Re: [asterisk-users] Possible bug - queue doesn't play hold music

2012-12-20 Thread Ishfaq Malik
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 11:16 -0600, Richard Mudgett wrote:
  On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 15:16 +, Ishfaq Malik wrote:
   Hi
   
   Can someone else please check the following:
   We have installed asterisk 1.8.18.0 onto our development and test
   servers. They were previously on 1.8.7.0
   
   When an inbound call executes a queue, I can see in the logs that
   the
   hold music is supposed to start playing but there is no sound. If
   the
   call is answered and the callee puts the caller on hold, I can see
   the
   same log message of hold music starting but this time the hold
   music can
   be heard.
   
   This is happening on both installations of 1.8.18.0.
   
   If other people are experiencing the same thing we can raise a bug
   on
   it.
   
   Log excerpts below with my comments after a # symbol
   
   -- Executing [s@ethn-xx-work:4]
   Queue(SIP/x.x.x.x-0061, test-ish,Tn,,,600)
   -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on
   SIP/x.x.x.x-0061  #comment: no
   music heard
 == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5
   -- SIP/101-0062 is ringing
   -- SIP/101-0062 is ringing
   -- SIP/101-0062 is ringing
   -- SIP/101-0062 is ringing
   -- SIP/101-0062 is ringing
   -- SIP/101-0062 answered SIP/x.x.x.x-0061
   -- Stopped music on hold on SIP/x.x.x.x-0061
   [2012-12-14 14:44:04] ERROR[26568]: chan_sip.c:29941 setup_srtp: No
   SRTP module loaded, can't setup SRTP session.
   -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on
   SIP/x.x.x.x-0061
#comment: music
   can be heard
   [2012-12-14 14:44:12] ERROR[26568]: chan_sip.c:29941 setup_srtp: No
   SRTP module loaded, can't setup SRTP session.
   -- Stopped music on hold on SIP/x.x.x.x-0061
 == Spawn extension (ethn-xx-work, s, 4) exited non-zero
 on 'SIP/x.x.x.x-0061'
   
  
  Really could do with a second opinion on this issue as it would quite
  a
  serious bug if it is one...
 
 The incoming call leg does not appear to be answered yet so I would not
 expect the caller to be able to hear MOH.
 
 Richard
 
The queue command in the dialplan does not have the r option, therefore
it should play the moh as specified in the queue's specific config
rather than a ringing tone. This has been the behaviour in previous 1.8
and in 1.4.

Also, why does the log indicate moh starting?

-- 
Ishfaq Malik i...@pack-net.co.uk
Department: VOIP Support
Company: Packnet Limited
t: +44 (0)845 004 4994
f: +44 (0)161 660 9825
e: i...@pack-net.co.uk
w: http://www.pack-net.co.uk

Registered Address: PACKNET LIMITED, 2A ENTERPRISE HOUSE, LLOYD STREET
NORTH, MANCHESTER
SCIENCE PARK, MANCHESTER, M156SE
COMPANY REG NO. 04920552


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Possible bug - queue doesn't play hold music

2012-12-20 Thread Ishfaq Malik
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 09:23 +, Ishfaq Malik wrote:
 On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 11:16 -0600, Richard Mudgett wrote:
   On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 15:16 +, Ishfaq Malik wrote:
Hi

Can someone else please check the following:
We have installed asterisk 1.8.18.0 onto our development and test
servers. They were previously on 1.8.7.0

When an inbound call executes a queue, I can see in the logs that
the
hold music is supposed to start playing but there is no sound. If
the
call is answered and the callee puts the caller on hold, I can see
the
same log message of hold music starting but this time the hold
music can
be heard.

This is happening on both installations of 1.8.18.0.

If other people are experiencing the same thing we can raise a bug
on
it.

Log excerpts below with my comments after a # symbol

-- Executing [s@ethn-xx-work:4]
Queue(SIP/x.x.x.x-0061, test-ish,Tn,,,600)
-- Started music on hold, class 'default', on
SIP/x.x.x.x-0061  #comment: no
music heard
  == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5
-- SIP/101-0062 is ringing
-- SIP/101-0062 is ringing
-- SIP/101-0062 is ringing
-- SIP/101-0062 is ringing
-- SIP/101-0062 is ringing
-- SIP/101-0062 answered SIP/x.x.x.x-0061
-- Stopped music on hold on SIP/x.x.x.x-0061
[2012-12-14 14:44:04] ERROR[26568]: chan_sip.c:29941 setup_srtp: No
SRTP module loaded, can't setup SRTP session.
-- Started music on hold, class 'default', on
SIP/x.x.x.x-0061
 #comment: music
can be heard
[2012-12-14 14:44:12] ERROR[26568]: chan_sip.c:29941 setup_srtp: No
SRTP module loaded, can't setup SRTP session.
-- Stopped music on hold on SIP/x.x.x.x-0061
  == Spawn extension (ethn-xx-work, s, 4) exited non-zero
  on 'SIP/x.x.x.x-0061'

   
   Really could do with a second opinion on this issue as it would quite
   a
   serious bug if it is one...
  
