Re: [Asterisk-Users] Scaleable Solution for small office

2004-01-07 Thread Miguel Cavazos
on the 5 to 8 secs of echo if your using on your zapata.conf
echotraining=yes you should get rid of this echo problem

Miguel
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 19:15, Ryan R. Fligg wrote:
 Hi,
 
  
 
 Have posted to this list a couple of times and have always received
 great responses and help.  I have a basic * system setup
 
 Using 3 X100P cards with 6 Snom200 IP phones.  It was a bit of a
 struggle getting everything up and running but have been pretty happy
 with 
 
 the flexibility and ease of *.  My major problem is one that has been
 discussed on this list many times before.  The echo from the X100P
 cards is 
 
 completely irritating to my users.  I have tweaked the system as much
 as I can, IE: switching tip and ring, using aggressive suppressor,
 tweaking the TX/RX 
 
 settings.  There is still echo in the first 0-8 seconds of the call
 while the echo cancellation is catching up.  I understand the problem
 is that you do not hear this 
 
 echo in analog systems even though it is present and it is only heard
 in the digital system because it is not as fast as analog.  
 
  
 
 So here is my problem.  Our CEO wants me to get rid of the system
 unless I can provide a solution that will expand and work just as good
 as an analog replacement
 
 PBX.  He came to me with this decision after trying to use the Snom200
 speaker phone for a conference call, not a good idea as we all know
 the speaker on this phone   
 
 is not a conference phone replacement.  He also was frustrated when he
 tried to patch a call that came to another extension, which
 transferred fine, but was disconnected when the receiving party made a
 switch on their PBX to another extension and it was dropped.  
 
  
 
 Currently we have 4 POTS lines and I have 1 setup for DSL and the
 other 3 hooked into the X100P cards, 2 outgoing and 2 incoming, using
 the DSL as incoming rollover.
 
 We are planning on expanding our business pretty rapidly and he wants
 a system that will be easy to setup and scale.  I know asterisk and
 VOIP phones are great for this
 
 but the little glitches in the phones, hardware wise, are not
 supporting my Asterisk decision.  I would like to upgrade to a channel
 bank, and was wondering if anyone has had any echo issues with other
 digium hardware.  I know that the X100P issue comes from not having
 ECAN DSP in the card.  I was also wondering if anyone had any luck
 adding a conference phone such as the Polycom Soundstation Conference
 Phone.  Any suggestions would be appreciated
 
  
 
  
 
 Ryan R. Fligg
 
  
 
 Secured Digital Storage, Inc.
 
 104 SW 4th St.
 
 Des Moines, IA 50309
 
 Phone: (515)-244-6290
 
 Cell: (720)-841-5802
 
 Website: www.dstorage.com
 
 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Scaleable Solution for small office

2004-01-06 Thread Ryan R. Fligg








Hi,



Have posted to this list a couple of times and have always
received great responses and help. I have a basic * system setup

Using 3 X100P cards with 6 Snom200 IP phones. It was a bit
of a struggle getting everything up and running but have been pretty happy with


the flexibility and ease of *. My major problem is one that
has been discussed on this list many times before. The echo from the X100P
cards is 

completely irritating to my users. I have tweaked the
system as much as I can, IE: switching tip and ring, using aggressive
suppressor, tweaking the TX/RX 

settings. There is still echo in the first 0-8 seconds of
the call while the echo cancellation is catching up. I understand the problem
is that you do not hear this 

echo in analog systems even though it is present and it is
only heard in the digital system because it is not as fast as analog. 



So here is my problem. Our CEO wants me to get rid of the
system unless I can provide a solution that will expand and work just as good
as an analog replacement

PBX. He came to me with this decision after trying to use
the Snom200 speaker phone for a conference call, not a good idea as we all know
the speaker on this phone 

is not a conference phone replacement. He also was
frustrated when he tried to patch a call that came to another extension, which
transferred fine, but was disconnected when the receiving party made a switch
on their PBX to another extension and it was dropped. 



Currently we have 4 POTS lines and I have 1 setup for DSL
and the other 3 hooked into the X100P cards, 2 outgoing and 2 incoming, using
the DSL as incoming rollover.

