[asterisk-users] IPKall using iax

2009-09-19 Thread Joseph
Is it possible to receive a call via IPKall through IAX connectivity without 
registration?
If so how to set it up.

I've run-into and old link;
http://forum.voxilla.com/ipkall-support-forum/ipkall-beta-testing-iax-connectivity-without-registration-26728.html

-- 
Joseph

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] DTMF end '1' has duration 57 but want minimum 80, emulating on IAX2/a16-q1-9657

2009-09-19 Thread Rajkumar S
Hello,

I have a 3 server asterisk configuration where one asterisk (say A) (v
1.4.25) has a digiuim card connected to E1 from which calls are routed
to another asterisk server  (B) (1.6.0.9) over SIP trunk from which
calls get routed to third server (C) (1.6.0.9) via IAX trunk.
SIP clients are connected to third server. A is the PSTN termination
server, B runs the menu and AGI and C is where SIP clients connect.
SIP clients can also dial outside and call goes like C - B - A -
PSTN.

I have an occasional problem where DTMF is not recognized, ie if
clients type a digit while in menu the system does not register it.

In my C server I saw a log line like this today:

DTMF end '1' has duration 57 but want minimum 80, emulating on IAX2/a16-q1-9657

Is the above message an indication of this problem? How can I fix it?

with regards,

raj

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Echo cancellation on DAHDI

2009-09-19 Thread DHAVAL INDRODIYA
hey , all

i have one issue on incoming DAHDI PRI

it works fine many times but sometimes it creates bad audio and also having
echo in line

also recording going to be disturbed by this

i cannot understand this properly

can any one have solutions and how to improve this also how to monitor lines
All dahdi lines

and any causes for telco i am fro INDIA .

regards
Dhaval
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] E65 fails registration, soft phone works

2009-09-19 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Luki lugos...@gmail.com [2009.09.19.0745 +0200]:
 sounds like the hiccup my E71 had once. I think the symptoms were
 identical. Changing the transport type from Auto to UDP solved the
 problem for me. The Auto setting worked, but only sometimes. Maybe
 the E65 is similar...

I've tried this before, but no change to the behaviour. :(

Thank you for taking the time to reply.

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
give a man a fish, and you'll feed him for a day. teach a man to
 fish, and he'll buy a funny hat. talk to a hungry man about fish,
 and you're a consultant.
  -- scott adams
 
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Sangoma A200 and battery removal detection ??!!!

2009-09-19 Thread M Shokuie
Dear Folks,

Anyone knows if Sangoma supports or going to provide support for battery
removal detection on FXO lines?? As Tzafrir said earlier DAHDI supports it,
which is a very nice feature but what about Sangoma?

Regards.
--
M. Shokuie Nia.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Help sending call to local server

2009-09-19 Thread DHAVAL INDRODIYA
hey paulh,

i think this would not help

because he wants such a dial command which forwards a call to local server
if server_ip is of same server

i have same kind of problem but still dont found proper solution

in,fact i need dialing on IP base in which dialing by using IP address will
send call to remote machine or same machine

regards
Dhaval

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Paul Hales pdha...@optusnet.com.au wrote:


 I have used the SIPPEER function to find if a phone is local and
 available before.

 PaulH


 Asterisk User wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I have a generalized syntax for dial application in my dialplan where
  I send calls to particular server.
  Here is my dial sysntax...
  exten =
  _x.,1,Dial(${Dial_technology}/${extension_to_ca...@${server_ip},30,r)
 
  I can send a call to remote server using register statement in
  sip.conf or iax.conf and it works as calls get landed in particular
  context of remote server.
 
  Would you please suggest me changes to be made in .conf file(s) if I
  want the calls to be landed in context of local server if Server_ip is
  the IP of a server running asterisk?
 
  Thanking you
 
 
  --ASTERISK USER
 
 
  
 
  ___
  -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 
  AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
  Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Sunday 20th Global Asterisk Mtg via VOIP - BerkeleyTIP - for forwarding

2009-09-19 Thread john_re
Get a VOIP headset, Install VOIP client SW,  join the global Asterisk
meeting this
Sunday Sept 20, 12N-3P Pacific Daylight Savings Time (UTC-8),
 3P-6P Eastern, (7P-10P UTC?)
http://sites.google.com/site/berkeleytip/remote-attendance

Lots of great, exciting new things for Asterisk users,
as we start Year 2 of the Global FSW GNU(Linux)/BSD,
Free HW, Free Culture, TIP meetings:
TIP = Talks, Installfest, Project/Programing Party.
Educational, Productive, Social.

