[asterisk-users] Asterisk Heartbeat Monitor for Fail safe.
Dear All, I want to configure Asterisk/Kamailio Like system monitor with Heartbeat is there any way to monitor Service If NODE1 is stopped or over loaded then NODE 2 will work and vice verse. any help appreciated because i m stuck in heartbeat to configure service. regards Dhaval ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Heartbeat Monitor for Fail safe.
On 12/21/2009 12:24 AM, DHAVAL INDRODIYA wrote: I want to configure Asterisk/Kamailio Like system monitor with Heartbeat There is, but Asterisk/Kamailio-like system is a meaninglessly vague description. That's like saying, Is there any way I can ride car/elephant-like transportation? is there any way to monitor Service If NODE1 is stopped or over loaded then NODE 2 will work and vice verse. any help appreciated because i m stuck in heartbeat to configure service. You would want to use a tool like SIP Swiss Army Knife (sipsak) to check for basic SIP responsiveness. It can be wrapped inside a custom OCF resource agent script, if you're using Heartbeat v2. -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Heartbeat Monitor for Fail safe.
Thanks Alex, regards Dhaval On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Alex Balashov abalas...@evaristesys.comwrote: On 12/21/2009 12:24 AM, DHAVAL INDRODIYA wrote: I want to configure Asterisk/Kamailio Like system monitor with Heartbeat There is, but Asterisk/Kamailio-like system is a meaninglessly vague description. That's like saying, Is there any way I can ride car/elephant-like transportation? is there any way to monitor Service If NODE1 is stopped or over loaded then NODE 2 will work and vice verse. any help appreciated because i m stuck in heartbeat to configure service. You would want to use a tool like SIP Swiss Army Knife (sipsak) to check for basic SIP responsiveness. It can be wrapped inside a custom OCF resource agent script, if you're using Heartbeat v2. -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] [Asterisk-users] asterisk +heartbeat (Wilton Helm)
having two NICs on the same subnet I'm trying to wrap my brain around that in the larger network picture. Two NICs in the same subnet (presumably on the same computer) would have access to the same other devices. This could potentially increase bandwidth (maybe?) and offer redundancy (if NICS, wiring or switches were the biggest source of failure). I'm not sure how the OS would decide which one to use for a given packet, or if an application (such as Asterisk) could determine which one to use. I can see potential problems with addressing, as other devices could send to one, and would definitely not know what to do with a reply from the other, etc. I'm not sure this would be an Asterisk bug. Without some concept of what I am missing here, I would consider it a cockpit error on system setup. The only reason I can think of for having two NICs in a computer would be using it as a router--in which case they wouldn't be on the same subnet. (OK I've done it before for redundant paths, but again, the paths should be on different subnets, otherwise how does one tell the OS which path was intended?) Try reading: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:Bonding We have 3 networks on each of our servers. Each network (and IP) is served by 2 nics. (yes 6 nics per server) Works well with Asterisk, you can disconnect cables or take power from one of the core switches without as much as a click in audio in ongoing connections. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] [Asterisk-users] asterisk +heartbeat (Wilton Helm)
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Freddi Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: having two NICs on the same subnet I'm trying to wrap my brain around that in the larger network picture. Two NICs in the same subnet (presumably on the same computer) would have access to the same other devices. This could potentially increase bandwidth (maybe?) and offer redundancy (if NICS, wiring or switches were the biggest source of failure). I'm not sure how the OS would decide which one to use for a given packet, or if an application (such as Asterisk) could determine which one to use. I can see potential problems with addressing, as other devices could send to one, and would definitely not know what to do with a reply from the other, etc. I'm not sure this would be an Asterisk bug. Without some concept of what I am missing here, I would consider it a cockpit error on system setup. The only reason I can think of for having two NICs in a computer would be using it as a router--in which case they wouldn't be on the same subnet. (OK I've done it before for redundant paths, but again, the paths should be on different subnets, otherwise how does one tell the OS which path was intended?) Try reading: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:Bonding We have 3 networks on each of our servers. Each network (and IP) is served by 2 nics. (yes 6 nics per server) Works well with Asterisk, you can disconnect cables or take power from one of the core switches without as much as a click in audio in ongoing I have mutihomed boxen on many different networks as well, this has never been an issue. Let's put aside why would you or there is no reason, and then think about it again. Let's just say you wanted two NICs on the same