We are planning on expanding our business pretty rapidly and
he wants a system that will be easy to setup and scale. I know asterisk and
VOIP phones are great for this

but the little glitches in the phones, hardware wise, are
not supporting my Asterisk decision. I would like to upgrade to a channel bank,
and was wondering if anyone has had any echo issues with other digium
hardware. I know that the X100P issue comes from not having ECAN DSP in the card.
I was also wondering if anyone had any luck adding a conference phone such as
the Polycom Soundstation Conference Phone. Any suggestions would be
appreciated





Ryan R. Fligg



Secured Digital Storage, Inc.

104 SW 4th St.

Des Moines, IA 50309

Phone: (515)-244-6290

Cell: (720)-841-5802

Website: www.dstorage.com

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]











Re: [Asterisk-Users] Scaleable Solution for small office

2004-01-06 Thread Michael Graves



Ryan,



I have a setup similar to yours; 3 x X100p, Snom 200s, etc. I haven't been too upset about the echo, although I haven't been able to eliminate that issue either. I don't really have any answer for you, but it raises a question I'd like to pose to the list. Are standalone FXO gateways like the Mediatrix substancially better than the X100p solution? They cost more, but might be worth it.



Michael





--Original Message Text---

From: Ryan R. Fligg

Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:15:41 -0600



st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }



Hi,  



   



Have posted to this list a couple of times and have always received great responses and help.  I have a basic * system setup  



Using 3 X100P cards with 6 Snom200 IP phones.  It was a bit of a struggle getting everything up and running but have been pretty happy with 



the flexibility and ease of *.  My major problem is one that has been discussed on this list many times before.  The echo from the X100P cards is 



completely irritating to my users.  I have tweaked the system as much as I can, IE: switching tip and ring, using aggressive suppressor, tweaking the TX/RX 



settings.  There is still echo in the first 0-8 seconds of the call while the echo cancellation is catching up.  I understand the problem is that you do not hear this 



echo in analog systems even though it is present and it is only heard in the digital system because it is not as fast as analog.  



   



So here is my problem.  Our CEO wants me to get rid of the system unless I can provide a solution that will expand and work just as good as an analog replacement  



PBX.  He came to me with this decision after trying to use the Snom200 speaker phone for a conference call, not a good idea as we all know the speaker on this phone 



is not a conference phone replacement.  He also was frustrated when he tried to patch a call that came to another extension, which transferred fine, but was disconnected when the receiving party made a switch on their PBX to another extension and it was dropped.  



   



Currently we have 4 POTS lines and I have 1 setup for DSL and the other 3 hooked into the X100P cards, 2 outgoing and 2 incoming, using the DSL as incoming rollover.  



We are planning on expanding our business pretty rapidly and he wants a system that will be easy to setup and scale.  I know asterisk and VOIP phones are great for this  



but the little glitches in the phones, hardware wise, are not supporting my Asterisk decision.  I would like to upgrade to a channel bank, and was wondering if anyone has had any echo issues with other digium hardware.  I know that the X100P issue comes from not having ECAN DSP in the card.  I was also wondering if anyone had any luck adding a conference phone such as the Polycom Soundstation Conference Phone.  Any suggestions would be appreciated  



   



   



Ryan R. Fligg  



   



Secured Digital Storage, Inc.  



104 SW 4th St.  



Des Moines, IA 50309  



Phone: (515)-244-6290  



Cell: (720)-841-5802  



Website: www.dstorage.com 



E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



   











--
MichaelGraves[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr.ProductSpecialistwww.pixelpower.com
PixelPowerInc.[EMAIL PROTECTED]

!michael.tag



RE: [Asterisk-Users] Scaleable Solution for small office

2004-01-06 Thread Tim Thompson








It might end up costing a little more, but
I would strongly suggest looking into the T100P/Channelbank combination instead
of the X100P cardsespecially for business class service.





I too had the same issues w/ the X100P,
although I have not experienced problems w/ the latest CVS. I still will install/sell only T100P
cards and channelbanks to businesses, especially if
they will use VOIP at their location.



I believe the extra dollars you spend on
the equipment will more than make up for the time you will spend on
troubleshooting problems related to echos.







