Re: [Asterisk-Users] voice pulse connect - no dtmf

2005-04-26 Thread Spencer Nassar
I saw the same thing.  Filed a support ticket with Voice Pulse Connect 
and they cleared it up within an hour.

SN
On Apr 22, 2005, at 12:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:52:04 -0700
From: "Doug Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] voice pulse connect  - no dtmf
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] Digium. Com"

Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
I've got bunch of VP connect lines, and a day back two LA area numbers 
stop
sending DTMF.  They are IAX2.

So, simply my customers can dial in, it hit my IVR but when they 
punch-in
the number, my * running 1.0.7 cannot identify the dtmf. IAX debug 
does not
show dtmf being sent to me.

Just want to know whether any of you had this experience, and if so 
how that
was fixed. Funny thing is this happened on two dids and others are OK.

Cheers
DH
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Wildcard X100P or TDM400P?

2005-03-08 Thread Spencer Nassar
I'm looking to add a single FXO port to my Asterisk box.  It looks like 
my options are a Digium Wildcard X100P off eBay for $6.99, or a 
Wildcard TDM400P with an FXO Module from Digium for $125.

Can anyone explain the tradeoffs (other than the ability to put 4 
FXO/FSO modules on the TDM400P).  What about RTC for the system - I 
know the TDM400P provides it.  Does the X100P?

Thanks!
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Astricon 2004 tutorials available?

2005-02-17 Thread Spencer Nassar
Does anyone know if the tutorial materials from Atricon 2004 are 
available for download anywhere?  I'm particularly interested in 
Joachim Vanheuverzwijn's Performance and Scalability tutorial slides 
(Asterisk - building your system for performance and scalability).  
Thanks!

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Server Criteria

2005-02-04 Thread Spencer Nassar
I've been doing a lot of background reading/searching of this list, 
voip-info.org, and Google, looking to define a good candidate for a 
server platform.  I'm very interested in thoughts from others!  So here 
goes...

Axiom 1:  if you are not doing doing much transcoding (converting 
between codecs), the bottleneck for supporting high volumes of 
simultaneous calls is system bus speed, not CPU power
---> points to a 64 bit AMD Opteron system, and maybe just one of the 
two processor slots populated.  Bus is twice as wide as a 32 bit 
system, and operates at 1.8GHz (a lot faster than a 64 bit Zeon 
system).  Then add the second processor to the board if you see you 
need it.

Axiom 2:  Get lots of memory
---> I haven't seen this quantified, and plan to do some testing.  I'll 
post results here, but can anyone share any insights?  I'm planning to 
start at 2GB, and go up from there if I see swap getting used.
   - what would an alaw to alaw connection consume (if it didn't hand 
off)?
   - what about a 5 call alaw meetme bridge (and how much memory per 
incremental caller)

Axiom 3: Don't allow any disk IO
---> I'm assuming this is related to #2 - get lots of memory to avoid 
swap to disk.  Other issues or thoughts?

Axoim 4: Come codecs will take advantage of the faster floating point 
of a 64 bit system
---> unknown... has anyone seen this?  Will Asterisk, compiled in a 64 
bit Linux environment, reap these or other benefits from being on a 64 
bit system (other than the system bus speed)?

Also, any experience with Asterisk on an Opteron out there?  Any 
unexpected issues?  How about card drivers?

Thanks!  I hope this spurs an interesting exchange of ideas that is of 
value to many.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Timer for MeetMe on Mac OS X

2005-01-31 Thread Spencer Nassar
Anyone have experience using MeetMe OS X?  Is there a (missing) timer 
issue?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Trunked IAX or not

2005-01-30 Thread Spencer Nassar
Has anyone benchmarked Asterisk on a dedicated single versus dual
processor machine?
http://www.astertest.com/
Cheers, Philipp
The test results that Philipp pointed out show some protocol 
comparisons that include "iax2 trunking / alaw" and "iax2 / alaw" and 
concludes that "IAX2 trunking is more than twice as fast as non 
trunking IAX."

Forgive the newbie question, but what is this distinction?  In what 
cases is a connection 'trunking' or 'not'?  If I have a "register =>" 
statement in my iax.conf file, is that a trunked connection to my DiD 
provider?

Thanks!
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Single or Dual Processor? High volume MeetMe

2005-01-30 Thread Spencer Nassar
Has anyone benchmarked Asterisk on a dedicated single versus dual 
processor machine?  Or could any Asterisk developers comment on whether 
it is architected in such a way that threads could run on multiple CPUs 
(especially MeetMe2)?

At a higher level, can I host more simultaneous lines and/or 
conferences for MeetMe if I use a dual processor machine versus single? 
 Also, any info on memory use with high numbers of conference users 
(100, 1000)?

Thanks!
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] zaprtc from bristuff? not there?

2005-01-23 Thread Spencer Nassar
I'm trying to take advice to use "zaprtc from bristuff" (from both a 
posting here and references on voip-info) because I have a 2.4 kernel 
SMP machine.

I've downloaded and installed bristuff-0.2.0-RC3a and now have the 
modules zaphfc and zaptel loaded.

Running meetme says the extension is invalid (I've double checked 
meetme.conf and extensions.conf).

There is no zaprtc version in that bristuff package (I thought there 
would be based on other posts).  Trying to load zaprtc 0.0.1 gives the 
same error as the standard asterisk distribution.

Do I download something more recent than zaprtc 0.0.1?  Can anyone tell 
me were (no luck googling)?  Other insights?

Thanks much!
Spencer
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] zaprtc load issue (different that other postings)

2005-01-22 Thread Spencer Nassar
zaprtc 'load' is failing on my machine (the make was fine, same output 
as other posts to this list)
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptelrtc]# make load
  sync
  modprobe zaptel
  insmod ./zaprtc.o
  ./zaprtc.o: init_module: Input/output error
  Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, 
including invalid IO or IRQ parameters.
You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg

I've seen other references to ensuring that rtc is unloaded first, but 
it's not loaded on my machine
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptelrtc]# lsmod
  Module  Size  Used byNot tainted
  zaptel181856   0
  soundcore   7012   0  (autoclean)
  e1000  75744   1
  iptable_nat22744   0  (autoclean) (unused)
  iptable_mangle  2776   0  (autoclean) (unused)
  ipt_REJECT  4632   1  (autoclean)
  ipt_multiport   1176   2  (autoclean)
  ipt_state   1080   3  (autoclean)
  ip_conntrack   29704   2  (autoclean) [iptable_nat ipt_state]
  iptable_filter  2412   1  (autoclean)
  ip_tables  16544   8  [iptable_nat iptable_mangle 
ipt_REJECT ipt_multiport ipt_state iptable_filter]
  microcode   6848   0  (autoclean)
  keybdev 2976   0  (unused)
  mousedev5624   0  (unused)
  hid22276   0  (unused)
  input   6144   0  [keybdev mousedev hid]
  usb-ohci   23176   0  (unused)
  usbcore80928   1  [hid usb-ohci]
  ext3   89960   2
  jbd55060   2  [ext3]
  mptscsih   41780   3
  mptbase43936   3  [mptscsih]
  sd_mod 13360   6
  scsi_mod  112680   2  [mptscsih sd_mod]

I'm running Redhat ES3 on a dual xeon system
Kernel is linux-2.4 -> linux-2.4.21-15.EL
Any ideas?
Thanks!
Spencer
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users