subnet with different IPS, Is it a bug or by design? I am fully aware of aggregated (bonding) of links too. I didn't bother to click the link because I assume it is just plain old network bonding (aggregating) like in the Cisco world, you can bond several NICs and get higher bandwidth on a switch, I have three NICS bonded for a three gigabit uplink and that material is too dry for this morning, and if it is what I think it is, I have been doing it for years, let's see I got my CCNA in 97 and renewed sometime or another Cisco calls this Multiliink in the router space.. I had three bonded T1s, I could unplug up to two of the T1s and and the internet stayed up up, just at 33% capacity. I am talking about NICs with different IPs on the same subnet. Is Asterisk or Linux deciding to reply to a packet sent to 10.0.0.1 (eht0) by sending that packet through 10.0.0.254? -- Thanks, Steve Totaro +18887771888 (Toll Free) +12409381212 (Cell) +12024369784 (Skype) ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] [Asterisk-users] asterisk +heartbeat (Wilton Helm)
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have mutihomed boxen on many different networks as well, this has never been an issue. Let's put aside why would you or there is no reason, and then think about it again. Let's just say you wanted two NICs on the same subnet with different IPS, Is it a bug or by design? This whole discussion seems to have forgotten about ARP... The kernel will dynamically learn MAC address to IP address associations as well as which interface the association was learned over using ARP broadcasts. This config is broken. I am fully aware of aggregated (bonding) of links too. I didn't bother to click the link because I assume it is just plain old network bonding (aggregating) like in the Cisco world, you can bond several NICs and get higher bandwidth on a switch, I have three NICS bonded for a three gigabit uplink and that material is too dry for this morning, and if it is what I think it is, I have been doing it for years, let's see I got my CCNA in 97 and renewed sometime or another Most Cisco devices (especially back in the day - 1997?) were using Cisco's EtherChannel: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EtherChannel Which is not quite the same as IEEE 802.3ad (referred to as LACP on some switches). I was working with Cisco devices at the time but I don't remember if I ever had the opportunity to configure bonding on my Cat 2950s... I can tell you that even though 802.3ad is a multi-vendor standard, many Cisco admins still configure EtherChannel between Cisco devices. Whether you are using EtherChannel or 802.3ad the catch is your switch needs to support one or the other and you have to specifically configure switch ports to be a member of that aggregation group. It limits bonded functionality to at least smart switches if not full blown managed switches like those from Cisco, HP, Foundry, etc. With most Linux users being as cheap as they are ;), the Link kernel bonding module provides an ability to bond NICS *without* requiring any special support or configuration on the switch. You are even provided various configuration options at module load time to tweak this. I've never used it (I use 802.3ad) so I can't be exactly sure how it works but I can bet there is some ARP magic in there somewhere... Cisco calls this Multiliink in the router space.. I had three bonded T1s, I could unplug up to two of the T1s and and the internet stayed up up, just at 33% capacity. Depending on how you were doing it (Multilink PPP?) that is VERY different technology. Not to be confused with what we have been calling bonding (sometimes referred to as teaming) which use a variety of Ethernet specific technologies. Although Token Ring, etc might have some equivalent (overlapping?) standards, u - who cares ;)? I am talking about NICs with different IPs on the same subnet. Is Asterisk or Linux deciding to reply to a packet sent to 10.0.0.1 (eht0) by sending that packet through 10.0.0.254? Understood. When you up an interface with an IP address and netmask the kernel automatically inserts a route for that network in the route table (using that interface): ip route show: 10.16.5.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.16.5.233 metric 1 default via 10.16.5.1 dev eth0 proto static As you can see I've also added a default route here. Now, if I ping my default route the kernel's ARP cache learns which MAC address that IP has and over which interface: arp -an: ? (10.16.5.1) at 00:13:72:26:36:b7 [ether] on eth0 My guess is that if you had two NICs on the same subnet with different IPs the kernel route table and ARP cache would get pretty confused. This seems so incredibly broken to me I've never tried Something else that seems strange about this arrangement, why would you want to bother to configure other hosts on the LAN differently? You're not really adding bandwidth/reliability (if you could call it that) unless you configure other machines on the LAN to use the different addresses... Weird. In short: If you want to have two NICs on the same network, run them through bonding.ko - PLEASE! ;) If you need other IPs, add an alias to your bonded interface! -- Kristian Kielhofner http://blog.krisk.org http://www.submityoursip.com http://www.astlinux.org http://www.star2star.com ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] [Asterisk-users] asterisk +heartbeat
