Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: 5, 000 concurrent calls system rollout question

2006-02-02 Thread Rafael Marconi

One single machine cant do 5000 IP - PSTN translations.


u can use some asterisk as frontend to do codec translation, from   
any codec to g711,
and deliver all calls to Asterisk with the Sangoma board in G711,  
Sangoma has a T3/E3 board


this exaple will reduce the load on the servers with pstn card.

If u want asterisk only to route 5000 calls, without rtp media, u  
dont need any of this .



Rafael Marconi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Em 02/02/2006, às 18:00, Wai Wu escreveu:

Isn't it ridiculous that Hammer charges an arm and a leg for any  
work they do. For systems as large as that one, we just setup a  
seperate one, connect them back to back and run automated script to  
burn it in.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of William
Boehlke
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:21 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: 5,000 concurrent calls system  
rollout

question


How we actually achieve the throughput is our intellectual property  
but we
have a number of customers who are scaling towards and past that  
traffic
level.  One of these days we hope to be able to justify the very  
large fee

Hammer wants to extract from us to produce a third party verification.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] auto fallthrough hangup on 1.2.1

2006-01-13 Thread Rafael Marconi

I see this problem too.


Send to us your extensions.conf

there is a diference from extensions in 1.0.X to 1.2.X

ex
exten = _X.,1,Dial(ZAp/g1/${EXTEN}),Ttr
to
exten = _X.,1,Dial,ZAP/g1/${EXTEN},Ttr


try change it.


Rafael Marconi

Em 14/01/2006, às 01:46, Pisac escreveu:


I upgraded from 1.0.9 to 1.2.1
My IVR which worked perfectly on 1.0.9, now hangup with no reason (at
least I could not find a cause)

When this hangup happen, I can read:
== Auto fallthrough, channel 'IAX/user-20' status is 'BUSY'
This happening also with ZAP channels

I'm really disappointed with 1.2.1, what is benefit from upgrade if I
must spend couple days to get my system to work as it worked  
previously

before upgrade (I think it should be named troublegrade).

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem Compiling Zaptel 1.2.1

2006-01-09 Thread Rafael Marconi

Hi all,

Im using Asterisk 1.2.1 with zaptel and Libpri in same version on a  
Dell PIV Dual-Core 64 bits with no problems.

I Compiled it on a Fedora Core 4 -- Argh




Rafael Marconi

Em 09/01/2006, às 19:34, Mojo with Horan  Company, LLC escreveu:

Are you running a 64-bit CPU or a 32bit one? I'm asking because I  
see the line with __set_64bit_var in there.


In addition, are you using an SMP box, or is it just  
hyperthreading, or is this an accident and you're really just using  
single cpu?


I don't know aything about asterisk and 64-bit compatibility (or  
SMP compatibility) but I thought these details might help someone  
else help you :)


Moj


Leandro Rzezak wrote:

Removed /usr/include/asterisk, same thing.. Any clue?
On 1/9/06, *Mojo with Horan  Company, LLC*  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you've ever compiled and installed an older version of * on  
this

box,
specifically from the 1.0 era, it's possible you need to try  
removing

/usr/include/asterisk and see if that helps.
Moj
Leandro Rzezak wrote:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.2.1]# make
  gcc -I/lib/modules/2.4.21- 4.ELsmp/build/include -O6 -DMODULE
  -D__KERNEL__ -DEXPORT_SYMTAB
  -I/lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/drivers/net -Wall -I.
  -Wstrict-prototypes -fomit-frame-pointer
  -I/lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp /build/drivers/net/wan
  -I/lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/net -DMODVERSIONS
-include
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/modversions.h
  -DSTANDALONE_ZAPATA -o zaptel.o -c zaptel.c
  In file included from
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/tqueue.h:19,
   from
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/aio.h:4,
   from
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/net.h:88,
   from
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/fs.h:15,
   from
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp /build/include/linux/ 
capability.h:17,

   from
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/binfmts.h:4,
   from
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/sched.h:10,
   from
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/mm.h:22,
   from
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/slab.h:14,
   from
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/proc_fs.h:5,
   from zaptel.c:45:
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/asm/system.h: In  
function

  `__set_64bit_var':
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/asm/system.h:189:  
warning:
  dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict- 
aliasing rules
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/asm/system.h:189:  
warning:
  dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict- 
aliasing rules

  In file included from
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/sched.h:24,
   from
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/mm.h:22,
   from
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/slab.h:14,
   from
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/proc_fs.h:5,
   from zaptel.c:45:
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/smp.h: At  
top level:
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/smp.h:31:  
error:

  conflicting types for 'smp_send_reschedule'
  /lib/modules/2.4.21- 4.ELsmp/build/include/asm/smp.h:41:  
error:

previous
  declaration of 'smp_send_reschedule' was here
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/linux/smp.h:31:  
error:

  conflicting types for 'smp_send_reschedule'
  /lib/modules/2.4.21-4.ELsmp/build/include/asm/smp.h:41: error:
previous
  declaration of 'smp_send_reschedule' was here
  make: *** [zaptel.o] Error 1
 
 
  What could I be missing? :) Thank you
 
  --
  Leandro Rzezak
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
- 
---

 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com
http://Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
Mojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office Manger, Horan  Company, LLC
(907) 747- x112
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com
http://Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call Routing from GnuGK to Asterisk

2005-12-10 Thread Rafael Marconi

Hi,
im using debian with asterisk instaled via apt-get (1.0.7 + oh323)

my asterisk is not a Gk, but a GW.
Look this conf


/etc/asterisk/oh323.conf


[register]
alias=asterisk
gwprefix=9
gwprefix=8
gwprefix=7
gwprefix=6
gwprefix=5
gwprefix=4
gwprefix=3
gwprefix=2
gwprefix=1
gwprefix=0



/etc/gatekeeper.ini

[RasSrv::GWPrefixes]
127.0.0.1
asterisk=0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9




in this way i force all calls to asterisk
i use some extensions with tech-prefix to route calls

like this

exten = _130X.,1,SetCallerID(130)
exten = _130X.,2,Dial,SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED],tr


Rafael Marconi


Em 09/12/2005, às 18:03, Code Lover escreveu:


Hi all,

I installed asterisk-oh323 and GnuGK on the linux box, and i wanted to
route all gnugk registered endpoint's call to oh323 GW (Asterisk)
which is already registered with GnuGK as Gatekeepr.

here is my gnugk.ini configuation.

 [Gatekeeper::Main]
 Fourtytwo=42
 TimeToLive=750
 Name=gnugk

 [RoutedMode]
 GKRouted=1
 H245Routed=0
 CallSignalPort=1720
 CallSignalHandlerNumber=1
 RemoveH245AddressOnTunneling=0
 AcceptNeighborsCalls=1
 AcceptUnregisteredCalls=1
 SupportNATedEndpoints=1
 DropCallsByReleaseComplete=1

 [RasSrv::ARQFeatures]
 ArjReasonRouteCallToSCN=0
 ArjReasonRouteCallToGatekeeper=1
 RoundRobinGateways=1

 [RoutingPolicy]
 default=neighbor

 [RasSrv::Neighbors]
 GK1=asterisk

 [Neighbor::GK1]
 GatekeeperIdentifier=GK1
 Host=212.xxx.xxx.xxx
 SendPrefixes=0
 AcceptPrefixes=*
 ForwardLRQ=always

Here is my error what i am getting in gnugk log.

admissionReject {
requestSeqNum = 8191
rejectReason = calledPartyNotRegistered null
  }

Please help me to solve this problem
--
--
Thank You,
Code Lover
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users