Re: [asterisk-users] TE410P (1st) without cables always green
Shaun, Follwing more tests : 1) In production box asterisk works with 2.4.X dahdi tree + kernel 2.33.x tree. I can put the trunk up and recieve some calls . 2) In the same box I had tested dahdi 2.6.X + same kernel, when run dahdi_cfg this error messages comes , in dahdi_cfg running and no interrupts are in dmesg .. Any idea ? Loading DAHDI hardware modules: wct4xxp: [ OK ] wcfxo: [ OK ] Running dahdi_cfg: DAHDI startup failed: Input/output error Please see the follwing quoted ( in old messages ) text about 2.6 dahdis, as you can see in devel box, dahdi_cfg works in new dadhdi ( I not know if pri goes up in asterisk, because this box are without ) Any idea here ? 3) I remember some problems in dahdi=2.6 our 2.5 with newer kernel trees. This issue ( new dahd's not works and old dahd's not compile in new kerne tree) will be a problem in future time. A brazilian guy post to me that are problems in new dahdi and old boards.. , can you confirm any issue in this points ? Regards, Em 09/02/2012 20:30, Marcio Gomes escreveu: Shaun, snip Just thinking out loud here but I'm guessing it may be fair to just set alarmdebounce to 0 by default on gen1 cards. With dahdi-linux 2.2.0.2 does your card function if you set alarm debounce to 2500? /etc/init.d/dahdi stop sleep 3 modprobe dahdi modprobe wct4xxp debug=1 alarmdebounce=2500 dahdi_cfg cat /proc/interrupts | grep wct4xxp; sleep 5 ; cat /proc/interrupts | grep wct4xxp 20: 62045611 62097065 IO-APIC-fasteoi wct4xxp 20: 62045613 62097065 IO-APIC-fasteoi wct4xxp No interrupts, I do some tests and alarmdebounce should be 0 or 1 to generate interrupts correctly. Just thinking out loud here but I'm guessing it may be fair to just set alarmdebounce to 0 by default on gen1 cards. Yeah, it's correct IMO. After working hours ( until next monday ) I will do some tests in production box.. ( I have to change the kernel config and others small things I have modified in last week and are generating some Kpanic's in module load ). I can only do this in time slot 00:00 - 07:00 am regards, Marcio Gomes -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE410P (1st) without cables always green
Hello Shaun, I take this approach : - zaptel 1.2.XX , 1.4.XX I can see interrupts working , I made some patches to compile in 2.6.32 kernel tree. - dahdi 2.0.0 to dahdi-2.2.0, I can see interrupts working, I made some patches to compile in 2.6.32 kernel tree - This itop from 2.2.0 tree : IRQs/Second Device (IRQ) CPU0CPU1 TOTAL rtc0 ( 8): 0 0 0 i8042 ( 1): 0 0 0 eth0 ( 28): 3 3 6 timer ( 0): 435 5661001 ata_piix, ata_piix ( 19): 2 1 3 pata_jmicron ( 16): 0 0 0 cascade ( 2): 0 0 0 wct4xxp ( 20): 566 4351001 As you can see, I am having 1K int/s - My patches are related to add #include linux/sched.c in dahdi-base.c , wct4xxp.c and wctdm.c , and comment out the lines relative to others drivers ( I only needs wcfxo, wctdm and wct4xxp to this box ) - 2.2.1 and greater - Compiles without patches, but not working, int/s = 0 I do not knows the main changes from 2.2.0 to to 2.2.1 dahdi-tree , but it is clear to me that problems are in this changes. I can goes up and down between versions with same issues, I do this because initially suspected from da dead lock in hardware create for some tests I have do. Regards, Marcio Gomes Em 07/02/2012 17:38, Marcio Gomes escreveu: News from Zaptel.. I patch the last zaptel.1.2.27 to compiles in 2.6.33 kernels series Surprise !! 