Re: [asterisk-users] Wi-Fi sip phones with auto provisioning
The Ascom i75 isn't really an 'auto-provision' out of the box WiFi phone, but it has a fairly painless USB cradle for programming. Works well with Asterisk DD-WRT. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Howes Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 06:24 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Wi-Fi sip phones with auto provisioning On 3 Dec 2009, at 13:55, Fred Posner wrote: On Dec 3, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Lefteris Zafiris wrote: Im looking for wifi sip phones that support auto provisioning and work flawlessly with atserisk. Can anyone suggest me some models? Don't know of any wifi phone that works flawlessly whatsoever. Best to consider a DECT style phone. If you do go Wifi, don't get a WIP310... S ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Legacy PBX
If I were to guess (with no config files it's really just a guess). I would think your Dial-plan logic isn't using the right 'trunk group' for calls. context=from-pstn group=0 context=from-legacy group=4 [from-pstn] exten = _.,1,Dial(Zap/g4/${EXTEN},190,r) exten = _.,n,Hangup() [from-legacy] exten = _.,1,Dial(Zap/g0/${EXTEN},190,r) exten = _.,n,Hangup() Please post your configs. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sriram Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 10:23 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Legacy PBX Hi All I am trying to setup : PSTN E1 --- Asterisk--Legacy PBX---Legacy Analog extensions. I've followed steps using : http://www.voipinfo.org/wiki/view/Asterisk-Panasonic i get the green light (sync) on both the 2nd span of digium TE420P (that is cnnected to the legacy pbx pri card) and the pri card of the legacy pbx. but when i try to make a call to asterisk so that it can send the call to the legacy pbx using Dial command - it exits saying - CHANUNAVAIL , but if i try to dial an external PSTN number the call gets thru.. Any help apprecriated. Thnks Sriram ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] All calls want to go out only on interface ZAP/g0
I have a legacy PBX that I want to slowly move off of. Below is a diagram of what I want my setup to look-like after testing. Old Mitel---24 Channels---Asterisk---PSTN | | | Ext. 3060 SIP. 2054 Cellular No matter my dial-plan logic; all calls seem to default to ZAP/g0. I can't seem to get any calls to go directly to ZAP/g2. NOTE: For testing 11# is added to the front of all calls coming from the PSTN. PSTN to Asterisk (g0) from-pstn Asterisk to LegacyPBX (g2) from-internal - -Deleted all Outbound routes. -Re-writing Zaptel to only include Port 1 Port 3 (No 'red alarms' in zttool) AMI, D4, E M and Wink - Master Timing on Port 3 (source from Port 1). -Added 'To_PSTN' on port g0. -Added 'To_LegacyPBX' on port g2. -Added New 'Catch all Route' to PSTN and to LegacyPBX (.) Test Performed: SIP to Cellular = Worked - Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:20] Dial(SIP/2054-b7801d70, ZAP/g0/2085553870|300|) in new stack -- Called g0/2085553870 -- Zap/1-1 answered SIP/2054-b7801d70 Test Performed: SIP to 3060 = Failed SIP to 3060 seems to go out g0 then came back in from g0 -- Goto (macro-dialout-trunk,s,17) -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:17] Macro(SIP/2054-b7801d70, dialout-trunk-predial-hook|) in new stack -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:18] GotoIf(SIP/2054-b7801d70, 0?bypass|1) in new stack -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:19] GotoIf(SIP/2054-b7801d70, 0?customtrunk) in new stack -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:20] Dial(SIP/2054-b7801d70, ZAP/g0/3060|300|) in new stack -- Called g0/3060 -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/24-1' -- Zap/1-1 answered SIP/2054-b7801d70 == Unknown extension '11#3060' in context 'from-pstn' requested -- Zap/24-1 Playing 'ss-noservice' (language 'en') Added 11#3060 to both PSTN and LegacyPBX dialplan Test Performed: SIP to 3060 = Failed -Goes out g0 and comes back unknown. -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:13] Set(SIP/2054-b7802098, OUTNUM=3060) in new stack -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:14] Set(SIP/2054-b7802098, custom=ZAP/g0) in new stack -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:15] GotoIf(SIP/2054-b7802098, 1?gocall) in new stack -- Goto (macro-dialout-trunk,s,17) -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:17] Macro(SIP/2054-b7802098, dialout-trunk-predial-hook|) in new stack -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:18] GotoIf(SIP/2054-b7802098, 0?bypass|1) in new stack -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:19] GotoIf(SIP/2054-b7802098, 0?customtrunk) in new stack -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:20] Dial(SIP/2054-b7802098, ZAP/g0/3060|300|) in new stack -- Called g0/3060 -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/24-1' -- Zap/1-1 answered SIP/2054-b7802098 == Unknown extension '11#3060' in context 'from-pstn' requested -- Zap/24-1 Playing 'ss-noservice' (language 'en') -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1' NOTE: For testing 11# is added to the front of all calls comming from the PSTN. Trying a Misc. Destination Inbound route combination: Added Misc Destination 811#3060 Changed DialPLan on LegacyPBX . 11#3060 8|11#3060 8|11. 8|. 8|1NXXNXX 8|NXX Added 'inbound route' of 11#3060 - to go to 'Misc dest 811#3060' Test Performed: SIP to 3060 = Failed -- Zap/1-1 answered SIP/2054-b7801bf0 == Unknown extension '11#30603060' in context 'from-pstn' requested -- Zap/24-1 Playing 'ss-noservice' (language 'en') -- Hungup 'Zap/24-1' Added only 8|. to dial plan Test Performed: SIP to 3060 = Failed -Fast Busy -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:20] Dial(Zap/24-1, ZAP/g0/811#|300|) in new stack -- Called g0/811# What a mess! What else can I try? ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] e911/CAMA/MF
Does anyone have any experience getting inbound ANI information from a CAMA/MF/EM Wink trunk on Asterisk? Is this only do-able with a PRI interface? Any information would be helpful. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] 2 AVM ISDN Fritzcards
