with the combination except for this one issue.

 For incoming calls only, either originating from other local SIP
 phones or from a PRI, calls won't get bridged (remote party get's
 hung up) if the call is answer too quickly on the Mitel. Or so it
 seems. The receiving Mitel phone thinks the call is in session though.
 
 Asterisk is reporting errors like:

 [Jul 19 10:46:41] NOTICE[2466]: chan_sip.c:8068
 set_address_from_contact: '72.16.1.20;tag=as7b9f4bfb' is not a
 valid SIP contact (missing sip:) trying to use anyway
 [Jul 19 10:46:41] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:8097
 set_address_from_contact: Invalid host name in Contact: (can't
 resolve in DNS) : '72.16.1.20'
 [Jul 19 10:46:41] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:5839 set_destination:
 Can't find address for host '72.16.1.20'
 [Jul 19 10:46:41] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:5839 set_destination:
 Can't find address for host '72.16.1.20'

 
 Might want to post a sip debug of one of the sessions from the Mitel phone.
 
 

Thanks Matt

I was also able to test this with Mitel's firmware version 7.0.0.8 
with the same results.

Mitel phone still acts like it's on a call, Asterisk does not nor 
does the originating phone.

PBX*CLI sip set debug peer 517
SIP Debugging Enabled for IP: 172.16.1.174:5060
   Audio is at 172.16.1.20 port 15594
   Adding codec 0x4 (ulaw) to SDP
   Adding non-codec 0x1 (telephone-event) to SDP
   Reliably Transmitting (no NAT) to 172.16.1.174:5060:
INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.1.20:5060;branch=z9hG4bK38581b5a;rport
From: 512 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as7ec9e8af
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 102 INVITE
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Max-Forwards: 70
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:20:54 GMT
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
Supported: replaces
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 236

v=0
o=root 2247 2247 IN IP4 172.16.1.20
s=session
c=IN IP4 172.16.1.20
t=0 0
m=audio 15594 RTP/AVP 0 101
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-16
a=silenceSupp:off - - - -
a=ptime:20
a=sendrecv

---
PBX*CLI
--- SIP read from 172.16.1.174:5060 ---
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via:SIP/2.0/UDP 
172.16.1.20:5060;rport=5060;received=172.16.1.20;branch=z9hG4bK38581b5a
From:512 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as7ec9e8af
To:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=4881ea36-2ca-6747d965
CSeq:102 INVITE
User-Agent:Mitel-5212-SIP-Phone 07.00.00.08 08000F32A6C1
Call-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Length:0


-
   --- (8 headers 0 lines) ---
PBX*CLI
--- SIP read from 172.16.1.174:5060 ---
SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
Via:SIP/2.0/UDP 
172.16.1.20:5060;rport=5060;received=172.16.1.20;branch=z9hG4bK38581b5a
From:512 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as7ec9e8af
To:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=4881ea36-2ca-6747d965
CSeq:102 INVITE
User-Agent:Mitel-5212-SIP-Phone 07.00.00.08 08000F32A6C1
Call-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Allow-Events:talk,hold,conference
Content-Length:0


-
   --- (9 headers 0 lines) ---
PBX*CLI
--- SIP read from 172.16.1.174:5060 ---
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via:SIP/2.0/UDP 
172.16.1.20:5060;rport=5060;received=172.16.1.20;branch=z9hG4bK38581b5a
From:512 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as7ec9e8af
To:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=4881ea36-2ca-6747d965
CSeq:102 INVITE
User-Agent:Mitel-5212-SIP-Phone 07.00.00.08 08000F32A6C1
Call-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact:p:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=4881ea36-2ca-6747d965
CSeq:102 INVITE
User sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Allow-Events:talk,hold,conference
Allow:INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,OPTIONS,REFER,NOTIFY,PRACK,UPDATE
Supported:timer,100rel,replaces
Content-Type:application/sdp
Content-Length:182

v=0
o=517 1216473942 1216473941 IN IP4 172.16.1.174
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 172.16.1.174
t=0 0
m=audio 20012 RTP/AVP 0 101
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000

