[Asterisk-Users] Two devices behind nat

2005-09-01 Thread Chris Wilson

Hello Everyone,

I have one machine (asterisk server) that is DMZ behind my nat firewall

on my client end (at home) i have a linksys wrt54g with 16384-32766
forwarded to my cisco 7960 (which works fine) and 16000 - 16383 forwarded
to my sipura 2100 (which is set to these ports)

For some reason, the sipura only works some of the time.

Both devices are set to register, is there anything else I need to do to get
them to work behind nat?

Thanks!

Chris

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] error messages

2005-08-28 Thread Chris Wilson

Hey,

does anyone know why i'd be receiving:

Aug 28 19:40:04 DEBUG[1875]: # Testing 66.27.233.241 with 10.0.10.0
Aug 28 19:40:04 DEBUG[1875]: Target address 66.27.233.241 is not local, 
substituting externip


I get tons of them, usually when the phone is registering/calling/receiving 
calls.


Thanks!

Chris 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Flash over SIP Trunk

2005-08-13 Thread Chris Wilson



Hello,

I have a Incoming/Outgoing SIP Trunk setup to 
Broadvoice, is there a way to send a "Flash" over the trunk, for example, to do 
flash transfers and call-waiting?

I tried to use Flash() but it seems to not work on 
the sip trunk, only my zap trunks. 

Please let me know, thanks! :)

Chris
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Flash Transfer (callthrough)

2005-08-13 Thread Chris Wilson

Hello Everyone:)!,

I have a Incoming/Outgoing SIP Trunk setup to Broadvoice, is there a way to
send a Flash over the trunk, for example, to do flash transfers and
call-waiting?

I tried to use Flash() but it seems to not work on the sip trunk, my
configuration is as follows:

exten = 500,1,Goto(callthrough,s,1)

[callthrough]
exten = s,1,SetVar(NR=)
exten = s,2,Background(privacy-prompt)
exten = s,3,ResponseTimeout(10)
exten = s,4,WaitExten(20)

exten = _X,1,SetVar(NR=${NR})
exten = _X,2,Goto(s,3)

exten = *,1,Goto(s,1)

exten = #,1,Playback(transfer)
exten = #,2,Flash()
exten = #,3,SendDTMF(${NR})
exten = #,4,Flash()
exten = #,5,Hangup()


Debug output is as follows:


Please let me know, thanks! :)

Chris

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Routing by Called interface

2004-05-08 Thread Chris Wilson
Hey everyone,

I want to run different lines directly to different extensions on two
FXO analog interfaces. ie; Zap/1 goes to Ext. 101, Zap/2 goes to
extensions 102


Does anyone know of a way to do this?

Thanks!

Chris

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Routing by called interface

2004-05-07 Thread Chris Wilson
Hey everyone,

I want to run different lines directly to different extensions on two
FXO analog interfaces. ie; Zap/1 goes to Ext. 101, Zap/2 goes to
extensions 102


Does anyone know of a way to do this?

Thanks!

Chris

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] DNIS on X100P

2004-02-01 Thread Chris Wilson



Hello,

I have 6 analog lines that ring downcoming 
into my office that support DNIS, my current phone system (SRX)displays 
the "called number" on the screen of the operator phone, IE; xxx-7873 = Netxn, 
xxx-7874 = Dolphinsafe, etc. 

Does asterisk support any type of features to 
distinguish between the numbers dialed?

Thanks!
Chris Wilson


[Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 Problems

2004-01-28 Thread Chris Wilson



Has anyone ever seen these errors generated by a 
cisco 7960? none of our other brand phones seem to generate these 
erros:

Jan 27 21:54:07 WARNING[-1147556944]: 
chan_sip.c:486 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
for seqno 101 (Response)Jan 27 21:54:08 WARNING[-1147556944]: 
chan_sip.c:486 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
for seqno 101 (Response)Jan 27 21:54:12 WARNING[-1147556944]: 
chan_sip.c:486 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
for seqno 101 (Response)Jan 27 21:54:14 WARNING[-1147556944]: 
chan_sip.c:2485 __transmit_response: Unable to determine sequence number 
from ''Jan 27 21:54:18 WARNING[-1147556944]: chan_sip.c:2485 
__transmit_response: Unable to determine sequence number from ''Jan 27 
21:54:22 WARNING[-1147556944]: chan_sip.c:2485 __transmit_response: Unable 
to determine sequence number from ''