  The incoming call leg does not appear to be answered yet so I would not
  expect the caller to be able to hear MOH.
  
  Richard
  
 The queue command in the dialplan does not have the r option, therefore
 it should play the moh as specified in the queue's specific config
 rather than a ringing tone. This has been the behaviour in previous 1.8
 and in 1.4.
 
 Also, why does the log indicate moh starting?
 

My apologies, you are correct. Every other time I've used MoH in a queue
it has been afetr a Playback or Background, both of which answer the
channel...

-- 
Ishfaq Malik i...@pack-net.co.uk
Department: VOIP Support
Company: Packnet Limited
t: +44 (0)845 004 4994
f: +44 (0)161 660 9825
e: i...@pack-net.co.uk
w: http://www.pack-net.co.uk

Registered Address: PACKNET LIMITED, 2A ENTERPRISE HOUSE, LLOYD STREET
NORTH, MANCHESTER
SCIENCE PARK, MANCHESTER, M156SE
COMPANY REG NO. 04920552


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Congestion() forcing PRI channels to be not available

2012-12-20 Thread Steve Davies
On 19 December 2012 21:54, Christopher Harrington ch...@acsdi.com wrote:

 You probably already know this, but 1.4x is very old (released in 2006)
 and is officially end-of-life.

 https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Versions

 You might get more help or better behavior by updating to a newer more
 current version of Asterisk, such as 1.8 which will be receiving bug fixes
 into October 2014.


 On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:47 PM, James Lamanna jlama...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 I have a PSTN Asterisk box that's connected to other dialplan PBXes
 through IAX2.

 Recently this box was upgraded to 1.4.44 with the latest DAHDI version.
 I've noticed that if one of the dialplan PBXes calls Congestion(), the PRI
 will return ISDN code 34 (as its supposed to do).
 However, the issue is that subsequent calls into that PRI channel are
 immediately responded by a Code 44 (channel not available) even though
 there is no live call on the channel.

 Has anyone else experienced this behavior? Its a pretty crippling
 behavior since all of our channels eventually become unresponsive until a
 'dahdi restart' is issued.

 Thanks.

 -- James


I believe that what you are describing is a very old bug, which is fixed
somewhere in the 1.8 timeline when the interface between DAHDI and Asterisk
is changed slightly. I encountered the same issue some time ago. I do not
recall the exact conditions under which the issue happens, but I believe it
is the attempt to cancel an unanswered inbound call with a specific subset
of cause codes.

If you are using an older Asterisk version, the only workaround is to use
Playtones + Hangup() instead of sending the Congestion() or Busy() cause
codes.

Regards,
Steve
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk conferencing |MEETME or app_conference

2012-12-20 Thread Bharat Lalcheta
Hii,

we implemented the same senario with modification of meet-me application
and using php and mysql.

When user want to talk, he press some predefined digit on the phone. Admin
can view who raise hands (press digit) in php page and press predeifned
digit and that user get unmuted. As soon as user complete his talk, admin
again press some digit and that user get muted.

Regards,

Bharat Lalcheta


On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:41 PM, pankaj pandey pankaj.n...@yahoo.comwrote:

 conference, when QA session begins, is there a way for participants to
 raise hands, if they have any questions so Leader can unmute them?




-- 
Bharat Lalcheta
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Recommended T.38 settings for receiving faxes from Cisco AS5350XM

2012-12-20 Thread Andreas Sikkema
Hi,

What are the recommended T.38 settings for sending/receiving faxes
from Cisco AS5350XM gateways? The chan_sip.conf file has a remark
about what Cisco is doing wrong and says that the values received from
the gateway should be overridden, but doesn't say what settings to use
for maximum success.

Can anyone give me some suggestions? I don't know much about T.38 and
I've been told I have to solve this...

Thanks!

-- 
Andreas

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and no RTP

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis

I have a CentOS 6.3 machine I installed Asterisk 11, worked fine...

I then tried to install on Cents 5.8, seemed to go fine... Then when I 
placed a call I got this:

ast_rtp_instance_new: No RTP engine was found. Do you have one loaded?

Did a search and found issues with ARM and this problem but did not help 
me, not using gtalk

or anything. Just call between two polycom phones on local network.

Tried looking at the config.log for rtp anything and it looks ok.

Anyone know what might be the issue?

Thanks,

Jerry

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Congestion() forcing PRI channels to be not available

2012-12-20 Thread James Lamanna
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Steve Davies davies...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 19 December 2012 21:54, Christopher Harrington ch...@acsdi.com wrote:

 You probably already know this, but 1.4x is very old (released in 2006)
 and is officially end-of-life.

 https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Versions

 You might get more help or better behavior by updating to a newer more
 current version of Asterisk, such as 1.8 which will be receiving bug fixes
 into October 2014.


