RE: [Asterisk-Users] Nortel Phones.

2004-10-26 Thread Kostur, Andre
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Nortel Phones.





Say... no chance that you could post your server code somewhere? We've got some i2004's kicking around doing nothing

-Original Message-
From: Carl Sempla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 2:08 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Nortel Phones.



On Monday, 25 October, 2004 22:19 : Jim Van Meggelen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Currently the Nortel IP phones only support Nortel's proprietary
 protocol, UNISTIM. There is currently no way for Asterisk to directly
 support these phones unless: a) Nortel releases a standards-complaint
 firmware image, or b) somebody is able to write UNISTIM compatibility
 into Asterisk.


Actually, I've done some reverse engineering on the UNISTIM protocol. I have
a fully functional server able to handle such phones. If someone want to
port my standalone code into asterisk, it would be great.


-- 
Carl



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Vegastream 50 FXO with Asterisk

2004-02-10 Thread Kostur, Andre
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Vegastream 50 FXO with Asterisk





Well, I've got my Vega 50 Analog able to pick any available analog port for an outgoing line.


Let's assume we've started with the QuickStart instructions that came with the Vega:


- First, add a new Planner Group. Give it a name (say, POTS), set the Lan to Active. Set the Cause to 34


- Modify the Inbound_From_LAN Profile
- Remove the Plan that the Quickstart told you to add
- Add a plan for every analog port you want to use
- Set the Src to IF:99,TEL:8.*
- Set the Dest to IF:xx,TEL:1, replace the 'xx' with the port number of the analog port
- Set the Group to the POTS group



This will set up the Vega so that if it receives a call of the form 8xxx, it will pick the first available analog port, and dial xxx.

-Original Message-
From: David Liu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 1:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Vegastream 50 FXO with Asterisk



Hi Adam,


Could you show us your configs on Asterisk and on Vega so everyone on the list can have a guide to get Vega working with Asterisk?

Thanks!
David
- Original Message - 
From: Low, Adam 
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' 
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 12:47 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Vegastream 50 FXO with Asterisk



I have a Vega 50 BRI working without any of the issues you mentioned, the dual SIP registrations is normal for most multi-line boxes enabled split users.

Rgds, Adam
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Dalgliesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 February 2004 20:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Vegastream 50 FXO with Asterisk



Anyone have any experience configuring VegaStream's with Asterisk.


I have run into a few of questions. 


1. It appear that after turning on registrations I am seeing two request for 
registration per line
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is purpose and how do I handle this?


2. DTMF btw Asterisk and the Unit I was unable to get rfc2833 to work 
successfully with inbound or outbound DTMF. Is this a known issue?


3. How is the best way to deal with dialout and selecting a free channel on the VegaStream


Any general suggestions/experiences with regard to configuring a VegaStream with asterisk would be appricated.


Thanks





* DISCLAIMER * 



This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure and may include proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person 




RE: [Asterisk-Users] Still looking for small fxo sip gateway

2004-02-03 Thread Kostur, Andre
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Still looking for small fxo sip gateway





You might want to take a look on the Wiki pages for VoIP, in particular:


http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-VoIP+Gateways


Offhand at our site we're trying to set up something similar (although a little larger, 10 FXO lines, but no requirement to pick which line the call goes out... our 10 lines are all overlines). Our Vegastream 50 FXO shipped yesterday (or perhaps this morning), so we should be getting it in a day or two. (BTW: I'm in Canada)

There's been rumours posted to this list that Digium is coming out with a higher-density FXO card, and Woody mentioned a Voicetronix Openline12, which appears to be a 12-port FXO card. And I believe that Intel/Dialogic puts out some multiport FXS/FXO cards...

 -Original Message-
 From: Rich Adamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 6:15 AM
 To: Asterisk-a-users-list
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Still looking for small fxo sip gateway
 
 
 
 I've been looking around for a small external sip fxo gateway, sending
 emails to possible vendors, etc, and can not seem to come up 
 with anything
 that fits. Suggestions anyone? (No channel bank  T1 card 
 suggestions, 
 please. I've also just completed an eval of the Mediatrix 1204 which
 does not support the requirements.)
 
 The market between two fxo pstn lines (pair of x100p's) and something
 around four to six lines seems to be lacking, or I'm looking in the
 wrong search engine (or something). I fully understand the 
 economics of
 when a channel bank and T1 card becomes cost effective, including the 
 eBay costs (and risks), etc. I've also heard the comments for months 
 now that Digium is/will be selling something real-soon-now.
 
