Re: [asterisk-users] odd issue with the with SIP over VPN

2010-01-24 Thread Zane C.B.
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:30:13 -0800
Dave Platt  wrote:

> 

Awesome. This client bug was the cause of this. Much thanks.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] odd issue with the with SIP over VPN

2010-01-23 Thread Zane C.B.
I've run into a odd issue where inbound calls to the SIP client work
fine, but outbound from the SIP client do not.

The path between the client and the server is as below.

N900 SIP client <-- OpenVPN --> Asterisk

The version of Asterisk in question is 1.6.0.18.

Any suggestions?


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Saftware RAID1 or Hardware RAID1 with Asterisk

2007-09-02 Thread Zane C.B.
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 17:46:19 +0300
Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 12:04:14AM -0400, Zane C.B. wrote:
> 
> > How the hell is mirroring using GEOM under FreeBSD more complex
> > than what it takes to get something very vaguely similar under
> > Linux?
> 
> It is more complex than a straight, non-software-RAID installation
> on BSD. This is all I meant. I don't intend to start any distro
> fight here.

Ahh, K. Cool. :)

Yeah, hardware RAID is always simpler to setup.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Saftware RAID1 or Hardware RAID1 with Asterisk

2007-09-01 Thread Zane C.B.
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 04:38:19 +0300
Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 07:29:09PM -0400, Zane C.B. wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:08:05 -0700
> > "shadowym" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Still true on CentOS 5.  You can only RAID partitions unless
> > > you do the LVM thing.  What are the disadvantages compared to
> > > being able to RAID the whole disk? Maybe for monitoring it's
> > > just more to deal with but does it make a RAID 1 any less
> > > reliable?
> > 
> > Being able to actually mirror a entire disk makes things a lot
> > easier to work with in all areas.
> > 
> > Why the hell would it make it less reliable? You have mirror
> > everything on a disk for reliable operation, including the swap.
> 
> You mentioned that the two disks are identical. Hence there's a
> large chance that they're from the same batch. This increases the
> chance of them failing together :-p

No, I am talking about the data on them. The disks just have to be
the same size.

> > 
> > Their are no disadvantages to mirror a entire disk.
> 
> A more complicated setup. But that's up to you to set up.

How the hell is mirroring using GEOM under FreeBSD more complex than
what it takes to get something very vaguely similar under Linux?

Software RAID1 on FreeBSD is way simpler, robust, and easier to work
with than Software RAID1 on Linux.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Saftware RAID1 or Hardware RAID1 with Asterisk

2007-09-01 Thread Zane C.B.
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:08:05 -0700
"shadowym" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Still true on CentOS 5.  You can only RAID partitions unless you do
> the LVM thing.  What are the disadvantages compared to being able
> to RAID the whole disk? Maybe for monitoring it's just more to deal
> with but does it make a RAID 1 any less reliable?

Being able to actually mirror a entire disk makes things a lot easier
to work with in all areas.

Why the hell would it make it less reliable? You have mirror
everything on a disk for reliable operation, including the swap.

Their are no disadvantages to mirror a entire disk.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Saftware RAID1 or Hardware RAID1 with Asterisk

2007-09-01 Thread Zane C.B.
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 11:51:19 -0600
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Zane C.B. wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:37:26 -0600
> > Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> >> Zane C.B. wrote:
> >>> 1: Software RAID on Linux is way less than impressive. Plus last
> >>> a I checked Linux can't handle mirroring a entire disk. Last I
> >>> looked at it around a year ago you were limited to only
> >>> mirroring partitions, which is a joke from a administrative
> >>> standpoint.
> >> How is this any different in FreeBSD?
> >>
> >> Could you explain to me how else you are going to mirror an
> >> entire disk in software when your boot partition is on the disk?
> > 
> > The raid info is done the same as on other decent system, it is
> > stored at the in the last sector of the provider.
> 
> I still don't understand what you mean by this. Something has to
> load the RAID engine, and if the RAID engine is sitting on root
> partition which is on the mirror, then it's not going to work.
> 
> Are you saying that this only works on disks that do not contain the
> root partition?

It is mirrored. This means both disks are exactly the same. Towards
the end of the kernel starting up, it goes through finding all the
gmirror disk devices etc. The raid information is contained at the
end of device.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Saftware RAID1 or Hardware RAID1 with Asterisk