 On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:47 PM, James Lamanna jlama...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,
 I have a PSTN Asterisk box that's connected to other dialplan PBXes
 through IAX2.

 Recently this box was upgraded to 1.4.44 with the latest DAHDI version.
 I've noticed that if one of the dialplan PBXes calls Congestion(), the PRI
 will return ISDN code 34 (as its supposed to do).
 However, the issue is that subsequent calls into that PRI channel are
 immediately responded by a Code 44 (channel not available) even though
 there is no live call on the channel.

 Has anyone else experienced this behavior? Its a pretty crippling
 behavior since all of our channels eventually become unresponsive until a
 'dahdi restart' is issued.

 Thanks.

 -- James


 I believe that what you are describing is a very old bug, which is fixed
 somewhere in the 1.8 timeline when the interface between DAHDI and Asterisk
 is changed slightly. I encountered the same issue some time ago. I do not
 recall the exact conditions under which the issue happens, but I believe it
 is the attempt to cancel an unanswered inbound call with a specific subset
 of cause codes.

 If you are using an older Asterisk version, the only workaround is to use
 Playtones + Hangup() instead of sending the Congestion() or Busy() cause
 codes.

 Regards,
 Steve

 Thanks Steve.
It must have been introduced between DAHDI 2.4.0 and 2.6.1 or between
Asterisk 1.4.35 and 1.4.44.
I had a box running Asterisk 1.4.35 + DAHDI 2.4.0 and I never had any
issues.

-- James
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and no RTP

2012-12-20 Thread Jonathan Rose
Jerry Geis wrote:
 I have a CentOS 6.3 machine I installed Asterisk 11, worked fine...
 
 I then tried to install on Cents 5.8, seemed to go fine... Then when
 I
 placed a call I got this:
 ast_rtp_instance_new: No RTP engine was found. Do you have one
 loaded?
 
 Did a search and found issues with ARM and this problem but did not
 help
 me, not using gtalk
 or anything. Just call between two polycom phones on local network.
 
 Tried looking at the config.log for rtp anything and it looks ok.
 
 Anyone know what might be the issue?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Jerry

Start by making sure the rtp engine module was compiled and added to
your modules directory. If you are using default directories, you can
do this with the following:

$ ls /usr/lib/asterisk/modules -l | grep res_rtp_

For me this shows two engine resources which register, those being:

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  990101 2012-12-19 15:25 res_rtp_asterisk.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  207519 2012-12-19 15:25 res_rtp_multicast.so

If those aren't present, and especially if res_rtp_asterisk isn't
present, you'll likely need use make menuselect to make sure they
are enabled. If they aren't fixing this could be pretty trivial. If
they are, make sure you aren't getting a build error when compiling.

If they are present (and I'm kinda guessing they are), check Asterisk's
log messages for problems with registering the RTP engines.
Specifically you are looking for log messages from rtp_engine.c which
have a form similar to:

RTP Engine 'name of engine' failed sanity check so it was not registered.

Alternatively the register rtp engine function can fail if the engine is
already in the list, but that seems unlikely. If that IS the case, you'll
have an error more similar to:

An RTP engine with the name 'name of engine' has already been registered.

I imagine you'll much more likely see the first one though.

I don't think we've put much effort into supporting Asterisk on ARM
platforms, so I don't really know much about the specifics on why this
would be failing. Hopefully the above helps though.

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis

This was a change in v1.8 and is documented in the v1.8 UPGRADE.txt file:

* The PRI channels in chan_dahdi can no longer change the channel name if a
   different B channel is selected during call negotiation.  To prevent using
   the channel name to infer what B channel a call is using and to avoid name
   collisions, the channel name format is changed.
   The new channel naming for PRI channels is:
   DAHDI/ispan/number[:subaddress]-sequence-number

* Added CHANNEL(dahdi_span), CHANNEL(dahdi_channel), and CHANNEL(dahdi_type)
   so the dialplan can determine the B channel currently in use by the channel.
   Use CHANNEL(no_media_path) to determine if the channel even has a B channel.

* Added AMI event DAHDIChannel to associate a DAHDI channel with an Asterisk
   channel so AMI applications can passively determine the B channel currently
   in use.  Calls with no-media as the DAHDIChannel do not have an associated
   B channel.  No-media calls are either on hold or call-waiting.

 ok - can I use a different method of doing my check to see if a line 
is available by

using the AMI call ExtensionState or ChanIsAvail?

Doing
Action: ExtensionState
Parameters: DAHDI/1

says Error
Message: Extension not specified

and
Action: Command
Command: ChanIsAvail
Parameters: DAHDI/1

says Error
No such command ChanIsAvail

I'm clearly missing something?

Jerry

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8.19.0 - [2012-12-18 19:19:51] ERROR[24485]: astobj2.c:115 INTERNAL_OBJ: user_data is NULL

2012-12-20 Thread Matthew Jordan
On 12/18/2012 10:56 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
 I'm getting this error message on my Asterisk CLI, and in the logs, roughly 
 every 10-20 seconds:
 
 [2012-12-18 19:19:51] ERROR[24485]: astobj2.c:115 INTERNAL_OBJ: user_data is 
 NULL
 
 While it doesn't appear to be actually affecting anything, I'm curious to 
 know what the error represents, where it's coming from, and of course, if 
 there is a fix for it. All info appreciated, thanks!
 