Join with the meeting from your home via VOIP,
or create a local meeting at your local college wifi cafe.


=
Quick announcement.  We're starting up BTIP year 2, for the 2009-10
school year.
http://sites.google.com/site/berkeleytip/home

September Videos: Puppet language, Python mystery talks, CampKDE
http://sites.google.com/site/berkeleytip/talk-videos

This year 2 we'll be focusing on 
1) Inviting UC Berkeley students via poster/flyers
2) Getting local meetings going at California colleges
3) Getting invitations out to more American countries
4) Getting topic groups (OLPC, Python, KDE  GNOME, BSD, Ubuntu, etc)
having simultaneous meetings.
5) Improving our VOIP server, perhaps upgrading to FreeSwitch.

==
Come join the Sept 20 Sunday meeting, get on voip, chat, discuss the
videos, work on your own projects  share them with others, help educate
students,  help work on the group projects.

Join #berkeleytip on irc.freenode.net,  we'll help you get your VOIP HW
 SW working. :)

Join the mailing lists  say hi, tell us what you are interested in.
http://groups.google.com/group/BerkTIPGlobal

You are invited to forward this message anywhere it would be welcomed.
:)

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] E65 fails registration, soft phone works

2009-09-19 Thread Torintino T

Martin,

Try to put qualify=yes.

Torintino

 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:45:05 -0700
 From: lugos...@gmail.com
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] E65 fails registration, soft phone works
 
 Martin,
 
 sounds like the hiccup my E71 had once. I think the symptoms were
 identical. Changing the transport type from Auto to UDP solved the
 problem for me. The Auto setting worked, but only sometimes. Maybe the
 E65 is similar...
 
 Luki
 
 2009/9/12 martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net:
  Hey folks,
 
  I am trying to get an E65 to connect to asterisk, and I would really
  appreciate a second set of eyes. The SIP dialog completes fine, but
  the phone subsequently says Registration failed.
 
  I am in a network that has what seems to be a SIP-capable NAT
  gateway, but the asterisk is configured nat=yes anyway. Using
  a softphone (twinkle), I can connect just fine, SIP and RTP work.
 
  But when the E65 tries to connect, it seems to complete the SIP
  REGISTER dialog, but then it'll say Registration failed:
 
 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 
 AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_
Drag n’ drop—Get easy photo sharing with Windows Live™ Photos.

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/photos.aspx___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] E65 fails registration, soft phone works

2009-09-19 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Torintino T torinti...@hotmail.com [2009.09.19.1356 +0200]:
 Try to put qualify=yes.

I had qualify=2000, but even with the default, the problem prevails.

Thanks for taking the time to reply,

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
den stil verbessern, das heißt den gedanken verbessern.
 - friedrich nietzsche
 
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma A200 and battery removal detection ??!!!

2009-09-19 Thread Doug Lytle
M Shokuie wrote:
  
 DAHDI supports it, which is a very nice feature but what about Sangoma?
  

I would suggest you ask Sangoma, they are very responsive.

Doug


-- 
Ben Franklin quote:

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary 
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Switchboard/advanced answering machine setup with Asterisk?

2009-09-19 Thread pk
Hi,

I'm a noob to Asterisk and this list so I apologize if I'm out of
place with my questions.

I'm planning to utilise Asterisk to build a switchboard (of sorts)
with it and was wondering if this would be feasible (from what I've read
about Asterisk it seems possible). What I would like to achieve:

All analog calls routed through Asterisk. Callers will need a login pin
code to progress (preferably a unique pin code for each caller that I
can give out). If I'm unable to answer, the caller should be able to
make various choices (i.e. leave a message etc.).

Is this possible?

I was thinking to utilise a low power VIA mini-itx or something like
that. Would a card like this be appropriate for my purpose?:
http://www.digium.com/en/products/analog/tdm410.php

Also, I'm living in Sweden and I was wondering where I could buy digium
cards?

Any tips, recommendations are welcome!

Best regards

Peter K

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] DTMF end '1' has duration 57 but want minimum 80, emulating on IAX2/a16-q1- 9657

2009-09-19 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Saturday 19 September 2009 01:07:54 Rajkumar S wrote:
 I have an occasional problem where DTMF is not recognized, ie if
 clients type a digit while in menu the system does not register it.