2007-08-23 Thread Zane C.B.
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:50:57 -0400
Dave Fullerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Zane C.B. wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:33:23 +0530
> > "Vidura Senadeera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >> I would like to get community's feedback with regard to RAID1
> >> ( Software or Hardware) implementations with asterisk.
> >>
> >> This is my setup
> >>
> >> Motherboard with SATA RAID1 support
> >> CENT OS 4.4
> >> Asterisk 1.2.19
> >> Libpri/zaptel latest release
> >> 2.8 Ghz Intel processor
> >> 2 80 GB SATA Hard disks
> >> 256 MB RAM
> >> digium PRI/E1 card
> >>
> >> Following are the concerns I am having
> >>
> >> I'm planing to put this asterisk server in production enviorment
> >> which is having E1 connection to the asterisk server,
> >> approximately 20 con-current calls, Music on hold, voice mail
> >> boxes.
> >>
> >> 1. If I use Software RAID, what would be the impact to my
> >> deployment? ( problems that I have to face with regard to the
> >> call flow ) 2. If I use Hardware based RAID 1, what would be the
> >> impact to the system? 3. According to your practical experiance
> >> what is the ideal solution among both options?
> >>
> >> I will be highly appreciate your feedback on this regard.
> > 
> > 1: Software RAID on Linux is way less than impressive. Plus last
> > a I checked Linux can't handle mirroring a entire disk. Last I
> > looked at it around a year ago you were limited to only mirroring
> > partitions, which is a joke from a administrative standpoint.
> > 2: No real impact other than a bad disk won't mean a reinstall.
> > 3: On Linux, go hardware. On FreeBSD it is personal choice.
> 
> You can (sort of) run raid on an entire disk, but you have to use
> LVM. You basically create a single partition on the disk, run raid
> on that partition and then use LVM with the /dev/md? device as a
> physical volume that you can then "partition" with LVM.

Yeah, still a ugly solution though.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Saftware RAID1 or Hardware RAID1 with Asterisk

2007-08-23 Thread Zane C.B.
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:37:26 -0600
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Zane C.B. wrote:
> > 1: Software RAID on Linux is way less than impressive. Plus last
> > a I checked Linux can't handle mirroring a entire disk. Last I
> > looked at it around a year ago you were limited to only mirroring
> > partitions, which is a joke from a administrative standpoint.
> 
> How is this any different in FreeBSD?
> 
> Could you explain to me how else you are going to mirror an entire
> disk in software when your boot partition is on the disk?

The raid info is done the same as on other decent system, it is stored
at the in the last sector of the provider.

making a mirrored freebsd system is like this...
1: install freebsd
2: dd if= of=<2nd drive for mirror>
3: gmirror label  <2nd drive>
4: mount 2nd drive and edit fstab to boot
using /dev/gmirror/
5: boot from 2nd drive
6: gmirror insert  


/me loves GEOM, the goddess of all disk subsystems or whatever.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=gmirror&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.2-RELEASE&format=html

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Saftware RAID1 or Hardware RAID1 with Asterisk

2007-08-21 Thread Zane C.B.
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:33:23 +0530
"Vidura Senadeera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Dear All,
> 
> I would like to get community's feedback with regard to RAID1
> ( Software or Hardware) implementations with asterisk.
> 
> This is my setup
> 
> Motherboard with SATA RAID1 support
> CENT OS 4.4
> Asterisk 1.2.19
> Libpri/zaptel latest release
> 2.8 Ghz Intel processor
> 2 80 GB SATA Hard disks
> 256 MB RAM
> digium PRI/E1 card
> 
> Following are the concerns I am having
> 
> I'm planing to put this asterisk server in production enviorment
> which is having E1 connection to the asterisk server, approximately
> 20 con-current calls, Music on hold, voice mail boxes.
> 
> 1. If I use Software RAID, what would be the impact to my
> deployment? ( problems that I have to face with regard to the call
> flow ) 2. If I use Hardware based RAID 1, what would be the impact
> to the system? 3. According to your practical experiance what is
> the ideal solution among both options?
> 
> I will be highly appreciate your feedback on this regard.

1: Software RAID on Linux is way less than impressive. Plus last a I
checked Linux can't handle mirroring a entire disk. Last I looked at
it around a year ago you were limited to only mirroring partitions,
which is a joke from a administrative standpoint.
2: No real impact other than a bad disk won't mean a reinstall.
3: On Linux, go hardware. On FreeBSD it is personal choice.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk does not disconnect SIP call

2004-07-31 Thread C.B.
Hello everybody,
my situation is the following: I have an ISDN telephone connected to a 
HFC ISDN card on an asterisk server. The asterisk server is behind a 
NAT, but all the ports (i.e. 5060 and the range specified in rtp.conf) 
are forwarded to the asterisk machine. I am using the German SIP 
provider Sipgate.de. The sip commands show that I am registered properly 
with Sipgate.

My problem is that when I want to call via the Sip provider a real phone 
number (ISDN phone >> SIP), I get a ring tone. When I now decide to hang 
up (f.e. when nobody answers), the called telephone continues to ring 
forever. This error shows up:
"app_dial.c : 362 wait_for_answer: Unable to forward frame"

If the other party answers and I am the first one to hang up, the call 
sometimes does not get cancelled as well. The called party has to hang 
up first to really disconnect the call. This error is not yet 
reproducable, as I said, sometimes it works and asterisk hangs up correctly.

I am using the lastest cvs version of asterisk that automatically 
installs with the install script of the brifstuff von www.junghanns.net.

Any suggestions how to solve it?
Christopher
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users