[asterisk-users] calls dropped with te110p E1

2007-07-18 Thread Tommaso Calosi

I have this problem on a te110p. On random basis the calls are

disconnected by asterisk. When this happens asterisk logs:

Jul 18 12:52:10 DEBUG[4668] channel.c: Got a FRAME_CONTROL (5) frame on channel 
Zap/13-1
Jul 18 12:52:10 DEBUG[4668] channel.c: Bridge stops bridging channels 
SIP/201-08270aa8 and Zap/13-1


Please see the atteched files containing details. 





SETUP

 SETUP ACK

ALLERTING

 CONNECT

CONNECT ACK
DISCONNECT

 RELEASE

RELEASE ACK




Asterisk 1.2.22
Zaptel 1.2.19
Libpri 1.2.5
Addons 1.2.7
Sounds 1.2.1

Tommaso Calosi





Jul 18 12:51:48 DEBUG[4200] chan_sip.c: Checking SIP call limits for device 201
Jul 18 12:51:48 DEBUG[4200] chan_sip.c: build_route: Contact hop: Marzia 
Ridolfi sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4187] logger.c:  Extension Changed 201 new state InUse 
for Notify User 200
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c: -- Executing 
NoOp(SIP/201-08270aa8, Real Number: 03356307910) in new stack
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c: -- Executing 
Macro(SIP/201-08270aa8, superdial|1|ZAP/G10|3356307910||tT) in new stack
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c: -- Executing 
NoOp(SIP/201-08270aa8, Peer 1 using ZAP/G10 to call 3356307910 for  with 
options tT) in new stack
Jul 18 12:51:48 DEBUG[4668] app_macro.c: Executed application: Noop
Jul 18 12:51:48 DEBUG[4668] pbx.c: Function result is '201'
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c: -- Executing 
Set(SIP/201-08270aa8, CDR(accountcode)=0557870201) in new stack
Jul 18 12:51:48 DEBUG[4668] app_macro.c: Executed application: Set
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c: -- Executing 
Set(SIP/201-08270aa8, CALLERID(all)=05578701 05578701) in new stack
Jul 18 12:51:48 DEBUG[4668] app_macro.c: Executed application: Set
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c: -- Executing 
Dial(SIP/201-08270aa8, ZAP/G10/3356307910||tT) in new stack
Jul 18 12:51:48 DEBUG[4668] dsp.c: dsp busy pattern set to 0,0
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c: -- Making new call for cr 32791
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c: -- Requested transfer capability: 
0x00 - SPEECH
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:  Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8)  
len=50
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:  Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 23/0x17) 
(Originator)
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:  Message type: SETUP (5)
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:  [04 03 80 90 a3]
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:  Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1  
Q.931 Std: 0  Info transfer capability: Speech (0)
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:   Ext: 1  
Trans mode/rate: 64kbps, circuit-mode (16)
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:   Ext: 1  
User information layer 1: A-Law (35)
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:  [18 03 a9 83 8d]
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:  Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1  IntID: 
Implicit, PRI Spare: 0, Exclusive Dchan: 0
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c: ChanSel: 
Reserved
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:Ext: 1  Coding: 
0   Number Specified   Channel Type: 3
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:Ext: 1  
Channel: 13 ]
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:  [28 08 30 35 35 37 38 37 30 31]
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:  Display (len= 8) [ 05578701 ]
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:  [6c 0a 00 80 30 35 35 37 38 37 30 31]
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:  Calling Number (len=12) [ Ext: 0  
TON: Unknown Number Type (0)  NPI: Unknown Number Plan (0)
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:
Presentation: Presentation permitted, user number not screened (0) '05578701' ]
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:  [70 0b 80 33 33 35 36 33 30 37 39 31 
30]
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c:  Called Number (len=13) [ Ext: 1  TON: 
Unknown Number Type (0)  NPI: Unknown Number Plan (0) '3356307910' ]
Jul 18 12:51:48 DEBUG[4187] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'Zap/13-1'
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4668] logger.c: -- Called G10/3356307910
Jul 18 12:51:48 DEBUG[4200] chan_sip.c: Stopping retransmission on '[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]' of Request 114: Match Found
Jul 18 12:51:48 DEBUG[4668] chan_sip.c: Oooh, format changed to 4
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4193] logger.c:  Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8)  
len=10
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4193] logger.c:  Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 23/0x17) 
(Terminator)
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4193] logger.c:  Message type: SETUP ACKNOWLEDGE (13)
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4193] logger.c:  [18 03 a9 83 8d]
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4193] logger.c:  Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1  IntID: 
Implicit, PRI Spare: 0, Exclusive Dchan: 0
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4193] logger.c: ChanSel: 
Reserved
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4193] logger.c:Ext: 1  Coding: 
0   Number Specified   Channel Type: 3
Jul 18 12:51:48 VERBOSE[4193] logger.c

