Re: [asterisk-users] 488 Not acceptable here
Hello; Thanks a lot for your kindly reply.Actually the alaw is enabled at asterisk but what I got to know from the other side that they only enabled ulaw. Below is my asterisk sip configuration for the sip trunk. Please advise. [user_name]type=peerhost=Provider_IP_Addressport=5083context=trunkinbounddisallow=allallow = ulaw,alaw,gsmcall-limit = 256 insecure = port,invitetrunkstyle = providertransport = udp dtmfmode = rfc2833remoteregister = yescbcallerid = 22021782qualify = yessrtpcapable = no RegardsBilal On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 2:50 PM, A J Stiles wrote: On Wednesday 20 Jan 2016, bilal ghayyad wrote: > Hello List; > I am facing a trouble with a sip trunk on asterisk 1.4 and asterisk 1.8 and > I am getting the following debug, can someone advise me about the > solution: <--- SIP read from Provider_IP_Address:5083 --->INVITE > . [stuff deleted] . > [Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37]<--- > Reliably Transmitting (no NAT) to Provider_IP_Address:5083 --->SIP/2.0 488 > Not acceptable here Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > Provider_IP_Address:5083;branch=z9hG4bKn1va9h109091cms8h5a0.1;received=Pro > vider_IP_Address From: "1828444" ;tag=rrZpHF51Z7a6D To: > ;tag=as5d16dbaf Call-ID: > 6bba7f72-3874-1234-0b95-0090fb3d96e0-UASession-CX9lUh8LWc-UASession-kOSBFq > loi5 CSeq: 1 INVITE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, > OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO Supported: > replaces Content-Length: 0 <> "488 Not acceptable here" usually means that negotiation failed for want of any mutually-supported codec. Make sure that you have "alaw", which is the native format used by the PSTN in civilised countries (and therefore, there is little need to use anything else unless you know you will never want PSTN connectivity), enabled at your end. Can you run this command and post the output? (It should all be on one line, but my mail client or yours may have eaten it) $ awk '/[[]|allow/&&!/^[ \t]*;/{printf "%6d:%s\n",NR, $0}' /etc/asterisk/sip.conf This will look for [section headers] in square brackets and lines containing "allow" (which also will catch "disallow") that are not commented out, in your SIP configuration, and print them out with line numbers. -- AJS Note: Originating address only accepts e-mail from list! If replying off- list, change address to asterisk1list at earthshod dot co dot uk . -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] 488 Not acceptable here
On Wednesday 20 Jan 2016, bilal ghayyad wrote: > Hello List; > I am facing a trouble with a sip trunk on asterisk 1.4 and asterisk 1.8 and > I am getting the following debug, can someone advise me about the > solution: <--- SIP read from Provider_IP_Address:5083 --->INVITE > . [stuff deleted] . > [Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37]<--- > Reliably Transmitting (no NAT) to Provider_IP_Address:5083 --->SIP/2.0 488 > Not acceptable here Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > Provider_IP_Address:5083;branch=z9hG4bKn1va9h109091cms8h5a0.1;received=Pro > vider_IP_Address From: "1828444" ;tag=rrZpHF51Z7a6D To: > ;tag=as5d16dbaf Call-ID: > 6bba7f72-3874-1234-0b95-0090fb3d96e0-UASession-CX9lUh8LWc-UASession-kOSBFq > loi5 CSeq: 1 INVITE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, > OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO Supported: > replaces Content-Length: 0 <> "488 Not acceptable here" usually means that negotiation failed for want of any mutually-supported codec. Make sure that you have "alaw", which is the native format used by the PSTN in civilised countries (and therefore, there is little need to use anything else unless you know you will never want PSTN connectivity), enabled at your end. Can you run this command and post the output? (It should all be on one line, but my mail client or yours may have eaten it) $ awk '/[[]|allow/&&!/^[ \t]*;/{printf "%6d:%s\n",NR, $0}' /etc/asterisk/sip.conf This will look for [section headers] in square brackets and lines containing "allow" (which also will catch "disallow") that are not commented out, in your SIP configuration, and print them out with line numbers. -- AJS Note: Originating address only accepts e-mail from list! If replying off- list, change address to asterisk1list at earthshod dot co dot uk . -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] 488 Not acceptable here