20: 68011 71871 IO-APIC-fasteoi wct4xxp in zttool the spans are RED, all is working with pre 1.4 zaptel and dahdi. The problems are in changes between zaptel.1.2.X and zaptel.1.4.X. I thinking now that is an old issue added from 1.2 to 1.4 branches and sucessivily to dahdi branches, and I lost something in past. But I want go to asterisk 1.8 and greater with new drivers , Can anyone help me in this ? regards, Em 07/02/2012 17:05, Marcio Gomes escreveu: Hello All, I really not understand de APIC changes in IO-APIC- and the greater 100 Interrupt numbers in old setups.. can you help me ? I forget to say, In production BOX, I only do a linux -R newconfig reboot , slots , hardware, setup, etc.. is the same.. no changes. It's give me a confirmation about it is not a hardware issue, the only changes are in software. In the development box, a hardware problem iss possible, I will make a copy of the working software and put in it to clarify this doubt. Regards, Marcio Gomes -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE410P (1st) without cables always green
Hello Shaun, 1) dahdi-linux-complete-2.2.0.2+2.2.0 , is generatiing 1K int/s after patches.. 2) Looking in 2.2.1 code, i see to wct4xxp.c the alarmdebounce set in 2500 and in 2.2.0 the alarmdebounce seted to 0, I load the module with alarmdebouce=0 paramter = the interrupts are up to 1000 int/s After this, I test all versions until dahdi-linux-complete-2.6.0+2.6.0 cd version make distclean make make install /etc/init.d/dahdi stop ;sleep 3; modprobe dahdi; modprobe wct4xxp debug=1 alarmdebounce=0 ; dahdi_cfg .itop = to see interrupts. always are 1000 ints/s I not touch in losalarmdebounce=0 aisalarmdebounce=0 yelalarmdebounce=0 module paramters. 3) Can you explain-me aboute how the alarmdebounce and its variants ( LOS, YEL, etcc ) impacts the system perfomance and how can i fine tune this ? Regards, Marcio Gomes Em 09/02/2012 10:45, Marcio Gomes escreveu: Hello Shaun, I take this approach : - zaptel 1.2.XX , 1.4.XX I can see interrupts working , I made some patches to compile in 2.6.32 kernel tree. - dahdi 2.0.0 to dahdi-2.2.0, I can see interrupts working, I made some patches to compile in 2.6.32 kernel tree - This itop from 2.2.0 tree : IRQs/Second Device (IRQ) CPU0CPU1 TOTAL rtc0 ( 8): 0 0 0 i8042 ( 1): 0 0 0 eth0 ( 28): 3 3 6 timer ( 0): 435 566 1001 ata_piix, ata_piix ( 19): 2 1 3 pata_jmicron ( 16): 0 0 0 cascade ( 2): 0 0 0 wct4xxp ( 20): 566 435 1001 As you can see, I am having 1K int/s - My patches are related to add #include linux/sched.c in dahdi-base.c , wct4xxp.c and wctdm.c , and comment out the lines relative to others drivers ( I only needs wcfxo, wctdm and wct4xxp to this box ) - 2.2.1 and greater - Compiles without patches, but not working, int/s = 0 I do not knows the main changes from 2.2.0 to to 2.2.1 dahdi-tree , but it is clear to me that problems are in this changes. I can goes up and down between versions with same issues, I do this because initially suspected from da dead lock in hardware create for some tests I have do. Regards, Marcio Gomes Em 07/02/2012 17:38, Marcio Gomes escreveu: News from Zaptel.. I patch the last zaptel.1.2.27 to compiles in 2.6.33 kernels series Surprise !! 20: 68011 71871 IO-APIC-fasteoi wct4xxp in zttool the spans are RED, all is working with pre 1.4 zaptel and dahdi. The problems are in changes between zaptel.1.2.X and zaptel.1.4.X. I thinking now that is an old issue added from 1.2 to 1.4 branches and sucessivily to dahdi branches, and I lost something in past. But I want go to asterisk 1.8 and greater with new drivers , Can anyone help me in this ? regards, Em 07/02/2012 17:05, Marcio Gomes escreveu: Hello All, I really not understand de APIC changes in IO-APIC- and the greater 100 Interrupt numbers in old setups.. can you help me ? I forget to say, In production BOX, I only do a linux -R newconfig reboot , slots , hardware, setup, etc.. is the same.. no changes. It's give me a confirmation about it is not a hardware issue, the only changes are in software. In the development box, a hardware problem iss possible, I will make a copy of the working software and put in it to clarify this doubt. Regards, Marcio Gomes -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE410P (1st) without cables always green
