Re: [Asterisk-Users] 404 User Not Found when calling between two X-Lites
I saw in the dump captured by Ethereal that X-Lite received 200(OK) from asterisk after sending INVITE. So I guessed X-Lite registered well. But I got null reply when I ran sip show peer in asterisk console. What is your opinion about that?On Apr 8, 2005 8:43 PM, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The configuration for X-Lite in sip.conf: [177209] ;Turn off silence suppression in X-Lite (Transmit Silence=YES)! ;Note that Xlite sends NAT keep-alive packets, so qualify=yes is not needed type=friend ;regexten=1234 ; When they register, create extension 1234 ;username=xlite1 ;callerid=Jane Smith 5678 host=dynamic ;nat=yes ; X-Lite is behind a NAT router ;canreinvite=no; Typically set to NO if behind NAT disallow=all ;allow=gsm ; GSM consumes far less bandwidth than ulaw allow=ulaw ;allow=alaw [177210] ;Turn off silence suppression in X-Lite (Transmit Silence=YES)! ;Note that Xlite sends NAT keep-alive packets, so qualify=yes is not needed type=friend ;regexten=1234 ; When they register, create extension 1234 ;username=xlite1 ;callerid=Jane Smith 5678 host=dynamic ;nat=yes ; X-Lite is behind a NAT router ;canreinvite=no; Typically set to NO if behind NAT disallow=all ;allow=gsm ; GSM consumes far less bandwidth than ulaw allow=ulaw ;allow=alaw The 2 X-Litesregistered well with username 177209 and 177210 respectively. When I made a call between them, I got 404 User Not Found message from asterisk.Any idea? X-Lites both run on Microsoft Windows XP Professional. asterisk 1.07 runs on Red Hat Linux 7.3.Need to look at sip show peers to see if they are actually registered.My first guess they are not since you likely need username= secret=parameters in both of the above examples.If they are in fact registered, then what context are both of theseextensions registered in, and what does that context look like inextensions.conf?___Asterisk-Users mailing listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] 404 User Not Found when calling between two X-Lites
I saw in the dump captured by Ethereal that X-Lite received 200(OK) from asterisk after sending INVITE. So I guessed X-Lite registered well. But I got null reply when I ran sip show peer in asterisk console. What is your opinion about that? If sip show peers does not show your xlite boxes, then they aren't registered. You really need to figure out why they aren't registering before attempting any calls, etc. You might consider using sip debug and sip no debug to see what is actually going on. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] 404 User Not Found when calling between two X-Lites
The configuration for X-Lite in sip.conf: [177209] ;Turn off silence suppression in X-Lite (Transmit Silence=YES)! ;Note that Xlite sends NAT keep-alive packets, so qualify=yes is not needed type=friend ;regexten=1234 ; When they register, create extension 1234 ;username=xlite1 ;callerid=Jane Smith 5678 host=dynamic ;nat=yes ; X-Lite is behind a NAT router ;canreinvite=no; Typically set to NO if behind NAT disallow=all ;allow=gsm ; GSM consumes far less bandwidth than ulaw allow=ulaw ;allow=alaw [177210] ;Turn off silence suppression in X-Lite (Transmit Silence=YES)! ;Note that Xlite sends NAT keep-alive packets, so qualify=yes is not needed type=friend ;regexten=1234 ; When they register, create extension 1234 ;username=xlite1 ;callerid=Jane Smith 5678 host=dynamic ;nat=yes ; X-Lite is behind a NAT router ;canreinvite=no; Typically set to NO if behind NAT disallow=all ;allow=gsm ; GSM consumes far less bandwidth than ulaw allow=ulaw ;allow=alaw The 2 X-Lites registered well with username 177209 and 177210 respectively. When I made a call between them, I got 404 User Not Found message from asterisk. Any idea? X-Lites both run on Microsoft Windows XP Professional. asterisk 1.07 runs on Red Hat Linux 7.3. Abe ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] 404 User Not Found when calling between two X-Lites
The configuration for X-Lite in sip.conf: [177209] ;Turn off silence suppression in X-Lite (Transmit Silence=YES)! ;Note that Xlite sends NAT keep-alive packets, so qualify=yes is not needed type=friend ;regexten=1234 ; When they register, create extension 1234 ;username=xlite1 ;callerid=Jane Smith 5678 host=dynamic ;nat=yes ; X-Lite is behind a NAT router ;canreinvite=no; Typically set to NO if behind NAT disallow=all ;allow=gsm ; GSM consumes far less bandwidth than ulaw allow=ulaw ;allow=alaw [177210] ;Turn off silence suppression in X-Lite (Transmit Silence=YES)! ;Note that Xlite sends NAT keep-alive packets, so qualify=yes is not needed type=friend ;regexten=1234 ; When they register, create extension 1234 ;username=xlite1 ;callerid=Jane Smith 5678 host=dynamic ;nat=yes ; X-Lite is behind a NAT router ;canreinvite=no; Typically set to NO if behind NAT disallow=all ;allow=gsm ; GSM consumes far less bandwidth than ulaw allow=ulaw ;allow=alaw The 2 X-Lites registered well with username 177209 and 177210 respectively. When I made a call between them, I got 404 User Not Found message from asterisk. Any idea? X-Lites both run on Microsoft Windows XP Professional. asterisk 1.07 runs on Red Hat Linux 7.3. Need to look at sip show peers to see if they are actually registered. My first guess they are not since you likely need username= secret= parameters in both of the above examples. If they are in fact registered, then what context are both of these extensions registered in, and what does that context look like in extensions.conf? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
