Re: [Asterisk-Users] My TDM-400P FXO experience
You're right, my mistake. Brancaleoni Matteo wrote: Hi On Tuesday, May 18, 2004, at 07:50 PM, Leo Ann Boon wrote: f. Be careful about the zap channel naming. With the old XP101, the first channel (card) is Zap/1 and the second Zap/2. With the TDM, it's Zap/1-1, Zap/2-1 ... Zap/4-1 for the 4 ports on the first card and Zap/1-2 ... Zap/4-2 for the second card. You might need to update your dial plan. that sounds very strange are you sure? as far as I know each Zap channel is unique, so with 2 cards you should have from Zap/1 to Zap/8 The difference between Zap/1-1 and Zap/1-2 is (for example) when you have 2 calls on the same zap channel, ie when you have a call on the phone on Zap/1-1 and pressing the flash key, you create Zap/1-2 on which you can dial another exten. I don't think that Zap/1-1 and Zap/1-2 are first channels on different cards at all please double check that (as I'll do...) Matteo. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] My TDM-400P FXO experience
I see that * refers to the channels this way on the console output, but I get warnings when I try to use the new naming in the extensions.conf dial plan - anyone else notice this? How do you refer to the channels in extensions? On Tuesday, May 18, 2004, at 07:50 PM, Leo Ann Boon wrote: f. Be careful about the zap channel naming. With the old XP101, the first channel (card) is Zap/1 and the second Zap/2. With the TDM, it's Zap/1-1, Zap/2-1 ... Zap/4-1 for the 4 ports on the first card and Zap/1-2 ... Zap/4-2 for the second card. You might need to update your dial plan. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] My TDM-400P FXO experience
Hi On Tuesday, May 18, 2004, at 07:50 PM, Leo Ann Boon wrote: f. Be careful about the zap channel naming. With the old XP101, the first channel (card) is Zap/1 and the second Zap/2. With the TDM, it's Zap/1-1, Zap/2-1 ... Zap/4-1 for the 4 ports on the first card and Zap/1-2 ... Zap/4-2 for the second card. You might need to update your dial plan. that sounds very strange are you sure? as far as I know each Zap channel is unique, so with 2 cards you should have from Zap/1 to Zap/8 The difference between Zap/1-1 and Zap/1-2 is (for example) when you have 2 calls on the same zap channel, ie when you have a call on the phone on Zap/1-1 and pressing the flash key, you create Zap/1-2 on which you can dial another exten. I don't think that Zap/1-1 and Zap/1-2 are first channels on different cards at all please double check that (as I'll do...) Matteo. -- Brancaleoni Matteo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Espia - Emmegi Srl ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] My TDM-400P FXO experience
A bit about my experience with the TDM-04 FXO. Only saw a few post on this subject, thought I would contribute a little about my experience to save others the hassle. and I might add... a. if any analog phones bridged on the pstn line go off-hook then on-hook, the tdm card senses it and rings the appropriate dialplan entry. b. executing 'stop now' and '/etc/rc.d/inti.d/zaptel stop' followed by a start more than a couple of times somehow leaves the tdm card unusable. Reboot the machine fixes the problem (RH9). c. disconnecting the analog pstn line from tdm card (and then reconnecting) causes the appropriate dialplan entry to ring exactly twice. Rich ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] My TDM-400P FXO experience
A bit about my experience with the TDM-04 FXO. Only saw a few post on this subject, thought I would contribute a little about my experience to save others the hassle. a. As an earlier poster noted, the driver for the FXO is in the wcfxs module. Perhaps it should be renamed to something less confusing. b. You need the zaptel,zapata libraries from the cvs, the ones with Asterisk 0.7.2 won't work. c. As the other poster noted, the card doesn't use any IRQ. I'm a little concerned about this, does it mean it's polling all the time? d. It'll work with Asterisk 0.7.2, just compile the new zaptel and zapata from cvs. Mine ran without having to recompile my old stable asterisk. e. Red-alarm doesn't seem to be detected at all. With the X101P, unplugging the line will trigger a red-alarm, not so with the FXO modules. All 4 LEDs on my TDM400 are always up. And zttool also shows everything as OK. f. Be careful about the zap channel naming. With the old XP101, the first channel (card) is Zap/1 and the second Zap/2. With the TDM, it's Zap/1-1, Zap/2-1 ... Zap/4-1 for the 4 ports on the first card and Zap/1-2 ... Zap/4-2 for the second card. You might need to update your dial plan. g. The card takes 12V power - I think a lot of it. Be careful about sharing with another device using 12V power (3.5 HDD and CD-ROM). My system uses 5V 2.5 HDD, so all the 12V power goes to the TDM. For those who are curious, my setup: - Mini-ITX Cl mobo with Via 1GHz Nehemiah CPU - 256MB DDR SDRAM - 2 x 2.5 HDD in RAID-1 configuration - 2 x TDM04B (for a total of 8 FXO module) - Trustix 2.0 with kernel 2.4.26 - Travla C137 Mini-ITX casing with 90W PSU. FYI. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