Thanks! Any feedback would be appreciated 
:)

Chris


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call

2004-01-25 Thread Chris Wilson
Hmm, The host seems to be good, I have no firewall rules in place at the
moment for the local network, and everything is consistantly reachable.

it seems to only happen when a call is hung up/initiated, and when the
program is first started...if that might provide any insight.


Thanks!:)


Chris

- Original Message - 
From: Doug Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 4:02 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call


 Chris Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hey,
 
 I'm getting an odd message in my logs, and have'nt been able to find much
information on it:
 
 Jan 24 00:22:39 WARNING[-1137431632]: chan_sip.c:486 retrans_pkt: Maximum
retries exceeded on call [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
seqno 102 (Request)

 Just guessing here, but it sounds like Asterisk sent a request, didn't
 get a reply, sent again, didn't get a reply, and so on until it hit an
 internal limit.  If my guess is correct, I suppose there could be many
 causes, including:

 * Target host down
 * No path to the target
 * Firewall blocking traffic
 * Target host not running SIP, at least on the targeted port.

 Doug
 -- 
 Doug Meredith ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 SystemGuard - Oracle remote support
 877-974-8273 (87-SYSGUARD)
 506-854-7997
 www.systemguard.com

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SayDigits

2004-01-25 Thread Chris Wilson
Awesome, that worked! Thanks :)

Chris
- Original Message - 
From: Grzegorz Nosek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SayDigits


 On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 10:56:59 -0800, Chris Wilson wrote 
  Has anyone had this problem: 
   
  (When calling to ext. 1010) 
   
  Jan 24 10:50:27 WARNING[-1252262992]: file.c:446  
  ast_openstream: File digits/ does not exist in any format 
  Jan 24 10:50:27 WARNING[-1252262992]: file.c:734  
  ast_streamfile: Unable to open digits/ (format ULAW): No  
  such file or directory 
   
   in Extensions.conf  
  exten = 1010,1,SayDigits(${CALLERID}) 
   
  /var/lib/asterisk/sounds/digits exists, and there are many  
  files in there. Any idea's? 
   
  Thanks! :) 
   
  Chris 
  
 have you tried: 
  
 exten = 1010,1,SayDigits(${CALLERIDNUM}) 
  
 ? 
  
 hth, 
  greg 
  
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call

2004-01-24 Thread Chris Wilson



Hey,

I'm getting an odd message in my logs, and have'nt 
been able to find much information on it:

Jan 24 00:22:39 WARNING[-1137431632]: 
chan_sip.c:486 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
for seqno 102 (Request)

I'm running asterisk with a Cisco 7960G 


If anyone know's why i'd get this.Any help 
would be appreciated! =] Thanks! 

Chris


Re: [Asterisk-Users] retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call

2004-01-24 Thread Chris Wilson



Hm, had that enabled since i set everything up. I 
tried with nat=no as well, same problem.

Welp, I guess if anyone figgers it out i'd 
appreciate any help that comes my way :).

Thanks!
Chris

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kannaiyan 
  Natesan 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 12:53 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 
  retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call
  
  You are having Cisco 7960G behind NAT.
  
  Try with nat=yes
  
  I'm not sure any other settings will solve that in 
  asterisk.
  I have tried but no luck.
  
  Kannaiyan
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Chris 
Wilson 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 8:26 
AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] retrans_pkt: 
Maximum retries exceeded on call

Hey,

I'm getting an odd message in my logs, and 
have'nt been able to find much information on it:

Jan 24 00:22:39 WARNING[-1137431632]: 
chan_sip.c:486 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
for seqno 102 (Request)

I'm running asterisk with a Cisco 7960G 


If anyone know's why i'd get this.Any help 
would be appreciated! =] Thanks! 

