Re: [Asterisk-Users] success story: TE406P (quadspan with hardware echocan)
Andy Kuo wrote: Hi Andrew, I'm using a TE406P too, and I have echocancel=yes in zapata.conf. Is this redundant? Should I take the line out? Please advice. No, if you don't put 'echocancel=yes' in zapata.conf, Asterisk will not request echo cancellation on the channels. If it doesn't request it, it won't be provided. Having the hardware echo can module just means that _when_ Asterisk requests it, Zaptel will be able to provide it without using software resources to do it. Keep in mind that Asterisk != Zaptel, they are two different layers of the system. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] success story: TE406P (quadspan with hardware echocan)
Hi Andrew, I'm using a TE406P too, and I have echocancel=yes in zapata.conf. Is this redundant? Should I take the line out? Please advice. Thanks. AK On 10/3/05, Rod Bacon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which version of asterisk and zaptel are you using?Will they work with 1.0.9 ?== Rod BaconEmpowered CommunicationsGround Floor, 102 York St. South MelbourneVictoria, Australia. 3205Phone: +613 99401600Fax: +613 99401650FWD: 512237 ICQ: 5662270== Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: I just wanted to post here and let everyone know that the TE406P (quadspan T1/E1 with hardware echo can) kicks some serious ass. We've been running a PRI now for over a year with Asterisk (every single call in and out is through two Asterisk boxes, including faxes) and while the software based echo cancellation is more than adequate, we'd get the occassional edgy echo and very infrequently get full-out holy shit echo. So far the TE406 has eliminated that entirely. Anyway as I said I just wanted to post here and tell the world that at least as far as I have been able to determine, the extra cost of the hardware echo can is *well* worth the money. -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users___--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] success story: TE406P (quadspan with hardware echocan)
Which version of asterisk and zaptel are you using? Will they work with 1.0.9 ? == Rod Bacon Empowered Communications Ground Floor, 102 York St. South Melbourne Victoria, Australia. 3205 Phone: +613 99401600Fax: +613 99401650 FWD: 512237 ICQ: 5662270 == Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: I just wanted to post here and let everyone know that the TE406P (quadspan T1/E1 with hardware echo can) kicks some serious ass. We've been running a PRI now for over a year with Asterisk (every single call in and out is through two Asterisk boxes, including faxes) and while the software based echo cancellation is more than adequate, we'd get the occassional edgy echo and very infrequently get full-out holy shit echo. So far the TE406 has eliminated that entirely. Anyway as I said I just wanted to post here and tell the world that at least as far as I have been able to determine, the extra cost of the hardware echo can is *well* worth the money. -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] success story: TE406P (quadspan with hardware echocan)
I just wanted to post here and let everyone know that the TE406P (quadspan T1/E1 with hardware echo can) kicks some serious ass. We've been running a PRI now for over a year with Asterisk (every single call in and out is through two Asterisk boxes, including faxes) and while the software based echo cancellation is more than adequate, we'd get the occassional edgy echo and very infrequently get full-out holy shit echo. So far the TE406 has eliminated that entirely. Anyway as I said I just wanted to post here and tell the world that at least as far as I have been able to determine, the extra cost of the hardware echo can is *well* worth the money. -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