 --Tim
 

Yeah, that's not a good thing. Its an error message from Asterisk's
reference counted object library, indicating one of two things:
1) The object attempting to be manipulated is not a reference counted object
2) The object attempting to be manipulated was (potentially) already
destroyed

Either way, you'll usually need some context to figure out what object
is being manipulated inappropriately. You can get (very) detailed
reference count logs by enabling reference count debugging in Asterisk
[1]. Note that this isn't available in menuselect, as it has to be
enabled in the specific modules you whose objects you want to track.

[1] https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Reference+Count+Debugging

-- 
Matthew Jordan
Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: http://digium.com  http://asterisk.org



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Richard Mudgett
 This was a change in v1.8 and is documented in the v1.8 UPGRADE.txt
 file:
 
 * The PRI channels in chan_dahdi can no longer change the channel
 name if a
   different B channel is selected during call negotiation.  To
   prevent using
   the channel name to infer what B channel a call is using and to
   avoid name
   collisions, the channel name format is changed.
   The new channel naming for PRI channels is:
   DAHDI/ispan/number[:subaddress]-sequence-number
 
 * Added CHANNEL(dahdi_span), CHANNEL(dahdi_channel), and
 CHANNEL(dahdi_type)
   so the dialplan can determine the B channel currently in use by the
   channel.
   Use CHANNEL(no_media_path) to determine if the channel even has a B
   channel.
 
 * Added AMI event DAHDIChannel to associate a DAHDI channel with an
 Asterisk
   channel so AMI applications can passively determine the B channel
   currently
   in use.  Calls with no-media as the DAHDIChannel do not have an
   associated
   B channel.  No-media calls are either on hold or call-waiting.
 ok - can I use a different method of doing my check to see if a line
 is available by
 using the AMI call ExtensionState or ChanIsAvail?
 
 Doing
 Action: ExtensionState
 Parameters: DAHDI/1
 
 says Error
 Message: Extension not specified

It is
Action: ExtensionState
Exten: 5551212
Context: fubar

This will return the status of the dialplan exten hint.

 and
 Action: Command
 Command: ChanIsAvail
 Parameters: DAHDI/1
 
 says Error
 No such command ChanIsAvail

ChanIsAvail is a dialplan application not a CLI command.  It also
will not work for what you want in this case.

 I'm clearly missing something?

Quite possibly. :)

Richard

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis

It is
Action: ExtensionState
Exten: 5551212
Context: fubar

This will return the status of the dialplan exten hint.

/  and
//  Action: Command
//  Command: ChanIsAvail
//  Parameters: DAHDI/1
//
//  says Error
//  No such command ChanIsAvail
/
ChanIsAvail is a dialplan application not a CLI command.  It also
will not work for what you want in this case.

/  I'm clearly missing something?
/
Quite possibly. :)

Richard

OK - so what I am trying to do is through the AMI interface
ask if channel DAHDI/1 is busy, on hook or available.

How do I tell that

In the past I simply did a core show channels and see if DAHDI/1 was 
present.

It it was I new it was in use...

How do check now in asterisk 11 if the channels are reported as DAHDI/i4 
etc...


Thanks,

Jerry

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Danny Nicholas
The Asterisk 11 part is irrelevant.  You need to use an AGI or local
call to use the ChanIsAvail function.

 

From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 11:03 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

 

It is
Action: ExtensionState
Exten: 5551212
Context: fubar
 
This will return the status of the dialplan exten hint.
 
 and
 Action: Command
 Command: ChanIsAvail
 Parameters: DAHDI/1
 
 says Error
 No such command ChanIsAvail
 
ChanIsAvail is a dialplan application not a CLI command.  It also
will not work for what you want in this case.
 
 I'm clearly missing something?
 
Quite possibly. :)
 
Richard

OK - so what I am trying to do is through the AMI interface
ask if channel DAHDI/1 is busy, on hook or available.

How do I tell that

In the past I simply did a core show channels and see if DAHDI/1 was
present.
It it was I new it was in use... 

How do check now in asterisk 11 if the channels are reported as DAHDI/i4
etc...

Thanks,

Jerry

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Richard Mudgett
 It is
 Action: ExtensionState
 Exten: 5551212
 Context: fubar
 
 This will return the status of the dialplan exten hint.
 
  and  Action: Command  Command: ChanIsAvail  Parameters: DAHDI/1
says Error  No such command ChanIsAvail ChanIsAvail is a
  dialplan application not a CLI command.  It also
 will not work for what you want in this case.
 
  I'm clearly missing something? Quite possibly. :)
 
 Richard OK - so what I am trying to do is through the AMI interface
 ask if channel DAHDI/1 is busy, on hook or available.
 