Shaun, snip Just thinking out loud here but I'm guessing it may be fair to just set alarmdebounce to 0 by default on gen1 cards. With dahdi-linux 2.2.0.2 does your card function if you set alarm debounce to 2500? /etc/init.d/dahdi stop sleep 3 modprobe dahdi modprobe wct4xxp debug=1 alarmdebounce=2500 dahdi_cfg cat /proc/interrupts | grep wct4xxp; sleep 5 ; cat /proc/interrupts | grep wct4xxp 20: 62045611 62097065 IO-APIC-fasteoi wct4xxp 20: 62045613 62097065 IO-APIC-fasteoi wct4xxp No interrupts, I do some tests and alarmdebounce should be 0 or 1 to generate interrupts correctly. Just thinking out loud here but I'm guessing it may be fair to just set alarmdebounce to 0 by default on gen1 cards. Yeah, it's correct IMO. After working hours ( until next monday ) I will do some tests in production box.. ( I have to change the kernel config and others small things I have modified in last week and are generating some Kpanic's in module load ). I can only do this in time slot 00:00 - 07:00 am regards, Marcio Gomes -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] TE410P (1st) without cables always green
TE4XXP: Configured channel 16 (TE4/0/1/16) sigtype 896 TE4XXP: Configured channel 17 (TE4/0/1/17) sigtype 128 TE4XXP: Configured channel 18 (TE4/0/1/18) sigtype 128 TE4XXP: Configured channel 19 (TE4/0/1/19) sigtype 128 TE4XXP: Configured channel 20 (TE4/0/1/20) sigtype 128 TE4XXP: Configured channel 21 (TE4/0/1/21) sigtype 128 TE4XXP: Configured channel 22 (TE4/0/1/22) sigtype 128 TE4XXP: Configured channel 23 (TE4/0/1/23) sigtype 128 TE4XXP: Configured channel 24 (TE4/0/1/24) sigtype 128 TE4XXP: Configured channel 25 (TE4/0/1/25) sigtype 128 TE4XXP: Configured channel 26 (TE4/0/1/26) sigtype 128 TE4XXP: Configured channel 27 (TE4/0/1/27) sigtype 128 TE4XXP: Configured channel 28 (TE4/0/1/28) sigtype 128 TE4XXP: Configured channel 29 (TE4/0/1/29) sigtype 128 TE4XXP: Configured channel 30 (TE4/0/1/30) sigtype 128 TE4XXP: Configured channel 31 (TE4/0/1/31) sigtype 128 dahdi: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) About to enter startup! TE4XXP: Span 1 configured for CCS/HDB3/CRC4 wct4xxp :05:00.0: timing source auto wct4xxp :05:00.0: Evaluating spans for timing source wct4xxp :05:00.0: span 1 is green : syncpos 1 *wct4xxp :05:00.0: RCLK source set to span 1 wct4xxp :05:00.0: Recovered timing mode, RCLK set to span 1 wct4xxp: LOF/LFA detected on span 1 but debouncing for 2500 ms wct4xxp: LOS detected on span 1 but debouncing for 2500 ms* SPAN 1: Primary Sync Source VPM400: Not Present OCT Result: /000a VPM450: Not Present Completed startup! Detected loss of E1 alignment on span 0! 5) cat /proc/interrupts cat /proc/interrupts 1 CPU0 CPU1 0: 598466 686790 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 4 4 IO-APIC-edge i8042 8: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc0 9: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi 16: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi pata_jmicron 19: 488966 400468 IO-APIC-fasteoi ata_piix, ata_piix 20: 20 8 IO-APIC-fasteoi wct4xxp 28: 3267 3254 PCI-MSI-edge eth0 NMI:12852981285102 Non-maskable interrupts LOC: 686792 598229 Local timer interrupts SPU: 0 0 Spurious interrupts PMI: 0 0 Performance monitoring interrupts PND: 0 0 Performance pending work RES:535493 Rescheduling interrupts CAL: 25 36 Function call interrupts TLB:136124 TLB shootdowns TRM: 0 0 Thermal event interrupts THR: 0 0 Threshold APIC interrupts MCE: 0 0 Machine check exceptions MCP: 5 5 Machine check polls ERR: 1 MIS: 0 best regards, Marcio Gomes -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE410P (1st) without cables always green
