Re: [asterisk-users] Bandwidth management and ADSL Router

2009-05-26 Thread Alex Balashov
bilal ghayyad wrote:
> Dear Eric;
> 
> Sangoma has ADSL router? And does that router support bandwidth division 
> capability?

Internal ADSL cards;  not external router appliances.

-- 
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (678) 237-1775

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Bandwidth management and ADSL Router

2009-05-26 Thread bilal ghayyad

Dear Eric;

Sangoma has ADSL router? And does that router support bandwidth division 
capability?

Dear jas;

About what u mentioned: it is related to linux, do u know a dsl router that 
does bandwidth divion?

Any help?
Regards
Bilal


 

> I've had good luck using a sangoma S518 ADSL card in a
> linux box.  the
> logging capabilities are supurb (cought my provider not
> providing what they
> said they were and great for troubleshooting as it logs
> line speed and
> dropouts to the second).  support is also top
> notch.  once installed it
> looks to the system like any other interface.  Since
> it looks to the system
> like any other interface you have the full power of
> routing, bridging,
> firewalling, iptables, neumerous queing schemes, etc. 
> everything linux has
> to offer.  It has served me well and is extremely
> flexable.
> 
> Eric Fort
> FortConsulting
> 
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:32 AM, bilal ghayyad 
> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hi All;
> >
> > I discover that most of the voice cutting complain are
> coming from the
> > Internet bandwidth when we are connecting two remote
> offices togethor via
> > Asterisk or any other IP PBX.
> >
> > Anyone has an idea on a ADSL router that work as ADSL
> + Bandwidth division?
> > So we can resolve the problem of providing a
> guaranteed bandwidth for the
> > voice packets instead of suffering the voice cutting?
> >
> > Regards
> > Bilal



  

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Bandwidth management and ADSL router

2009-05-26 Thread Eric Fort
I've had good luck using a sangoma S518 ADSL card in a linux box.  the
logging capabilities are supurb (cought my provider not providing what they
said they were and great for troubleshooting as it logs line speed and
dropouts to the second).  support is also top notch.  once installed it
looks to the system like any other interface.  Since it looks to the system
like any other interface you have the full power of routing, bridging,
firewalling, iptables, neumerous queing schemes, etc.  everything linux has
to offer.  It has served me well and is extremely flexable.

Eric Fort
FortConsulting

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:32 AM, bilal ghayyad  wrote:

>
> Hi All;
>
> I discover that most of the voice cutting complain are coming from the
> Internet bandwidth when we are connecting two remote offices togethor via
> Asterisk or any other IP PBX.
>
> Anyone has an idea on a ADSL router that work as ADSL + Bandwidth division?
> So we can resolve the problem of providing a guaranteed bandwidth for the
> voice packets instead of suffering the voice cutting?
>
> Regards
> Bilal
>
>
>
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Bandwidth management and ADSL router

2009-05-26 Thread James A. Shigley
A lot of ISP adsl modems aren't capable. But most should be. Just log in to it 
give it a private IP for your lan(192.X.X.X or whatever your using) then have 
all your computers use that local IP as their gateway address.

If you have an ADSL modem which doesn't then simple get a router (hell a 
Linksys/Dlink $50 cheapy from wallmart would work) and have the ADSL plug into 
the router and all the stations use the router for their gateway.

If you have a spare server or virtual server space you can use Vyatta 
(Vyatta.com) it is a free open source router/firewall/vpn/few other things. 
I've never used it in a virtual environment, but I see no reason why it 
wouldn't work that way. Also note that it requires almost nothing to run so you 
can put it on an old < 1Ghz machine and It would still operate just fine.

James Shigley
Monroe Telephone Answering Service
409-981-9213
Infinity 5.5,UC 4.02.3803, Blink 3.0.104
Ecreator:2.21, eResponse 1.1.7
Webportal,WebApps,
 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, including any attachments, contains 
information which may be confidential or privileged. The information is 
intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are 
not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution 
or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received 
this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by "reply to sender 
only" message and destroy all electronic and hard copies of the communication, 
including attachments. 

"Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen." -- 
Albert Einstein 
"Once you can accept the universe as matter expanding into nothing that is 
something,wearing stripes with plaid comes easy." -- Albert Einstein
"Theory is when you know something, but it doesn't work. Practice is when
something works, but you don't know why. Programmers combine theory and
practice: Nothing works and they don't know why.-Anonymous Developer"

-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com 
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of bilal ghayyad
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:55 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Bandwidth management and ADSL router


Thanks for all.