 How do I tell that
 
 In the past I simply did a core show channels and see if DAHDI/1
 was present.
 It it was I new it was in use...
 
 How do check now in asterisk 11 if the channels are reported as
 DAHDI/i4 etc...

You should just cache the AMI DAHDIChannel event information in your
program.

If you really must you could use the CLI command pri show channels.
However, it is not intended to be repeatedly run for performance
reasons.  It blocks processing of ISDN messages while it is running.

Richard

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis


You should just cache the AMI DAHDIChannel event information in your
program.

If you really must you could use the CLI command pri show channels.
However, it is not intended to be repeatedly run for performance
reasons.  It blocks processing of ISDN messages while it is running.


I am not continually logged in to the AMI to catch those events...

Can I make a call to a local channel, run some context+ extension,
there call ChanIsAvail for the channel I am interested in -
but they how do I get that info back to my C program?

Also is that a big overhead?

jerry
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Danny Nicholas
IMO the local channel call should be the lowest overhead option available.

 

From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 11:42 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

 

 
 
You should just cache the AMI DAHDIChannel event information in your
program.
 
If you really must you could use the CLI command pri show channels.
However, it is not intended to be repeatedly run for performance
reasons.  It blocks processing of ISDN messages while it is running.


I am not continually logged in to the AMI to catch those events...

Can I make a call to a local channel, run some context+ extension,
there call ChanIsAvail for the channel I am interested in - 
but they how do I get that info back to my C program?

Also is that a big overhead?

jerry

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Richard Mudgett
 You should just cache the AMI DAHDIChannel event information in your
 program.
 
 If you really must you could use the CLI command pri show channels.
 However, it is not intended to be repeatedly run for performance
 reasons.  It blocks processing of ISDN messages while it is running.
 I am not continually logged in to the AMI to catch those events...
 
 Can I make a call to a local channel, run some context+ extension,
 there call ChanIsAvail for the channel I am interested in -
 but they how do I get that info back to my C program?
 
 Also is that a big overhead?

Whether the overhead is going to affect performance to be a problem
depends on how often you execute the command.

You can also use the AMI DAHDIShowChannels action.  If the channel has
a B channel it will be listed with which B channel it currently is
attached.

Richard

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis


IMO the local channel call should be the lowest overhead option available.

What about:

Action: Command
Command: dahdi show channels

I can just look to see if Extension has anything for the Chan I am 
interested in?


is that a big overhead and block anything?

Jerry

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis

On 12/20/2012 01:00 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:


IMO the local channel call should be the lowest overhead option available.

What about:

Action: Command
Command: dahdi show channels

I can just look to see if Extension has anything for the Chan I am 
interested in?


is that a big overhead and block anything?

Jerry

Looks like the dahdi show channels does not work for me because if I 
make a call
originating from a polycom phone going out a line (DAHDI/1) it is not 
reflected there.

So I cannot tell the line is in use.

It only shows a call as active if its an incoming call.

Jerry
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis

I have a little dialplan context now...

[check-chanisavail]
exten = s,1,ChanIsAvail(${agi_channel})
exten = s,n,System(/bin/echo ${AVAILCHAN}  /tmp/${agi_file})
exten = s,n,Hangup()

and a call file:

Channel: Local/s@check-chanisavail/n
Context: check-chanisavail
Extension: s
Priority: 1
SetVar: agi_file=jerry
SetVar: agi_channel=DAHDI/1

To tell me if a channel is busy or not.

When no channels are busy I execute the dialplan above and
it correctly gave me DAHDI/1-1 in my file. As expected.

When I call in from the outside into my asterisk box,
then I execute my dialplan above and I query (DAHDI/1) I get
AVAILCHAN =  which is what I expect.

However, if I use a polycom phone to dial out, and then I execute
my dialplan above and I query (DAHDI/1) it says its still available.
Should it not say AVAILCHAN =  as I am using that line it is not 
available.


Thanks,

Jerry

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Danny Nicholas
Just for grins, do you have a softphone like xlite that you can try the
outgoing call on?  I think it's an outgoing issue, not a polycom one.

-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 1:56 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

I have a little dialplan context now...

[check-chanisavail]
exten = s,1,ChanIsAvail(${agi_channel}) exten = s,n,System(/bin/echo
${AVAILCHAN}  /tmp/${agi_file}) exten = s,n,Hangup()

and a call file:

Channel: Local/s@check-chanisavail/n
Context: check-chanisavail
Extension: s
Priority: 1
SetVar: agi_file=jerry
SetVar: agi_channel=DAHDI/1

To tell me if a channel is busy or not.

When no channels are busy I execute the dialplan above and it correctly gave
me DAHDI/1-1 in my file. As expected.

When I call in from the outside into my asterisk box, then I execute my
dialplan above and I query (DAHDI/1) I get AVAILCHAN =  which is what I
expect.