-
   --- (15 headers 8 lines) ---
   Found RTP audio format 0
   Found RTP audio format 101
   Peer audio RTP is at port 172.16.1.174:20012
   Found audio description format PCMU for ID 0
   Found audio description format telephone-event for ID 101
   Capabilities: us - 0x4 (ulaw), peer - audio=0x4 (ulaw)/video=0x0 
(nothing), combined - 0x4 (ulaw)
   Non-codec capabilities (dtmf): us - 0x1 (telephone-event), peer - 
0x1 (telephone-event), combined - 0x1 (telephone-event)
   Peer audio RTP is at port 172.16.1.174:20012
[Jul 19 13:20:56] NOTICE[2466]: chan_sip.c:8068 
set_address_from_contact: 
'p:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=4881ea36-2ca-6747d965' is not a valid SIP 
contact (missing sip:) trying to use anyway
[Jul 19 13:20:56] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:8097 
set_address_from_contact: Invalid host name in Contact: (can't 
resolve in DNS) : '172.16.1.174'
   list_route: hop: p:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=4881ea36-2ca-6747d965
   set_destination: Parsing 
p:[EMAIL 

Re: [asterisk-users] OT Astricon/Digium Beach Ball Mailing

2008-07-19 Thread Alex Balashov
randulo wrote:

 On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Alex Balashov
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've asked a number of others I know in real life who got the beach
 balls and all are reported as being fully functional.
 
 So this is not a case for the bug tracker? Perhaps a bounty...

I've already submitted plastic patches to Beach Ball-rc5-pl5-beta trunk.

-- 
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Not a valid SIP contact - Asterisk 1.4.21.1 Mitel SIP phones

2008-07-19 Thread Grygoriy Dobrovolskyy
Maybe stupid solution but, when Mitel phone i called, why dont you pickup
put the person on hold, call Mitel phone, and connect them, what i want to
say, add some delay.

2008/7/19 Mark Wiater [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Matt Watson wrote:
  On July 19, 2008 11:22:08 am Mark Wiater wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I have a client using Mitel 5212 phones in SIP mode with a 1.4.21.1
  Asterisk server (and a couple of previous 1.4 versions). They're
  mostly happy with the combination except for this one issue.
 
  For incoming calls only, either originating from other local SIP
  phones or from a PRI, calls won't get bridged (remote party get's
  hung up) if the call is answer too quickly on the Mitel. Or so it
  seems. The receiving Mitel phone thinks the call is in session though.
 
  Asterisk is reporting errors like:
 
  [Jul 19 10:46:41] NOTICE[2466]: chan_sip.c:8068
  set_address_from_contact: '72.16.1.20;tag=as7b9f4bfb' is not a
  valid SIP contact (missing sip:) trying to use anyway
  [Jul 19 10:46:41] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:8097
  set_address_from_contact: Invalid host name in Contact: (can't
  resolve in DNS) : '72.16.1.20'
  [Jul 19 10:46:41] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:5839 set_destination:
  Can't find address for host '72.16.1.20'
  [Jul 19 10:46:41] WARNING[2466]: chan_sip.c:5839 set_destination:
  Can't find address for host '72.16.1.20'
 
 
  Might want to post a sip debug of one of the sessions from the Mitel
 phone.
 
 

 Thanks Matt

 I was also able to test this with Mitel's firmware version 7.0.0.8
 with the same results.

 Mitel phone still acts like it's on a call, Asterisk does not nor
 does the originating phone.

