wondering if anybody knows this..does shady dial work only with a zap
interface or can it be configured to be used with SIP or IAX.
Nauman
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 5:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #4448 - 10 msgs
Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: VoIP hackers gut Caller ID ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
2. Cisco 7960 NAT question (Ben Merrills)
3. Re: Small Linux Distro ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
4. RE: Cisco 7960 NAT question (Hall, Eric M.)
5. Minimum install required for Asterisk + voicemail & SIP friends from
mysql (=?iso-8859-1?q?Umar=20Sear?=)
6. Re: ISDN, AVM C4, HFC-cards and echo (Junaid Saeed Uppal)
7. RE: ISDN, AVM C4, HFC-cards and echo (Robinson Tim-W10277)
8. Question about Cisco IP Phone 7960 (Hall, Eric M.)
9. Re: VoIP hackers gut Caller ID (Brian Cuthie)
10. Re: VoIP hackers gut Caller ID (Stuart Baggs)
--__--__--
Message: 1
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP hackers gut Caller ID
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:59:00 0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because if p2p voip means i get the
same volume of junk phonecalls as i
currently do spam emails
i am not even going to _think_ about
adopting it.
We _need_ authentification.
"Steve Totaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
__
>why regulate? nobody regulates the return address on a letter sent via
>USPS.
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Kevin Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 10:00 AM
>Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP hackers gut Caller ID
>
>
>> Adam Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > Chris Foster wrote:
>> > > The Register is carrying a article written by Kevin Poulsen of
>> > > Securtiy Focus, calling asterisk "..the most powerful tool for
>> > > manipulating and accessing CPN data.."
>> > >
>> > > I hope NuFone doesn't drop asterisk-set-able callerid's after
>> > > this article; i've been wanting that feature from voicepluse for
>> > > a long time.
>> > >
>> > These kind of things will be reason (excuse) for Voip to be
>> > regulated
>> >
>> Perhaps service providers who allow the Caller*ID to be set should
>> insist that customers provide evidence that they own the phone
>> numbers that they want to publish, and then limit the customers'
>> choices to only the numbers in their approved list. Calling the
>> customer on the provided number(s) would be an easy way to check, and
>> a setup fee could be levied to cover the provider's time and expenses, if
required.
>>
>> Being able to discover a "blocked" Caller*ID is another matter. Both
>> are good areas for regulation.
>>
>> --
>>_/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/
>> _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h
>> _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/_/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/
>>
>> ___
>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>
>___
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--__--__--
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 12:00:55 +0100
From: "Ben Merrills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 NAT question
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've got 4 Cisco 7960's and they're behind a firewall (sonic wall). The
asterisk box is on a WAN connection on the other end of a DS3, the phones
connect fine to the Asterisk server as you can see from the output of show
sip peers below.
tp3/tp3 D N 255.255.255.255 60665
Unmonitored
tp2/tp2 D N 255.255.255.255 60646
Unmonitored
tp1/tp1 D N 255.255.255.255 60649
Unmonitored
Now, the Cisco phones are set to use nat (nat =3D 1) and in the SIP
configuration, the phones are also configured for SIP.
[tp1]
type=3Dfriend
secret=3Dtp1
host=3Ddynamic
nat=3Dyes
callerid=3D"Test Phone 1"
I can make calls out over the phones, but can't get anything back in. If I
call voicemail say, then that's fine. B