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX call limit

2007-01-22 Thread Tommaso Calosi

Gordon Henderson wrote:

On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Cristian Draghici wrote:


IDEfisk is based on iaxclient (iaxclient.sourceforge.net) which will
reject a call with the BUSY signal if there is no available line in
the softphone to take the call.

This means you need to configure IDEfisk to use only one line (call
context). I don't know if this is possible.

Somewhere in IDEfisk is this call that initialised iax client:
iaxclient.h:EXPORT int iaxc_initialize(int audType, int nCalls);

what you want is nCalls to be 1.


There is a configurable parameter in sip.conf: call-limit, but this 
seems to be missing from the iax channel setup. Maybe this is 
deliberate for other reasons though.


But switching to a SIP client and using this might work, if SIP is an 
option for you.


Gordon


 

Hope this helps,
Cristi


--
Cristian Draghici
http://www.loudhush.ro


On 1/21/07, Nir Simionovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




Hi Philipp,

  Thanks for the tip, but that is not what I initially meant. I'm using
IDEfisk, and I would like it when a call comes
Into IDEfisk to generate a BUSY signal, if there is already a call 
in the

client. Any ideas ?

Nir S

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Philipp Kempgen

Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:55 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] IAX call limit

Nir Simionovich wrote:

   Stupid and silly question - is there a way to limit the number of
 concurrent calls an IAX client can make? something in the similar
 sense of incominglimit and outgoing limit on SIP?

It can be done in the dial plan:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+Queue+with+limited+calls+per+IAX+agent 




Best regards,
  Philipp

--
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones.
  Asterisk - http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

You may consider using the macro superdial. There you can specify the 
maximum number of concurrent calls per group, so that the next one 
recieves the busy tone.





___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.4 I hear other party's voice only when I speack need help - SOLVED -

2006-08-30 Thread Tommaso Calosi

Giorgio Incantalupo wrote:

Hi Tommaso,
have you tried to search for noise suppression? I remember some phone 
has a function to automatically suppress it so the caller does not 
hear anything and thinks the other party has hung up.



Giorgio Incantalupo



Tommaso Calosi wrote:
I have this problem with Asterisk 1.2.4 I hear other party's voice 
only when I speack or i make some noise. Otherwise i hear nothing. 
Futhermore every time i receive a call , this message is displayed :  
-- Started music on hold, class 'my_class', on SIP/ some random 
public ip address -08222740


any help?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


I've solved right now.

The problem was occurring just with musiconhold. Icoming calls are 
answerd and a message is played back using dial with m option. The 
problem is that the caller has silence unless it produces noise. I had 
to modprobe ztdummy.





___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.4 I hear other party's voice only when I speack need help

2006-08-29 Thread Tommaso Calosi
I have this problem with Asterisk 1.2.4 I hear other party's voice only 
when I speack or i make some noise. Otherwise i hear nothing. Futhermore 
every time i receive a call , this message is displayed :  -- Started 
music on hold, class 'my_class', on SIP/ some random public ip address 
-08222740


any help?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Call transfer asterisk + with SPA-1001

2006-07-25 Thread Tommaso Calosi
Does anybody knows how to transfer calls from Sipura SPA 1001 configured 
as asterisk internal ?