 PBX*CLI sip set debug peer 517
 SIP Debugging Enabled for IP: 172.16.1.174:5060
   Audio is at 172.16.1.20 port 15594
   Adding codec 0x4 (ulaw) to SDP
   Adding non-codec 0x1 (telephone-event) to SDP
   Reliably Transmitting (no NAT) to 172.16.1.174:5060:
 INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.1.20:5060;branch=z9hG4bK38581b5a;rport
 From: 512 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as7ec9e8af
 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CSeq: 102 INVITE
 User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
 Max-Forwards: 70
 Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:20:54 GMT
 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
 Supported: replaces
 Content-Type: application/sdp
 Content-Length: 236

 v=0
 o=root 2247 2247 IN IP4 172.16.1.20
 s=session
 c=IN IP4 172.16.1.20
 t=0 0
 m=audio 15594 RTP/AVP 0 101
 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
 a=fmtp:101 0-16
 a=silenceSupp:off - - - -
 a=ptime:20
 a=sendrecv

 ---
 PBX*CLI
 --- SIP read from 172.16.1.174:5060 ---
 SIP/2.0 100 Trying
 Via:SIP/2.0/UDP
 172.16.1.20:5060;rport=5060;received=172.16.1.20;branch=z9hG4bK38581b5a
 From:512 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as7ec9e8af
 To:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ;tag=4881ea36-2ca-6747d965
 CSeq:102 INVITE
 User-Agent:Mitel-5212-SIP-Phone 07.00.00.08 08000F32A6C1
 Call-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Length:0


 -
   --- (8 headers 0 lines) ---
 PBX*CLI
 --- SIP read from 172.16.1.174:5060 ---
 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
 Via:SIP/2.0/UDP
 172.16.1.20:5060;rport=5060;received=172.16.1.20;branch=z9hG4bK38581b5a
 From:512 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as7ec9e8af
 To:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ;tag=4881ea36-2ca-6747d965
 CSeq:102 INVITE
 User-Agent:Mitel-5212-SIP-Phone 07.00.00.08 08000F32A6C1
 Call-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Allow-Events:talk,hold,conference
 Content-Length:0


 -
   --- (9 headers 0 lines) ---
 PBX*CLI
 --- SIP read from 172.16.1.174:5060 ---
 SIP/2.0 200 OK
 Via:SIP/2.0/UDP
 172.16.1.20:5060;rport=5060;received=172.16.1.20;branch=z9hG4bK38581b5a
 From:512 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as7ec9e8af
 To:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ;tag=4881ea36-2ca-6747d965
 CSeq:102 INVITE
 User-Agent:Mitel-5212-SIP-Phone 07.00.00.08 08000F32A6C1
 Call-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Contact:p:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ;tag=4881ea36-2ca-6747d965
 CSeq:102 INVITE
 User sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Allow-Events:talk,hold,conference
 Allow:INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,OPTIONS,REFER,NOTIFY,PRACK,UPDATE
 Supported:timer,100rel,replaces
 Content-Type:application/sdp
 Content-Length:182

 v=0
 o=517 1216473942 1216473941 IN IP4 172.16.1.174
 s=SIP Call
 c=IN IP4 172.16.1.174
 t=0 0
 m=audio 20012 RTP/AVP 0 101
 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000

 -
   --- (15 headers 8 lines) ---
   Found RTP audio format 0
   Found RTP audio format 101
   Peer audio RTP is at port 172.16.1.174:20012
   Found audio description format PCMU for ID 0
   Found audio description format telephone-event for ID 101
   Capabilities: us - 0x4 (ulaw), peer - audio=0x4 (ulaw)/video=0x0
 (nothing), combined - 0x4 (ulaw)
   Non-codec capabilities 

Re: [asterisk-users] Changinf Polycom-501 config server from remote?

2008-07-19 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Saturday 19 July 2008 12:11:46 Michael Graves wrote:
 There are many parameters that cannot be defined via the web GUI. These
 must be defined in the config files. Uptake of the configs is only done
 at boot time. I recall that the www.voip-info.org wiki has a Perl
 script for remote forcing a reboot of Polycom phones.

