[asterisk-users] T.38 not working - help needed with log interpretation
Dear all, I have the following situation: Local T.38 endpoint - ASTERISK - SIP provider (with T.38 support) I am trying to send a fax from my local T.38 endpoint to arbitrary external fax numbers (which I am not in control of, so I don't know if the other end supports T.38, is connected to a PBX, who is their provider, and so on), of course trying to use T.38 at least from my local endpoint to the provider's gateway. This always fails. I have recorded the respective network traffic with Wireshark. From the log, I can see that the training is successful. The transmission fails exactly at the moment when it should switch to T.38. I think that my endpoint is misbehaving in that situation and wanted to make sure that I am right by asking the experts. Here is an excerpt of the log (the part which I am considering relevant): No. TimeSourceDestination Protocol Length Info 14308 16.089226 192.168.20.48 192.168.20.14 RTP 214 PT=ITU-T G.711 PCMU, SSRC=0x8A086DE, Seq=6, Time=23840 14311 16.109178 83.125.8.155 192.168.20.48 RTP 214 PT=ITU-T G.711 PCMU, SSRC=0x71FD8337, Seq=41621, Time=24000 14312 16.110788 192.168.20.48 192.168.20.14 RTP 214 PT=ITU-T G.711 PCMU, SSRC=0x8A086DE, Seq=63334, Time=24000 14313 16.118096 83.125.8.71 192.168.20.48 SIP/SDP 988 Request: INVITE sip:000387839679@79.211.71.113:64280, in-dialog | 14314 16.118466 192.168.20.48 83.125.8.71 SIP 633 Status: 100 Trying | 14315 16.118739 192.168.20.48 192.168.20.14 SIP/SDP 923 Request: INVITE sip:bCo9m7OfHWK2Y2sb@192.168.20.14:5060, in-dialog | 14321 16.169196 192.168.20.14 192.168.20.48 SIP/SDP 982 Status: 200 OK | 14322 16.170900 192.168.20.48 192.168.20.14 SIP 476 Request: ACK sip:bCo9m7OfHWK2Y2sb@192.168.20.14:5060 | 14323 16.171160 192.168.20.48 83.125.8.71 SIP/SDP 951 Status: 200 OK | 14329 16.208396 83.125.8.71 192.168.20.48 SIP 559 Request: ACK sip:000387839679@79.211.71.113:64280 | 14453 17.611041 192.168.20.14 192.168.20.48 SIP/SDP 1204 Request: INVITE sip:004921123704...@spock-asterisk.home.omeganet.de:5060, in-dialog | 14454 17.611304 192.168.20.48 192.168.20.14 SIP 577 Status: 100 Trying | 14649 22.611128 192.168.20.48 192.168.20.14 SIP 612 Status: 488 Not acceptable here | 14650 22.661007 192.168.20.14 192.168.20.48 UDP 42 Source port: 5060 Destination port: 5060[Malformed Packet] 14651 23.111663 192.168.20.48 192.168.20.14 SIP 612 Status: 488 Not acceptable here | 14652 23.162024 192.168.20.14 192.168.20.48 UDP 42 Source port: 5060 Destination port: 5060[Malformed Packet] 14653 24.112190 192.168.20.48 192.168.20.14 SIP 612 Status: 488 Not acceptable here | 14654 24.162038 192.168.20.14 192.168.20.48 UDP 42 Source port: 5060 Destination port: 5060[Malformed Packet] 14655 25.838900 192.168.20.14 192.168.20.48 SIP 484 Request: BYE sip:004921123704144@192.168.20.48:5060 | 14656 25.839076 192.168.20.48 192.168.20.14 SIP 519 Status: 500 Server error | 14657 26.110508 192.168.20.48 192.168.20.14 SIP 612 Status: 488 Not acceptable here | 14658 26.161125 192.168.20.14 192.168.20.48 UDP 42 Source port: 5060 Destination port: 5060[Malformed Packet] 19910 30.111548 192.168.20.48 192.168.20.14 SIP 612 Status: 488 Not acceptable here | 19911 30.162368 192.168.20.14 192.168.20.48 UDP 42 Source port: 5060 Destination port: 5060[Malformed Packet] 192.168.20.14 is my local T.38 endpoint, 192.168.20.48 is ASTERISK, and 83.125.8.xxx are the provider's gateways / servers. My interpretation of the log is as follows: - The first three packets are the end of the training (quite sure about that) - Packets 14313, 14314: The provider re-invites asterisk for T.38 (confirmed by viewing the packet's details), asterisk answers Trying ... to the provider - Packets 14315, 14321, 14322: Asterisk re-invites the local endpoint (again confirmed by looking into the packet's details), the local endpoint answers OK, and asterisk ACKs the OK. - Packets 14323, 14329: Asterisk accepts the invitation from the provider by sending OK to the provider, and the provider ACKs the OK. - Packets 14453, 14454 and 14649: The local endpoint again tries to re-invite asterisk for T.38 (confirmed by looking into the packet's details), Asterisk answers Trying and then refuses, saying 488: Not acceptable here - From then on, things go
Re: [asterisk-users] Confbridge
Take a look here: http://asteriskfaqs.org/tag/confbridge/page/2 Am 02.12.2014 03:37, schrieb Bryant Zimmerman: I am doing dynamic conference bridges using confbridge in asterisk 11. Is there a way to toggle off an on recording of an ongoing conference call I have figured out how to record a conference if it is turned on when someone enters. Also I have noticed that when setting music_on_hold_class dynamically it does not override what is set on the channel. exten = s,n,Set(CONFBRIDGE(user,music_on_hold_class)=latin) Does anyone have any ideas on how I might fix this as well? -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk ARA with Multi tenant solution
