Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Jitter Buffer for 1.2.5

2006-03-31 Thread Rosario Pingaro

seems that if you get that log you didn't use jitetr buffer at all.

In my opinion the latest jitter 1.2-branch is not working, the last working 
seems 1.2.1 patched.


Hope Zoa could lead us to fix it.

Regards
Rosario



- Original Message - 
From: Adam Moffett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Jitter Buffer for 1.2.5





jitterbufferfor svn trunk + jitterbuffer
jitterbuffer-1.2 for 1.2 + jitterbuffer
test-this-branchfor the test branch with a lot of cool stuff 
including

the jitterbuffer


I installed the jitterbuffer-1.2 branch and I have a few questions.

First and foremost I'm getting hundreds of lines like this in my log file:

Mar 17 10:54:03 WARNING[22831] abstract_jb.c: Recieved frame with invalid 
timing info: has_timing_info=0, len=1668178290, ts=1718447988
Mar 17 10:54:03 WARNING[22831] abstract_jb.c: Recieved frame with invalid 
timing info: has_timing_info=0, len=1668178290, ts=1718447988


The console shows something similar:
Mar 17 10:57:09 WARNING[22866]: abstract_jb.c:347 ast_jb_put: Recieved 
frame with invalid timing info: has_timing_info=0, len=-1, ts=166273064
Mar 17 10:57:09 WARNING[22866]: abstract_jb.c:347 ast_jb_put: Recieved 
frame with invalid timing info: has_timing_info=0, len=-1, ts=166273064
Mar 17 10:57:10 WARNING[22866]: abstract_jb.c:347 ast_jb_put: Recieved 
frame with invalid timing info: has_timing_info=0, len=-1, ts=166273064


My log file is going to be very big today.  What could be responsible for 
frames (every frame?) having invalid timing info?


Second I'm not sure if it's actually doing anything.  For testing, I tried 
setting the max size to 2000ms and implementation to fixed.if I'm 
reading the comments in the sample config correctly that should create a 
2000ms fixed jitter buffer, which in turn should mean a 2 second delay in 
audio, but I wasn't hearing any delay at all.  Is this not a valid way to 
test whether the jitter buffer is doing something?


ThirdI'm interested in a way to create some jitter ;)  I was thinking 
I might take an ethernet hub and try to saturate it with several 
simultaneous large file transfers or something like that.  Another 
possibility might be an 802.11 wireless connection at a fairly long range. 
If anyone knows of a more convenient way for me to create a jittery 
connection I'd be very interested.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Jitter Buffer for 1.2.5

2006-03-17 Thread Adam Moffett



jitterbufferfor svn trunk + jitterbuffer
jitterbuffer-1.2 for 1.2 + jitterbuffer
test-this-branchfor the test branch with a lot of cool stuff 
including

the jitterbuffer


I installed the jitterbuffer-1.2 branch and I have a few questions.

First and foremost I'm getting hundreds of lines like this in my log file:

Mar 17 10:54:03 WARNING[22831] abstract_jb.c: Recieved frame with 
invalid timing info: has_timing_info=0, len=1668178290, ts=1718447988
Mar 17 10:54:03 WARNING[22831] abstract_jb.c: Recieved frame with 
invalid timing info: has_timing_info=0, len=1668178290, ts=1718447988


The console shows something similar:
Mar 17 10:57:09 WARNING[22866]: abstract_jb.c:347 ast_jb_put: Recieved 
frame with invalid timing info: has_timing_info=0, len=-1, ts=166273064
Mar 17 10:57:09 WARNING[22866]: abstract_jb.c:347 ast_jb_put: Recieved 
frame with invalid timing info: has_timing_info=0, len=-1, ts=166273064
Mar 17 10:57:10 WARNING[22866]: abstract_jb.c:347 ast_jb_put: Recieved 
frame with invalid timing info: has_timing_info=0, len=-1, ts=166273064


My log file is going to be very big today.  What could be responsible 
for frames (every frame?) having invalid timing info?


Second I'm not sure if it's actually doing anything.  For testing, I 
tried setting the max size to 2000ms and implementation to fixed.if 
I'm reading the comments in the sample config correctly that should 
create a 2000ms fixed jitter buffer, which in turn should mean a 2 
second delay in audio, but I wasn't hearing any delay at all.  Is this 
not a valid way to test whether the jitter buffer is doing something?