However, if I use a polycom phone to dial out, and then I execute my
dialplan above and I query (DAHDI/1) it says its still available.
Should it not say AVAILCHAN =  as I am using that line it is not
available.

Thanks,

Jerry

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to
Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and DAHDI/i4

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis

Just for grins, do you have a softphone like xlite that you can try the
outgoing call on?  I think it's an outgoing issue, not a polycom one.


I do not have a softphone. I have a yealink VP-2009 and same behavior.

Jerry

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] sip call failed in openbts with asterisk

2012-12-20 Thread Eric Wieling
Cause 20 means your SIP device is not registered or you do not have an IP 
specified for it in your peer.

sip show peers will show that.

-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com 
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Scott Huang
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 11:16 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] sip call failed in openbts with asterisk

Hi

  I met a problem in asterisk, please see message in the following, the detail 
debug log is in the attached file. can someone help to point out where to 
correctly configure asterisk, thanks a lot !

BR/Scott

---
-- Executing [8690@phones:1] Dial(SIP/IMSI466990004244439-0014, 
SIP/IMSI466974104638690) in new stack Really destroying SIP dialog 
'3862c8d23be16ce36e564c3251cbc10c@127.0.1.1:5060' Method: INVITE [Dec 21 
00:05:39] WARNING[2838]: app_dial.c:2218 dial_exec_full: Unable to create 
channel of type 'SIP' (cause 20 - Unknown)
  == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1)
-- Auto fallthrough, channel 'SIP/IMSI466990004244439-0014' status is 
'CHANUNAVAIL'



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] libpri 1.4.14 Now Available

2012-12-20 Thread Asterisk Development Team
The Asterisk Development Team has announced the release of libpri 1.4.14.
This release is available for immediate download at
http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/libpri

The release of libpri 1.4.14 resolves several issues reported by the
community and would have not been possible without your participation.
Thank you!

The following are the issues resolved in this release:

* --- Fix compiler warning in pritest.c.
  (Closes issue PRI-145. Reported by Tzafrir Cohen)

* --- Q.SIG: Allow PROGRESS when in the Active state.
  (Closes issue PRI-147. Reported by Nick Merrett)

* --- Handle optional Recommendation octet 3a in Cause IE.
  (Closes issue PRI-151. Reported by Tzafrir Cohen)

For a full list of changes in this release, please see the ChangeLog:

http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/libpri/ChangeLog-1.4.14

Thank you for your continued support of Asterisk!

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and no RTP

2012-12-20 Thread Jerry Geis

  Error loading module 'res_rtp_asterisk.so': /usr/lib64/libavformat.so.52: 
undefined symbol: av_tree_node_size

This is the error I get when trying to start Asterisk 11 on centos 5.

Asterisk 11 works fine on my centos 6 box - I also verified that on centos 6
I do not have the above mentioend file.

ls /usr/lib64/libav*
libavahi-client.so.3  libavahi-common.so.3  
libavahi-core.so.6libavahi-glib.so.1
libavahi-ui.so.0  libavc1394.so.0
libavahi-client.so.3.2.5  libavahi-common.so.3.5.1  
libavahi-core.so.6.0.1libavahi-glib.so.1.0.1
libavahi-ui.so.0.1.1  libavc1394.so.0.3.0


Is there another library it can use instead of libavformat? something 
I have installed on Centos 6

and not on centos 5?

Thanks

Jerry

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] bug? 'dahdi show channel x' HWEC echo cancellation display is incorrect while not on a call

2012-12-20 Thread Justin Killen
When doing a 'dahdi show channel X' from the asterisk console, when the line is 
not part of a call the echo cancellation line ALWAYS says 'currently OFF'.  
Once a call is in progress, it will change to 'ON'.  Is this a bug, or is the 
behavior by design?

My setup:

Asterisk 10.10.0
Dahdi 2.6.1
TE820 T1 card

In chan_dahdi.cfg:
...
echocancel=yes
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
echotraining=800
...


And in #included chan_dahdi_additional.conf (this is a freepbx install):

...
;;[3884]
signalling=fxo_ks
pickupgroup=
mailbox=3884@default
immediate=no
echotraining=800
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
echocancel=yes
context=from-internal
callprogress=no
callgroup=
callerid=John Doe 3884
busydetect=no
busycount=7
accountcode=
channel=73
...

-Justin Killen
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] bug? 'dahdi show channel x' HWEC echo cancellation display is incorrect while not on a call

2012-12-20 Thread Russ Meyerriecks
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 03:13:01PM -0800, Justin Killen wrote:
 When doing a 'dahdi show channel X' from the asterisk console, when the line
 is not part of a call the echo cancellation line ALWAYS says 'currently OFF'.
 Once a call is in progress, it will change to 'ON'.  Is this a bug, or is the
 behavior by design?

This is expected behavior. From a DAHDI perspective: The echocan chip's
channels are allocated on demand during channel setup and de-allocated on
channel teardown.