Chris


[Asterisk-Users] SayDigits

2004-01-24 Thread Chris Wilson




Has anyone had this problem:

(Whencalling to ext. 1010)

Jan 24 10:50:27 WARNING[-1252262992]: file.c:446 
ast_openstream: File digits/" does not exist in any formatJan 24 10:50:27 
WARNING[-1252262992]: file.c:734 ast_streamfile: Unable to open digits/" (format 
ULAW): No such file or directory
 in Extensions.conf 
exten = 
1010,1,SayDigits(${CALLERID})


/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/digits exists, and 
there are many files in there. Any idea's?
Thanks! :)
Chris


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mute button in Grandstream?

2003-11-28 Thread Chris Wilson
Hi John,

 On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Anton Yurchenko wrote:
  Hello,
 
  Has anybody been able to get the Mute button work on grandstream? it
  simply does nothing. Only Hold is avalable, which is not that good.
 
 
 Does the GS even HAVE a mute button? The 101's appear not to.

My 100 has MUTE/DEL in the bottom right hand corner. And no, it doesn't 
work for me either :-)

Cheers, Chris.
-- 
_  __ __ _
 / __/ / ,__(_)_  | Chris Wilson -- UNIX Firewall Lead Developer |
/ (_  ,\/ _/ /_ \ | NetServers.co.uk http://www.netservers.co.uk |
\__/_/_/_//_/___/ | 21 Signet Court, Cambridge, UK. 01223 576516 |

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 3x AVM Fritz!Card PCI for a EuroISDN PBX.

2003-11-28 Thread Chris Wilson
Hi David,

 I'm currently considering various PBX solutions for our office telephone
 network, and would very much like to use Asterisk. Currently, my
 research is incomplete. I have been recommended to use the above cards,
 but it is unclear from my Googling whether my configuration will work:
 
- 3x Fritz!Card PCI's in one host.
- 3x 6 b-channels.
- ~20 Budgetone (and some others) handsets.
 
 Can anyone answer these questions:
 
- Will the 3 ISDN cards function correctly in one host?

We have done this and it works, using a variant of the hack posted on the 
website. Points to watch out for:

- It's not reliable. We've had Asterisk spontaneously refuse to dial out 
or accept connections on CAPI until the cards are reset. We don't 
recommend doing this in production.

- You need to be careful with the patch because there are two types of 
cards, and the patch isn't clever about how it detects them, so either 
make sure that all your cards are absolutely identical in /proc/pci, or 
fix the patch.

- Will running all 3 cards flat out require particularly beefy
  hardware?

Doesn't seem to.

- Will the Grandstream phones provide a good equivilant to
  professional dedicated PBX phones? (assuming a good network)  I
  have read lots about echo problems and so on, is this an issue?

They are cheap and nasty feeling, and not particularly reliable, so I 
would say no. Cisco 7960 is much better, although more of a pain to get 
working out of the box, since you need DHCP, TFTP and configuration tools.

Cheers, Chris.
-- 
_  __ __ _
 / __/ / ,__(_)_  | Chris Wilson -- UNIX Firewall Lead Developer |
/ (_  ,\/ _/ /_ \ | NetServers.co.uk http://www.netservers.co.uk |
\__/_/_/_//_/___/ | 21 Signet Court, Cambridge, UK. 01223 576516 |

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Larger SIP packets

2003-11-27 Thread Chris Wilson
Hi all,

We would like to increase the size (sample length) of RTP packets sent by 
Asterisk to SIP phones. I gather that Asterisk currently always uses 20ms 
packets for RTP, although I can't find in the source where that's defined, 
unless it's in chan_zap.c.

I'm guessing from
[http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-September/019490.html]
that it's not possible right now (or at least wasn't in September). Does
anyone know if and when it's coming as an option, or if we can modify the
source to always use, say, 40ms packets instead of 20?

Thanks in advance for any advice. Please CC me since I'm not subscribed to 
the list anymore (too much traffic).

