Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 12 - zombie processes

2014-11-04 Thread Yaron Nachum
Mathew,
We are aware that this is an open source product, and our expectations are
clear.
All we are asking is that once there is someone assigned to the issue, he
will guide us in what other data or tests should be performed in order to
diagnose and fix the issue in the shortest time.

Sorry if the message is not understood.
Yaron

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Matthew Jordan  wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Yaron Nachum 
> wrote:
> > Hello Asterisk users & developers,
> > I have opened an issue few days ago regarding the crash and the zombie
> > processes. I haven't received any response and it has't been assigned.
> > If something is wrong or missing with the issue please get back to me
> and I
> > will handle it.
> >
> > Please look into it because we still have crashes every day or two, and
> we
> > can't reproduce the issue in our lab with a simulator.
> >
>
> To set expectations here:
>
> This is an open source project. No one is under any obligation to look
> at your issue.
>
> There are currently around 20 issues or so in the issue tracker in
> Triage. Bug marshals are working through those issues as fast as they
> can, but generally they work from oldest to newest. If an older issue
> takes a lot of investigation... well, there's only so many hours in a
> day.
>
> Even after an issue is triaged, that is not a guarantee that someone
> will fix your issue. It is a crash, and that generally means it is
> higher priority - however, if you can't reproduce it in a lab
> environment or provide instructions on how it is reproduced, then you
> have to hope that a developer who does look at it can infer the cause
> of the crash from the information available. Any information you can
> provide beyond the backtrace on how to reproduce the issue will help a
> developer who looks at it.
>
> Again, however, no one is under any obligation to fix the issue. If
> you need more assurance that your issue is resolved, I'd highly
> recommend looking at issuing a bug bounty [1], or contacting a
> developer in the Asterisk Developer Community for assistance.
>
> [1] https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Bug+Bounties
>
> --
> Matthew Jordan
> Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager
> 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
> Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org
>
> --
> _
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Hangup Chanel when a peer unregisters

2014-11-04 Thread Pat Collins
Hello group and thank you for the attention.

I'm using Asterisk 11.12 running on Ubuntu Server 12.04

We have an issue with channels remaining open after a SIP peer unregisters.

It seems that if the peer goes away before manually hanging up a call, the
channel remains open until a hangup request is sent from the CLI.

Is there any way to drop a channel when the peer using it disappears?

Googled every phrase I could think of.  No luck.

Thank you!

Pat Collins

 

 

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Asterisk SIP UUI Protocol

2014-11-04 Thread Gopalakrishnan N
Hi,

I came thru ISDN UUI (User-User Information) protocol which is defined in
this RFC - http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-17.txt

But I don't understand how to use this with Asterisk. Any idea would be
much appreciated.

Thanks.
Gopal.
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 12 - zombie processes

2014-11-04 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Yaron Nachum  wrote:
> Hello Asterisk users & developers,
> I have opened an issue few days ago regarding the crash and the zombie
> processes. I haven't received any response and it has't been assigned.
> If something is wrong or missing with the issue please get back to me and I
> will handle it.
>
> Please look into it because we still have crashes every day or two, and we
> can't reproduce the issue in our lab with a simulator.
>

To set expectations here:

This is an open source project. No one is under any obligation to look
at your issue.

There are currently around 20 issues or so in the issue tracker in
Triage. Bug marshals are working through those issues as fast as they
can, but generally they work from oldest to newest. If an older issue
takes a lot of investigation... well, there's only so many hours in a
day.

Even after an issue is triaged, that is not a guarantee that someone
will fix your issue. It is a crash, and that generally means it is
higher priority - however, if you can't reproduce it in a lab
environment or provide instructions on how it is reproduced, then you
have to hope that a developer who does look at it can infer the cause
of the crash from the information available. Any information you can
provide beyond the backtrace on how to reproduce the issue will help a
developer who looks at it.

Again, however, no one is under any obligation to fix the issue. If
you need more assurance that your issue is resolved, I'd highly
recommend looking at issuing a bug bounty [1], or contacting a
developer in the Asterisk Developer Community for assistance.