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Need help with Junghanns Quadbri

2006-07-04 Thread Tommaso Calosi
I think you'll need to set the jumpers on the card in order to specify 
the NT ports.


Jean-Louis curty wrote:

Hi everybody
 
I hope that somebody can help me with the following 
 
I have

 2 quadbri cards
2 - 1t0 cards
1 pabx alcatel 4200
 
I would like to connect my asterisk to the alcatel ,
 
I installed bristuff 0.3.0-1p ,

loaded the zaphfc driver in NT mode
configured zaptel and zapata , it works great.
 
 
then I removed the 1 t0 card,

added the quadbri
loaded qozap : insmod qozap.ko ports=15 ( 4 ports in NT )
 
adjusted the zaptel zapata, specified the right signalling, right context

ran ztcfg -vv ( 12 channels configured )
started asterisk,
I get layer1 down message on the 4 ports,
leds remain red
what ever I do in my conf , I am not able to get a reaction from the 
card ( I tried with my two quadbri, on 2 different pc's )
 
 
what can I check ?

thanks
jl


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] New Digium Card b410p

2006-06-30 Thread Tommaso Calosi
Who knows something interesting about the new BRI digium card b410p ? 
For example, will it use the misdn driver or the native zaptel? Any 
interesting links will be appreciated too.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 360 Passsword Issue

2006-06-23 Thread Tommaso Calosi
I have had the same problem too,  I solved resetting the phone to 
factory defaults



Edward de Zeeuw wrote:

I'll take a look first thing tomorrow and let you know what I find.  Thanks!
Edward

Colin Anderson wrote:
  

In the Snom web management page under Advanced make sure Challenge response
on phone is turned to OFF. This is a stupid feature to have on by default
from the factory. 


-Original Message-
From: Edward de Zeeuw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 11:54 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 360 Passsword Issue


I have multiple (20+) Snom 360 phones communicating with asterisk
1.2.7.1.  Almost regularly (daily) and in some cases ongoing 9every 10
minutes the phones ask for password and id the account they are seeking
the password for.  If I hit the X key the phone continues operating
normally.  Has anyone else come across a similar issue?

Edward
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

  


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call limit function on sip channel to external pop

2006-06-21 Thread Tommaso Calosi
you can either use the call_limit for each internal or if you wish 
something centralized ( for example a maximum total of 30  concurrent 
calls ) you can use the superdial macro 
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Superdial+macro



Patrick wrote:

On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 09:20 +0200, bram kortleven wrote:
  

Hi,

We've been using asterisk as our main telephone-communications platform
for years now, and we wrote several extra scripts and features for it.
Now we 're looking for a solution to limit the number of channels going
to an external SIP provider.
We recently upgraded our system from asterisk 1.0 to 1.2(.9 now) to be
able to use such features, but nothing helped...
When we configure a new channel, it seems to work, but putting the
call_limit on an existing sip channel going out, it doesn't do anything.

Anyone already had such an issue, or anyone knowing the best config for
limiting outgoing sip channels to external sip providers?



Previous answers to similar questions usually point to:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+SetGroup

Regards,
Patrick

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

  


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] SPA-941 Disable call waiting or Disable Call waiting via asterisk

2006-06-14 Thread Tommaso Calosi
I'm trying to disable call waiting for Linksys SPA-941, but 
unfortunately as far as I have seen, there are no parameters on the web 
interface regarding this feature. I just want callers to hear the busy 
tone when the called party is at the phone. Probably I can accomplish 
this by using the disable call waiting in asterisk as well, but I have 
not been able to find any documentation for this. I have found this 
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=PBX+Disable+Call+Waiting 
about call waiting,  but it's quite unusefull.


Thanks

Tommaso Calosi
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA-941 Disable call waiting or Disable Call waiting via asterisk

2006-06-14 Thread Tommaso Calosi
Well, it does help, but it causes the announced transfer to fail, 
because if you set call-limit=1 you cannot dial out to announce the 
transfer...