Hello List; I am facing a trouble with a sip trunk on asterisk 1.4 and asterisk 1.8 and I am getting the following debug, can someone advise me about the solution: <--- SIP read from Provider_IP_Address:5083 --->INVITE sip:22021782@Asterisk_IP_Address:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP Provider_IP_Address:5083;branch=z9hG4bKn1va9h109091cms8h5a0.1 From: "1828444" ;tag=rrZpHF51Z7a6D To: Call-ID: 6bba7f72-3874-1234-0b95-0090fb3d96e0-UASession-CX9lUh8LWc-UASession-kOSBFqloi5 CSeq: 1 INVITE Max-Forwards: 68 Supported: timer Unsupported: refer Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,INFO,REGISTER,NOTIFY Contact: Content-Length: 729 Content-Type: application/sdp User-Agent: Netborder SS7 to VoIP Media Gateway 5.1 Allow-Events: talk Accept: application/sdp Privacy: none X-IP-Info: 10.11.11.3 v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1453083377 1453083378 IN IP4 Provider_IP_Address s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 Provider_IP_Address t=0 0 m=audio 28388 RTP/AVP 8 0 98 9 99 100 18 3 102 101 13 a=rtpmap:98 AMR/8000 a=rtpmap:99 G7221/16000 a=fmtp:99 bitrate=32000 a=rtpmap:100 G726-32/8000 a=rtpmap:102 iLBC/8000 a=fmtp:102 mode=30 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ptime:20 m=audio 29684 RTP/AVP 4 101 13 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ptime:30 m=audio 21364 RTP/AVP 8 0 98 9 99 100 18 3 102 101 13 a=rtpmap:98 AMR/8000 a=rtpmap:99 G7221/16000 a=fmtp:99 bitrate=32000 a=rtpmap:100 G726-32/8000 a=rtpmap:102 iLBC/8000 a=fmtp:102 mode=30 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ptime:20 <->[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] --- (18 headers 29 lines) ---[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Sending to Provider_IP_Address : 5083 (no NAT)[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Using INVITE request as basis request - 6bba7f72-3874-1234-0b95-0090fb3d96e0-UASession-CX9lUh8LWc-UASession-kOSBFqloi5[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found peer 'gulfnet'[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 8[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 0[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 98[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 9[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 99[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 100[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 18[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 3[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 102[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 101[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 13[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found unknown media description format AMR for ID 98[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found unknown media description format G7221 for ID 99[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found audio description format G726-32 for ID 100[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found audio description format iLBC for ID 102[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found audio description format telephone-event for ID 101[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 4[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 101[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 13[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found audio description format telephone-event for ID 101[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 8[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 0[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 98[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 9[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 99[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 100[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 18[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 3[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 102[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 101[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found RTP audio format 13[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] Found unknown media description format AMR for ID 98[Jan 18 10:52:37] VERBOSE[2421] logger.c: [Jan 18 10:52:37] F
[asterisk-users] 488 Not acceptable here
I am helping a friend on one of his sip trunk and couldn't find the way to resolve his problem. His asterisk's problem is like this: 0. When incoming call to one of his sip trunk, Asterisk reply with "488 Not acceptable here". So the call get dropped. 1. Recently upgraded Elastix with Asterisk 1.4.33 2. Was working fine before the upgrade 3. There are total 4 SIP trunks connected to different providers. All others works fine. 4. All codecs are allowed. 5. I setup his account on my Asterisk as a SIP trunk, both incoming and outgoing call work fine. (So it is not his provider's problem) 6. I checked his FreePBX style multi sip*.conf files and all seem correct. So what can I do to find out where went wrong on this sip trunk? Thanks. Jian Hers is the debug out put: <--- SIP read from 208.65.xxx.xxx:5060 ---> INVITE sip:160428xx...@192.168.1.83:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 208.65.xxx.xxx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-ad239907e0915d0b-1---d8754z-;rport Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 208.65.xxx.xxx:5061;branch=z9hG4bK-pcerhxpz5hr4addh;rport=5061 Max-Forwards: 69 Record-Route: Contact: "Anonymous" To: From: "CID NAME";tag=kvspovbxperbwmfk.o Call-ID: 12904...