Tim Thompson





-Original Message-
From: Ryan R. Fligg
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004
1:16 PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users]
Scaleable Solution for small office



Hi,



Have posted to this list a couple of
times and have always received great responses and help. I have a basic *
system setup

Using 3 X100P cards with 6 Snom200
IP phones. It was a bit of a struggle getting everything up and running
but have been pretty happy with 

the flexibility and ease of *.
My major problem is one that has been discussed on this list many times
before. The echo from the X100P cards is 

completely irritating to my users.
I have tweaked the system as much as I can, IE: switching tip and ring, using
aggressive suppressor, tweaking the TX/RX 

settings. There is still echo
in the first 0-8 seconds of the call while the echo cancellation is catching
up. I understand the problem is that you do not hear this 

echo in analog systems even though
it is present and it is only heard in the digital system because it is not as
fast as analog. 



So here is my problem. Our CEO
wants me to get rid of the system unless I can provide a solution that will
expand and work just as good as an analog replacement

PBX. He came to me with this
decision after trying to use the Snom200 speaker phone for a conference call,
not a good idea as we all know the speaker on this phone 

is not a conference phone
replacement. He also was frustrated when he tried to patch a call that
came to another extension, which transferred fine, but was disconnected when
the receiving party made a switch on their PBX to another extension and it was
dropped. 



Currently we have 4 POTS lines and I
have 1 setup for DSL and the other 3 hooked into the X100P cards, 2 outgoing
and 2 incoming, using the DSL as incoming rollover.

We are planning on expanding our
business pretty rapidly and he wants a system that will be easy to setup and
scale. I know asterisk and VOIP phones are great for this

but the little glitches in the
phones, hardware wise, are not supporting my Asterisk decision. I would
like to upgrade to a channel bank, and was wondering if anyone has had any echo
issues with other digium hardware. I know that the X100P issue comes from
not having ECAN DSP in the card. I was also wondering if anyone had any
luck adding a conference phone such as the Polycom Soundstation Conference
Phone. Any suggestions would be appreciated





Ryan R. Fligg



Secured Digital Storage, Inc.

104 SW 4th St.

Des Moines, IA 50309

Phone: (515)-244-6290

Cell:
(720)-841-5802

Website: www.dstorage.com

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 










RE: [Asterisk-Users] Scaleable Solution for small office

2004-01-06 Thread Michael Graves
Tim,

For my home office it would cost a lot more to go that route. I'm
thinking of a 4 port FXO adapter instead of the 3 or 4 X100's. I see
such gateway devices for $600-800. I suspect the channel bank and T1
card would be overkill for such a small situation.

Michael

--Original Message Text---
From: Tim Thompson
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:39:53 -0600

Clean Clean DocumentEmail MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) } /* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:Table Normal;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt
0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Times New
Roman;} 

It might end up costing a little more, but I would strongly suggest
looking into the T100P/Channelbank combination instead of the X100P
cardsespecially for business class service.  

   

   

I too had the same issues w/ the X100P, although I have not experienced
problems w/ the latest CVS.  I still will install/sell only T100P cards
and channelbanks to businesses, especially if they will use VOIP at
their location.  

   

I believe the extra dollars you spend on the equipment will more than
make up for the time you will spend on troubleshooting problems related
to echos.  

   

   

Tim Thompson  


   

-Original Message-
From: Ryan R. Fligg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Scaleable Solution for small office  

   

Hi,  

   

Have posted to this list a couple of times and have always received
great responses and help.  I have a basic * system setup  

Using 3 X100P cards with 6 Snom200 IP phones.  It was a bit of a
struggle getting everything up and running but have been pretty happy
with 

the flexibility and ease of *.  My major problem is one that has been
discussed on this list many times before.  The echo from the X100P
cards is 

completely irritating to my users.  I have tweaked the system as much
as I can, IE: switching tip and ring, using aggressive suppressor,
tweaking the TX/RX 

settings.  There is still echo in the first 0-8 seconds of the call
while the echo cancellation is catching up.  I understand the problem
is that you do not hear this 

echo in analog systems even though it is present and it is only heard
in the digital system because it is not as fast as analog.  