-- 
Russ Meyerriecks
Digium, Inc. | Linux Kernel Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
direct: +1 256-428-6025
Check us out at: www.digium.com  www.asterisk.org

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 11 and no RTP

2012-12-20 Thread Jonathan Rose
Jerry Geis wrote:

Error loading module 'res_rtp_asterisk.so':
/usr/lib64/libavformat.so.52: undefined symbol:
av_tree_node_size
 This is the error I get when trying to start Asterisk 11 on centos 5.
 
 Asterisk 11 works fine on my centos 6 box - I also verified that on
 centos 6
 I do not have the above mentioend file.
 
 ls /usr/lib64/libav*
 libavahi-client.so.3  libavahi-common.so.3
 libavahi-core.so.6libavahi-glib.so.1
 libavahi-ui.so.0  libavc1394.so.0
 libavahi-client.so.3.2.5  libavahi-common.so.3.5.1
 libavahi-core.so.6.0.1libavahi-glib.so.1.0.1
 libavahi-ui.so.0.1.1  libavc1394.so.0.3.0
 
 Is there another library it can use instead of libavformat?
 something
 I have installed on Centos 6
 and not on centos 5?

I'm not aware of what alternatives if any are available and for which
versions of CentOS they would be available for... this sort of thing
isn't really something I have a great deal of expertise with. If I
had to guess, the problem is that libavahi and libavformat is probably
a dependency of pjproject/pjnath which is employed by res_rtp_asterisk
Asterisk 11, though I'm not certain about that.  You might be able to
use the old res_rtp_asterisk by grabbing it from Asterisk 10's source
and making whatever tweaks are needed... but I wouldn't recommend it.

Is there some reason you can't get the required libraries for CentOS5?
Without knowing what the differences are between libs you have on the
CentOS5 and CentOS6 machines... I really don't have a lot to go on.

--
Jonathan R. Rose
Digium, Inc. | Software Engineer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
direct +1 256 428 6139 

Check us out at: http://digium.com  http://asterisk.org

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] bug? 'dahdi show channel x' HWEC echo cancellation display is incorrect while not on a call

2012-12-20 Thread Justin Killen
This is highly confusing.  It would be nice if at least the display gave the 
configured value as well.

-Justin Killen

-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com 
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Russ Meyerriecks
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 3:21 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] bug? 'dahdi show channel x' HWEC echo 
cancellation display is incorrect while not on a call

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 03:13:01PM -0800, Justin Killen wrote:
 When doing a 'dahdi show channel X' from the asterisk console, when the line
 is not part of a call the echo cancellation line ALWAYS says 'currently OFF'.
 Once a call is in progress, it will change to 'ON'.  Is this a bug, or is the
 behavior by design?

This is expected behavior. From a DAHDI perspective: The echocan chip's
channels are allocated on demand during channel setup and de-allocated on
channel teardown.

-- 
Russ Meyerriecks
Digium, Inc. | Linux Kernel Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
direct: +1 256-428-6025
Check us out at: www.digium.com  www.asterisk.org

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] dahdi timing source multiple cards

2012-12-20 Thread Dave George
I have a box with 12 T1s  (4 Te410P cards).  The PSTN provider is reporting
slips and ask me to update the clock source.  I have my system.conf set as
the following but when I run dahdi_scan only the ports on Card 1 are showing
up with syncsrc=1

 

system.conf :

span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs

bchan=2-24

mtp2=1

 

span=2,2,0,esf,b8zs

bchan=26-48

mtp2=25

 

span=3,3,0,esf,b8zs

bchan=49-72

 

span=4,4,0,esf,b8zs

bchan=73-96

 

span=5,5,0,esf,b8zs

bchan=97-120

 

span=6,6,0,esf,b8zs

bchan=121-144

 

span=7,7,0,esf,b8zs

bchan=145-168

 

span=8,8,0,esf,b8zs

bchan=169-192

 

span=9,9,0,esf,b8zs

bchan=193-216

 

span=10,10,0,esf,b8zs

bchan=217-240

 

span=11,11,0,esf,b8zs

bchan=241-264

 

span=12,12,0,esf,b8zs

bchan=265-288

 

 

dahdi_scan :

 

[1]

active=yes

alarms=OK

description=T4XXP (PCI) Card 0 Span 1

name=TE4/0/1

manufacturer=Digium

devicetype=Wildcard TE410P (3rd Gen) (VPMOCT128)

location=Board ID Switch 0

basechan=1

totchans=24

irq=225

type=digital-T1

syncsrc=1

lbo=0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1)

coding_opts=B8ZS,AMI

framing_opts=ESF,D4

coding=B8ZS

framing=ESF

[2]

active=yes

alarms=OK

description=T4XXP (PCI) Card 0 Span 2

name=TE4/0/2

manufacturer=Digium

devicetype=Wildcard TE410P (3rd Gen) (VPMOCT128)

location=Board ID Switch 0

basechan=25

totchans=24

irq=225

type=digital-T1

syncsrc=1

lbo=0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1)

coding_opts=B8ZS,AMI

framing_opts=ESF,D4

coding=B8ZS

framing=ESF

[3]