@208.xx.xx.xx~o CSeq: 493 INVITE Expires: 300 Content-Disposition: session Content-Type: application/sdp User-Agent: Sippy cisco-GUID: 4084071434-3712422367-2859401243-560159692 h323-conf-id: 4084071434-3712422367-2859401243-560159692 Content-Length: 109 v=0 o=Sippy 153068680 0 IN IP4 74.205.xxx.xxx s=- t=0 0 m=audio 34772 RTP/AVP 0 c=IN IP4 74.205.xxx.xxx <-> --- (17 headers 6 lines) --- Sending to 208.65.xxx.xxx : 5060 (NAT) Using INVITE request as basis request - 12904...@208.xx.xx.xx~o Found peer 'vsp06' Found RTP audio format 0 <--- Reliably Transmitting (NAT) to 208.65.xxx.xxx:5060 ---> SIP/2.0 488 Not acceptable here Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 208.65.xxx.xxx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-ad239907e0915d0b-1---d8754z-;received=208.65.xxx.xxx;rport=5060 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 208.65.xxx.xxx:5061;branch=z9hG4bK-pcerhxpz5hr4addh;rport=5061 From: "CID NAME";tag=kvspovbxperbwmfk.o To: ;tag=as40501684 Call-ID: 12904...@208.xx.xx.xx~o CSeq: 493 INVITE User-Agent: 000e082e83c7Linksys/SPA2102-5.2.5 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO Supported: replaces Content-Length: 0 <> Scheduling destruction of SIP dialog '12904...@208.xx.xx.xx~o' in 6400 ms (Method: INVITE) <--- SIP read from 208.65.xxx.xxx:5060 ---> ACK sip:160428xx...@192.168.1.83:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 208.65.xxx.xxx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-ad239907e0915d0b-1---d8754z-;rport Max-Forwards: 70 To: ;tag=as40501684 From: "CID NAME";tag=kvspovbxperbwmfk.o Call-ID: 12904...@208.xx.xx.xx~o CSeq: 493 ACK Content-Length: 0 <-> --- (8 headers 0 lines) --- Really destroying SIP dialog '12904...@208.xx.xx.xx~o' Method: ACK Really destroying SIP dialog '2ded46615e78d7992c15bea726fae...@127.0.0.1' Method: REGISTER astpbx*CLI> sip set debug off SIP Debugging Disabled -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] 488 Not Acceptable Here
A packet capture would be most useful. Then, you could review your SDP with your provider. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andy Beak Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 7:27 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] 488 Not Acceptable Here Hi, I'm having real difficulty in getting calls to go through with Asterisk. I've managed to check that my SIP connection is made to my provider. Below is an email I received from them: snipsnipsnip I am not certain of the reason for rejection but it has to do with the SDP, it does not seem to be a codec issue, the response is as you have seen: SIP/2.0 488 Not Acceptable Here Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.14;received=172.28.20.106;branch=z9hG4bK42d2ea03;rport=60017 From: "Andy" ;tag=as5c784926 To: ;tag=SD24jn898-4C46B8A2-5688CB2-0ADE2C09 Call-ID: 32d506cd3489aa81031937f467ef6...@192.168.0.14 CSeq: 102 INVITE Reason: Q.850 ;cause=127 ;text="Interworking, unspecified" Content-Length: 0 There looks to be a non-standard element in your SDP that is not supported by any of the networks. snipsnipsnip Which configuration file is possibly incorrect in this scenario? What dumps are likely to be useful to me? Thanks, Andy -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] 488 Not Acceptable Here
Hi, I'm having real difficulty in getting calls to go through with Asterisk. I've managed to check that my SIP connection is made to my provider. Below is an email I received from them: snipsnipsnip I am not certain of the reason for rejection but it has to do with the SDP, it does not seem to be a codec issue, the response is as you have seen: SIP/2.0 488 Not Acceptable Here Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.14;received=172.28.20.106;branch=z9hG4bK42d2ea03;rport=60017 From: "Andy" ;tag=as5c784926 To: ;tag=SD24jn898-4C46B8A2-5688CB2-0ADE2C09 Call-ID: 32d506cd3489aa81031937f467ef6...@192.168.0.14 CSeq: 102 INVITE Reason: Q.850 ;cause=127 ;text="Interworking, unspecified" Content-Length: 0 There looks to be a non-standard element in your SDP that is not supported by any of the networks. snipsnipsnip Which configuration file is possibly incorrect in this scenario? What dumps are likely to be useful to me? Thanks, Andy -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] 488 Not acceptable here sent by Asterisk - SIPdebug follows
