Re: [Asterisk-Users] SATA hard disk compatibility

2006-05-03 Thread Dovid Bender
Assaf I am going to argue with you and agree with John
ehre. FC has a very small shelf life and AFAIK it
dosent have what CentOS does. CentOS is RHLE without a
serial num or support. Try it out (www.centos.org).

--- Assaf Flatto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Fedora core stable version now is FC4 (which is to
 say Red hat 10 
 version 4 or even Red Hat 11 if we count in the old
 way RH did ).
 IAX and the configuration have changed a bit from
 1.0.3  so you'll need 
 to modify the file to match the new configuration
 but other then that it 
 should be no problem to move to a more Up-To-Date
 system.
 the current stable asterisk is 1.2.7.1 , and it
 works smoothly for me on 
 several machine i installed and used in several
 locations.
 
 As John suggested CentOs is a good idea to use ,
 however there are some 
 well documented problems with the zaptel ( that is
 if you are using 
 digium hardware ) compilation ,but all in all it
 shouldn't be a problem.
 
 Assaf
 
 
 amna saleem wrote:
  Thanks alot for the help.
  I have not worked on fedra core .Which version
 should I use
  Also can you tell me that if I am using Red hat
 Enterprise, which 
  asterisk version will be the best suited ? and
 will i be able to use 
  the same .conf files which i used earlier with
 aserisk 1.0.3.
  I only need to use IAX ,and the IAX soft phones
 ,don`t really have to 
  use SIP or H323.
  Also I want a stable asterisk version like 1.0.3
 which doesn`t need to 
  be upgraded continuously.
   
  I hope you will help me 
  Regards,
  Amna 
 
   
  On 4/27/06, *Assaf Flatto* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  The Hardware support of SATA in RH9.0 is not
 fully integrated
  AFAIK , so
  moving to a SATA hard disk without an upgrade
 might not be the
  safest bet.
 
  on the other hand until you try you won't know
 for sure .
 
  have you thought of using the Fedora Core ?
 those have SATA
  support and
  they should be the closest thing to RH9 you
 can find.
 
 
  why don't you want to upgrade the asterisk ?
 1.0.3 is a very old
  version
  and many fixes and features where added to the
 software .
 
 
  Assaf
 
  amna saleem wrote:
   Hi!
   I have been using ASterisk 1.0.3 on Red hat
 Linux 9.0 for a long
  time
   now on my Home PC.
   I want to shift to a PC having SATA hard
 disk .Can I install Redhat
   9.0 on SATA hard disk ??some people are
 telling me that I have to go
   for Linux Enterprise 4.0.I don`t want to
 leave Linux 9.0 because I
   want to run Asterisk 1.0.3
  
   Can anyone help me??
   Amna
  
 


  
  
 ___
   --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
 Easynews.com
  http://Easynews.com --
  
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
 
  --
  Assaf Flatto
  Atelis IT Manager
  Cellular: +972-54-5679230
  e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
 Easynews.com
  http://Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:


http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 


 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
 Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:


http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 
 -- 
 Assaf Flatto
 Atelis IT Manager
 Cellular: +972-54-5679230
 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com
 --
 
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SATA hard disk compatibility

2006-05-01 Thread Assaf Flatto
Fedora core stable version now is FC4 (which is to say Red hat 10 
version 4 or even Red Hat 11 if we count in the old way RH did ).
IAX and the configuration have changed a bit from 1.0.3  so you'll need 
to modify the file to match the new configuration but other then that it 
should be no problem to move to a more Up-To-Date system.
the current stable asterisk is 1.2.7.1 , and it works smoothly for me on 
several machine i installed and used in several locations.


As John suggested CentOs is a good idea to use , however there are some 
well documented problems with the zaptel ( that is if you are using 
digium hardware ) compilation ,but all in all it shouldn't be a problem.


Assaf


amna saleem wrote:

Thanks alot for the help.
I have not worked on fedra core .Which version should I use
Also can you tell me that if I am using Red hat Enterprise, which 
asterisk version will be the best suited ? and will i be able to use 
the same .conf files which i used earlier with aserisk 1.0.3.
I only need to use IAX ,and the IAX soft phones ,don`t really have to 
use SIP or H323.
Also I want a stable asterisk version like 1.0.3 which doesn`t need to 
be upgraded continuously.
 
I hope you will help me 
Regards,
Amna 

 
On 4/27/06, *Assaf Flatto* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


The Hardware support of SATA in RH9.0 is not fully integrated
AFAIK , so
moving to a SATA hard disk without an upgrade might not be the
safest bet.

on the other hand until you try you won't know for sure .

have you thought of using the Fedora Core ? those have SATA
support and
they should be the closest thing to RH9 you can find.


why don't you want to upgrade the asterisk ? 1.0.3 is a very old
version
and many fixes and features where added to the software .


