[Asterisk-Users] IAXPHONE failures in calls to Cisco Phones
I have been operating a functional
asterisk system using Fedora in a 500 MHz Pentium III
Stations are Cisco 7960s and Grandstream 102s. We needed to
identify a software based phone
to handle traveling users, so we tried IAXPHONE's latest
version.
Interestingly, calls from the IAX client to 7960 phones fail. going right
to voicemail. The following
lists the console messages from one such attempt. [Note the
Response 400 "Bad request.]:
-- Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from 68.106.146.79, requested format = 2,
actual format = 2
-- Executing Macro("[EMAIL PROTECTED]/9",
"exten-vm|6410|6410") in new stack
-- Executing
SetMusicOnHold("[EMAIL PROTECTED]/9", "default") in new
stack
-- Executing Dial("[EMAIL PROTECTED]/9",
"SIP/6410|20|tr") in new stack
-- Called 6410
-- Got SIP response 400 "Bad Request" back
from 68.106.146.79
== No one is available to answer at this time
-- Executing VoiceMail2("[EMAIL PROTECTED]/9",
"u6410") in new stack
-- Playing 'vm-theperson' (language 'en')
-- Playing 'digits/6' (language 'en')
-- Playing 'digits/4' (language 'en')
-- Playing 'digits/1' (language 'en')
-- Playing 'digits/0' (language 'en')
-- Playing 'vm-isunavail' (language 'en')
-- Playing 'vm-intro' (language 'en')
-- Playing 'beep' (language 'en')
If, however, we use the IAX client to call a Grandstream phone, the call
works. Here are the
coinsole message from such a call:
-- Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from 68.106.146.79, requested
format = 2, actual format = 2
-- Executing Macro("[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3",
"exten-vm|6413|6413") in new stack
-- Executing
SetMusicOnHold("[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3", "default") in new
stack
-- Executing Dial("[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3",
"SIP/6413|20|tr") in new stack
-- Called 6413
-- SIP/6413-9405 is ringing
-- SIP/6413-9405 answered [EMAIL PROTECTED]/3
== Spawn extension (macro-exten-vm, s, 2) exited non-zero on
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3' in macro 'exten-vm'
== Spawn extension (from-iaxphone, 6413, 1) exited non-zero on
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3'
-- Hungup '[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3'
The strange thing is, that both extensions are defined identically in
"extensions.conf" file:
; User Name
exten => 6410,1,Macro(exten-vm,6410,6410)
exten => 6411,1,Macro(exten-vm,6411,6411)
exten => 6412,1,Macro(exten-vm,6412,6412)
exten => 6413,1,Macro(exten-vm,6413,6413)
exten => ,1,Macro(exten-vm,,)
Has anyone else experienced this, or does anyone have idea what's
wrong?
Many thanks!
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Randomly Stopping
Recently we established connection between two Asterisk systems using IAX. Since then, we have observed that these boxes randomly stop working. Checking the processes shows the Asterisk process is not running. There is no error message on the remote consoles that we use to monitor these boxes. Has anyone else experienced this phenomenon? Prior to the IAX interconnection, these boxes operated without any failure. TIA / Dam Zener ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Anyone used a Grandstream ATA286 with Asterisk
an associate of mine sent me an email of the slick sheet on this one. I understand that mentioning this vendor has resulted in some flamethrowing on the list, and I do not want to cause trouble - just looking for some info. Thanks! Sam Z ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX Implementation Problem
As I said in my post, I have substituted @domain.net for the actual domains in use to simplify the posting. The actual domains resolve using nslookup from each machine At 11:30 01/29/2004, you wrote: On Thursday 29 January 2004 10:12, MLS Drop for SysAdmin wrote: > We have been, unsuccessful, trying to implement inter-asterisk > communications using IAX. I was wondering if anyone is having > similar problems, or would share information about their succes/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] This doesn't resolve: Host [EMAIL PROTECTED] not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) Host [EMAIL PROTECTED] not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) -Tilghman ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] IP Blue Skinny Client with Asterisk
Has anyone successfully implement IP Blue's skinny 7960 soft client with Asterisk. There is not much info that we have been able to find about configuring Skinny clients. Thanks Sam Zener ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Multiple Line Appearances
Has anyone successfully implemented concurrent appearance of the same PBX extension on multiple SIP phones? When using Cisco 7960s under call manager, you can have several phones with the same line appearance, but the first user to seize a line makes it inaccessible to other phones. Under SIP operation it seems as though this is not possible, but we don't see group ringing definable for SIP extensions. Thanks for your feedback Sam Zener ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] IAX Implementation Problem
We have been, unsuccessful, trying to implement inter-asterisk
communications using IAX. I was wondering if anyone is having
similar problems, or would share information about their
succes/
Our environment consists of two servers with public IP addresses and DNS
entries that resolve. (for the example we use
"domain.net")
Based on the information available to us, we have tried the
following:
In the IAX.CONF of Server 1 (called "ABLE") we have
placed:
register =>
able:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
we have also placed:
[baker]
context=internal
type=friend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
secret=password
auth=md5
In the EXTENSIONS.CONF file on ABLE we have
placed:
[to-baker]
exten => _6.,1,Dial(IAX/baker/${EXTEN:1})
and [internal] is the existing context for handling internal
calls
In the IAX.CONF file on Server 2 (called "BAKER") we have
placed:
register =>
baker:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
we have also placed:
[able]
context=internal
type=friend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
secret=password
auth=md5
and in the EXTENSIONS.CONF on Baker we have
placed:
[to able]
exten => _8.,1,Dial(IAX/able/${EXTEN:1})
and [internal] is the existing context for handling internal
calls.
When we reload both Asterisk servers, ABLE shows no registration with
BAKER,
and BAKER shows error messages :
Jan 29 11:06:49 NOTICE[-1147503696]: chan_iax.c:2896 register_verify: No
registration for peer 'baker' (from 10.1.1.1)
[Note: 10.1.1.1 is substituted in the above message for the actual
IP]
No calls go through from ABLE to BAKER or vice-versa
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Sam Zener
Network Techician
