Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answer on second ring - need it on first.

2003-10-05 Thread Jon Stockill
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Steven Critchfield wrote:

> On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 12:02, Lists wrote:
> > But would you then not be able to use caller id from the telco?
>
> CallerID on an analog line is sent between the first and second ring
> normally. So if the requester wants callerid and first ring answer, he
> will have to move to PRI.
>
> Some choices have drawbacks, of course PRI is usually just cost.

BRI gies the signalling advantages, but without the costs.

-- 
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answer on second ring - need it on first.

2003-10-04 Thread Richard Scobie
Steven Critchfield wrote:
On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 12:02, Lists wrote:

But would you then not be able to use caller id from the telco?


CallerID on an analog line is sent between the first and second ring
normally. So if the requester wants callerid and first ring answer, he
will have to move to PRI. 

Some choices have drawbacks, of course PRI is usually just cost. 

Fortunately I do not require Caller ID.

Adding usecallerid=no to zapata.conf has resulted in answering on the 
first ring. Interestingly it has also fixed a 196kB memory leak that 
occurs for every call to the X100P. This is outlined in Bug 356.

Regards,

Richard

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answer on second ring - need it on first.

2003-10-04 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 12:02, Lists wrote:
> But would you then not be able to use caller id from the telco?

CallerID on an analog line is sent between the first and second ring
normally. So if the requester wants callerid and first ring answer, he
will have to move to PRI. 

Some choices have drawbacks, of course PRI is usually just cost. 


> On Sat, 4 
> Oct 2003, Martin Pycko wrote:
> 
> > Yeah, I'd put usecallerid=no since I bet it's set by default as yes.
> > 
> > Martin
> > 
> > On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Richard Scobie wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > > Martin Pycko wrote:
> > > > take out usecallerid=yes in zapata.conf
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks Martin, but my zapata.conf is :
> > >
> > > [channels]
> > > echocancel=yes
> > > echocancelwhenbridged=yes
> > > busydetect=yes
> > > busycount=6
> > > context=incoming
> > > signalling=fxs_ks
> > > group=1
> > > channel => 1-2
> > >
> > > Perhaps I need a usecallerid=no in there. I'll test this when I'm back
> > > at work. I have not changed this prior to rebuilding the source.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > >
> > 
> > ___
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > 
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answer on second ring - need it on first.

2003-10-04 Thread Lists
But would you then not be able to use caller id from the telco?




On Sat, 4 
Oct 2003, Martin Pycko wrote:

> Yeah, I'd put usecallerid=no since I bet it's set by default as yes.
> 
> Martin
> 
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Richard Scobie wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Martin Pycko wrote:
> > > take out usecallerid=yes in zapata.conf
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> >
> >
> > Thanks Martin, but my zapata.conf is :
> >
> > [channels]
> > echocancel=yes
> > echocancelwhenbridged=yes
> > busydetect=yes
> > busycount=6
> > context=incoming
> > signalling=fxs_ks
> > group=1
> > channel => 1-2
> >
> > Perhaps I need a usecallerid=no in there. I'll test this when I'm back
> > at work. I have not changed this prior to rebuilding the source.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > ___
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answer on second ring - need it on first.

2003-10-04 Thread Martin Pycko
Yeah, I'd put usecallerid=no since I bet it's set by default as yes.

Martin

On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Richard Scobie wrote:

>
>
> Martin Pycko wrote:
> > take out usecallerid=yes in zapata.conf
> >
> > Martin
> >
>
>
> Thanks Martin, but my zapata.conf is :
>
> [channels]
> echocancel=yes
> echocancelwhenbridged=yes
> busydetect=yes
> busycount=6
> context=incoming
> signalling=fxs_ks
> group=1
> channel => 1-2
>
> Perhaps I need a usecallerid=no in there. I'll test this when I'm back
> at work. I have not changed this prior to rebuilding the source.
>
> Regards,
>
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answer on second ring - need it on first.

2003-10-04 Thread Rich Adamson

> After re-installing, I am finding that when dialling into an X100P, that 
> Answer is now answering on the second ring, where it always used to 
> answer on the first before.
> 
> In the console, "Starting simple switch on 'Zap/1-1' appears halfway 
> through the first ring and "Executing Answer("Zap/1-1", "") in new 
> stack" appears at the end of the second.
> 
> I cannot recall having changed  anything previously, in order for it 
> answer on the first, but I would really like the old behaviour back.

I'd suspect that behavior is the result of a problem I reported to
support, for which Martin worked/fixed a few weeks ago.  The issue that
I was having resulted from using the X100P with a CO Centrex line that
rings with a Long & a Short (within the normal ring cycle) to indicate
an incoming call from an outside party. Although * was picking up the
line, apparently the CallerID timing mechanism within * was looking
for CallerID data after the first ring (the Long) and obviously that
data wasn't there and therefore CallerID constantly failed.

I really don't have a clue what was changed since I didn't have any
before/after source snapshot.

Rich


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answer on second ring - need it on first.

2003-10-04 Thread Richard Scobie


Martin Pycko wrote:
take out usecallerid=yes in zapata.conf

Martin



Thanks Martin, but my zapata.conf is :

[channels]
echocancel=yes
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
busydetect=yes
busycount=6
context=incoming
signalling=fxs_ks
group=1
channel => 1-2
Perhaps I need a usecallerid=no in there. I'll test this when I'm back 
at work. I have not changed this prior to rebuilding the source.

Regards,

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answer on second ring - need it on first.

2003-10-03 Thread Martin Pycko
take out usecallerid=yes in zapata.conf

Martin

On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Richard Scobie wrote:

> After some months of "Make updates", I have just  deleted my Zaptel and
> Asterisk source directories and done "cvs checkout" 's of asterisk and
> zaptel, in order to clean up the trees.
>
> After re-installing, I am finding that when dialling into an X100P, that
> Answer is now answering on the second ring, where it always used to
> answer on the first before.
>
> In the console, "Starting simple switch on 'Zap/1-1' appears halfway
> through the first ring and "Executing Answer("Zap/1-1", "") in new
> stack" appears at the end of the second.
>
> I cannot recall having changed  anything previously, in order for it
> answer on the first, but I would really like the old behaviour back.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Richard
>
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Answer on second ring - need it on first.

2003-10-03 Thread Richard Scobie
After some months of "Make updates", I have just  deleted my Zaptel and 
Asterisk source directories and done "cvs checkout" 's of asterisk and 
zaptel, in order to clean up the trees.

After re-installing, I am finding that when dialling into an X100P, that 
Answer is now answering on the second ring, where it always used to 
answer on the first before.

In the console, "Starting simple switch on 'Zap/1-1' appears halfway 
through the first ring and "Executing Answer("Zap/1-1", "") in new 
stack" appears at the end of the second.

I cannot recall having changed  anything previously, in order for it 
answer on the first, but I would really like the old behaviour back.

Thanks,

Richard

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users