Alberto Sagredo wrote:
It has a conceptual problem i have notified several times to 
Cisco-Linksys. It could not be disabled, i have the same problem with 
my queue extensions, and the way to resolve has been to use 
call-limit=1 in extensions.


i hope this helps.

Tommaso Calosi escribió:
I'm trying to disable call waiting for Linksys SPA-941, but 
unfortunately as far as I have seen, there are no parameters on the 
web interface regarding this feature. I just want callers to hear the 
busy tone when the called party is at the phone. Probably I can 
accomplish this by using the disable call waiting in asterisk as 
well, but I have not been able to find any documentation for this. I 
have found this 
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=PBX+Disable+Call+Waiting 
about call waiting,  but it's quite unusefull.


Thanks

Tommaso Calosi
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users







___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Playback welcome message while phones ring, please help

2006-06-06 Thread Tommaso Calosi
I want that incoming callers to hear a welcome message while the phones 
ring. I know I can use Dial with the m(class) option to make the same 
with musiconhold, but the problem is that musiconhold does not start 
from the beginning of my mp3 file.  If I use Playback or Background, the 
phones do not ring unless the mp3 file is over...


Any suggestion?


Thanks
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Playback welcome message while phones ring, please help

2006-06-06 Thread Tommaso Calosi

Thanks, it works for me too.

Tim Sharp wrote:

Yes it does, I just set our system up that way.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gareth
Blades
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 6:37 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Playback welcome message while phones
ring,please help


I believe if you use the new native music on hold feature it always
plays the music on hold starting from the beginning.

On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 11:15, Tommaso Calosi wrote:
  
I want that incoming callers to hear a welcome message while the phones 
ring. I know I can use Dial with the m(class) option to make the same 
with musiconhold, but the problem is that musiconhold does not start 
from the beginning of my mp3 file.  If I use Playback or Background, the 
phones do not ring unless the mp3 file is over...


Any suggestion?


Thanks
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

  


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Snom firmwares suck --additional datapoint to consider

2006-05-29 Thread Tommaso Calosi

Guido Hecken wrote:

I looked long and hard at the LAN and it was basically narrowed down to


the
  

switches. In this smaller install, several cheapo Dlink ($30) switches
de-aggregate a Cisco Catalyst switch. What I noticed was that any phone
plugged direcly into the Catalyst did *not* lock up or reboot. Any phone
plugged into the crap switches experienced the lockup. So now we are down


to
  

the cheap switches themselves. We are nuking the Dlink switches and
replacing them with 3com workgroup switches, same as what we use in the
large install to good effect, and I fully expect the problem to dissapear.



We had the same problems with some cheap LevelOne Switches.
The Snoms rebooted during a call, calls dropped etc.
Replacing the switches was the solution.

Guido
 
___

--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

  
I have moved to 3com switches,but  the Snom 320 still locks up, and also 
I don't think it's reasonable to force customers to buy 3com just 
because Snom firmware sucks.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] misdn problem

2006-05-29 Thread Tommaso Calosi
In your extension.conf, in the misdn context you defined in 
/etc/asterisk/misdn.conf you have to add something linke the following line


[from-pstn]
exten = 0108680550,1,Dial(SIP/201)

If you don't want to have to write a string for each called extension, 
you can put something like. Obviously SIP/201 is the phone you wish to ring.


[from-pstn]
exten = _.,1,Dial(SIP/201)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I have two HFC ISDN Cards, configured using mISDN on asterisk svn head 1.2

These two cards are connected to 2 ISDN Lines, receiving calls for 50
numbers.