Assaf

amna saleem wrote:
 Hi!
 I have been using ASterisk 1.0.3 on Red hat Linux 9.0 for a long
time
 now on my Home PC.
 I want to shift to a PC having SATA hard disk .Can I install Redhat
 9.0 on SATA hard disk ??some people are telling me that I have to go
 for Linux Enterprise 4.0.I don`t want to leave Linux 9.0 because I
 want to run Asterisk 1.0.3

 Can anyone help me??
 Amna



 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com
http://Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


--
Assaf Flatto
Atelis IT Manager
Cellular: +972-54-5679230
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com
http://Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  


--
Assaf Flatto
Atelis IT Manager
Cellular: +972-54-5679230
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SATA hard disk compatibility

2006-04-30 Thread amna saleem
Thanks alot for the help.
I have not worked on fedra core .Which version should I use
Also can you tell me that if I am using Red hat Enterprise, which asterisk version will be the best suited ? and will i be able to use the same .conf files which i used earlier with aserisk 1.0.3.
I only need to use IAX ,and the IAX soft phones ,don`t really have to use SIP or H323.
Also I want a stable asterisk version like 1.0.3 which doesn`t need to be upgraded continuously.

I hope you will help me
Regards,
Amna
On 4/27/06, Assaf Flatto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Hardware support of SATA in RH9.0 is not fully integrated AFAIK , somoving to a SATA hard disk without an upgrade might not be the safest bet.
on the other hand until you try you won't know for sure .have you thought of using the Fedora Core ? those have SATA support andthey should be the closest thing to RH9 you can find.why don't you want to upgrade the asterisk ? 
1.0.3 is a very old versionand many fixes and features where added to the software .Assafamna saleem wrote: Hi! I have been using ASterisk 1.0.3 on Red hat Linux 9.0 for a long time
 now on my Home PC. I want to shift to a PC having SATA hard disk .Can I install Redhat 9.0 on SATA hard disk ??some people are telling me that I have to go for Linux Enterprise 4.0.I don`t want to leave Linux 
9.0 because I want to run Asterisk 1.0.3 Can anyone help me?? Amna  ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users--Assaf FlattoAtelis IT ManagerCellular: +972-54-5679230e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] SATA hard disk compatibility

2006-04-27 Thread amna saleem
Hi!
I have been using ASterisk 1.0.3 on Red hat Linux 9.0 for a long time now on my Home PC.
I want to shift to a PC having SATA hard disk .Can I install Redhat 9.0 on SATA hard disk ??some people are telling me that I have to go for Linux Enterprise 4.0.I don`t want to leave Linux 9.0 because I want to run Asterisk 
1.0.3 

Can anyone help me??
Amna 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SATA hard disk compatibility

2006-04-27 Thread Assaf Flatto
The Hardware support of SATA in RH9.0 is not fully integrated AFAIK , so 
moving to a SATA hard disk without an upgrade might not be the safest bet.


on the other hand until you try you won't know for sure .

have you thought of using the Fedora Core ? those have SATA support and 
they should be the closest thing to RH9 you can find.



why don't you want to upgrade the asterisk ? 1.0.3 is a very old version 
and many fixes and features where added to the software .



Assaf

amna saleem wrote:

Hi!
I have been using ASterisk 1.0.3 on Red hat Linux 9.0 for a long time 
now on my Home PC.
I want to shift to a PC having SATA hard disk .Can I install Redhat 
9.0 on SATA hard disk ??some people are telling me that I have to go 
for Linux Enterprise 4.0.I don`t want to leave Linux 9.0 because I 
want to run Asterisk 1.0.3
 
Can anyone help me??

Amna


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  


--
Assaf Flatto
Atelis IT Manager
Cellular: +972-54-5679230
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SATA hard disk compatibility

2006-04-27 Thread John Novack



amna saleem wrote:


Hi!
I have been using ASterisk 1.0.3 on Red hat Linux 9.0 for a long time 
now on my Home PC.
I want to shift to a PC having SATA hard disk .Can I install Redhat 
9.0 on SATA hard disk ??some people are telling me that I have to go 
for Linux Enterprise 4.0.I don`t want to leave Linux 9.0 because I 
want to run Asterisk 1.0.3
 
Can anyone help me??

Amna


Why not use the CentOS 4.? version, since it is the free version of RH 
Enterprise 4.0, unless you REALLY need to pay for support!


John Novack

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] SATA

2005-07-22 Thread Lee Archer
Title: SATA






Has anyone had any problems with SATA, either on board or 3rd party setup? I've currently got a problem where an AMD non SATA FC2 system is working fine but an Intel system with a 3Ware SATA card and FC3 is radomly not syncing with the ISDN30. It allows and receives calls but at random intervals drops them.

Regards


Lee


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.2/55 - Release Date: 21/07/2005



###This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SATA

2005-07-22 Thread Lists
On Friday 22 July 2005 05:47, Lee Archer wrote:
 Has anyone had any problems with SATA, either on board or 3rd party setup? 
 I've currently got a problem where an AMD non SATA FC2 system is working
 fine but an Intel system with a 3Ware SATA card and FC3 is radomly not
 syncing with the ISDN30.  It allows and receives calls but at random
 intervals drops them.

 Regards

 Lee

Hmm, that's odd. Though I know that 3Ware on Intel has been found to be rock 
solid w RH.

3Ware is usually our first choice. (I just realized that we don't use ISDN30.)
-- 

List Manager
Network Voice Communications, Inc.
netwvcom.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users