The command is actually integrated into the CLI:

CLI sip notify polycom-check-cfg name

Multiple commands like this are possible, and they're all defined in
/etc/asterisk/sip_notify.conf

-- 
Tilghman

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Echo Issue

2008-07-19 Thread Chad Whitten
This is almost standard with voip calls.  The echo-cancellation has to
train up to the call parameters.  Some hardware is better with it than
others and you can try tweaking the value for the echo canceler up and
down.  What type hardware are you using - both phone and server?

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Joseph L. Casale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am being told by the users on a purely sip based setup that when an
 inbound sip call is first answered, they here an echo on their greeting
 and then the conversation stabilizes and it works well.

 Any ideas where to look to start curing this?

 Thanks!
 jlc

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




-- 
Chad Whitten
Metro Network Solutions
(601) 366-6630 Phone
(601) 366-6066 Fax
(601) 842-6804 Cellular
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Not a valid SIP contact - Asterisk 1.4.21.1 Mitel SIP phones

2008-07-19 Thread Grey Man
 2008/7/19 Mark Wiater [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Your problem is the Contact header coming back in the Mitel's Ok response.

Contact:p:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=4881ea36-2ca-6747d965

Asterisk is not going to be able to parse that! It should be:

Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=4881ea36-2ca-6747d965

I'd get your Mitel vendor to log a fault about that. It's a big
problem as the Contact field is critical for further in-dialogue SIP
requests such as transfer related requests and BYEs.

Regards,

Greyman.

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] New Bridge Command/Event in 1.6?

2008-07-19 Thread Douglas Garstang
I just downloaded Asterisk 1.6 beta 9 because I had read that there was a new 
bridge command. After looking through the doc/* documentation, I see no mention 
of a bridge application or AMI command.

Does it exist?

I am trying to take a bridged call, and redirect each to another destination, 
which I can do with the redirect() AMI command. After doing some dial plan 
processing, I would like to bridge them back together. How can I do this? The 
redirect command takes a channel and an extension as an argument, not another 
channel.

Doug.


  ___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Stop vm-intro being played

2008-07-19 Thread Simon
Hi There,

Is there a way just to have the custom voice message play, and not
have asterisk play: vm-intro after that?

Thanks

Simon

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Question about stopping Asterisk

2008-07-19 Thread Christian
Hi all,
I've installed Asterisk 1.6 on my Ubuntu Hardy system and I also used
the make config command at the end of the installation so that Asterisk
loads at boot.
However, I want to disable this now.
What is the best way of doing this?
Many thanks for any help,
Christian


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Question about stopping Asterisk

2008-07-19 Thread Alex Balashov
Christian wrote:
 Hi all,
 I've installed Asterisk 1.6 on my Ubuntu Hardy system and I also used
 the make config command at the end of the installation so that Asterisk
 loads at boot.
 However, I want to disable this now.
 What is the best way of doing this?
 Many thanks for any help,
 Christian

This is really an Ubuntu question, but:

cd /etc/init.d
update-rc.d asterisk remove

-- 
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Beginner Questions part II

2008-07-19 Thread Rony Ron
Hi John,
*for the first part:
you can create 3 contexts: internal,external and main
in your internal context you put your internal extension
in the external context you send the send the XXX-XXX- to the 
providers trunk
and in the main context you just include the internal context (first) 
then the external context.

** second part:
check here: 
http://www.jackenhack.com/blog/archives/2005/09/26/adding-blacklist-to-an-asteriskhome-pbx-voip-server/

*BR,*

John Koenig a écrit :
 I should start with a thank you to the list for helping me getting up 
 and running with Asterisk about a week ago.  I have been happily 
 fiddling with Asterisk since then :).

 I am working on adding a couple features to my dialplan.  My setup 
 involves my asterisk box connecting to another third party sip 
 provider.  I configured the extra trunk and there are no issues passing 
 calls through their systems.  As it stands right now, I setup a calling 
 rule that matches the pattern 9-XXX-XXX-, stripes off the 9, and 
 then passes the call through to the third party.  I would like to just 
 dial XXX-XXX- without having to dial the extra 9.  Is there a way 
 that I can configure asterisk so that I check to see if the extension 
 exists on my box first, if it does then pickup and if it doesn't then 
 forward the call onto the third party?  If so, how?