Everything is OK on 75 % and bad on 25 %

When is bad, In /var/log/asterisk/full I see

May 26 09:55:28 WARNING[24410] chan_misdn.c: Extension can never match, so
disconnecting
May 26 09:55:28 DEBUG[24410] channel.c: Prodding channel 'mISDN/1-1'
May 26 09:55:28 DEBUG[24410] channel.c: Scheduling timer at 160 sample
intervals
May 26 09:55:28 WARNING[24410] chan_misdn.c: Extension can never match, so
disconnecting
May 26 09:55:28 DEBUG[24410] channel.c: Prodding channel 'mISDN/2-1'
May 26 09:55:28 DEBUG[24410] channel.c: Scheduling timer at 160 sample
intervals

on the asterisk console, if  I set misdn set debug 10, I see

P[ 1] handle_frm: frm-addr:42000103 frm-prim:3f082
P[ 1]  -- lib: NEW_CR Ind with l3id:200ec on this port.
P[ 1]  -- new_process: New L3Id: 200ec
P[ 1] handle_frm: frm-addr:42000103 frm-prim:30582
P[ 1] set_channel: bc-channel:0 channel:1
P[ 1] lib Got Prim: Addr 42000103 prim 30582 dinfo 200ec
P[ 1] $$$ find_chan: No channel found for oad:3481303064 dad:0108680550
P[ 0] $$$ find_chan: No channel found with l3id:200ec
P[ 1] I IND :SETUP oad:3481303064 dad:0108680550
P[ 1]  -- mode:TE cause:16 ocause:16 rad:
P[ 1]  -- facility:FAC_NONE out_facility:FAC_NONE
P[ 1]  -- info_dad: onumplan:0 dnumplan:2 rnumplan:
P[ 1]  -- screen:0 -- pres:0
P[ 1]  -- channel:1 caps:Speech pi:0 keypad:
P[ 1]  -- urate:0 rate:16 mode:0 user1:0
P[ 1]  -- pid:336 addr:50010102 l3id:200ec
P[ 1]  -- b_stid:0 layer_id:50010180
P[ 1]  -- bc:81681d4 h:0 sh:0
P[ 1] $$$ find_chan: No channel found for oad:3481303064 dad:0108680550
P[ 1]  -- Bearer: Speech
P[ 1]  -- Codec: Alaw
P[ 0]  -- * NEW CHANNEL dad:0108680550 oad:3481303064
P[ 1] read_config: Getting Config
P[ 1] config_jb: Called
P[ 1]  -- * CallGrp: PickupGrp:
P[ 1] * Queuing chan 0x842e8b0
P[ 1] CONTEXT:from-pstn
P[ 1] Tone Indicate:
P[ 1]  -- Busy
P[ 1] misdn_write: * prods us
P[ 1] SENDEVENT: stack-nt:0 stack-uperid:4104
P[ 1] I SEND:DISCONNECT oad:3481303064 dad:00108680550
P[ 1]  -- mode:TE cause:16 ocause:1 rad:
P[ 1]  -- facility:FAC_NONE out_facility:FAC_NONE
P[ 1]  -- info_dad: onumplan:0 dnumplan:2 rnumplan:
P[ 1]  -- screen:0 -- pres:0
P[ 1]  -- channel:1 caps:Speech pi:0 keypad:
P[ 1]  -- urate:0 rate:16 mode:0 user1:0
P[ 1]  -- pid:336 addr:50010102 l3id:200ec
P[ 1]  -- b_stid:0 layer_id:50010180
P[ 1]  -- bc:81681d4 h:0 sh:0
P[ 1] GOT SETUP OK
P[ 1] Freeing Msg on prim:30582
P[ 2] handle_frm: frm-addr:42000203 frm-prim:3f082
P[ 2]  -- lib: NEW_CR Ind with l3id:40076 on this port.
P[ 2]  -- new_process: New L3Id: 40076
P[ 2] handle_frm: frm-addr:42000203 frm-prim:30582
P[ 2] set_channel: bc-channel:0 channel:1
P[ 2] lib Got Prim: Addr 42000203 prim 30582 dinfo 40076
P[ 2] $$$ find_chan: No channel found for oad:3481303064 dad:0108680550
P[ 1] $$$ find_chan: No channel found with l3id:40076
P[ 2] I IND :SETUP oad:3481303064 dad:0108680550
P[ 2]  -- mode:TE cause:16 ocause:16 rad:
P[ 2]  -- facility:FAC_NONE out_facility:FAC_NONE
P[ 2]  -- info_dad: onumplan:0 dnumplan:2 rnumplan:
P[ 2]  -- screen:0 -- pres:0
P[ 2]  -- channel:1 caps:Speech pi:0 keypad:
P[ 2]  -- urate:0 rate:16 mode:0 user1:0
P[ 2]  -- pid:337 addr:50010202 l3id:40076
P[ 2]  -- b_stid:0 layer_id:50010280
P[ 2]  -- bc:8173dec h:0 sh:0
P[ 2] $$$ find_chan: No channel found for oad:3481303064 dad:0108680550
P[ 2]  -- Bearer: Speech
P[ 2]  -- Codec: Alaw
P[ 0]  -- * NEW CHANNEL dad:0108680550 oad:3481303064
P[ 2] read_config: Getting Config
P[ 2] config_jb: Called
P[ 2]  -- * CallGrp: PickupGrp:
P[ 2] * Queuing chan 0x84a8ea0
P[ 2] CONTEXT:from-pstn
P[ 2] Tone Indicate:
P[ 2]  -- Busy
P[ 2] misdn_write: * prods us
P[ 2] SENDEVENT: stack-nt:0 stack-uperid:4204
P[ 2] I SEND:DISCONNECT oad:3481303064 dad:00108680550
P[ 2]  -- mode:TE cause:16 ocause:1 rad:
P[ 2]  -- facility:FAC_NONE out_facility:FAC_NONE
P[ 2]  -- info_dad: onumplan:0 dnumplan:2 rnumplan:
P[ 2]  -- screen:0 -- pres:0
P[ 2]  -- channel:1 caps:Speech pi:0 keypad:
P[ 2]  -- urate:0 rate:16 mode:0 user1:0
P[ 2]  -- pid:337 addr:50010202 l3id:40076
P[ 2]  -- b_stid:0 layer_id:50010280
P[ 2]  -- bc:8173dec h:0 sh:0
P[ 2] GOT SETUP OK
P[ 2] Freeing Msg on prim:30582
P[ 2] MGMT: Short status dinfo 201
P[ 2] MGMT: SSTATUS: L2_ESTABLISH