Hello Shaun, Thanks for your answer, I try all dahdi I can compile in Slackware 13.1 and 13.37 ( recently I downgrade to 13.1, to compile some older kernels, but it is not the answer. ) It looks like your development box is having problems with interrupts from the card. Once you run dahdi_cfg for the span you should be getting 1 interrupts/sec and above I can see you only got 28. Yeah.. I forget to look at it. As i say, I try with all.. let's go.. I recompile the dahdi-linux-complete-2.6.0+2.6.0 witj 2.6.33.4 kernel. The interrupt problems persists. 20:630 1476 IO-APIC-fasteoi wct4xxp Do your development boxes work with an older version of DAHDI? Just not 2.3.0.1? Also, why not upgrade to 2.5.0.2 or the trunk of the 2.6 branch? All versions 2.2.XXX to SVN same problems... This is interrupt outputs to today SVN : 20: 1348 1788 IO-APIC-fasteoi wct4xxp ** This warning message, can be ignored in compilation ? from /usr/src/ASTERISK/20111212/DAHDI/dahdi-kernel/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-base.c:67: In function 'copy_from_user', inlined from 'dahdi_chan_write' at /usr/src/ASTERISK/20111212/DAHDI/dahdi-kernel/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-base.c:2449: /usr/src/linux-2.6.33.4/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h:212: warning: call to 'copy_from_user_overflow' declared with attribute warning: copy_from_user() buffer size is not provably correct CC [M] /usr/src/ASTERISK/20111212/DAHDI/dahdi-kernel/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-sysfs.o ** In production box a intersting cat /proc/interrupts, * this is the working setup # cat /usr/src/ASTERISK/COMPILA/zaptel/ChangeLog 0.1.6: * Move network structures to be malloc()'d when needed * Add HDLC PPP Support * Fix multi-channel stuff in zaptel and torisa uname -a Linux zap1 2.6.11.12-ul2 #6 SMP Mon Dec 14 17:40:08 BRST 2009 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux zap1*CLI show version Asterisk CVS-HEAD-11/14/05-18:16:29 built by root@zap1 on a i686 running Linux cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 0: 15203536 0IO-APIC-edge timer 8: 2 0IO-APIC-edge rtc 9: 0 0 IO-APIC-level acpi 14: 42471 0IO-APIC-edge ide0 15:175 0IO-APIC-edge ide1 169: 15161016 0 IO-APIC-level libata, wcfxo 177: 130432 0 IO-APIC-level eth0 193: 15159692 0 IO-APIC-level t4xxp 201: 15160988 0 IO-APIC-level wcfxo NMI: 0 0 LOC: 15203154 15203153 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 * this is the NEW setup , the system has 2 hardisks with 2 slacks, 2 asterisk setups.. all compiled from sources ( I not like pre build softwares , when i am in trouble I have serious problems to modify, and slackware has poor packages but is lovely stable distrib ) cat /proc/interrupts ( this kernel are without SMP compilation, but the problem is the same if I compile with SMP ) root@zap2:/etc/dahdi# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 73 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 2 IO-APIC-edge i8042 2: 0XT-PIC-XTcascade 9: 4 IO-APIC-fasteoi 12: 4 IO-APIC-edge i8042 14: 1476 IO-APIC-edge ata_piix 15: 8583 IO-APIC-edge ata_piix 18: 62007 IO-APIC-fasteoi ata_piix, wcfxo 19: 62119 IO-APIC-fasteoi wcfxo 21: 1022 IO-APIC-fasteoi eth0 22: 1039 IO-APIC-fasteoi wct4xxp NMI: 0 Non-maskable interrupts LOC: 20739 Local timer interrupts SPU: 0 Spurious interrupts PMI: 0 Performance monitoring interrupts PND: 0 Performance pending work RES: 0 Rescheduling interrupts CAL: 0 Function call interrupts TLB: 0 TLB shootdowns TRM: 0 Thermal event interrupts THR: 0 Threshold APIC interrupts MCE: 0 Machine check exceptions