But what all gave me was a software need to be installed on PC, but I am 
looking for a router (ADSL router) that can does this, because usually the ADSL 
router is the default gateway where all the traffic goes out and in. 

Any ADSL router device can do this?

About Draytek, as I understand that control can be done only at upload traffic 
and not download traffic, while 90% of the problem are coming from download 
traffic, so this is not the needed.

Any advise in that direction?

Regards
Bilal


  


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Bandwidth management and ADSL router

2009-05-26 Thread bilal ghayyad

Thanks for all.

But what all gave me was a software need to be installed on PC, but I am 
looking for a router (ADSL router) that can does this, because usually the ADSL 
router is the default gateway where all the traffic goes out and in. 

Any ADSL router device can do this?

About Draytek, as I understand that control can be done only at upload traffic 
and not download traffic, while 90% of the problem are coming from download 
traffic, so this is not the needed.

Any advise in that direction?

Regards
Bilal


  


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Bandwidth management and ADSL router

2009-05-26 Thread Bruce Komito
As does ZeroShell (www.zeroshell.net/eng).

Bruce Komito
WPTI Telecom
(775) 236-5815


On Tue, 26 May 2009, Michael Graves wrote:

> m0n0wall and pfsense both do traffic shaping, which forcibly allocates
> bandwidth for your VoIP traffic.
>
> Michael
>
> On Tue, 26 May 2009 04:32:59 -0700 (PDT), bilal ghayyad wrote:
>
> >
> >Hi All;
> >
> >I discover that most of the voice cutting complain are coming from the 
> >Internet bandwidth when we are connecting two remote offices togethor via 
> >Asterisk or any other IP PBX.
> >
> >Anyone has an idea on a ADSL router that work as ADSL + Bandwidth division? 
> >So we can resolve the problem of providing a guaranteed bandwidth for the 
> >voice packets instead of suffering the voice cutting?
> >
> >Regards
> >Bilal
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >___
> >-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> >
> >asterisk-users mailing list
> >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
>
> --
> Michael Graves
> mgravesmstvp.com
> http://blog.mgraves.org
> o713-861-4005
> c713-201-1262
> sip:mgra...@mstvp.onsip.com
> skype mjgraves
> fwd 54245
>
>
>
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Bandwidth management and ADSL router

2009-05-26 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Tue, 26 May 2009, bilal ghayyad wrote:

> Hi All;
>
> I discover that most of the voice cutting complain are coming from the 
> Internet bandwidth when we are connecting two remote offices togethor 
> via Asterisk or any other IP PBX.
>
> Anyone has an idea on a ADSL router that work as ADSL + Bandwidth 
> division? So we can resolve the problem of providing a guaranteed 
> bandwidth for the voice packets instead of suffering the voice cutting?

Draytek 2800 series routers have adequate traffic management on outgoing 
traffic to do a reasonable job. (There is a very little you can do to 
shape incoming traffic)

However you need to make sure that the actual Internet connection isn't 
where the bottleneck is. Try making calls when you can guarantee that no 
other traffic is flowing into/out of each end.

Gordon

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Bandwidth management and ADSL router

2009-05-26 Thread Michael Graves
m0n0wall and pfsense both do traffic shaping, which forcibly allocates
bandwidth for your VoIP traffic.

Michael

On Tue, 26 May 2009 04:32:59 -0700 (PDT), bilal ghayyad wrote:

>
>Hi All;
>
>I discover that most of the voice cutting complain are coming from the 
>Internet bandwidth when we are connecting two remote offices togethor via 
>Asterisk or any other IP PBX.
>
>Anyone has an idea on a ADSL router that work as ADSL + Bandwidth division? So 
>we can resolve the problem of providing a guaranteed bandwidth for the voice 
>packets instead of suffering the voice cutting?
>
>Regards
>Bilal
>
>
>  
>
>___
>-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
>asterisk-users mailing list
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

--
Michael Graves
mgravesmstvp.com
http://blog.mgraves.org
o713-861-4005
c713-201-1262
sip:mgra...@mstvp.onsip.com
skype mjgraves
fwd 54245




___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Bandwidth management and ADSL router

2009-05-26 Thread Alex Balashov
A lot of the ADSL CPE (customer premise equipment) deployed has basic 
QoS capabilities in a pre-set kind of way, but if you want to do your 
own DiffServ tagging the standard practice is to do Layer 2 Ethernet 
bridging to a more intelligent box behind the ADSL CPE.

bilal ghayyad wrote:

> Hi All;
> 
> I discover that most of the voice cutting complain are coming from the 
> Internet bandwidth when we are connecting two remote offices togethor via 
> Asterisk or any other IP PBX.
> 
> Anyone has an idea on a ADSL router that work as ADSL + Bandwidth division? 
> So we can resolve the problem of providing a guaranteed bandwidth for the 
> voice packets instead of suffering the voice cutting?
> 
> Regards
> Bilal
> 
> 
>   
> 
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-- 
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (678) 237-1775

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Bandwidth management and ADSL router

2009-05-26 Thread bilal ghayyad

Hi All;

I discover that most of the voice cutting complain are coming from the Internet 
bandwidth when we are connecting two remote offices togethor via Asterisk or 
any other IP PBX.

Anyone has an idea on a ADSL router that work as ADSL + Bandwidth division? So 
we can resolve the problem of providing a guaranteed bandwidth for the voice 
packets instead of suffering the voice cutting?

Regards
Bilal


  

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Bandwidth Management

2006-04-12 Thread Alexander Lopez
Brought over from -users, Please reply to the -dev list.

I agree, lets move the discusstion over to that list as it has to be discussed 
there. After we reach an accord on how it should be done we will open up a 
issue on Mantis.

I see this as being two distinctive parts that would need to be tied together:

First:  We need to make the selection of CODECS technology agnostic, There 
currently exist a facility for CODEC selection (SIP_CODEC) in the sip channel 
but not in others.

Second: Discuss is this sould be an outside application that is called from 
within Asterisk or if it should become a function 
Set(CODEC=${OPTIMALCODEC(quality)})
available options could be:

quality
bandwidth
license 



Any comments.

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wai Wu
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 10:51 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Bandwidth Management
> 
> I think this belongs to the development mail-list. 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Jean-Michel Hiver
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 12:05 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bandwidth Management
> 
> Andy Tan a écrit :
> 
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> >thanks for the suggestion.
> >
> >Did some checks, and thought that I could set a global variable to 
> >track the utilized bandwidth.
> >
> >Wish that there are plans for support to include variables like 
> >SIP_CODEC in other protocols.
> >  
> >
> Actually this sounds like a really nice idea. It would be 
> cool to have a way to start using less intensive bandwith 
> codecs for new calls when bandwith reaches a certain threshold.
> 
> For example:
> 
> - 0-40% bandwith: g711
> - 40-60% bandwith: g729
> - 60%-80% bandwith: g723
> - 80%-100% bandwith: drop new calls, or maybe use lpc10
> 
> It wouldn't help in SOHO usage but when using Asterisk as a 
> call termination gateway, it would help making the most out 
> of available bandwith. g711 is certainly better than g729 
> when you have the bandwith, and i'm pretty sure that even 
> lpc10 sounds better when on non-saturated bandwith compared 
> with g729 with some packet loss...
> 
> How would you go about implementing this?
> 
> Cheers,
> Jean-Michel.
> 
> --
> Jean-Michel Hiver - http://ykoz.net/
> Découvrez la Réunion des Technologies IP & Telecom
> TEL: +262 (0)262 55 03 98 - RCS 434 273 330 SAINT PIERRE
> 
> 
> ___
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> ___
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Bandwidth Management

2006-04-12 Thread Wai Wu
I think this belongs to the development mail-list. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jean-Michel Hiver
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 12:05 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bandwidth Management

Andy Tan a écrit :

>Hi Alex,
>
>thanks for the suggestion.
>
>Did some checks, and thought that I could set a global variable to 
>track the utilized bandwidth.
>
>Wish that there are plans for support to include variables like 
>SIP_CODEC in other protocols.
>  
>
Actually this sounds like a really nice idea. It would be cool to have a way to 
start using less intensive bandwith codecs for new calls when bandwith reaches 
a certain threshold.

For example:

- 0-40% bandwith: g711
- 40-60% bandwith: g729
- 60%-80% bandwith: g723
- 80%-100% bandwith: drop new calls, or maybe use lpc10

It wouldn't help in SOHO usage but when using Asterisk as a call termination 
gateway, it would help making the most out of available bandwith. g711 is 
certainly better than g729 when you have the bandwith, and i'm pretty sure that 
even lpc10 sounds better when on non-saturated bandwith compared with g729 with 
some packet loss...

How would you go about implementing this?

Cheers,
Jean-Michel.