all the (4) channels were idle at call  time.

Thanks in advance

Andrea

Chi ricevesse questa mail per errore e' gentilmente pregato di cancellarla.

Visitate il sito http://www.frameweb.it


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Snom firmwares suck

2006-05-24 Thread Tommaso Calosi
I agree... Snom firmware are buggy. You can use any version, you'll 
always find a bug, expecially for 320's. I think instead of developing  
the XML minibrowser they should make the phones to work properly.

Dovid Bender wrote:
I was transporting it in my suitcase when I flew from NY to FL. When I 
got there the screen was dead. I contacted snom and they were real 
helpfull and resolving the issue.
 
Dovid


*/Alex Robar [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:

Interesting, I've never had a screen just die on me. Are you
saying that the screen just stops working?

As for firmware, I've always found that the best way to deal with
problematic firmware is to talk to the company about it.
Especially in a scenario like you're in, where everyone else seems
happy with the firmware. It's very likely that Snom may not be
aware of the problems you are experiencing. I can't say that I've
ever had a Snom reboot in the middle of a conversation. I don't
think my phones have ever just rebooted when I haven't asked them
to. I would certainly talk to Snom about this.

Alex

On 5/19/06, *Remco Barende* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Most people seem quite positive about Snom phones, I cannot
share this
opinion.

The displays are dying quite often, and firmware is buggy. I
have tried
every firmware from 4.5 up to 5.x and 6.04 but keep having
problems with
phones locking up or rebooting during an ongoing conversation.

REALLY annoying for a phone that is advertised / targeted as a
business
class phone
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com
http://easynews.com/ --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




-- 
Alex Robar

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries 
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman9/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39666/*http://messenger.yahoo.com/ 
for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Misdn 0.2.1 BUSY tone

2006-05-24 Thread Tommaso Calosi

I have this problem on misdn 0.2.1:
in extension.conf  i have such a situation;

[misdn_incoming]
exten = 06786541,1,Dial(SIP/203)

where SIP/203 is a GXP-2000.