MCP: 1 Machine check polls ERR: 0 In new and old SPAN 2 is without cable. [2] active=yes alarms=OK description=T4XXP (PCI) Card 0 Span 2 name=TE4/0/2 manufacturer=Digium devicetype=Wildcard TE410P/TE405P (1st Gen) location=Board ID Switch 0 basechan=32 totchans=31 irq=22 type=digital-E1 syncsrc=0 lbo=0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1) coding_opts=HDB3 framing_opts=CCS,CRC4 coding=HDB3 framing=CCS/CRC4 I really not understand de APIC changes in IO-APIC- and the greater 100 Interrupt numbers in old setups.. can you help me ? regards, marcio -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE410P (1st) without cables always green
Hello Shaun, Thanks for your answer, I try all dahdi I can compile in Slackware 13.1 and 13.37 ( recently I downgrade to 13.1, to compile some older kernels, but it is not the answer. ) It looks like your development box is having problems with interrupts from the card. Once you run dahdi_cfg for the span you should be getting 1 interrupts/sec and above I can see you only got 28. Yeah.. I forget to look at it. As i say, I try with all.. let's go.. I recompile the dahdi-linux-complete-2.6.0+2.6.0 witj 2.6.33.4 kernel. The interrupt problems persists. 20:630 1476 IO-APIC-fasteoi wct4xxp Do your development boxes work with an older version of DAHDI? Just not 2.3.0.1? Also, why not upgrade to 2.5.0.2 or the trunk of the 2.6 branch? All versions 2.2.XXX to SVN same problems... This is interrupt outputs to today SVN : 20: 1348 1788 IO-APIC-fasteoi wct4xxp ** This warning message, can be ignored in compilation ? from /usr/src/ASTERISK/20111212/DAHDI/dahdi-kernel/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-base.c:67: In function 'copy_from_user', inlined from 'dahdi_chan_write' at /usr/src/ASTERISK/20111212/DAHDI/dahdi-kernel/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-base.c:2449: /usr/src/linux-2.6.33.4/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h:212: warning: call to 'copy_from_user_overflow' declared with attribute warning: copy_from_user() buffer size is not provably correct CC [M] /usr/src/ASTERISK/20111212/DAHDI/dahdi-kernel/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-sysfs.o ** In production box a intersting cat /proc/interrupts, * this is the working setup # cat /usr/src/ASTERISK/COMPILA/zaptel/ChangeLog 0.1.6: * Move network structures to be malloc()'d when needed * Add HDLC PPP Support * Fix multi-channel stuff in zaptel and torisa uname -a Linux zap1 2.6.11.12-ul2 #6 SMP Mon Dec 14 17:40:08 BRST 2009 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux zap1*CLI show version Asterisk CVS-HEAD-11/14/05-18:16:29 built by root@zap1 on a i686 running Linux cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 0: 15203536 0IO-APIC-edge timer 8: 2 0IO-APIC-edge rtc 9: 0 0 IO-APIC-level acpi 14: 42471 0IO-APIC-edge ide0 15:175 0IO-APIC-edge ide1 169: 15161016 0 IO-APIC-level libata, wcfxo 177: 130432 0 IO-APIC-level eth0 193: 15159692 0 IO-APIC-level t4xxp 201: 15160988 0 IO-APIC-level wcfxo NMI: 0 0 LOC: 15203154 15203153 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 * this is the NEW setup , the system has 2 hardisks with 2 slacks, 2 asterisk setups.. all compiled from sources ( I not like pre build softwares , when i am in trouble I have serious problems to modify, and slackware has poor packages but is lovely stable distrib ) cat /proc/interrupts ( this kernel are without SMP compilation, but the problem is the same if I compile with SMP ) root@zap2:/etc/dahdi# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 73 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 2 IO-APIC-edge i8042 2: 0XT-PIC-XTcascade 9: 4 IO-APIC-fasteoi 12: 4 IO-APIC-edge i8042 14: 1476 IO-APIC-edge ata_piix 15: 