 The other feature I am looking to add is *67 caller id blocking.  Am I 
 right in thinking that I first would configure an incoming call rule 
 that matches to *67-whatever and then pass unknown as the caller id 
 from there?

 Any help is greatly appreciated.  Even if it is just pointing me in the 
 right direction in regards to reading material.

 Thanks,

 John

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

   


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk-users Digest, Vol 48, Issue 57

2008-07-19 Thread ruth
Hola,

Estoy de vacaciones hasta el 1 de Agosto. 

Para dar soporte sobre la centralita de telefonia:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Perdonen las molestias.

Ruth Llaneza Lapausa - Tecnico de VoIP.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tlf: 902 199 384
Mildmac SA � www.mildmac.es � [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C/ Hnos. Garc�a Noblejas 41, 6� planta.
28037 - Madrid
Tlf: +34 91 501 33 02
Fax: +34 91 501 57 45



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Echo Issue

2008-07-19 Thread Noah Miller
 This is almost standard with voip calls.  The echo-cancellation has to
 train up to the call parameters.  Some hardware is better with it than
 others and you can try tweaking the value for the echo canceler up and
 down.

Hmm.  This has not been my experience.  I have rarely seen echo on
pure SIP calls, but in all cases that I have, I've found that it is a
regular acoustic echo caused by unusual gain settings on at least one
end of the call.





 On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Joseph L. Casale
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am being told by the users on a purely sip based setup that when an
 inbound sip call is first answered, they here an echo on their greeting
 and then the conversation stabilizes and it works well.

 Any ideas where to look to start curing this?

 Thanks!
 jlc

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




 --
 Chad Whitten
 Metro Network Solutions
 (601) 366-6630 Phone
 (601) 366-6066 Fax
 (601) 842-6804 Cellular
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Beep on transfer

2008-07-19 Thread Noah Miller
Hi John -

 I have a request that I have not been able to figure out as yet.  I need
 to be able to play a beep when a call is transfered via attended transfer.
 This is exactly what is in the bug tracker at:
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=3819
 Has any one found a way, elegant ot otherwise, to make something such as
 this work?
 Thanks in advance for any help.

Here's an incredibly inelegant way:  When an incoming call hits an
extension, set a channel variable to a particular value.  Put a check
in your extension logic to see if that channel variable is set (put
this before you set the channel variable). If the variable is set,
play a beep.  If it's not, don't play a beep. Extremely hackish, but
it would fulfill the request.

Yes, this would play a beep if a call was just blind transferred.  It
would also beep if the call was parked (and possibly picked up by the
same person), but you could also hack some more to avoid this.


- Noah

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Stop vm-intro being played

2008-07-19 Thread Simon
Got it!... we are using Elastix and i just had to set s in the
VM_OPTS in the extensions_additional.conf file.

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi There,

 Is there a way just to have the custom voice message play, and not
 have asterisk play: vm-intro after that?

 Thanks

 Simon


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] conference bridge

2008-07-19 Thread Nhadie Ramos
Hi,

How can i setup conference when i have 2 asterisk servers?
my setup is 2 asterisk servers using realtime, i'm simply using DNS SRV just 
for redundancy (not really high availability). i have a web interface, wherein 
i can create extension, conference etc.

adding extension is ok, even if ext1 is registered on Asterisk 1 and ext2 is 
registered on asterisk 2 they will still be able to call each other, but on the 
conference, e.g. when ext1 dials conference no. 1000 and ext 2 dials conf 1000 
also, they will be connected to two different conference room. my meetme is 
also setup on realtime. how can i set it up in such a way ext on registered on 
different asterisk server can connect to the same conference room.

Regrdas,
Nhadie



  ___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users