On 09/20/06 15:06 Dinesh Nair said the following: On 09/19/06 16:59 Steve Langstaff said the following: I wonder whether you are experiencing the following bug (since the SIP INVITE has a multipart SDP body): http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=7124&nbn=4 thanks for the link, however, on 18th may 2006, kpfleming's note says, "This should be fixed in both 1.2 branch and trunk," and i'm using 1.2.12.1 which was just released this week. looking thru the current chan_sip.c code, it does seem like kevin's modified patch has been committed into the branch i'm using, so this isnt the problem. [am cc'ing reply into -dev because a bug report was opened on this at http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8010 with a patch provided] i've managed to track this down to a loop which terminated prematurely in find_sdp() in chan_sip.c. this bug would have prevented proper handling of multipart/mixed content types due to the loop which searches for the end of the block ending prematurely and setting req->sdp_start > req->sdp_end. i've provided patches for trunk and 1.2.x in the bug entry, as i think this should also be committed to 1.2.x. -- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." [EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0) http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/ +==oOO--(_)--OOo==+ | for a in past present future; do| | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=+ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] 488 Not acceptable here sent by Asterisk - SIPdebug follows
On 09/19/06 16:59 Steve Langstaff said the following: I wonder whether you are experiencing the following bug (since the SIP INVITE has a multipart SDP body): http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=7124&nbn=4 thanks for the link, however, on 18th may 2006, kpfleming's note says, "This should be fixed in both 1.2 branch and trunk," and i'm using 1.2.12.1 which was just released this week. looking thru the current chan_sip.c code, it does seem like kevin's modified patch has been committed into the branch i'm using, so this isnt the problem. -- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." [EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0) http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/ +==oOO--(_)--OOo==+ | for a in past present future; do| | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=+ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] 488 Not acceptable here sent by Asterisk - SIPdebug follows
I wonder whether you are experiencing the following bug (since the SIP INVITE has a multipart SDP body): http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=7124&nbn=4 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Dinesh Nair > Sent: 19 September 2006 06:54 > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: [asterisk-users] 488 Not acceptable here sent by > Asterisk - SIPdebug follows > > > the situation > > Asterisk <-- SIP ---> SIPGW <--- SIP Phone > > SIP Phone is trying to call asterisk dialplan: > > exten => 0224577501,1,Answer() > exten => 0224577501,2,Playback(demo-instruct) > exten => 0224577501,3,Hangup() > > however, asterisk 1.2.12.1 (on FreeBSD 6.1) sends back a "488 > Not acceptable here" with a CLI message of > > WARNING[162]: chan_sip.c:3529 process_sdp: Insufficient > information for SDP (m = '', c = '') > > > it seems to be dropping out in process_sdp() because it can't > find the m= > or the c=. this is a little odd, so am wondering if this has > triggered some > edge case in find_sdp(), get_sdp() or get_sdp_iterate(). i've > been poring > thru the code (as the box is remote, and i cant duplicate it > locally), but > can't find exactly where in chan_sip.c its borking. > > any advice would be much appreciated. > > the SIP debug is attached below: > > (10.14.32.179 is the SIPGW, 10.14.32.164 is Asterisk) > > >>> begin sip debug > <-- SIP read from 10.14.32.179:5060: > INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.14.32.179:5060 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.14.32.189:5060 > Record-Route: > Supported: replaces > User-Agent: SIP201 (lp201_sip0423.bin) > Contact: > From: > ;tag=a0e20bd-13c4-132e6-4aed8ab-2ea8 > To: > Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CSeq: 1 INVITE > History-Info: ;index 1 > Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary=unique-boundary > Content-Length: 474 > > --unique-boundary > Content-Type: application/sdp > > v=0 > o=SIP201 12367 0 IN IP4 10.14.32.189 > s=SIP201 Session > i=Audio Session > c=IN IP4 10.14.32.189 > t=0 0 > m=audio 16384 RTP/AVP 4 18 0 8 18 > a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000/1 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000/1 > a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000/1 > a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000/1 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000/1 > > --unique-boundary > Content-Type: application/isup;version=Indonesia > Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary > > > --- (14 headers 21 lines)--- > Using INVITE request as basis request - > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sending to 10.14.32.179 : 5060 (non-NAT) > Found peer 'RISTI' > Sep 19 09:38:53 WARNING[162]: chan_sip.c:3529 process_sdp: > Insufficient > information for SDP (m = '', > c = '') > Transmitting (no NAT) to 10.14.32.179:5060: > SIP/2.0 488 Not acceptable here > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.14.32.179:5060;received=10.14.32.179 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.14.32.189:5060 > From: > ;tag=a0e20bd-13c4-132e6-4aed8ab-2ea8 > To: ;tag=as5a7aa73d > Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CSeq: 1 INVITE > User-Agent: QubeTalk ECS > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY > Contact: > Content-Length: 0 > > > --- > Destroying call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > suria*CLI> > <-- SIP read from 10.14.32.179:5060: > ACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.14.32.179:5060 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.14.32.189:5060 > Record-Route: > Contact: > User-Agent: SIP201 (lp201_sip0423.bin) > From: > ;tag=a0e20bd-13c4-132e6-4aed8ab-2ea8 > To: ;tag=as5a7aa73d > Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CSeq: 1 ACK > Content-Length:0 > > > --- (11 headers 0 lines)--- > Destroying call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > >>> end sip debug > > > -- > Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." > [EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0) > http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/ > +==oOO--(_)--OOo== > + > | for a in past present future; do > | > | for b in clients employers associates relatives > neighbours pets; do | > | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of > my $a $b." | > | done; done > | > += > + > ___ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] 488 Not acceptable here sent by Asterisk - SIP debug follows
the situation Asterisk <-- SIP ---> SIPGW <--- SIP Phone SIP Phone is trying to call asterisk dialplan: exten => 0224577501,1,Answer() exten => 0224577501,2,Playback(demo-instruct) exten => 0224577501,3,Hangup() however, asterisk 1.2.12.1 (on FreeBSD 6.1) sends back a "488 Not acceptable here" with a CLI message of WARNING[162]: chan_sip.c:3529 process_sdp: Insufficient information for SDP (m = '', c = '') it seems to be dropping out in process_sdp() because it can't find the m= or the c=. this is a little odd, so am wondering if this has triggered some edge case in find_sdp(), get_sdp() or get_sdp_iterate(). i've been poring thru the code (as the box is remote, and i cant duplicate it locally), but can't find exactly where in chan_sip.c its borking. any advice would be much appreciated. the SIP debug is attached below: (10.14.32.179 is the SIPGW, 10.14.32.164 is Asterisk) >>> begin sip debug <-- SIP read from 10.14.32.179:5060: INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.14.32.179:5060 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.14.32.189:5060 Record-Route: Supported: replaces User-Agent: SIP201 (lp201_sip0423.bin) Contact: From: ;tag=a0e20bd-13c4-132e6-4aed8ab-2ea8 To: Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 1 INVITE History-Info: ;index 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary=unique-boundary Content-Length: 474 --unique-boundary Content-Type: application/sdp v=0 o=SIP201 12367 0 IN IP4 10.14.32.189 s=SIP201 Session i=Audio Session c=IN IP4 10.14.32.189 t=0 0 m=audio 16384 RTP/AVP 4 18 0 8 18 a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000/1 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000/1 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000/1 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000/1 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000/1 --unique-boundary Content-Type: application/isup;version=Indonesia Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary --- (14 headers 21 lines)--- Using INVITE request as basis request - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sending to 10.14.32.179 : 5060 (non-NAT) Found peer 'RISTI' Sep 19 09:38:53 WARNING[162]: chan_sip.c:3529 process_sdp: Insufficient information for SDP (m = '', c = '') Transmitting (no NAT) to 10.14.32.179:5060: SIP/2.0 488 Not acceptable here Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.14.32.179:5060;received=10.14.32.179 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.14.32.189:5060 From: ;tag=a0e20bd-13c4-132e6-4aed8ab-2ea8 To: ;tag=as5a7aa73d Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 1 INVITE User-Agent: QubeTalk ECS Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY Contact: Content-Length: 0 --- Destroying call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' suria*CLI> <-- SIP read from 10.14.32.179:5060: ACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.14.32.179:5060 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.14.32.189:5060 Record-Route: Contact: User-Agent: SIP201 (lp201_sip0423.bin) From: ;tag=a0e20bd-13c4-132e6-4aed8ab-2ea8 To: ;tag=as5a7aa73d Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length:0 --- (11 headers 0 lines)--- Destroying call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >>> end sip debug -- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." [EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0) http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/ +==oOO--(_)--OOo==+ | for a in past present future; do| | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=+ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] 488 Not acceptable here