8583 IO-APIC-edge ata_piix 18: 62007 IO-APIC-fasteoi ata_piix, wcfxo 19: 62119 IO-APIC-fasteoi wcfxo 21: 1022 IO-APIC-fasteoi eth0 22: 1039 IO-APIC-fasteoi wct4xxp NMI: 0 Non-maskable interrupts LOC: 20739 Local timer interrupts SPU: 0 Spurious interrupts PMI: 0 Performance monitoring interrupts PND: 0 Performance pending work RES: 0 Rescheduling interrupts CAL: 0 Function call interrupts TLB: 0 TLB shootdowns TRM: 0 Thermal event interrupts THR: 0 Threshold APIC interrupts MCE: 0 Machine check exceptions MCP: 1 Machine check polls ERR: 0 In new and old SPAN 2 is without cable. [2] active=yes alarms=OK description=T4XXP (PCI) Card 0 Span 2 name=TE4/0/2 manufacturer=Digium devicetype=Wildcard TE410P/TE405P (1st Gen) location=Board ID Switch 0 basechan=32 totchans=31 irq=22 type=digital-E1 syncsrc=0 lbo=0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1) coding_opts=HDB3 framing_opts=CCS,CRC4 coding=HDB3 framing=CCS/CRC4 I really not understand de APIC changes in IO-APIC- and the greater 100 Interrupt numbers in old setups.. can you help me ? regards, marcio -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE410P (1st) without cables always green
Hello All, I really not understand de APIC changes in IO-APIC- and the greater 100 Interrupt numbers in old setups.. can you help me ? I forget to say, In production BOX, I only do a linux -R newconfig reboot , slots , hardware, setup, etc.. is the same.. no changes. It's give me a confirmation about it is not a hardware issue, the only changes are in software. In the development box, a hardware problem iss possible, I will make a copy of the working software and put in it to clarify this doubt. Regards, Marcio Gomes -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TE410P (1st) without cables always green
News from Zaptel.. I patch the last zaptel.1.2.27 to compiles in 2.6.33 kernels series Surprise !! 20: 68011 71871 IO-APIC-fasteoi wct4xxp in zttool the spans are RED, all is working with pre 1.4 zaptel and dahdi. The problems are in changes between zaptel.1.2.X and zaptel.1.4.X. I thinking now that is an old issue added from 1.2 to 1.4 branches and sucessivily to dahdi branches, and I lost something in past. But I want go to asterisk 1.8 and greater with new drivers , Can anyone help me in this ? regards, Em 07/02/2012 17:05, Marcio Gomes escreveu: Hello All, I really not understand de APIC changes in IO-APIC- and the greater 100 Interrupt numbers in old setups.. can you help me ? I forget to say, In production BOX, I only do a linux -R newconfig reboot , slots , hardware, setup, etc.. is the same.. no changes. It's give me a confirmation about it is not a hardware issue, the only changes are in software. In the development box, a hardware problem iss possible, I will make a copy of the working software and put in it to clarify this doubt. Regards, Marcio Gomes -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Adtran TA 750 Channel Bank config
Hello, What is the minimal configuration ( Chassi, modules, power supply, etc. ) to connect a Adtran 750 Channel Bank to a second port at TE410P board, and provide 24 FXS to analog extensions phones ? - The TE410P first port is will be connected to a ISDN-PRI fractional with 15 lines. Is it a good channel bank ? Are there some problems with this config ( like echo, latency and others ) or this config is like a comercial Digital PBX solution ? Thanks in advanced , Marcio Gomes ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Radius
