Re: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone had problems with Digium TDM400P and hyperthreading?

2005-04-15 Thread Paul Hewlett
On Friday 15 April 2005 07:45, Damian Funnell wrote:
 Digium have told us that a problem that we are having (with accuracy of
 zap interface as measured using zttest) may be due to the fact that we
 have a Xeon processor with hyperthreading and have suggested turning H/T
 off.

 Anyone else experienced a problem like this?  No too keen about turning
 H/T off, as we're running the SMP RH kernel and don't really feel like
 replacing the kernel (and other kernel-specific bits) on the off chance
 that H/T is actually the problem.

AFAIK, HT is not useful if your application does a lot of floating point 
calculations as there is only one FPU. What happens is that there is a 1-2% 
overhead when HT is on (for semaphores and such). IF HT does not gain more 
than this 1-2% you actually end up slowing things down and this is the case 
for floating point applications (because of only one FPU).

IS asterisk floating point heavy ?

Paul H
 

-- 
Paul Hewlett (Linux #359543) 
Tel: +27 21 852 8812  Cel: +27 72 719 2725  Fax: +27 86 672 0563
-- 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone had problems with Digium TDM400P and hyperthreading?

2005-04-15 Thread tmassey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/15/2005 01:45:22 AM:

 Digium have told us that a problem that we are having (with accuracy of 
 zap interface as measured using zttest) may be due to the fact that we 
 have a Xeon processor with hyperthreading and have suggested turning H/T 

 off.
 

I've never ran Asterisk on an HT-enabled processor.  However, I've had too 
many problems to count with HT and Linux.  I turn it off on nearly every 
server that has it.  Then again, most of my servers are not CPU bound and 
I couldn't care less about the performance.

Also, make sure you update your motherboard's BIOS.  It's responsible for 
updating the CPU microcode, and often the BIOS may have newer microcode 
than your Linux distribution.

 Anyone else experienced a problem like this?  No too keen about turning 
 H/T off, as we're running the SMP RH kernel and don't really feel like 
 replacing the kernel (and other kernel-specific bits) on the off chance 
 that H/T is actually the problem.

An SMP kernel should run just fine on a single-processor box.  Slower, but 
fine.  At least, it works for me...

TIm Massey

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Has anyone had problems with Digium TDM400P and hyperthreading?

2005-04-14 Thread Damian Funnell
Digium have told us that a problem that we are having (with accuracy of 
zap interface as measured using zttest) may be due to the fact that we 
have a Xeon processor with hyperthreading and have suggested turning H/T 
off.

Anyone else experienced a problem like this?  No too keen about turning 
H/T off, as we're running the SMP RH kernel and don't really feel like 
replacing the kernel (and other kernel-specific bits) on the off chance 
that H/T is actually the problem.

Thanks,
Damian.
FFF Managed Technology Ltd
60 Cook St
P.O. 6368 Wellesley St
Auckland
t +64 9 356 2911
f +64 9 358 9070
m +64 21 415 297
w www.fff.co.nz
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users