   

So here is my problem.  Our CEO wants me to get rid of the system
unless I can provide a solution that will expand and work just as good
as an analog replacement  

PBX.  He came to me with this decision after trying to use the Snom200
speaker phone for a conference call, not a good idea as we all know the
speaker on this phone 

is not a conference phone replacement.  He also was frustrated when he
tried to patch a call that came to another extension, which transferred
fine, but was disconnected when the receiving party made a switch on
their PBX to another extension and it was dropped.  

   

Currently we have 4 POTS lines and I have 1 setup for DSL and the other
3 hooked into the X100P cards, 2 outgoing and 2 incoming, using the DSL
as incoming rollover.  

We are planning on expanding our business pretty rapidly and he wants a
system that will be easy to setup and scale.  I know asterisk and VOIP
phones are great for this  

but the little glitches in the phones, hardware wise, are not
supporting my Asterisk decision.  I would like to upgrade to a channel
bank, and was wondering if anyone has had any echo issues with other
digium hardware.  I know that the X100P issue comes from not having
ECAN DSP in the card.  I was also wondering if anyone had any luck
adding a conference phone such as the Polycom Soundstation Conference
Phone.  Any suggestions would be appreciated  

   

   

Ryan R. Fligg  

   

Secured Digital Storage, Inc.  

104 SW 4th St.  

Des Moines, IA 50309  

Phone: (515)-244-6290  

Cell: (720)-841-5802  

Website: www.dstorage.com 

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

   
  

--
Michael Graves   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Product Specialist  www.pixelpower.com
Pixel Power Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

...All we are is dust in the wind. - Kansas
 
** Tag(s) inserted by Bandit Tagger98 - http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c918704


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Scaleable Solution for small office

2004-01-06 Thread TC
I would like to upgrade to a channel bank, and was wondering if anyone has
had any echo issues with other digium hardware.
the t100 connected to a channel bank will not gurantee no echo,
but from experience I do have 2 solutions that removed 100% of the echo from
my installations


1) CAC ADIT 600 channel bank, 8 port FXO cards with what CAC call adaptive
impedance matching
 I had both a x100 and a t100 and an adtran ta-750 that both produce
echo connect to my local PSTN
 when i tried the ADIT 600 with 8 port FXO connect to my analog line ALL
perceived echo
 vanished, I still had the echo can settings in zaptel turned on

2) Install an Inline T1 hardware echo can between the T100 card and the
channel bank T1 interface
I took that same adtran ta-750 that gave echo on the analog lines and
installed a TellLabs 2572 64ms
hardware echo card, turned off all zaptel echo settings, and All
perceived echo vanished

My personal belief is that the hit and mis echo on the x100/x101 cards is
caused by the impedance mismatch
between these cards and different Telco lines, the zaptel stuff tries to fix
this echo after the
fact  the current algorithms will not converge in a sub-second time frame




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Scaleable Solution for small office

2004-01-06 Thread calvis
I have an opportunity to purchase a used ADIT 600 Channel Bank with 3 FXS
Cards.  What would be a fair price for this equipment?

Charles


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of TC
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 4:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Scaleable Solution for small office

I would like to upgrade to a channel bank, and was wondering if anyone has
had any echo issues with other digium hardware.
the t100 connected to a channel bank will not gurantee no echo,
but from experience I do have 2 solutions that removed 100% of the echo from
my installations


1) CAC ADIT 600 channel bank, 8 port FXO cards with what CAC call adaptive
impedance matching
 I had both a x100 and a t100 and an adtran ta-750 that both produce
echo connect to my local PSTN
 when i tried the ADIT 600 with 8 port FXO connect to my analog line ALL
perceived echo
 vanished, I still had the echo can settings in zaptel turned on

2) Install an Inline T1 hardware echo can between the T100 card and the
channel bank T1 interface
I took that same adtran ta-750 that gave echo on the analog lines and
installed a TellLabs 2572 64ms
hardware echo card, turned off all zaptel echo settings, and All
perceived echo vanished

My personal belief is that the hit and mis echo on the x100/x101 cards is
caused by the impedance mismatch
between these cards and different Telco lines, the zaptel stuff tries to fix
this echo after the
fact  the current algorithms will not converge in a sub-second time frame




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Virus Hunter at itechgroup.com]


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Virus Hunter at itechgroup.com]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users