Re: [Asterisk-Users] Gsm + snom phones

2004-01-22 Thread Detlef Wengorz
Matteo Brancaleoni wrote:
 
 Hi.
 
  About a month ago I made a test with snom200b.
  At least then it worked ok with *.
  At the moment  I'm using mainly g711a. So, there is always a possibility
  something
 
 but you also tested gsm ?

It works for me with gsm :-)
6 snom 200 and one snom 105 with gsm over german t-dsl (128 Kbit)

sound is really good :-)

 
 Greets,Matteo.
 
 --
 Matteo Brancaleoni
 Espia System Administrator
 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Web   : http://www.espia.it
 Phone : +39 02 70633354  - ext 201
 IAX(2): [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ext 201
 Iaxtel: 1-700-56-62458   - ext 201
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
Best regards 
Detlef Wengorz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Detlef Wengorz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] ISDN CAPI and anonymous callers

2004-01-15 Thread Detlef Wengorz
Walter Doerr wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 I am trying to use * to handle anonymous ISDN callers.
 
 Something like
 
 exten = 5150/0,1,Congestion

use:
   exten = 5150/,1,Congestion

 
 should work but doesn't. Apparently because the ISDN CAPI doesn't
 use 0 for callers who don't send their number.
 
 Is there a way to make * identify ISDN callers who use CLIR?
 
 -Walter
 
 --
   Walter Doerr   =*=   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   =*=   FAX: +49 2421 962001
   The poor folks who only have 100MBytes of RAM five years
 from now may not be able to buffer a 16MB packet, but that's their
 tough luck.  (John Gilmore on Mon, 10 Oct 88 18:10:21 PDT)
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
Best regards 
Detlef Wengorz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Detlef Wengorz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Strange code in rtp.c / disconnect - maybe reinvite problems

2003-11-25 Thread Detlef Wengorz
Daniel Chabrol wrote:
 
 Hi List!
 
 I get WARNING[14351]: File rtp.c, Line 1202 (ast_rtp_bridge): codec0 =
 524300 is not codec1 = 524300, can't do reinvite at my asterisk console.
 
 The code there looks realy strange:
 
 codec0 = pr0-get_codec(c0);
 codec1 = pr1-get_codec(c1);
 ast_log(LOG_WARNING, codec0 = %d is not codec1 = %d, can't do
 reinvite\n,codec0,codec1);
 /* Hey, we can't do reinvite if both parties speak diffrent codecs */
 if (codec0 != codec1)
 return -2;
 
 I think the message should only occur *after* checking equality:
 
 if (codec0 != codec1) {
 ast_log(LOG_WARNING, codec0 = %d is not codec1 = %d, can't do
 reinvite\n,codec0,codec1);
 return -2;
 }
 
 I hoped this can't do reinvite would explain my disconnects from the
 nikotel.com sip server after 60 seconds. But this little bug seems only
 to be display-specific and not affect funtion. But maybe i oversight

That's correct :-(
but change the code like this

if (codec0 != codec1) {
 ast_log(LOG_WARNING,
 codec0 = %d is not codec1 = %d, can't do
reinvite\n,codec0,codec1);

 ast_mutex_unlock(c0-lock); // unlock before return
 ast_mutex_unlock(c1-lock); // unlock before return
 return -2;
}

and try again.
maybe it helps.




 something which still disables the reinvite even if i use
 canreinvite=yes in my sip.conf:
 
 [nikotel]
 type=friend
 username=USERID
 fromuser=USERID
 secret=PASSWORD
 host=calamar0.nikotel.com
 canreinvite=yes
 context=internal
 ; no nat entry because im not using nat!
 
 Is there someone which is able to use Nikotel.com with the current
 CVS-Version (in my case CVS-11/24/03-19:24:22). BTW: 0.5.0 don't work
 too in my case (at least not longer than 60 seconds). Pulver.com calls
 and so on are no problem. Any suggestions?
 
 Best regards,
 Daniel
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
Best regards 
Detlef Wengorz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Detlef Wengorz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users