 Specifically, I'd like to use a 4-port fxo sip gateway 
 capable of supporting
 four US pstn analog lines, CallerID, Touchtone, loop style 
 supervision,
 and have the capability for asterisk to direct an outbound call to a 
 specific port on that gateway. I think that implies each port must
 execute a sip register command successfully. It's also 
 expected to accept 
 incoming pstn calls directing those to a single asterisk. (I 
 don't care 
 about an IP dialtone, nat, etc, just a plain-jane two-way sip 
 gateway.)
 
 If anyone is designing such a box and need professional eval, we can 
 certainly work with you privately (off list to radamson @ 
 routers dot com)
 to accomidate those needs.
 
 Anyone seen such a beast at a reasonable price?






[Asterisk-Users] X-Lite, X100P, and Speex

2004-01-30 Thread Kostur, Andre
Title: X-Lite, X100P, and Speex





I'm having a problem with using X-Lite to initiate a call via Asterisk out an X100P analog port, using the Speex codec. I've put in the registry fix for X-Lite and Speex so that works OK, and calling the echo test extension works. However, if I call out the analog port it appears that audio being initiated by X-Lite is being dropped, but audio being initiated from the analog line is being encoded and heard OK on X-Lite. /var/log/asterisk/messages keeps repeating WARNING[]: Frame too large and WARNING[]: Out of buffer space over and over again. Any ideas on what's wrong? (and if it's simply that one cannot use the speex codec with outbound calls, how would one configure asterisk to allow speex when it's a SIP to SIP call, but G.711 if it's a SIP to Analog call?)

Oh, and using ztmonitor, it shows the zap channel receiving all sorts of sound, but no transmit.


Asterisk 0.7.1 (Debian/Unstable package)
zaptel 0.1.6





RE: [Asterisk-Users] X-Lite Asterisk: Speex iLBC not working?

2004-01-29 Thread Kostur, Andre
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] X-Lite  Asterisk: Speex  iLBC not working?





On the flip side, I have tried the registry fix with X-Lite build 1101 against Asterisk 0.7.1 (Debian/Unstable package), and it works (at least for speex)

Asterisk 0.7.1 from Debian/Unstable
Win2K
X-Lite build 1101


 -Original Message-
 From: Philipp von Klitzing
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 8:36 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] X-Lite  Asterisk: Speex  iLBC not
 working?
 
 
 Hi!
 
  check out the latests cvs it has two reg files that will 
 fix xlite or xpro
  to work
 
 Doesn't work for me:
 WARNING[9226]: chan_sip.c:2087 process_sdp: No compatible codecs!
 
 - CVS from yesterday
 - Win 98 SE
 - X-Lite build 1082
 - took registry file from bug note, couldn't import it, so added the 
 DWORD entry for iLBC manually
 
 Question: In sip.conf it is allow=ilbc and not allow=iLBC, right?
 Anyway, neither of the two worked.





RE: [Asterisk-Users] 8 lines - best approach

2004-01-24 Thread Kostur, Andre
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] 8 lines - best approach





Hey neighbour! I'll be posting on here what sort of experience we'll have with 8 (actually 10) incoming FXO lines going to a Vegastream gateway...

 -Original Message-
 From: Darren Martz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 6:10 PM
 To: Chris Albertson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 8 lines - best approach
 
 
 Thanks Chris!!
 
 Running copper does not seem logical to me either. The last 
 time I checked
 (Sept03), the cost of 8 lines in a T1 was almost double the 
 cost of split
 lines.
 
 I have been considering NuFone, and have investigated it. We 
 have also been
 looking for a decent IP based business phone, but I'll post a separate
 question for that :)
 
 I have three businesses all with the same problem. A decent 
 T1 price would
 be the best, so I could centralize everything and only 
 outsource the long
 distance side.
 
 I'm in Vancouver, BC Canada with the Telus Inc monopoly.
 What range of prices do most American telco's charge for a T1??
 
 The price (in C$) I was quoted was $450/m plus $27/m per 
 voice channel with
 zero features. Plus there was a $1200 setup fee.
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Chris Albertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Darren Martz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 8:49 AM
 Subject: Fwd: [Asterisk-Users] 8 lines - best approach
 
 
 
 
 First get rid of those 8 analog lines. then you'l have
 two options:
 
 1) Have the local phone company provide you with a T1 line
 that you can plug directly into the Digium card. After all
 it seems silly for ther phone company to split out the lines
 to 8 pairs runs 16 coppr wires only to have you re-combine
 them.
 