ThirdI'm interested in a way to create some jitter ;)  I was 
thinking I might take an ethernet hub and try to saturate it with 
several simultaneous large file transfers or something like that.  
Another possibility might be an 802.11 wireless connection at a fairly 
long range.  If anyone knows of a more convenient way for me to create a 
jittery connection I'd be very interested.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Jitter Buffer for 1.2.5

2006-03-15 Thread Olle E Johansson


14 mar 2006 kl. 15.38 skrev Matt:


The jitterbuffer branch is based on svn trunk (the same as the old
CVS HEAD)
The jitterbuffer-1.2 branch is based on the 1.2 branch HEAD
(meaning latest 1.2 version code).


Ok... so if I pull the 'jitterbuffer' branch I would get 'svn trunk  
code'.


But if I pull 'jitterbuffer-1.2' I get the same code as I would have
if I downloaded 1.2.5 and then applied a jitterbuffer patch (which I
know, does not exist for 1.2.5).


No, but you would get 1.2.5 + jitterbuffer patch + any changes to the
1.2 branch after we released 1.2.5.

/Olle

---
* Olle E Johansson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Cell phone +46 70 593 68 51, Office +46 8 96 40 20, Sweden



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Jitter Buffer for 1.2.5

2006-03-15 Thread Olle E Johansson


14 mar 2006 kl. 19.00 skrev Robert Webb:



On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:32:02 +0100
 Olle E Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

14 mar 2006 kl. 13.35 skrev Matt:

Right saw that.   But I'm trying to get away from using CVS-HEAD :)

We all are. Every developer have switched from CVS to Subversion :-)
This is not the development branch, but the release branch code,
which we use to create the 1.2.x releases.
The jitterbuffer itself is *not* release branch code, it's very much
development. Please test it.
The jitterbuffer branch is based on svn trunk (the same as the  
old  CVS HEAD)
The jitterbuffer-1.2 branch is based on the 1.2 branch HEAD   
(meaning latest 1.2 version code).

/O


Olle,

  Pardon this dumb question please, but where are these test  
located. I looked under http://svn.digium.com and do not see them.  
I am not fluent in where everything is located and would like to do  
some testing on some of the other items such as the sip  
jitterbuffer. It will only be minimal but I would like to help  
where I can.


For viewing: http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/team/oej - then pick  
a branch


For checking out

svn checkout http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/team/oej/name  name

Use

jitterbufferfor svn trunk + jitterbuffer
jitterbuffer-1.2for 1.2 + jitterbuffer
test-this-branchfor the test branch with a lot of cool stuff 
including
the jitterbuffer

Thanks for testing!

/Olle


---
* Olle E. Johansson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Asterisk Developer
* Asterisk Training http://edvina.net/training/



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Jitter Buffer for 1.2.5

2006-03-14 Thread Matt
Right saw that.   But I'm trying to get away from using CVS-HEAD :)  
Is the jitterbuffer patch PURELY 1.2.5 with the patch in place?


On 3/14/06, Olle E Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 13 mar 2006 kl. 21.59 skrev Matt:

  Hi,
  I really want to start using 1.2.5, but I also really need to have the
  jitter buffer.  Can anyone offer a suggestion of how to go?   I've
  looked at the SIP_JB patch and there seems to be no indication of a
  patch for the 1.2.5 release.

 Look again. There is a new branch called jitterbuffer-1.2 that follows
 svn HEAD in the 1.2 branch. This is documented in the bug tracker
 report for the jitterbuffer :-)

 Please test! Thanks!

 /O


 ---
 * Olle E. Johansson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 * Asterisk Training http://edvina.net/training/



 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Jitter Buffer for 1.2.5

2006-03-14 Thread Olle E Johansson


14 mar 2006 kl. 13.35 skrev Matt:


Right saw that.   But I'm trying to get away from using CVS-HEAD :)

We all are. Every developer have switched from CVS to Subversion :-)

This is not the development branch, but the release branch code,
which we use to create the 1.2.x releases.

The jitterbuffer itself is *not* release branch code, it's very much
development. Please test it.