SIP DEBUG would show the information in the INVITE. Obelix wrote: Quoting Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: How can you determine which codecs are acceptable to them? Do they have a way of indicating it? Perhaps they dont' like the codec you're offering in your INVITE message? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] 488 Not acceptable here
Obelix wrote: I have been receiving a lot these 488 "Not Acceptable Here" from a number of providers. What could the problem be? What is the most common cause of this message? In my experience, that is caused by one side requireing a codec that the other side does not support. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] 488 Not acceptable here
Yes. They tell you what's acceptable to them inside the SIP messages you're trading back and forth on the call setup. You can use "sip debug" within Asterisk to get a closer look at those messages. On 10/14/05, Obelix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Quoting Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:How can you determine which codecs are acceptable to them? Do they have a way of indicating it?> Perhaps they dont' like the codec you're offering in your INVITE message?>> Ray>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 01:36:17PM +, Obelix wrote: > >> > I have been receiving a lot these 488 "Not Acceptable Here" from a number> of> > providers. What could the problem be?> >> > What is the most common cause of this message? > ___> --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -->> Asterisk-Users mailing list> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.___--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] 488 Not acceptable here
Quoting Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: How can you determine which codecs are acceptable to them? Do they have a way of indicating it? > Perhaps they dont' like the codec you're offering in your INVITE message? > > Ray > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 01:36:17PM +, Obelix wrote: > > > > I have been receiving a lot these 488 "Not Acceptable Here" from a number > of > > providers. What could the problem be? > > > > What is the most common cause of this message? > ___ > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] 488 Not acceptable here
Perhaps they dont' like the codec you're offering in your INVITE message? Ray On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 01:36:17PM +, Obelix wrote: > > I have been receiving a lot these 488 "Not Acceptable Here" from a number of > providers. What could the problem be? > > What is the most common cause of this message? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] 488 Not acceptable here
I have been receiving a lot these 488 "Not Acceptable Here" from a number of providers. What could the problem be? What is the most common cause of this message? This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] 488 Not Acceptable Here
> The message is generated directly by the called Sipura/PAP2. No, if you read the sip debug carefully, you would see Asterisk is transmitting 488 Not Acceptable Here. If you mean the destination device, that's not possible since the user was calling an echo test. > This message is very likely due to a codec issue (ie, the called unit > was instructed to use G279 but it had already one call setup with G729), > or the called unit was in the process of setting up a call and had no > available G279 codec for the second call. ( the Sipuras/PAP2 reserve > G729 during call setup even though it might end up using G711). The > codec is only released once the call is set up. I know that, which is why the sip.conf entry is set to allow=g729 and allow=ulaw. Any other ideas? -- Nabeel Jafferali X2 Networks www.x2n.ca T: 1.647.722.6900 1.877.VOIP.X2N F: 1.866.655.6698 FWD: 46990 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] 488 Not Acceptable Here