Hi team, I had implementation complete customized IPPBX solution with the help on Asterisk , ARA and a2billing for billing purpose. Now only issue I come is if a customer A and B want to used similar extension rang then it's only possible with adding account-code like 100e12345 and 100e67890. But in GUI I will manage display and other features but issue come when customers want to register with Asterisk service. So customers will try 100 not 100e12345, or 100e67890. So my question is can we by pass this or any other alternative solution by which we may got solution? Any clue will be appreciated. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] On Fedora, kernel update resets /var/run/asterisk owner to root.root
On Fedora 20, every time the kernel updates, /var/run/asterisk owner is set to root.root. I'm running asterisk under user asterisk. Is there any way to keep /var/run/asterisk as asterisk.asterisk. Or do I find a new place to put asterisk.pid? sean -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] On Fedora, kernel update resets /var/run/asterisk owner to root.root
Are you using the Fedora RPMs or are you compiling it yourself? If you're compiling it yourself, you'll need to create a file called /etc/tmpfiles.d/asterisk.conf with this content: d /run/asterisk 0755 asterisk asterisk On Fedora /var/run is a symlink to /run, and /run is a tmpfs partition, which means it gets wiped out every time you reboot. systemd-tmpfiles uses the files in /etc/tmpfiles.d and /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d to recreate files/directories at boot time. On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:22 PM, sean darcy seandar...@gmail.com wrote: On Fedora 20, every time the kernel updates, /var/run/asterisk owner is set to root.root. I'm running asterisk under user asterisk. Is there any way to keep /var/run/asterisk as asterisk.asterisk. Or do I find a new place to put asterisk.pid? sean -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Jeff Ollie -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] On Fedora, kernel update resets /var/run/asterisk owner to root.root
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:22 PM, sean darcy seandar...@gmail.com wrote: Or do I find a new place to put asterisk.pid? Also, if you use the native systemd unit file, you no longer need a PID file, although you still need /run/asterisk to store the control socket. -- Jeff Ollie -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] On Fedora, kernel update resets /var/run/asterisk owner to root.root
On 12/02/2014 02:46 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:22 PM, sean darcy seandar...@gmail.com wrote: Or do I find a new place to put asterisk.pid? Also, if you use the native systemd unit file, you no longer need a PID file, although you still need /run/asterisk to store the control socket. So systemd is taking over the galaxy. Put asterisk.conf in /etc/tmpfiles.d, and all worked. It needs to be included in the rpm. I still need ctl so I can access * remotely. Thanks for the help. sean -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] On Fedora, kernel update resets /var/run/asterisk owner to root.root
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:00:25PM -0500, sean darcy wrote: On 12/02/2014 02:46 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:22 PM, sean darcy seandar...@gmail.com wrote: Or do I find a new place to put asterisk.pid? Also, if you use the native systemd unit file, you no longer need a PID file, although you still need /run/asterisk to store the control socket. So systemd is taking over the galaxy. No. /run has become a tmpfs directory. /var/run has been a tmpfs in Debian (tmpfs or deleted at startup) even before systemd. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com +972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com http://www.xorcom.com -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] On Fedora, kernel update resets /var/run/asterisk owner to root.root
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM, sean darcy seandar...@gmail.com wrote: Put asterisk.conf in /etc/tmpfiles.d, and all worked. It needs to be included in the rpm. It's already in the RPMs distributed by Fedora. I wouldn't know about the RPMs distributed by Digium. -- Jeff Ollie -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