 In my C server I saw a log line like this today:

 DTMF end '1' has duration 57 but want minimum 80, emulating on
 IAX2/a16-q1-9657

 Is the above message an indication of this problem? How can I fix it?

It isn't evidence of this problem, but it might be indicative of it.  What
this message says is that the DTMF lasted for 57ms, but Asterisk normally
doesn't detect DTMF that lasts for under 80ms, so it is increasing the
duration of the DTMF to compensate (because as a digital signal, DTMF is
reliable, but when sent as audio, it might not be).  What it probably
indicates is that the DTMF sent to your system is _incredibly_ short, and if a
DTMF detector is employed, it's possible that the DTMF audio is simply too
short to be reliably detected.

-- 
Tilghman Lesher
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
twitter: Corydon76 | IRC: Corydon76-dig (Freenode)
Check us out at: www.digium.com  www.asterisk.org

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] DTMF end '1' has duration 57 but want minimum 80, emulating on IAX2/a16-q1-9657

2009-09-19 Thread Cary Fitch
FWIW:
From old, old memory, DTMF was 60 ms on, 40 ms off, way back when.  With
modern technology, shorter durations could work.  Most phones of all types
don't make a standardized tone burst but produce tones only while the button
is pressed.  Fast punching will produce short tones.

On the other hand, a redialed number will be very well formatted.

Reliability of TT data transfer for audio applications (over the phone voice
mail, credit card, IVR, etc) would be better if the phones would run button
pushes through the redial buffer/formatter.  But they don't.

Cary Fitch

-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tilghman
Lesher
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 9:18 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users]DTMF end '1' has duration 57 but want minimum
80, emulating on IAX2/a16-q1-9657

On Saturday 19 September 2009 01:07:54 Rajkumar S wrote:
 I have an occasional problem where DTMF is not recognized, ie if
 clients type a digit while in menu the system does not register it.

 In my C server I saw a log line like this today:

 DTMF end '1' has duration 57 but want minimum 80, emulating on
 IAX2/a16-q1-9657

 Is the above message an indication of this problem? How can I fix it?

It isn't evidence of this problem, but it might be indicative of it.  What
this message says is that the DTMF lasted for 57ms, but Asterisk normally
doesn't detect DTMF that lasts for under 80ms, so it is increasing the
duration of the DTMF to compensate (because as a digital signal, DTMF is
reliable, but when sent as audio, it might not be).  What it probably
indicates is that the DTMF sent to your system is _incredibly_ short, and if
a
DTMF detector is employed, it's possible that the DTMF audio is simply too
short to be reliably detected.

-- 
Tilghman Lesher
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
twitter: Corydon76 | IRC: Corydon76-dig (Freenode)
Check us out at: www.digium.com  www.asterisk.org

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] DUNDi + SIP Realtime

2009-09-19 Thread JR Richardson
 Good afternoon gentlemen (and ladies).
 
 A costumer of mine has many servers and each one maps their SIP extensions
 to the others via DUNDi. It works like a charm. SIP extensions can only
 register at one server, the one they belong to. In case one extension
 wants to call other that is registered in another server, DUNDi takes care
 of that by calling the other server using IAX2 and G.729 codec. It's
 important to clarify that each server today works as a completely
 independent PBX, talking to each other using IAX2 that is routed via a
 MPLS network. Also, the servers are very distant from each other
 physically.
 
 Today the extensions are being mapped in DUNDi like this:
 
 [dundi-internal]
 exten = _70XX,1,Noop()
 
 And all extensions configurations are done in sip.conf. No realtime is
 being used, yet.
 
 
 
 
 Now the customer wants to take a step further and make it possible that
 *every* SIP extension could be able to register in *every* server. That
 would make possible for them to use DNS to automatically find the
 closest PBX and make the extension register on that one.
 
 So far I considered the following for this project:
 
 - Moving all SIP extensions from individual sip.confs to one MySQL
 database, and point all servers to that one
 - Configure sip.conf on each machine like this:
 
 regcontext=dundi-internal
 rtcachefriends=yes
 rtsavesysname=yes
 rtupdate=no
 rtautoclear=yes
 ignoreregexpire=no
 
 That way each time an extension registers, Asterisk would add an extension
 to the dundi-internal context, which as you guessed, is the one being
 mapped to the other servers. So instead of mapping extensions using
 wildcards, the extensions will be mapped individually.
 
 extensions.conf would be something like this:
 