Cheers, Chris.
-- 
_  __ __ _
 / __/ / ,__(_)_  | Chris Wilson -- UNIX Firewall Lead Developer |
/ (_  ,\/ _/ /_ \ | NetServers.co.uk http://www.netservers.co.uk |
\__/_/_/_//_/___/ | 21 Signet Court, Cambridge, UK. 01223 576516 |

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] ISDN PBX + IVR + Voicemail Configuration - Sanity Check ...

2003-11-07 Thread Chris Wilson
Hi Hans,

 b. Hooked up to ISDN PBX using an ISDN4Linux (chan_modem ?) or CAPI4Linux
 (chan_capi ?) compatible ISDN controller.

We had real problems with chan_modem, where Asterisk would deadlock after 
the first call was hung up. We saw this with both 0.5.0 and CVS from 
late October. Other people have reported success with chan_modem, so I 
don't know if it's a site-specific issue.

We are using CAPI now which seems to work reasonably well, except that we
had an unexplained total ISDN failure a few days ago, which was fixed by
restarting Asterisk.

In case anyone is interested in the deadlock, which also affects 
analog modems for us, here is the backtrace:

#0  0xe002 in ?? ()
#1  0x08052355 in ast_log (level=0, file=0x80b42a8 asterisk.c, line=337,
function=0x80b4304 urg_handler, fmt=0x80b42f4 Urgent handler\n)
at logger.c:266
#2  0x080832a2 in urg_handler (num=-4) at asterisk.c:337
#3  signal handler called
#4  0xe000 in ?? ()
#5  0x08093ef6 in el_getc (el=0x80ca970, cp=0xbfffea4b
@øê\f\b\214ê^?¿\002)
at read.c:347
#6  0x08093d65 in read_getcmd (el=0x80ca970,
cmdnum=0xfffc Address 0xfffc out of bounds,
ch=0xbfffea4b @øê\f\b\214ê^?¿\002) at read.c:243
#7  0x08094025 in el_gets (el=0x80ca970, nread=0xbfffea8c) at read.c:443
#8  0x08082761 in main (argc=135064312, argv=0xbfffea8c) at
asterisk.c:1459
#9  0x420156a4 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
(gdb)
(gdb) up
#1  0x08052355 in ast_log (level=0, file=0x80b42a8 asterisk.c, line=337,
function=0x80b4304 urg_handler, fmt=0x80b42f4 Urgent handler\n)
at logger.c:266
266 ast_mutex_lock(loglock);

 P.S. He who comes up with clean internal ISDN bus (point to multi-point)
 support for Asterisk, based on CologneChip based equipment receives an 18
 large Dutch cheese in the mail, right after I've wiped away my tears of
 happiness !

We are really looking forward to trying this too. Klaus-Peter is the man 
=) (sorry dan, can't use your softphone on *nix).

Cheers, Chris.
-- 
   ___ __ _
 / __// / ,__(_)_  | Chris Wilson -- UNIX Firewall Lead Developer |
/ (_ / ,\/ _/ /_ \ | NetServers.co.uk http://www.netservers.co.uk |
\ _//_/_/_//_/___/ | 21 Signet Court, Cambridge, UK. 01223 576516 |




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: *, Fritz!PCI and strange behavior

2003-11-06 Thread Chris Wilson
Hi Patrick and others,

On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Patrick Lidstone (Personal E-mail) wrote:

  - Very often, after * runs for a while, it stops recognizing incoming
ISDN calls and refuses to send out ISDN calls.
 
 I have this. If I try to dial out, I get an all channels are busy at 
 this time error, when they are not.

How did you get this error displayed? All I get with CAPI DEBUG is a 
reason code.

 The funny thing is, 
restarting * or CAPI doesn't work - I have to shutdown both, unplug
and replug the ISDN cable, and then after startup everything works
again. At first, I thought that it might be a bad cable, so I taped
down everything in order to prevent it from moving. This
  didn't help.
I really do not understand why the thing with the cable is 
  necessary.
 