having two NICs on the same subnet I'm trying to wrap my brain around that in the larger network picture. Two NICs in the same subnet (presumably on the same computer) would have access to the same other devices. This could potentially increase bandwidth (maybe?) and offer redundancy (if NICS, wiring or switches were the biggest source of failure). I'm not sure how the OS would decide which one to use for a given packet, or if an application (such as Asterisk) could determine which one to use. I can see potential problems with addressing, as other devices could send to one, and would definitely not know what to do with a reply from the other, etc. I'm not sure this would be an Asterisk bug. Without some concept of what I am missing here, I would consider it a cockpit error on system setup. The only reason I can think of for having two NICs in a computer would be using it as a router--in which case they wouldn't be on the same subnet. (OK I've done it before for redundant paths, but again, the paths should be on different subnets, otherwise how does one tell the OS which path was intended?) Wilton ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] [Asterisk-users] asterisk +heartbeat
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Wilton Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: having two NICs on the same subnet I'm trying to wrap my brain around that in the larger network picture. Two NICs in the same subnet (presumably on the same computer) would have access to the same other devices. This could potentially increase bandwidth (maybe?) and offer redundancy (if NICS, wiring or switches were the biggest source of failure). I'm not sure how the OS would decide which one to use for a given packet, or if an application (such as Asterisk) could determine which one to use. I can see potential problems with addressing, as other devices could send to one, and would definitely not know what to do with a reply from the other, etc. I'm not sure this would be an Asterisk bug. Without some concept of what I am missing here, I would consider it a cockpit error on system setup. The only reason I can think of for having two NICs in a computer would be using it as a router--in which case they wouldn't be on the same subnet. (OK I've done it before for redundant paths, but again, the paths should be on different subnets, otherwise how does one tell the OS which path was intended?) Wilton ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users If you are referring to my post about strange behavior of asterisk sending on one NIC and receiving on another. This could be a useful feature but I think it was a bug and caused issues. The phone is programmed with the IP of the NIC to use, so it should send packets there, Asterisk should send packets back out the same NIC that they came in on (in case, all LAN, server and phones). The path should be determined by IP and or MAC address. I would definitely call it a bug. Increased bandwidth is nice but in a world of cheap gigabit switches and servers with standard dual gigabit NICs, I don' see a huge need. I have dual homed servers on the same subnet in case a NIC or switch died, by plugging into different switches. I have also done this (although not necessary) with Quintum boxes, register four 24 port FXS boxes to one NIC and four to the secondary. With STP http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/rtrmgmt/sw_ntman/cwsimain/cwsi2/cwsiug2/vlan2/stpapp.htm You can mesh your network without worrying about packet storms. -- Thanks, Steve Totaro +18887771888 (Toll Free) +12409381212 (Cell) +12024369784 (Skype) ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat
How did you define the secondary IP address? Did you actually set that up in the network scripts and bind it to eth0 or did you just define it in /etc/ha.d/haresources? You should only have the virtual IP defined in haresources along with the primary server and what you want to do on node up/down. My haresources file has a single line: ohasterisk01 10.191.32.31 MailTo::user@domain.com::Asterisk fonulator asterisk We're obviously using the redFone FoneBRIDGE for our T1 connection as you can see we're firing the fonulator script and then asterisk. HTH! Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nhadie Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:47 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat Hi, I'm using heartbeat as a failover for my asterisk server. on the active server 1 i have 10.10.10.1 eth0 10.10.10.3 secondary eth0 asterisk listens to the secondary ip, so that if server 1 fails, server 2 will then get that IP. so if server 1 fails, server 2 will have the IP 10.10.10.2 eth0 10.10.10.3 secondary eth0 problem is i have to bind asterisk to the secondary IP if dont, i cant make calls. but if server 2 is inactive, asterisk does not run, as on the config it is binded on the secondary ip. anyone uses heartbeat for failover? tia. regards, nhadie ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat
I had an issue in 1.2.x that I am not sure ever got fixed but having two NICs on the same subnet did strange things. Strange like one NIC would be used for outbound traffic and the other for inbound traffic. Maybe someone knows why, if it was a bug, if it was fixed? I could think of something creative but am drained right now and have to go buy some coax and connectors. If nobody helps you by then, I will. Thanks, Steve Totaro On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Gleim, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: How did you define the secondary IP address? Did you actually set that up in the network scripts and bind it to eth0 or did you just define it in /etc/ha.d/haresources? You should only have the virtual IP defined in haresources along with the primary server and what you want to do on node up/down. My haresources file has a single line: ohasterisk01 10.191.32.31 MailTo::user@domain.com::Asterisk fonulator asterisk We're obviously using the redFone FoneBRIDGE for our T1 connection as you can see we're firing the fonulator script and then asterisk. HTH! Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nhadie Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:47 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat Hi, I'm using heartbeat as a failover for my asterisk server. on the active server 1 i have 10.10.10.1 eth0 10.10.10.3 secondary eth0 asterisk listens to the secondary ip, so that if server 1 fails, server 2 will then get that IP. so if server 1 fails, server 2 will have the IP 10.10.10.2 eth0 10.10.10.3 secondary eth0 problem is i have to bind asterisk to the secondary IP if dont, i cant make calls. but if server 2 is inactive, asterisk does not run, as on the config it is binded on the secondary ip. anyone uses heartbeat for failover? tia. regards, nhadie ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat
Are you using bindaddr=0.0.0.0 in sip.conf and iax.conf ?? On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had an issue in 1.2.x that I am not sure ever got fixed but having two NICs on the same subnet did strange things. Strange like one NIC would be used for outbound traffic and the other for inbound traffic. Maybe someone knows why, if it was a bug, if it was fixed? I could think of something creative but am drained right now and have to go buy some coax and connectors. If nobody helps you by then, I will. Thanks, Steve Totaro On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Gleim, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: How did you define the secondary IP address? Did you actually set that up in the network scripts and bind it to eth0 or did you just define it in /etc/ha.d/haresources? You should only have the virtual IP defined in haresources along with the primary server and what you want to do on node up/down. My haresources file has a single line: ohasterisk01 10.191.32.31 MailTo::user@domain.com::Asterisk fonulator asterisk We're obviously using the redFone FoneBRIDGE for our T1 connection as you can see we're firing the fonulator script and then asterisk. HTH! Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nhadie Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:47 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat Hi, I'm using heartbeat as a failover for my asterisk server. on the active server 1 i have 10.10.10.1 eth0 10.10.10.3 secondary eth0 asterisk listens to the secondary ip, so that if server 1 fails, server 2 will then get that IP. so if server 1 fails, server 2 will have the IP 10.10.10.2 eth0 10.10.10.3 secondary eth0 problem is i have to bind asterisk to the secondary IP if dont, i cant make calls. but if server 2 is inactive, asterisk does not run, as on the config it is binded on the secondary ip. anyone uses heartbeat for failover? tia. regards, nhadie ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat
hi sir as mentioned i need to bind it on the secondary ip. coz if i bind it to 0.0.0.0, it's rejecting the call. i'm not sure if possible with heartbeat to execute a command after it takes over an IP. so i can reload asterisk on the failover server once it has the ip so i can bind asterisk to it. regards nhadie Edgar Guadamuz wrote: Are you using bindaddr=0.0.0.0 http://0.0.0.0 in sip.conf and iax.conf ?? On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had an issue in 1.2.x that I am not sure ever got fixed but having two NICs on the same subnet did strange things. Strange like one NIC would be used for outbound traffic and the other for inbound traffic. Maybe someone knows why, if it was a bug, if it was fixed? I could think of something creative but am drained right now and have to go buy some coax and connectors. If nobody helps you by then, I will. Thanks, Steve Totaro On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Gleim, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How did you define the secondary IP address? Did you actually set that up in the network scripts and bind it to eth0 or did you just define it in /etc/ha.d/haresources? You should only have the virtual IP defined in haresources along with the primary server and what you want to do on node up/down. My haresources file has a single line: ohasterisk01 10.191.32.31 http://10.191.32.31/ MailTo::user@domain.com::Asterisk fonulator asterisk We're obviously using the redFone FoneBRIDGE for our T1 connection as you can see we're firing the fonulator script and then asterisk. HTH! Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nhadie Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:47 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat Hi, I'm using heartbeat as a failover for my asterisk server. on the active server 1 i have 10.10.10.1 http://10.10.10.1/ eth0 10.10.10.3 http://10.10.10.3/ secondary eth0 asterisk listens to the secondary ip, so that if server 1 fails, server 2 will then get that IP. so if server 1 fails, server 2 will have the IP 10.10.10.2 http://10.10.10.2/ eth0 10.10.10.3 http://10.10.10.3/ secondary eth0 problem is i have to bind asterisk to the secondary IP if dont, i cant make calls. but if server 2 is inactive, asterisk does not run, as on the config it is binded on the secondary ip. anyone uses heartbeat for failover? tia. regards, nhadie ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com http://www.api-digital.com/ -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat
Gleim, Jason wrote: How did you define the secondary IP address? Did you actually set that up in the network scripts and bind it to eth0 or did you just define it in /etc/ha.d/haresources? You should only have the virtual IP defined in haresources along with the primary server and what you want to do on node up/down. hi sir, secondary is asisgned by heartbeat via haresources. My haresources file has a single line: ohasterisk01 10.191.32.31 MailTo::user@domain.com::Asterisk fonulator asterisk does this mean asterisk will run after it takes over the IP? can i do this without the fonulator script? We're obviously using the redFone FoneBRIDGE for our T1 connection as you can see we're firing the fonulator script and then asterisk. HTH! Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nhadie Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:47 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat Hi, I'm using heartbeat as a failover for my asterisk server. on the active server 1 i have 10.10.10.1 eth0 10.10.10.3 secondary eth0 asterisk listens to the secondary ip, so that if server 1 fails, server 2 will then get that IP. so if server 1 fails, server 2 will have the IP 10.10.10.2 eth0 10.10.10.3 secondary eth0 problem is i have to bind asterisk to the secondary IP if dont, i cant make calls. but if server 2 is inactive, asterisk does not run, as on the config it is binded on the secondary ip. anyone uses heartbeat for failover? tia. regards, nhadie ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat
Version 2 of Linux-HA allows order constraints, so you can first set the IP and then start asterisk. (service asterisk should be down until IP address moves) On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Nhadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gleim, Jason wrote: How did you define the secondary IP address? Did you actually set that up in the network scripts and bind it to eth0 or did you just define it in /etc/ha.d/haresources? You should only have the virtual IP defined in haresources along with the primary server and what you want to do on node up/down. hi sir, secondary is asisgned by heartbeat via haresources. My haresources file has a single line: ohasterisk01 10.191.32.31 MailTo::user@domain.com::Asterisk fonulator asterisk does this mean asterisk will run after it takes over the IP? can i do this without the fonulator script? We're obviously using the redFone FoneBRIDGE for our T1 connection as you can see we're firing the fonulator script and then asterisk. HTH! Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nhadie Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:47 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat Hi, I'm using heartbeat as a failover for my asterisk server. on the active server 1 i have 10.10.10.1 eth0 10.10.10.3 secondary eth0 asterisk listens to the secondary ip, so that if server 1 fails, server 2 will then get that IP. so if server 1 fails, server 2 will have the IP 10.10.10.2 eth0 10.10.10.3 secondary eth0 problem is i have to bind asterisk to the secondary IP if dont, i cant make calls. but if server 2 is inactive, asterisk does not run, as on the config it is binded on the secondary ip. anyone uses heartbeat for failover? tia. regards, nhadie ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat
So Redfone relies on http running? That is almost as bad as using ping. HTTP could be up but Asterisk could have crapped out but ping and HTTP could still be up. I think the manager is the best way. If your backup box has 10.10.10.3 hardcoded and up, you have an IP conflict and I am surprised it works at all. Just a thought, but how about you run a cron job on your backup that connects to your primary Asterisk boxes' AMI and issues some benign command and pings it. If it works as expected, then all is well, if it AMI doesn't reply, continue your cron to ping. If no ping replies, then proceed to bring up 10.10.10.3. on your secondary box If ping works but asterisk doesn't, you could continue your cron job to ssh the primary box and disable the 10.10.10.3 NIC and then bring up the 10.10.10.3 NIC on the spare. If this is for SIP, just use OpenSer, if for TDM, use Redfone. Thanks, Steve Totaro On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Nhadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi sir as mentioned i need to bind it on the secondary ip. coz if i bind it to 0.0.0.0, it's rejecting the call. i'm not sure if possible with heartbeat to execute a command after it takes over an IP. so i can reload asterisk on the failover server once it has the ip so i can bind asterisk to it. regards