active=yes

alarms=OK

description=T4XXP (PCI) Card 0 Span 3

name=TE4/0/3

manufacturer=Digium

devicetype=Wildcard TE410P (3rd Gen) (VPMOCT128)

location=Board ID Switch 0

basechan=49

totchans=24

irq=225

type=digital-T1

syncsrc=1

lbo=0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1)

coding_opts=B8ZS,AMI

framing_opts=ESF,D4

coding=B8ZS

framing=ESF

[4]

active=yes

alarms=OK

description=T4XXP (PCI) Card 0 Span 4

name=TE4/0/4

manufacturer=Digium

devicetype=Wildcard TE410P (3rd Gen) (VPMOCT128)

location=Board ID Switch 0

basechan=73

totchans=24

irq=225

type=digital-T1

syncsrc=1

lbo=0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1)

coding_opts=B8ZS,AMI

framing_opts=ESF,D4

coding=B8ZS

framing=ESF

[5]

active=yes

alarms=OK

description=T4XXP (PCI) Card 1 Span 1

name=TE4/1/1

manufacturer=Digium

devicetype=Wildcard TE410P (3rd Gen) (VPMOCT128)

location=PCI  Bus 10 Slot 03

basechan=97

totchans=24

irq=233

type=digital-T1

syncsrc=0

lbo=0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1)

coding_opts=B8ZS,AMI

framing_opts=ESF,D4

coding=B8ZS

framing=ESF

[6]

active=yes

alarms=OK

description=T4XXP (PCI) Card 1 Span 2

name=TE4/1/2

manufacturer=Digium

devicetype=Wildcard TE410P (3rd Gen) (VPMOCT128)

location=PCI  Bus 10 Slot 03

basechan=121

totchans=24

irq=233

type=digital-T1

syncsrc=0

lbo=0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1)

coding_opts=B8ZS,AMI

framing_opts=ESF,D4

coding=B8ZS

framing=ESF

[7]

active=yes

alarms=OK

description=T4XXP (PCI) Card 1 Span 3

name=TE4/1/3

manufacturer=Digium

devicetype=Wildcard TE410P (3rd Gen) (VPMOCT128)

location=PCI  Bus 10 Slot 03

basechan=145

totchans=24

irq=233

type=digital-T1

syncsrc=0

lbo=0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1)

coding_opts=B8ZS,AMI

framing_opts=ESF,D4

coding=B8ZS

framing=ESF

[8]

active=yes

alarms=OK

description=T4XXP (PCI) Card 1 Span 4

name=TE4/1/4

manufacturer=Digium

devicetype=Wildcard TE410P (3rd Gen) (VPMOCT128)

location=PCI  Bus 10 Slot 03

basechan=169

totchans=24

irq=233

type=digital-T1

syncsrc=0

lbo=0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1)

coding_opts=B8ZS,AMI

framing_opts=ESF,D4

coding=B8ZS

framing=ESF

[9]

active=yes

alarms=OK

description=T4XXP (PCI) Card 2 Span 1

name=TE4/2/1

manufacturer=Digium

devicetype=Wildcard TE410P (4th Gen) (VPMOCT128)

location=PCI  Bus 10 Slot 04

basechan=193

totchans=24

irq=50

type=digital-T1

syncsrc=0

lbo=0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1)

coding_opts=B8ZS,AMI

framing_opts=ESF,D4

coding=B8ZS

framing=ESF

[10]

active=yes

alarms=OK

description=T4XXP (PCI) Card 2 Span 2

name=TE4/2/2

manufacturer=Digium

devicetype=Wildcard TE410P (4th Gen) (VPMOCT128)

location=PCI  Bus 10 Slot 04

basechan=217

totchans=24

irq=50

type=digital-T1

syncsrc=0

lbo=0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1)

coding_opts=B8ZS,AMI

framing_opts=ESF,D4

coding=B8ZS

framing=ESF

[11]

active=yes

alarms=OK

description=T4XXP (PCI) Card 2 Span 3

name=TE4/2/3

manufacturer=Digium

devicetype=Wildcard TE410P (4th Gen) (VPMOCT128)

location=PCI  Bus 10 Slot 04

basechan=241

totchans=24

irq=50

type=digital-T1

syncsrc=0

lbo=0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1)

coding_opts=B8ZS,AMI

framing_opts=ESF,D4

coding=B8ZS

framing=ESF

[12]

active=yes

alarms=OK

description=T4XXP (PCI) Card 2 Span 4

name=TE4/2/4

manufacturer=Digium

devicetype=Wildcard TE410P (4th Gen) (VPMOCT128)

location=PCI  Bus 10 Slot 04

basechan=265

totchans=24

irq=50

type=digital-T1

syncsrc=0

lbo=0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1)

coding_opts=B8ZS,AMI

framing_opts=ESF,D4

coding=B8ZS

framing=ESF

[root@aislecom28502 dahdi]#

 

Thanks,

Dave