The jitterbuffer branch is based on svn trunk (the same as the old  
CVS HEAD)
The jitterbuffer-1.2 branch is based on the 1.2 branch HEAD  
(meaning latest 1.2 version code).


/O
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Jitter Buffer for 1.2.5

2006-03-14 Thread Matt
 The jitterbuffer branch is based on svn trunk (the same as the old
 CVS HEAD)
 The jitterbuffer-1.2 branch is based on the 1.2 branch HEAD
 (meaning latest 1.2 version code).

Ok... so if I pull the 'jitterbuffer' branch I would get 'svn trunk code'.

But if I pull 'jitterbuffer-1.2' I get the same code as I would have
if I downloaded 1.2.5 and then applied a jitterbuffer patch (which I
know, does not exist for 1.2.5).

Is that correct?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Jitter Buffer for 1.2.5

2006-03-14 Thread Robert Webb


On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:32:02 +0100
 Olle E Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


14 mar 2006 kl. 13.35 skrev Matt:

Right saw that.   But I'm trying to get away from using 
CVS-HEAD :)
We all are. Every developer have switched from CVS to 
Subversion :-)


This is not the development branch, but the release 
branch code,

which we use to create the 1.2.x releases.

The jitterbuffer itself is *not* release branch code, 
it's very much

development. Please test it.

The jitterbuffer branch is based on svn trunk (the 
same as the old  CVS HEAD)
The jitterbuffer-1.2 branch is based on the 1.2 branch 
HEAD  (meaning latest 1.2 version code).


/O


Olle,

  Pardon this dumb question please, but where are these 
test located. I looked under http://svn.digium.com and do 
not see them. I am not fluent in where everything is 
located and would like to do some testing on some of the 
other items such as the sip jitterbuffer. It will only be 
minimal but I would like to help where I can.


Robert
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Jitter Buffer for 1.2.5

2006-03-14 Thread Matt
http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/team/oej/jitterbuffer-1.2/

On 3/14/06, Robert Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:32:02 +0100
   Olle E Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  14 mar 2006 kl. 13.35 skrev Matt:
 
  Right saw that.   But I'm trying to get away from using
 CVS-HEAD :)
  We all are. Every developer have switched from CVS to
 Subversion :-)
 
  This is not the development branch, but the release
 branch code,
  which we use to create the 1.2.x releases.
 
  The jitterbuffer itself is *not* release branch code,
 it's very much
  development. Please test it.
 
  The jitterbuffer branch is based on svn trunk (the
 same as the old  CVS HEAD)
  The jitterbuffer-1.2 branch is based on the 1.2 branch
 HEAD  (meaning latest 1.2 version code).
 
  /O

 Olle,

Pardon this dumb question please, but where are these
 test located. I looked under http://svn.digium.com and do
 not see them. I am not fluent in where everything is
 located and would like to do some testing on some of the
 other items such as the sip jitterbuffer. It will only be
 minimal but I would like to help where I can.

 Robert
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Jitter Buffer for 1.2.5

2006-03-14 Thread Robert Webb


On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:44:57 -0500
 Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/team/oej/jitterbuffer-1.2/




Thank you I was looking directly under asterisk and 
not team. :-)


Robert
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] SIP Jitter Buffer for 1.2.5

2006-03-13 Thread Matt
Hi,
I really want to start using 1.2.5, but I also really need to have the
jitter buffer.  Can anyone offer a suggestion of how to go?   I've
looked at the SIP_JB patch and there seems to be no indication of a
patch for the 1.2.5 release.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Jitter Buffer for 1.2.5

2006-03-13 Thread Olle E Johansson


13 mar 2006 kl. 21.59 skrev Matt:


Hi,
I really want to start using 1.2.5, but I also really need to have the
jitter buffer.  Can anyone offer a suggestion of how to go?   I've
looked at the SIP_JB patch and there seems to be no indication of a
patch for the 1.2.5 release.


Look again. There is a new branch called jitterbuffer-1.2 that follows
svn HEAD in the 1.2 branch. This is documented in the bug tracker
report for the jitterbuffer :-)

Please test! Thanks!

/O


---
* Olle E. Johansson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Asterisk Training http://edvina.net/training/



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users