RE: [SPAM HEADER] - Re: [asterisk-users] Snom or Cisco Phones? - Email found in subject

2006-11-01 Thread Cory Andrews



That looks like a rebranded Snom 300 to 
me.

Cory Andrews



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rosli 
SukriSent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:16 AMTo: 
Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: [SPAM 
HEADER] - Re: [asterisk-users] Snom or Cisco Phones? - Email found in 
subject
http://www.aztech.com/prod_iptelephony_ip150.htmlaztech 
rawks... the lcd has backlighting and methinks is snom inside
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [SPAM HEADER] - Re: [asterisk-users] Snom or Cisco Phones? - Email found in subject

2006-11-01 Thread Andrew Latham

it is, the navigation button is exactly the same, also notice the
extreamly short handset cord



On 11/1/06, Cory Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



That looks like a rebranded Snom 300 to me.

Cory Andrews


 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Rosli Sukri
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:16 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [SPAM HEADER] - Re: [asterisk-users] Snom or Cisco Phones? - Email
found in subject


http://www.aztech.com/prod_iptelephony_ip150.html

aztech rawks... the lcd has backlighting and methinks is snom inside

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users






--
---
Andrew Latham - AKA: LATHAMA (lay-th-ham-eh)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If any of the above are down we have bigger problems than my email!
Hind sight is most always 20/20 or better.
---
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [SPAM HEADER] - Re: [asterisk-users] Snom or Cisco Phones? - Email found in subject

2006-10-31 Thread Cory Andrews
I concur with Conrad.  Cisco phones were retrofitted for SIP, whereas
Snom phone are built around, and expressly for, the SIP standard.  To be
in compliance with Cisco regs, you are also supposed to have a SIP User
license and a Smartnet contract for each phone if you abide by their
program.  I realize it is not difficult to obtain the SIP firmware, but
if you were dealing with a Cisco authorized VAR, they are supposed to
sell you the SIP User license and Smartnet, which allows you to obtain a
CCO login and access Cisco firmware files including SIP.  Legitimately
licensing and Smartnetting your phones adds $150-$200 per seat depending
on how far up the food chain you are. 

Cisco is the industry leader in terms of market penetration with their
IP handsets, and it's not a coincidence that you see Cisco phones and
other products prominently features in television shows and movies.  

I think Snom made great strides in terms of aesthetics with their
product line moving from the Snom 190/200 series, which had a look and
feel I would describe as european, to their newer 300/320/360 series
handsets, which have a look, feel and ballast more suitable for the US
marketplace.


Cory Andrews
e - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m - 716.907.4059
aim - B2Cory

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Conrad
Wood
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion
Subject: [SPAM HEADER] - Re: [asterisk-users] Snom or Cisco Phones? -
Email found in subject

On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 13:29 -0600, Joe Dennick wrote:
 Comparing Snom to Cisco phones is sort of like comparing Mercedes to 
 Kia cars

Not really. Both are very good phones. 

* My Clients prefer cisco because it looks more business-like. - The new
snom phones do look better though and the side car rules.
* The Cisco phone 'feels' very good in your hand, and the voicequality
is superb. (I'd say slightly better than that of the snom 360)

* Technically, I find the snom phone more advanced and I can do more
cool stuff with it - Cisco doesn't seem to like giving features away in
SIP.
* Snom phones, for example, have freely programmable buttons that can
park/retrieve/transfer calls, show line status etc. I can't get that to
work with Cisco phones at all.
* Putting custom ringtones (and choosing which ones to use) is a
no-brainer with snoms and real trouble with ciscos.
* On ciscos, I find the upgrade path from sccp to sip a totally
unnecessary annoyance.



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users