 Straight asterisk restart always clears this condition for me.

We just experienced a problem which looked something like this. Nobody 
could call in or out through the Fritz cards until we restarted Asterisk. 
The CAPI debug output looked like this:

  == CONNECT_IND (PLCI=0x101,DID=510,CID=221,CIP=0x1,CONTROLLER=0x1)
  == DISCONNECT_IND PLCI=0x101 REASON=0
  == CONNECT_IND (PLCI=0x101,DID=510,CID=(null),CIP=0x4,CONTROLLER=0x1)
  == DISCONNECT_IND PLCI=0x101 REASON=0

where CONNECT_IND was immediately followed by DISCONNECT_IND. There was 
none of the normal output:

-- data = 514:901482320681
-- capi request omsn = 514
  == found capi with omsn = 514

or CONNECT_CONF/CONNECT_B3_REQ/DISCONNECT_B3_IND.

Reason code 0 looks very suspicious. /var/log/messages showed:

Nov  6 13:11:42 voip kernel: kcapi: appl 1 ncci 0x10102 up
Nov  6 13:12:19 voip kernel: kcapi: appl 1 ncci 0x10102 down
Nov  6 13:13:35 voip kernel: kcapi: appl 1 ncci 0x10101 up
Nov  6 13:13:41 voip kernel: kcapi: appl 1 ncci 0x10101 down
Nov  6 13:13:49 voip kernel: kcapi: appl 1 ncci 0x10101 up
Nov  6 13:13:58 voip kernel: kcapi: appl 1 ncci 0x10101 down
Nov  6 13:15:26 voip kernel: kcapi: appl 1 ncci 0x10101 up
Nov  6 13:15:56 voip kernel: kcapi: appl 1 ncci 0x10101 down

Does anybody have any ideas?

  Any light that you can shine on this would be most helpful. OBTW: the 
  answer don't use a Fritz is not applicable here - I'm trying to 
  assess the feasibility of making a 300$ ISDN SoHo PBX...
 
 I think the problem may be related to call progress indication from the
 ISDN line. I have UK ISDN2e (packaged as Business Highway - which
 includes what is effectively a telco-owned TA with two analogue ports).
 I have noticed that outgoing channels getting tied up corresponds to
 placing a call which is terminated prematurely (e.g. hangup before
 completing dialing) or dialing a call which can't be completed because
 the dialed PSTN subscriber number is invalid. I've learned to live with
 it - but it would be great to get to the bottom of it.

Sorry, forgot to run show channels and capi info. Will try to remember 
next time.

Cheers, Chris.
-- 
   ___ __ _
 / __// / ,__(_)_  | Chris Wilson -- UNIX Firewall Lead Developer |
/ (_ / ,\/ _/ /_ \ | NetServers.co.uk http://www.netservers.co.uk |
\ _//_/_/_//_/___/ | 21 Signet Court, Cambridge, UK. 01223 576516 |

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] NetJet Cards

2003-11-03 Thread Chris Wilson
Hi Matthew,

On 2 Nov 2003, Matthew Enger wrote:

 exten = _004,1,Dial(modem/g1/V${EXTEN:1})

Try this Dial command:

Dial(Modem/ttyI0:${EXTEN:1})

 msn=0397468733L*

Try removing L* from the MSN, it looks wrong to me.

You might find that ttyI0 and ttyI1 are both channels of the first card, 
and that you will need ttyI2 and ttyI3 for the second card. But I haven't 
tested isdn4linux with more than one card.

Please let me know if you get it working, I had major problems with 
Asterisk hanging using the isdn4linux and other modem drivers. Eventually 
I had to switch to CAPI.

Cheers, Chris.
-- 
   ___ __ _
 / __// / ,__(_)_  | Chris Wilson -- UNIX Firewall Lead Developer |
/ (_ / ,\/ _/ /_ \ | NetServers.co.uk http://www.netservers.co.uk |
\ _//_/_/_//_/___/ | 21 Signet Court, Cambridge, UK. 01223 576516 |

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users