I want to make the 203 to answer just one call at the same time, so i've 
disabled the call waiting feature on the phone, but when I do this the 
caller does not hear the Busy tone, it receives the telco Network 
error tone.


I want the caller to receive the busy tone when the called is busy . How 
can I do this?

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Unwanted conference with snom320 and asterisk1.07bristuffed

2006-05-09 Thread Tommaso Calosi

I've tested this problem pretty much in these days.

-  A ( Snom 320 ) put B caller on Hold
-  C calls A
- A press the transfer button twice
- Now B and C are connected ( makes no sense to me )

So, for one side there is a human error ( the operator should not press 
the transfer button twice ) BUT SNOM MAKES ALL MORE COMPLICATED!!!.


I think this feature is just causing problem to most of the snom users. 
It would be a very good thing if snom could disable this feature or at 
least make it possible to disable from users.


This behavior is 100% indipendent from the Call join on Xfer setting.

This is the answer from snom


Dear Tommaso Calosi,

Is the initial problem still present with V5.5?

However Call join on Xfer works like this: When this feature is turned 
to on, you will connect an incoming call to, for example, a colleague 
you already have on hold by pressing TRANSFER. You will not be able to 
pick one of severals calls on hold to transfer the call to. If this is 
your usual scenario, set this feature to off and use the function keys 
-/- to select the calls to be joined! Press TRANSFER and ENTER to 
join them.


If you have only two calls involved you can use Call join on Xfer. Only 
if you except many simultaneous calls on HOLD do not use it. However 
none of the transfer scenarios is supposed to switch to conference mode.


Any new observations you may report me again.

Tommaso Calosi - SYSMIC SRL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Franklin Webb wrote:
We use a large number of Snom 320's and we have this same problem even 
with Call join on Xfer set to off.  I had not previously linked it 
decisively to the Snoms, but it sounds like that is likely our issue.  
We've had to stay at the 4.5 firmware because otherwise we get 
additional incomming calls when our reps put someone on hold to make a 
transfer.
 
If I find any solution I'll be sure to share it with the list.
 
Thanks for sharing your experiences,
 
Frank Webb

Assistant Project Leader
Inter Media Marketing Solutions

- Original Message -
*From:* Alexander Lopez mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
*Sent:* Thursday, May 04, 2006 7:35 AM
*Subject:* RE: [Asterisk-Users] Unwanted conference with snom320
and asterisk1.07bristuffed

Under Advanced make sure this is set:

 


Call join on Xfer (2 calls): to off

 

 

 

 




*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
*Tommaso Calosi
*Sent:* Thursday, May 04, 2006 4:02 AM
*To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
*Subject:* [Asterisk-Users] Unwanted conference with snom320 and
asterisk 1.07bristuffed

 


 I have 13 Snom 320 with asterisk 1.07 bristuffed. The problem is
that sometimes on random basis, when one customer is placed on
hold and another call arrives, the customers are put in conference
with each other. This look very strange to me, but I've disabled
the confernce button on the snom phones to prevent the human
errors, but it still occurs.

Investigating I've discovered that a similar problem was fixed
with the Snom320 Release 5.2 
(http://www.snom.com/snom320_release_notes.html )


It says:
fixed unwanted conference bug in offhook/enter during ringback
with an incoming call

BUT my phones are already running 5.2 firmware.

Any idea?

Am I the only one with this problem?
Do you think is the usual  buggy-snom firmware problem? Or it
might be an Asterisk problem?


 

 

 



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Unwanted conference with snom320 and asterisk 1.07 bristuffed

2006-05-04 Thread Tommaso Calosi
Title: Messaggio



Ihave 13 Snom 320 with asterisk 1.07 
bristuffed. The problem is that sometimes on random basis, when one customer is 
placed on hold and another call arrives, the customers are put in conference 
with each other. This look very strange to me, but I've disabled the confernce 
button on the snom phones to prevent the human errors, but it still occurs. 
Investigating I've discovered that a similar problem was fixed with the 
Snom320 Release 5.2 (http://www.snom.com/snom320_release_notes.html 
) It says: fixed unwanted conference bug in offhook/enter during 
ringback with an incoming call BUT my phones are already running 5.2 
firmware. Any idea? Am I the only one with this problem? Do 
you think is the usual buggy-snom firmware problem? Or it might be an 
Asterisk problem? 