Nabeel Jafferali wrote: I have a whole bunch of remote devices connected to my Asterisk box, including SPA-3000s, PAP2-NAs and Cisco 7960s. The PAP2-NAs I have only rolled out recently and I am having a problem that is intermittent and inconsistent. It happens to some users but not other users on the same ISP. It happens to users in 2 different countries where the Internet setup (NAT issues) are completely different. It happens to some users intermittently and some users on every call. Note all the PAP2-NAs are running the same and latest firmware. Am I missing something completely obvious? Is there a way to see why Asterisk is sending 488 (i.e. what is not acceptable?). sip debug peer and sip.conf is below: The message is generated directly by the called Sipura/PAP2. This message is very likely due to a codec issue (ie, the called unit was instructed to use G279 but it had already one call setup with G729), or the called unit was in the process of setting up a call and had no available G279 codec for the second call. ( the Sipuras/PAP2 reserve G729 during call setup even though it might end up using G711). The codec is only released once the call is set up. -- Andres Network Admin http://www.telesip.net ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] 488 Not Acceptable Here
I have a whole bunch of remote devices connected to my Asterisk box, including SPA-3000s, PAP2-NAs and Cisco 7960s. The PAP2-NAs I have only rolled out recently and I am having a problem that is intermittent and inconsistent. It happens to some users but not other users on the same ISP. It happens to users in 2 different countries where the Internet setup (NAT issues) are completely different. It happens to some users intermittently and some users on every call. Note all the PAP2-NAs are running the same and latest firmware. Am I missing something completely obvious? Is there a way to see why Asterisk is sending 488 (i.e. what is not acceptable?). sip debug peer and sip.conf is below: Sip read: INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 v: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.252.155.227:11288;branch=z9hG4bK-8079155a;rport f: Bode Dar ;tag=faf9295d7d8c85e6o0 t: i: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 103 INVITE Max-Forwards: 70 Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="3255",realm="asterisk",nonce="",uri="sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]", algorithm=MD5,response="" m: Bode Dar Expires: 240 User-Agent: Linksys/PAP2-2.0.14(LSVa) l: 402 Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INFO, INVITE, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER k: x-sipura c: application/sdp v=0 o=- 13600 13600 IN IP4 216.252.155.227 s=- c=IN IP4 216.252.155.227 t=0 0 m=audio 14274 RTP/AVP 18 0 2 8 96 97 98 100 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729a/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:2 G726-32/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:96 G726-40/8000 a=rtpmap:97 G726-24/8000 a=rtpmap:98 G726-16/8000 a=rtpmap:100 NSE/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=ptime:30 a=sendrecv 15 headers, 18 lines Ignoring this request Transmitting (no NAT): SIP/2.0 488 Not Acceptable Here Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.252.155.227:11288;branch=z9hG4bK-8079155a From: Bode Dar ;tag=faf9295d7d8c85e6o0 To: ;tag=as0be177dc Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 103 INVITE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER Contact: Content-Length: 0 to 216.252.155.227:11288 The user's sip.conf entry is: [3255] type=friend username=3255 secret=** accountcode=3255 callerid="Bode Dar" <> context=clients-int host=dynamic qualify=yes nat=yes disallow=all allow=g729 allow=ulaw -- Nabeel Jafferali X2 Networks www.x2n.ca T: 1.647.722.6900 1.877.VOIP.X2N F: 1.866.655.6698 FWD: 46990 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] "488 not acceptable here" message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I'm creating a test environment for Asterisk. I have Asterisk running > on a > PC with only a NIC card, No FXO, FXS, TDM cards. I have two Cisco > 7960 > phones setup for SIP. Within Asterisk, the SIP SHOW PEERS, shows the > phones. They don't appear under SIP SHOW REGISTRY. When I call phone > 2 > from phone 1, I get a message stating it is from Phone 2, stating, Got > SIP > Response 488 "Not Acceptable Here" back from 167.131.14.26. Can > someone > point me in the direction to look for the trouble? You'll want to try forcing allowed codecs in your sip.conf to something like: disallow=all allow=ulaw Last I experienced any 4xx responses the issue for me was codec selection (rather, problems with selection). In my own searches, I didn't find any record of this issue being clearly explained or related to codecs. Hopefully Google catches this. -tk ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] "488 not acceptable here" message
Title: "488 not acceptable here" message I'm creating a test environment for Asterisk. I have Asterisk running on a PC with only a NIC card, No FXO, FXS, TDM cards. I have two Cisco 7960 phones setup for SIP. Within Asterisk, the SIP SHOW PEERS, shows the phones. They don't appear under SIP SHOW REGISTRY. When I call phone 2 from phone 1, I get a message stating it is from Phone 2, stating, Got SIP Response 488 "Not Acceptable Here" back from 167.131.14.26. Can someone point me in the direction to look for the trouble?