--
Jean-Michel Hiver - http://ykoz.net/
Découvrez la Réunion des Technologies IP & Telecom
TEL: +262 (0)262 55 03 98 - RCS 434 273 330 SAINT PIERRE


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bandwidth Management

2006-04-11 Thread Jean-Michel Hiver

Andy Tan a écrit :


Hi Alex,

thanks for the suggestion.

Did some checks, and thought that I could set a global variable to track
the utilized bandwidth.

Wish that there are plans for support to include variables like
SIP_CODEC in other protocols.
 

Actually this sounds like a really nice idea. It would be cool to have a 
way to start using less intensive bandwith codecs for new calls when 
bandwith reaches a certain threshold.


For example:

- 0-40% bandwith: g711
- 40-60% bandwith: g729
- 60%-80% bandwith: g723
- 80%-100% bandwith: drop new calls, or maybe use lpc10

It wouldn't help in SOHO usage but when using Asterisk as a call 
termination gateway, it would help making the most out of available 
bandwith. g711 is certainly better than g729 when you have the bandwith, 
and i'm pretty sure that even lpc10 sounds better when on non-saturated 
bandwith compared with g729 with some packet loss...


How would you go about implementing this?

Cheers,
Jean-Michel.

--
Jean-Michel Hiver - http://ykoz.net/
Découvrez la Réunion des Technologies IP & Telecom
TEL: +262 (0)262 55 03 98 - RCS 434 273 330 SAINT PIERRE


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Bandwidth Management

2006-04-11 Thread Andy Tan
Hi Alex,

thanks for the suggestion.

Did some checks, and thought that I could set a global variable to track
the utilized bandwidth.

Wish that there are plans for support to include variables like
SIP_CODEC in other protocols.
 
Regards

On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:50:56 -0400, "Alexander Lopez"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> "Out of the Box" probably not but with an AGI script this is very
> doable:
> 
> You can have a script that monitors active calls and the Codecs that are
> in use. The script will have to do some math to calculate the bandwidth
> in use and then using the variables in Asterisk, Namely SIP_CODEC. If
> you are using SIP. There has not been a Variable coded for the other
> Technologies at this time.
> 
> Alex
>  
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Tan
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:00 AM
> > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Bandwidth Management
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > understand that the bandwidth utilized for each call is 
> > dependent on the codec used, wonder if Asterisk can monitor 
> > the total bandwidth utilized and restrict/reject new calls 
> > when the resource is insufficient to support them reliably?
> > 
> > Regards
> > Andy Tan
> > --
> >   Andy Tan
> >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > --
> > http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail...
> > 
> > ___
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> > 
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > 
> ___
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
  Andy Tan
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - And now for something completely different…

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bandwidth Management

2006-04-11 Thread Rusty Dekema
On 4/11/06, Andy Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> understand that the bandwidth utilized for each call is dependent on the
> codec used, wonder if Asterisk can monitor the total bandwidth utilized
> and restrict/reject new calls when the resource is insufficient to
> support them reliably?
>
> Regards
> Andy Tan

To the best of my knowledge, Asterisk does not have such a feature at
the current time.

-Rusty
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Bandwidth Management

2006-04-11 Thread Alexander Lopez
"Out of the Box" probably not but with an AGI script this is very
doable:

You can have a script that monitors active calls and the Codecs that are
in use. The script will have to do some math to calculate the bandwidth
in use and then using the variables in Asterisk, Namely SIP_CODEC. If
you are using SIP. There has not been a Variable coded for the other
Technologies at this time.

Alex
 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Tan
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:00 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Bandwidth Management
> 
> Hi,
> 
> understand that the bandwidth utilized for each call is 
> dependent on the codec used, wonder if Asterisk can monitor 
> the total bandwidth utilized and restrict/reject new calls 
> when the resource is insufficient to support them reliably?
> 
> Regards
> Andy Tan
> --
>   Andy Tan
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> --
> http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail...
> 
> ___
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Bandwidth Management

2006-04-11 Thread Andy Tan
Hi,

understand that the bandwidth utilized for each call is dependent on the
codec used, wonder if Asterisk can monitor the total bandwidth utilized
and restrict/reject new calls when the resource is insufficient to
support them reliably?

Regards
Andy Tan
-- 
  Andy Tan
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail...

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Bandwidth Management

2006-04-11 Thread Andy Tan
Hi,

understand that the bandwidth utilized for each call is dependent on the
codec used, wonder if Asterisk can monitor the total bandwidth utilized
and restrict/reject new calls when the resource is insufficient to
support them reliably?

Regards
Andy Tan
-- 
  Andy Tan
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Does exactly what it says on the tin

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users