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


R: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 320 HOLD and TRANSFER not detected

2006-04-28 Thread Tommaso Calosi
Title: Messaggio



Hi 
Franklin,

I've 
downgraded the firmware to 4.5 but that didn't solve. The problem was in 
sip.conf in the field "fromuser" which i set to Name Surname. If I set the 
fromuser field that way it doesn't transfer or hold. If iI set it to N.Surneme ( 
without space ) it works. The strange thing is that on gxp2000 it works in both 
ways. 

Bye 
and thanks

Tommaso Calosi

-Messaggio 
originale-Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Franklin 
WebbInviato: giovedì 27 aprile 2006 21.23A: Asterisk Users 
Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionOggetto: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 
Snom 320 HOLD and TRANSFER not detected

  Hi there Tommaso,
  
  You've probably already tried this, but a reset 
  and reboot often fixes certain flakey behaviours on our Snom 320s. We've 
  had to revert back to the 4.5 firmware because of some issues with the 5.0 and 
  later, mostly that additional calls come in when our reps put customers on 
  hold.
  
  I have one phone here still at 5.3 firmware and I 
  tested the hold key and that did not happen.
  
  Assuming everything is identicle in the config it 
  could be bad phones, but we've seen a very small percentage of those. 
  Overall we've found the Snom320 to be an excellent phone for our 
  purposes.
  
  Best of luck,
  
  Franklin Webb
  Assistant Project Leader
  Inter-Media Marketing Solutions
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
    Tommaso Calosi 
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com 

Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 2:03 
PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 320 HOLD 
and TRANSFER not detected

I have a 
preoblem with my snom 320 phones. I have 5 snom phones installed and all of 
them have 5.2 firmware. All have same settings in the advanced panel. 
On2 phones when I press the hold or transfer key nothing happens and * 
does not start the musiconhold. In the The hold and transfer keys are set as 
F_R and F_TRANSFER correctly as the others. Other snoms and gxp-2000 work 
ok.

Any 
ideas?






___--Bandwidth and 
Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing 
listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: 
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Snom 320 HOLD and TRANSFER not detected

2006-04-27 Thread Tommaso Calosi
Title: Messaggio



I have a preoblem 
with my snom 320 phones. I have 5 snom phones installed and all of them have 5.2 
firmware. All have same settings in the advanced panel. On2 phones when I 
press the hold or transfer key nothing happens and * does not start the 
musiconhold. In the The hold and transfer keys are set as F_R and F_TRANSFER 
correctly as the others. Other snoms and gxp-2000 work ok.

Any 
ideas?



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] one-waysilence during calls

2006-04-05 Thread Tommaso Calosi
Title: Messaggio





My sip phones 
are connected to asterisk PBX 1.2.4. The PBX is connected to the provider 
through IAX2 connection. Sometimes randomly the voice is stopped and both caller 
and called don't hear the other's voice. During this silence period Asterisk is 
not logging any errors. This happen on incoming 
calls too, and incoming calls are through ISDN BRI 
lines


Any 
idea?

Thanks


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Music on hold not working between SIP clients

2005-04-12 Thread Tommaso Calosi








Hi,

I have problems in configuring music on hold between SIP clients: if I dial
from an iax to a sip and then the iax place the call on hold, then the music
starts. If the sip client places the call on hold, the music does not start and
nothing is reported by the Asterisk console. I think it may depend on the
sip.conf configuration, but I couldnt find docs about this.

Currently Im using madplay for music, and I have configured the
musiconhold.conf with this setting

[classes]
default = custom:/var/lib/asterisk/mohmp3/,/usr/local/bin/madplay --mono -R 8000 -A -20 --output=raw:-





Thanks



Tommaso Calosi






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users