 [internal]
 ;Tries to make the call using SIP, in the case
 ;the extension is registered in this server
 ;If it's not, switches to DUNDi
 exten = _,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN},60)
 exten = _,n,NoOp(DIALSTATUS = ${DIALSTATUS})
 exten = _,n,NoOp(FROM_DUNDI = ${FROM_DUNDI})
 exten = _,n,GotoIf($[${FROM_DUNDI} = 1]?end:start)
 exten = _,n(start),Answer()
 exten = _,n,Playback(vm-dialout)
 exten = _,n,Goto(dundi-internal-helper,${EXTEN},1)
 exten = _,n(end),Noop(Loop detected. Hanging up.)
 exten = _,n,Hangup()
 
 [dundi-internal-helper]
 switch = DUNDi/dundi_internal
 
 [from-dundi]
 exten = _,1,Set(FROM_DUNDI=1)
 exten = _,n,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN},60)
 
 
 So far it's working fine in a test lab with 2 servers running Asterisk
 1.6.0.15.
 
 For the gurus out there: is there something that I'm doing terribly wrong,
 that would break everything and make the universe collapse into itself
 when I apply the same principle on production?
 
 I'll be happy to provide more details in case there are any doubts. I
 really appreciate your feedback, no matter what is it. :)
 
 
 
 Vin?cius Fontes
 www.asteriskforum.com.br - Informa??es e discuss?o sobre Asterisk e
 telefonia IP

[JR Richardson] 
I used to do this exact thing a few years ago, wrote a couple of papers
about it.  Realtime + DINDi works great for this, I would add in MySQL
replication to the mix so each server writes the SIP cache info to a Master
database that is replicated out to all the servers.  Each server will have a
copy of the same database and be able to contact the phones if DUNDi queries
become unavailable.

The tricky problem you may run into, if you haven't figured it out yet, is
what to do about voicemail and where the storage will be, distributed
voicemail will be problematic in a dynamic sip ua registration environment
across multiple servers.  Centralize voicemail using DUNDi can help this out
as well.

I'll send you some papers off line

Hope this helps.

JR

Engineering for the Masses 


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] DUNDi + SIP Realtime

2009-09-19 Thread Vinícius Fontes
- JR Richardson jmr.richard...@gmail.com escreveu:

  Good afternoon gentlemen (and ladies).
  
  A costumer of mine has many servers and each one maps their SIP
 extensions
  to the others via DUNDi. It works like a charm. SIP extensions can
 only
  register at one server, the one they belong to. In case one
 extension
  wants to call other that is registered in another server, DUNDi
 takes care
  of that by calling the other server using IAX2 and G.729 codec.
 It's
  important to clarify that each server today works as a completely
  independent PBX, talking to each other using IAX2 that is routed via
 a
  MPLS network. Also, the servers are very distant from each other
  physically.
  
  Today the extensions are being mapped in DUNDi like this:
  
  [dundi-internal]
  exten = _70XX,1,Noop()
  
  And all extensions configurations are done in sip.conf. No realtime
 is
  being used, yet.
  
  
  
  
  Now the customer wants to take a step further and make it possible
 that
  *every* SIP extension could be able to register in *every* server.
 That
  would make possible for them to use DNS to automatically find the
  closest PBX and make the extension register on that one.
  
  So far I considered the following for this project:
  
  - Moving all SIP extensions from individual sip.confs to one MySQL
  database, and point all servers to that one
  - Configure sip.conf on each machine like this:
  
  regcontext=dundi-internal
  rtcachefriends=yes
  rtsavesysname=yes
  rtupdate=no
  rtautoclear=yes
  ignoreregexpire=no
  
  That way each time an extension registers, Asterisk would add an
 extension
  to the dundi-internal context, which as you guessed, is the one
 being
  mapped to the other servers. So instead of mapping extensions using
  wildcards, the extensions will be mapped individually.
  
  extensions.conf would be something like this:
  
  [internal]
  ;Tries to make the call using SIP, in the case
  ;the extension is registered in this server
  ;If it's not, switches to DUNDi
  exten = _,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN},60)
  exten = _,n,NoOp(DIALSTATUS = ${DIALSTATUS})
  exten = _,n,NoOp(FROM_DUNDI = ${FROM_DUNDI})
  exten = _,n,GotoIf($[${FROM_DUNDI} = 1]?end:start)
  exten = _,n(start),Answer()
  exten = _,n,Playback(vm-dialout)
  exten = _,n,Goto(dundi-internal-helper,${EXTEN},1)
  exten = _,n(end),Noop(Loop detected. Hanging up.)
  exten = _,n,Hangup()
  
  [dundi-internal-helper]
  switch = DUNDi/dundi_internal
  
  [from-dundi]
  exten = _,1,Set(FROM_DUNDI=1)
  exten = _,n,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN},60)
  
  
  So far it's working fine in a test lab with 2 servers running
 Asterisk
  1.6.0.15.
  