nhadie Edgar Guadamuz wrote: Are you using bindaddr=0.0.0.0 http://0.0.0.0 in sip.conf and iax.conf ?? On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had an issue in 1.2.x that I am not sure ever got fixed but having two NICs on the same subnet did strange things. Strange like one NIC would be used for outbound traffic and the other for inbound traffic. Maybe someone knows why, if it was a bug, if it was fixed? I could think of something creative but am drained right now and have to go buy some coax and connectors. If nobody helps you by then, I will. Thanks, Steve Totaro On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Gleim, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How did you define the secondary IP address? Did you actually set that up in the network scripts and bind it to eth0 or did you just define it in /etc/ha.d/haresources? You should only have the virtual IP defined in haresources along with the primary server and what you want to do on node up/down. My haresources file has a single line: ohasterisk01 10.191.32.31 http://10.191.32.31/ MailTo::user@domain.com::Asterisk fonulator asterisk We're obviously using the redFone FoneBRIDGE for our T1 connection as you can see we're firing the fonulator script and then asterisk. HTH! Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nhadie Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:47 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat Hi, I'm using heartbeat as a failover for my asterisk server. on the active server 1 i have 10.10.10.1 http://10.10.10.1/ eth0 10.10.10.3 http://10.10.10.3/ secondary eth0 asterisk listens to the secondary ip, so that if server 1 fails, server 2 will then get that IP. so if server 1 fails, server 2 will have the IP 10.10.10.2 http://10.10.10.2/ eth0 10.10.10.3 http://10.10.10.3/ secondary eth0 problem is i have to bind asterisk to the secondary IP if dont, i cant make calls. but if server 2 is inactive, asterisk does not run, as on the config it is binded on the secondary ip. anyone uses heartbeat for failover? tia. regards, nhadie ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com http://www.api-digital.com/ -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com
Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat
Edgar Guadamuz wrote: Version 2 of Linux-HA allows order constraints, so you can first set the IP and then start asterisk. (service asterisk should be down until IP address moves) hi sir, i think this should do the trick for me. asterisk should be stopped, then when it gets the VIP, i will start asterisk and bind it to the VIP. is this how i should do it? asterisk-2 \ LVSSyncDaemonSwap::master \ IPaddr2::10.10.10.3/28/eth1/10.10.10.15 asterisk TIA. Regards, Ron On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Nhadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gleim, Jason wrote: How did you define the secondary IP address? Did you actually set that up in the network scripts and bind it to eth0 or did you just define it in /etc/ha.d/haresources? You should only have the virtual IP defined in haresources along with the primary server and what you want to do on node up/down. hi sir, secondary is asisgned by heartbeat via haresources. My haresources file has a single line: ohasterisk01 10.191.32.31 http://10.191.32.31/ MailTo::user@domain.com::Asterisk fonulator asterisk does this mean asterisk will run after it takes over the IP? can i do this without the fonulator script? We're obviously using the redFone FoneBRIDGE for our T1 connection as you can see we're firing the fonulator script and then asterisk. HTH! Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nhadie Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:47 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat Hi, I'm using heartbeat as a failover for my asterisk server. on the active server 1 i have 10.10.10.1 http://10.10.10.1/ eth0 10.10.10.3 http://10.10.10.3/ secondary eth0 asterisk listens to the secondary ip, so that if server 1 fails, server 2 will then get that IP. so if server 1 fails, server 2 will have the IP 10.10.10.2 http://10.10.10.2/ eth0 10.10.10.3 http://10.10.10.3/ secondary eth0 problem is i have to bind asterisk to the secondary IP if dont, i cant make calls. but if server 2 is inactive, asterisk does not run, as on the config it is binded on the secondary ip. anyone uses heartbeat for failover? tia. regards, nhadie ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com http://www.api-digital.com/ -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com http://www.api-digital.com/ -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com http://www.api-digital.com/ -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] asterisk+heartbeat
Hi, I'm using heartbeat as a failover for my asterisk server. on the active server 1 i have 10.10.10.1 eth0 10.10.10.3 secondary eth0 asterisk listens to the secondary ip, so that if server 1 fails, server 2 will then get that IP. so if server 1 fails, server 2 will have the IP 10.10.10.2 eth0 10.10.10.3 secondary eth0 problem is i have to bind asterisk to the secondary IP if dont, i cant make calls. but if server 2 is inactive, asterisk does not run, as on the config it is binded on the secondary ip. anyone uses heartbeat for failover? tia. regards, nhadie ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