 2) Get 8 DID numbers from a VOIP provider like NuFone or
 Iconnect and have all your incomming calls come in over
 your Internet link. Now yu've got zero hardawre, except for
 the PC.
 
 I suppose you would want local extensions... Depending on
 the numbr you might want a channel bank and anlog desk phones
 or go with all IP Phones
 
 
 
 
 --- Darren Martz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  From: Darren Martz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [Asterisk-Users] 8 lines - best approach
  Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 07:30:42 -0800
 
  I have 8 lines coming into an existing PBX system and am looking for
  a cost
  effective way to replace the existing system with Asterisk. We need
  some of
  the features in Asterisk, including its ability to support remote
  offices
  (long distance savings).
 
  At first glance this appears to require a T100P card and a channel
  bank, but
  that seems rather expensive. My estimated price on that would be
  roughly
  $2600 for 8 lines given that system - perhaps my estimate is way
  off
 
  Is there another way that is more cost effective?
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 =
 Chris Albertson
 Home: 310-376-1029 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cell: 310-990-7550
 Office: 310-336-5189 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 KG6OMK
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
 http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 





RE: [Asterisk-Users] 8 lines - best approach

2004-01-23 Thread Kostur, Andre
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] 8 lines - best approach





One solution that we're investigating is using a gateway product instead of a channel bank.


There's a couple to choose from...take a look at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-VoIP+Gateways


Sounds like you want one of the FXO devices. We haven't actually purchased ours yet, but we're looking into buying one of the Vegastream 50 Analog units. 10 incoming FXO ports. Saves us the cost of a proper channel bank, and a T1 card for the * server.

I'm not recommending them specifically (just an example... you may be able to get better prices from other resellers), but Atacomm (http://www.atacomm.com) lists the price of a Vega 50 FXO at $2350, a Multitech MVP810 at $2999, AudioCodes MP108 FXO at $1429. (US $)

 -Original Message-
 From: Darren Martz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 7:31 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] 8 lines - best approach
 
 
 I have 8 lines coming into an existing PBX system and am 
 looking for a cost
 effective way to replace the existing system with Asterisk. 
 We need some of
 the features in Asterisk, including its ability to support 
 remote offices
 (long distance savings).
 
 At first glance this appears to require a T100P card and a 
 channel bank, but
 that seems rather expensive. My estimated price on that would 
 be roughly
 $2600 for 8 lines given that system - perhaps my estimate is 
 way off
 
 Is there another way that is more cost effective?
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 





RE: [Asterisk-Users] Debian Packages and Mirrors

2004-01-23 Thread Kostur, Andre
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Debian Packages and Mirrors





Note that there are also asterisk packages in the standard Debian repositories


http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=asterisk=names=1=insensitive=all=all

v0.1.11 in stable, v0.5.0 in testing, v0.7.1 in unstable (unless you're not on an i386)


The source for the zaptel interface is there too (package name: zaptel). Haven't looked for libpri... we don't have a PRI service...)

What do you have different in your packages?


 -Original Message-
 From: William Waites [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 8:09 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Debian Packages and Mirrors
 
 
 FYI and to whom it may concern, I have made Debian
 packages of Asterisk et. al. You still need to build
 a new kernel and the zaptel modules from source, but
 Asterisk and libpri are manageable with dpkg.
 
 The debs as well as mirrors of the source distribution
 are here:
 
  http://www.ntgos.com/Projects/Asterisk/Download
  http://parc.styx.org/asterisk
 
 I would also like to mirror the CVS repository as
 well as set up a cvsweb...
 
 -w
 -- 
 /~\ The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
 \ / No HTML/RTF in email
 X No Word docs in email
 / \ Respect for open standards





[Asterisk-Users] Channel Banks

2004-01-19 Thread Kostur, Andre
Title: Channel Banks





OK, I'm having some trouble finding which equipment I need 


What I'd like to do is take about a dozen incoming analog lines and bring them into an * server. Of course one is going to have a hard time fitting a dozen X100P cards in a case, so an alternative would be a channel bank and a T100P in the * server. Now here's where my confusion comes in. I _think_ I need a channel bank that has a T1 interface on one side (to go to the * server), and FXO interfaces on the other (to accept the incoming analog lines from the telco)? And are there suggestions out there as to which channel banks one should select for this sort of deployment?