[1] https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Bug+Bounties

-- 
Matthew Jordan
Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SPA504G auto answer

2014-11-04 Thread Larry Moore



On 23/10/2014 4:57 PM, Larry Moore wrote:


On 23/10/2014 5:43 AM, Leandro Dardini wrote:

Hello,
I am struggling to have a SPA504G to auto answer (for intercom/paging).
I have tried the following SIP headers (not all together), but without
luck:

SIPAddHeader(Call-Info:\;answer-after=0);
SIPAddHeader(Call-Info: answer-after=0);
SIPAddHeader(Alert-Info: info=intercom);
SIPAddHeader(Alert-Info: Ring Answer);
SIPAddHeader(P-Auto-Answer: normal);



What does your dialplan look like that makes the paging call?

Listing from my Asterisk:

'8000' => 1. Set(SIP_CODEC=alaw)
2. Dial(MulticastRTP/linksys/224.168.168.168:45678/224.168.168.168:6061)
3. Hangup()




In the process of setting up another system, there is an additional 
requirement for the multicast paging to work.


Asterisk will need to know where to route the multicast traffic, on your 
Asterisk system, check your routing table and see if there is a route to 
the multicast address through the interface which connects to your 
phones. If not, create a routing entry, in this case to 224.168.168.168 
through the desired interface.



Larry.

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] queue log realtime mysql

2014-11-04 Thread Jonas Kellens

On 04-11-14 11:50, Ishfaq Malik wrote:


On 4 November 2014 10:40, Jonas Kellens > wrote:


Hello,

I have 5 Asterisk servers all using mysql realtime to store queue
log information.

There is 1 out of 5 servers which stores the data in 4 columns :
'data1' --> 'data 5'.

All other servers store data in 1 column 'data' with the data
seperated by pipe.

I see no difference in my configuration of extconfig.conf and
logger.conf. Maybe a hidden default value ?

Can someone tell me which setting makes the mysql realtime driver
store data in 1 column or in seperate columns ?

Using Asterisk 1.8.12.2



Kind regards,

Jonas.



Are you using mysql_realtime or odbc with a mysql back end?



Using mysql_realtime, not using odbc.


Kind regards,

Jonas
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] queue log realtime mysql

2014-11-04 Thread Ishfaq Malik
On 4 November 2014 10:40, Jonas Kellens  wrote:

>  Hello,
>
> I have 5 Asterisk servers all using mysql realtime to store queue log
> information.
>
> There is 1 out of 5 servers which stores the data in 4 columns : 'data1'
> --> 'data 5'.
>
> All other servers store data in 1 column 'data' with the data seperated by
> pipe.
>
> I see no difference in my configuration of extconfig.conf and logger.conf.
> Maybe a hidden default value ?
>
> Can someone tell me which setting makes the mysql realtime driver store
> data in 1 column or in seperate columns ?
>
> Using Asterisk 1.8.12.2
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jonas.
>
>
>
Are you using mysql_realtime or odbc with a mysql back end?


-- 

Ishfaq Malik
Department: VOIP Support
Company: Packnet Limited
t: +44 (0)845 004 4994
f: +44 (0)161 660 9825
e: i...@pack-net.co.uk
w: http://www.pack-net.co.uk

Registered Address: PACKNET LIMITED, Duplex 2, Ducie House
37 Ducie Street
Manchester, M1 2JW
COMPANY REG NO. 04920552
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] queue log realtime mysql

2014-11-04 Thread Jonas Kellens

Hello,

I have 5 Asterisk servers all using mysql realtime to store queue log 
information.


There is 1 out of 5 servers which stores the data in 4 columns : 'data1' 
--> 'data 5'.


All other servers store data in 1 column 'data' with the data seperated 
by pipe.


I see no difference in my configuration of extconfig.conf and 
logger.conf. Maybe a hidden default value ?


Can someone tell me which setting makes the mysql realtime driver store 
data in 1 column or in seperate columns ?


Using Asterisk 1.8.12.2



Kind regards,

Jonas.
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users