  For the gurus out there: is there something that I'm doing terribly
 wrong,
  that would break everything and make the universe collapse into
 itself
  when I apply the same principle on production?
  
  I'll be happy to provide more details in case there are any doubts.
 I
  really appreciate your feedback, no matter what is it. :)
  
  
  
  Vin?cius Fontes
  www.asteriskforum.com.br - Informa??es e discuss?o sobre Asterisk e
  telefonia IP
 
 [JR Richardson] 
 I used to do this exact thing a few years ago, wrote a couple of
 papers
 about it.  Realtime + DINDi works great for this, I would add in
 MySQL
 replication to the mix so each server writes the SIP cache info to a
 Master
 database that is replicated out to all the servers.  Each server will
 have a
 copy of the same database and be able to contact the phones if DUNDi
 queries
 become unavailable.
 
 The tricky problem you may run into, if you haven't figured it out
 yet, is
 what to do about voicemail and where the storage will be, distributed
 voicemail will be problematic in a dynamic sip ua registration
 environment
 across multiple servers.  Centralize voicemail using DUNDi can help
 this out
 as well.
 
 I'll send you some papers off line
 
 Hope this helps.
 
 JR
 
 Engineering for the Masses 
 
 
 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 
 AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Thank you so much for your answers. I really wasn't aware of the problem with 
voicemail, but storing it on IMAP or even MySQL will certainly help.

Your case is really close to my own, with a few differences. The main objective 
in my case is not redundancy, but saving bandwidth. That because if a user of 
pbxA is physically in the same network of pbxB, it will register directly to 
pbxA. And as the dialplan uses the options tT on Dial(), if this user calls an 
extension registered at pbxB, the audio needs to go to pbxA and come back to 
pbxB. To make things worst, in this case the codec used is alaw.

So my idea is to force all inter-server communication to be done 

Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma A200 and battery removal detection ??!!!

2009-09-19 Thread Moises Silva
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 3:33 AM, M Shokuie sena...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear Folks,

 Anyone knows if Sangoma supports or going to provide support for battery
 removal detection on FXO lines?? As Tzafrir said earlier DAHDI supports it,
 which is a very nice feature but what about Sangoma?



Hello M. Shokuie,

In Asterisk installations, Sangoma boards use DAHDI drivers to hook up to
Asterisk ( because chan_dahdi works only with DAHDI devices). If you were
using FreeSWITCH you could use native wanpipe devices /dev/wanpipex_xx
instead of /dev/dahdi/x, which uses native Sangoma drivers.

In both modes the drivers notify on-hook, off-hook events depending on the
battery status.

 --
Moises Silva
Software Developer
Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3
Canada
t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. m...@sangoma.com
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Stop / Resume in Dialplan / AMI

2009-09-19 Thread Guillaume Yziquel
Hello.

I'd like to know if the two following functionalities are available in 
Asterisk.

-1- A stop/wait/halt functionality in the Dialplan. Like:

exten = myexten, n, Halt

where execution of the dialplan would wait indefinitely. I guess a Wait 
would be OK, but I'd like this wait to wait indefinitely.

-2- A Goto functionality from the AMI: You give the channel, and you can 
ask it to change its priority.

-3- Or a WaitForEvent: The AMI sends an event, and the Dialplan resumes 
dialplan execution after this event.

These are a few questions I have about AMI / Dialplan asynchronous 
integration, and guidance would be appreciated.

All the best,

-- 
  Guillaume Yziquel
http://yziquel.homelinux.org/

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Asterisk + Nonoh

2009-09-19 Thread TuSuNaMi
Hello;

Asterisk voip configuration settings for nonoh did, but somehow could not
manage. I would like your example of working configuration.

Best regards
M.B.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Experience with Sangoma's USBfxo

2009-09-19 Thread Olivier
Hi,

I've seen this USB product from Sangoma :
http://www.sangoma.com/products_and_solutions/hardware/analog_telephony/usb_fxo.html

Is it working ok ?
Is it easy to integrate it with Asterisk ?
How would you rate your experience with it ?

Regards
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users