Perhaps you could try the OpenSUSE LiveCD and find out. -Mark Best -Network Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] -(208) 750-2054 This communication is the property of Nez Perce County and may contain confidential or privileged information. The information contained in this communication is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. Distribution, publication, or retransmission of this message is strictly prohibited. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. Please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 7:24 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 2 AVM ISDN Fritzcards On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, with Suse 10.2/10.3 and chan_misdn. Just to follow up on this. SLES 10.2 SP2 worked bang on. The two cards are configured and working correctly and recognised by Asterisk. Question: I guess you were meaning openSUSE 10.2/10.3... will openSUSE 11 work here? Simon ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Avaya IP Phones with *
Does anyone have any experience getting Avaya phones working with Asterisk? (I.E. 9650) BLF etc? ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Avaya IP Phones with *
Busy Lamp features? How is the sound quality compared to Polycom/Cisco/Snom etc? Recommend this kind of phone? (FYI: Doing phone research - while trying to be 'backwards'-compatible with an Avaya IP G450/S8700 system.) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob G Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:49 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Avaya IP Phones with * Yes we do everyday here at Google - Original Message - From: Mark Best To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Avaya IP Phones with * Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:24:16 -0700 Does anyone have any experience getting Avaya phones working with Asterisk? (I.E. 9650) BLF etc? ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mail.com Autos http://www.oncars.com - Powered by Oncars.com: Drive By Today! ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Mitel SX-200 + *
Does anyone have any experience getting a Mitel SX-200 EL/ML PBX system to work with *? I'm not getting inbound or outbound calls to work. (Inbound caller gets line busy tone.) SETTINGS FROM MITEL: I built a Crossover cable and connected it like this: PSTN--T1--ASTRISK--T1--OLD MITEL -Crossover Cable Pin-out: 1 - 4 2 - 5 4 - 1 5 - 2 Mitel Settings: Line Coding = B8ZS Framing = D4 (T1 Card 9109-021-001-NA) (My config: span=1,1,0,d4,b8zs em=1-24) The card is a 24 channel T1 - not a PRI right? (T1 EM Emulation Trunk: 1) So does that mean I use EM with Winkstart? (signalling=em_w) (is this spelt right?) (Wink setting is an assumption based upon a setting I saw in the PBX called wink timer) Using a Sangoma A104D: zttool -GAVE OK on PSTN -Gave RED on MITEL Timing -Receiving Time from PSTN Giving to the Mitel What debugging can I do to get more information? ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Mitel SX-200 + *
Eric, Looks like my Mitel does support ESF; I'll try changing it. One question before I do. If I change it right now, do you suppose my Telco automatically adapt? TELCO---T1---MITEL -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 12:58 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Mitel SX-200 + * I would strongly recommend ESF/B8ZS. If you have a RED alarm that means the device does not see a line connected to it -- check cabling. Mark Best wrote: Does anyone have any experience getting a Mitel SX-200 EL/ML PBX system to work with *? I'm not getting inbound or outbound calls to work. (Inbound caller gets line busy tone.) SETTINGS FROM MITEL: I built a Crossover cable and connected it like this: PSTN--T1--ASTRISK--T1--OLD MITEL -Crossover Cable Pin-out: 1 - 4 2 - 5 4 - 1 5 - 2 Mitel Settings: Line Coding = B8ZS Framing = D4 (T1 Card 9109-021-001-NA) (My config: span=1,1,0,d4,b8zs em=1-24) The card is a 24 channel T1 - not a PRI right? (T1 EM Emulation Trunk: 1) So does that mean I use EM with Winkstart? (signalling=em_w) (is this spelt right?) (Wink setting is an assumption based upon a setting I saw in the PBX called wink timer) Using a Sangoma A104D: zttool -GAVE OK on PSTN -Gave RED on MITEL Timing -Receiving Time from PSTN Giving to the Mitel What debugging can I do to get more information? ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Consulting for Asterisk, Polycom, Sangoma, Digium, Cisco, LAN, WAN, QoS, T-1, PRI, Frame Relay, Linux, and network design. Based near Birmingham, AL. Now accepting clients worldwide. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Mitel SX-200 + *
Jared, Thanks for the help. There are other T1 trunks (using AMI,D4) going to different departments; however the trunk line talking to the Telco is what it is. I do have the ability to change it to ESF, so I will try changing it - do you suppose my Telco will automaticly adapt if I do? (I'm fairly confident they support ESF.) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jared Smith Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 1:08 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Mitel SX-200 + * On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:34 -0800, Mark Best wrote: Does anyone have any experience getting a Mitel SX-200 EL/ML PBX system to work with *? No, but I'll make a few comments anyway. I'm not sure if they'll help you at all, but maybe it'll help explain a few things to someone else on the list. I'm not getting inbound or outbound calls to work. (Inbound caller gets line busy tone.) Is the T1 in alarm? You've first gotta get it out of alarm before you can make calls on it. Alarms are usually caused by physical connectivity problems, or problems with framing and/or linecoding. Mitel Settings: Line Coding = B8ZS Framing = D4 (T1 Card 9109-021-001-NA) Hmmmn... D4 and B8ZS together? That's bizarre. Usually people will use D4 framing and AMI linecoding together, or ESF framing and B8ZS linecoding. I've never seen anyone uuse B8ZS linecoding with D4 framing. -- Jared Smith Community Relations Manager Digium, Inc. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users