Hello Derek, I am also intersted in your free radius implementation.. Can you send it me ? Cheers, Marcio Gomes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Derek: Email me off-list and i'll send you my inplimentation based on freeradius-0.8.1... it's highly customized for our platform, but you should be able to use it with a little customization... Derek Bruce Calgary Telecom [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Derek Samford mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 1:27 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Radius I know this has been hashed, and rehashed, but I saw that a few people had said they were going to release their code soon. Is there a working implementation of RADIUS for Asterisk out there? Not looking to start a debate on how bad it is for billing purposes, thats a given, but I need it for legacy systems. Thanks, Derek ### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] G.729 vs. G.729 pass thru
Hello, I am testing * in a developer computer. Can I uninstall the license and transfer it to a production computer in future ? []s Marcio Gomes Derek Samford wrote: As long as you have a IDE drive available, and mounted when you install it, it will work. This includes CD ROM's...It's what I did. Funkiness with the registration process. As far as pass through goes, from what I understand, it *should*, but when you have licensed binaries, from what I've seen, it doesn't. It's actually used 2 licenses. I plan on figuring that out next. Derek From: Unavailable ID [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 5:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] G.729 vs. G.729 pass thru Hello everyone, If you don't have Digium card but you want to use G.729 codec, do you need a license for it? If the VoIP termination point supports G.729 and you are using sip phone (soft/hard phone), can you use the G.729 pass thru or you have to buy the license? Have anyone test it with SCSI system? Seems like it only work on machine with IDE disk. Thanks. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Brazilian Protocol
Q.462 to Q.478 cover R2. You need to know how it has been modified in each country too, as nobody quite implements the ITU specs. In some weeks we will buy 405 or 410 bords if it works with Brazilian ISDN-PRI, also we will stop using some E1 trunks.. if anyone is able to port R2 MFC-5C signals to boards, we can keep one E1 trunk to this tests. Please mail me in private ( marcio #AT# microlink#com#br ). []s Marcio Gomes ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Brazilian Protocol
You need a R2 converter. R2lib is under construction. - When in PRI (Primary Rate ISDN), does it support CSS7 DSS1 ? - Is asterisk pabx enough to implement these protocols o we need other drivers/software? - Do you know if any brazilian telco (Telemar, Vesper, Embratel, GVT, Telefonica, BRT, etc) supports custumers with you hardware? GVT supports E1/ISDN. What is the ISDN Sinalization from GVT, I think using PRI Lines with telco in Brazil, we will have comaptibility with Digium Borads! Is it correct ? Best Regards, []s Marcio Gomes Daniel Can you help me? Thanks in advance ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2lib
Hello All, I forgot this question in my last post .. Where is the primary site to R2Lib ? Best Regards, Marcio Gomes Marcio Gomes wrote: You need a R2 converter. R2lib is under construction. - When in PRI (Primary Rate ISDN), does it support CSS7 DSS1 ? - Is asterisk pabx enough to implement these protocols o we need other drivers/software? - Do you know if any brazilian telco (Telemar, Vesper, Embratel, GVT, Telefonica, BRT, etc) supports custumers with you hardware? GVT supports E1/ISDN. What is the ISDN Sinalization from GVT, I think using PRI Lines with telco in Brazil, we will have comaptibility with Digium Borads! Is it correct ? Best Regards, []s Marcio Gomes Daniel Can you help me? Thanks in advance ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
