Re: [Asterisk-Users] Speech Recognition and Asterisk
On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 13:26, Mike Meyer wrote: Mike, I have been mulling similar ideas for some time. I've turned up the same projects you have. From what I can tell, I feel I am uncovering the tip of the ice berg and this may not be trivial. I've pretty much got the same feeling based on my research. I don't think this is a trivial problem to solve. But it seems that the Voice recognition application, once developed, would have to be linked via an AGI to the asterisk dial plan. I think this is accurate. You would use either AGI or a native Asterisk module to connect the pieces. Has anyone gotten Voice recognition working with Asterisk? Last I saw, a few were attempting to apply Sphinx back in the December and April time frame. Any shared successes, progress or direction on Sphinx or any other VR app would be appreciated before I start down this road. I have nothing working at this point, just some ideas and a plan to explore further. As soon as I have free time I'm hoping to explore some of my ideas on my * system. I certainly would be happy to hear others' experiences on this mail list. -joe -- Innovation Software Group, LLC - http://www.innovationsw.com Custom Internet and Computer Solutions Linux, UNIX, Java Training ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:25, Steven M. Sokol wrote: Not currently. There is a bounty for the development of working Wildcard drivers for Free/Net/Open BSD. Care to write them? On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:33, James Moran wrote: Dam wish I was that good to do that. You can pitch into the bounty to sweeten the pot for someone who is good enough. I know some guys who are capable and I've forwarded on the bounty notice but I'm guessing it's not high enough to make it worth their while shrug. -joe -- Innovation Software Group, LLC - http://www.innovationsw.com Custom Internet and Computer Solutions Linux, UNIX, Java Training ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] zaptel on Debian
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 20:47, Duane wrote: The fix for me since I roll my own kernels, after a lot of buggering about and head banging on the desk, the solution was rather simple... cd /usr/src ln -s linux-2.4.25 linux If you build your own software, the above is recommended. I do this routinely on my systems. Many software packages built from source expect the linux source code/headers in /usr/src/linux. -joe -- Innovation Software Group, LLC - http://www.innovationsw.com Custom Internet and Computer Solutions Linux, UNIX, Java Training ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] zaptel on Debian
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 00:34, Hermann Wecke wrote: On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Tim Sailer wrote: Does anyone have the zaptel modules built for Debian 2.4.24 kernel? Someone here is running * on debian? I have * running on Debian stable. I back-ported the zaptel and asterisk packages from testing. I'm currently evaluating * for my uses and so this is not a production system. My back-ported packages are also not complete although they are functional for my uses so far. Recompiled kernel to latest (?) 2.4.24 uname -a Linux mail 2.4.24 #5 SMP Tue Mar 2 17:31:13 BRT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux stegosaurus:/etc/asterisk# uname -a Linux stegosaurus 2.4.18-1-686 #1 Mon Jan 5 19:32:08 UTC 2004 i686 unknown do you have a hardware problem? the zaptel hardware just worked for me. -joe -- Innovation Software Group, LLC - http://www.innovationsw.com Custom Internet and Computer Solutions Linux, UNIX, Java Training ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] s/asterisk mailinglists/asterisk forum/g ?
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 10:06, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: now that the lists are at 2-300 email messages a day, perhaps it's time to move it to a web forum instead? This can give us lots of categories (all the apps and channels etc etc), an easily searchable thing such as phpbb and it'll be a lot easier to find the actual info. While I myself am feeling a little overwhelmed by the mail traffic too, I don't like the idea of forums. Personally, I have yet to see a forum that I consider useful. All too often forums are slow, difficult to search and waste too much time throughout the day polling for new posts. I think a decent mail list archive with searching capabilities and sortable by date/thread/author should be fine. If the traffic is too much for you then unsubscribe and scan the archives from time to time. I'm involved with a few organizations that spent considerable time, effort and $$ setting up and managing forums only to find they are consistently under-utilized. I vote against forums. -joe -- Innovation Software Group, LLC - http://www.innovationsw.com Custom Internet and Computer Solutions Linux, UNIX, Java Training ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Compiling while * is running
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 14:26, David Gomillion wrote: Rob Fugina wrote: Seg faulting compiles usually indicate a memory problem on the machine. Not lack of size, but bad memory, badly seated memory, etc... There's no reason asterisk running, or the drivers being loaded, should cause a compile to seg fault. I don't agree. When first learning to program, my programs segfaulted all of the time, regarless of what machine I was on. Often, it was doing something stupid, like trying to replace a file that was in use, etc. I think you are mis-reading Rob. True that your own programs segfaulted but did you cause GCC to segfault? I think the original author said that GCC was itself segfaulting. GCC is so well used and tested that as Rob points out, the most common cause of a GCC segfault is hardware failure. My suggestion: if this downtime is unacceptable for your use, then get an identical machine, exactly alike in all ways, including library versions, hardware, etc, and compile it on that machine. Then copy the appropriate directories over to your production machine. Copy the production machine's directories to a safe location, stop * and zaptel, copy the new compiled things over, then restart * and zaptel. My guess is that 30 seconds should be plenty of time for this change. Thus, you only need to have been up for the last 3.47 days to have 99.999% uptime. This is a reason I argue for binary packages in production environments. You can build the packages (eg. debs or RPMs) on a development machine at your leisure and install the binary in minutes on the production machine. If your packages use proper dependencies you can also be much more sure you can reproduce your environment on new hardware (testing, qa, hot-spare, disaster recovery etc). -joe -- Innovation Software Group, LLC - http://www.innovationsw.com Custom Internet and Computer Solutions Linux, UNIX, Java Training ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
