Re: [asterisk-users] Alcatel OXE + Asterisk as external IVR

2008-12-18 Thread Artifex Maximus
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Olivier oza-4...@myamail.com wrote:
 2008/12/17 Artifex Maximus artife...@gmail.com
 On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Olivier oza-4...@myamail.com wrote:
  2008/12/17 Artifex Maximus artife...@gmail.com
  If you don't expect to get more than 15 (or 12) calls at a time, I don't
  see
  any real downside to use option 2.
 Often we have more than 15 calls at same time and that is why first
 option is not acceptable.
 you mean second option is not acceptable, don't you ?
Sorry that is my mistake and you are right. I wanna use one channel
and only while call is inside the IVR.

Bye,
Zsolt

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Alcatel OXE + Asterisk as external IVR

2008-12-18 Thread Olivier
2008/12/18 Artifex Maximus artife...@gmail.com

 On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Olivier oza-4...@myamail.com wrote:
  2008/12/17 Artifex Maximus artife...@gmail.com
  On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Olivier oza-4...@myamail.com wrote:
   2008/12/17 Artifex Maximus artife...@gmail.com
   If you don't expect to get more than 15 (or 12) calls at a time, I
 don't
   see
   any real downside to use option 2.
  Often we have more than 15 calls at same time and that is why first
  option is not acceptable.
  you mean second option is not acceptable, don't you ?
 Sorry that is my mistake and you are right. I wanna use one channel
 and only while call is inside the IVR.


No problem !

By the way, have you found any doc describing Asterisk Q.SIG features ?



 Bye,
 Zsolt

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Alcatel OXE + Asterisk as external IVR

2008-12-17 Thread Olivier
2008/12/17 Artifex Maximus artife...@gmail.com

 On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Olivier oza-4...@myamail.com wrote:
  2008/12/17 Artifex Maximus artife...@gmail.com
  Is anyone using the $subject setup?
 
  What I would like to do the following setup:
  1. OXE is setup for receiving calls, handling Agents
  2. Asterisk as external IVR on extension 9xxx connected with ISDN
 (Q.931)
  PRI
 
  I've talked with support person at Alcatel and he said that Q.931
  cannot handle this situation because after calls leave OXE it does
  not know anything so I cannot hangup in Asterisk and call will use two
  channel. Is it right? He said that ABCF2 or Q.SIG is able handling
  this situation because Q.SIG is an extension to Q.931. I take some
  search on topic and find out that Asterisk's Q.SIG not fully
  implemented. Is Asterisk implementation enough for this kind of setup?
  What is needed is that the Asterisk box should either :
  - forward incoming call to the right endpoint, using a single channel,
  - open a second channel and remain in media path till it ends.
 Thanks for your answer! You are right and first option what I am
 looking for. I have asked support staff and sending back DTMF on open
 channel does not help.


True  !



  I'm not an authority on this topic, but I would say that, as OXE and
  asterisk are connected through an E1/T1 link,
  - you must upgrade OXE and Asterisk to Q.SIG to get forwarding option
 (and
  check asterisk's QSIG supports Call Deflection),
  - casual PRI is enough if you stick with 2 channels option.
 Unfortunately I am not expert on this topic as well but second option
 is not good for us. The question is how good Asterisk's Q.SIG
 implementation for this task.


That's the question !
Maybe someone else could help on this as I don't have much experience to
share.



  If you don't expect to get more than 15 (or 12) calls at a time, I don't
 see
  any real downside to use option 2.
 Often we have more than 15 calls at same time and that is why first
 option is not acceptable.

you mean second option is not acceptable, don't you ?



 Bye,
 Zsolt

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Alcatel OXE + Asterisk as external IVR

2008-12-17 Thread Artifex Maximus
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Olivier oza-4...@myamail.com wrote:
 2008/12/17 Artifex Maximus artife...@gmail.com
 Is anyone using the $subject setup?

 What I would like to do the following setup:
 1. OXE is setup for receiving calls, handling Agents
 2. Asterisk as external IVR on extension 9xxx connected with ISDN (Q.931)
 PRI

 I've talked with support person at Alcatel and he said that Q.931
 cannot handle this situation because after calls leave OXE it does
 not know anything so I cannot hangup in Asterisk and call will use two
 channel. Is it right? He said that ABCF2 or Q.SIG is able handling
 this situation because Q.SIG is an extension to Q.931. I take some
 search on topic and find out that Asterisk's Q.SIG not fully
 implemented. Is Asterisk implementation enough for this kind of setup?
 What is needed is that the Asterisk box should either :
 - forward incoming call to the right endpoint, using a single channel,
 - open a second channel and remain in media path till it ends.
Thanks for your answer! You are right and first option what I am
looking for. I have asked support staff and sending back DTMF on open
channel does not help.

 I'm not an authority on this topic, but I would say that, as OXE and
 asterisk are connected through an E1/T1 link,
 - you must upgrade OXE and Asterisk to Q.SIG to get forwarding option (and
 check asterisk's QSIG supports Call Deflection),
 - casual PRI is enough if you stick with 2 channels option.
Unfortunately I am not expert on this topic as well but second option
is not good for us. The question is how good Asterisk's Q.SIG
implementation for this task.

 If you don't expect to get more than 15 (or 12) calls at a time, I don't see
 any real downside to use option 2.
Often we have more than 15 calls at same time and that is why first
option is not acceptable.

Bye,
Zsolt

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Alcatel OXE + Asterisk as external IVR

2008-12-17 Thread Olivier
2008/12/17 Artifex Maximus artife...@gmail.com

 Hi all!

 Is anyone using the $subject setup?

 What I would like to do the following setup:
 1. OXE is setup for receiving calls, handling Agents
 2. Asterisk as external IVR on extension 9xxx connected with ISDN (Q.931)
 PRI

 The incoming calling route:
 1. OXE handles incoming calls, answer
 2. Transfer to extension 9xxx
 3. Asterisk answer (using one channel)
 4. IVR is handling calls
 5. If needed IVR transfer back to specified Pilot in OXE with Dial
 (using two channels)
 6. Asterisk hangup (free both channels)
 7. OXE connect the PSTN incoming line with Pilot as extension transfer does

 I've talked with support person at Alcatel and he said that Q.931
 cannot handle this situation because after calls leave OXE it does
 not know anything so I cannot hangup in Asterisk and call will use two
 channel. Is it right? He said that ABCF2 or Q.SIG is able handling
 this situation because Q.SIG is an extension to Q.931. I take some
 search on topic and find out that Asterisk's Q.SIG not fully
 implemented. Is Asterisk implementation enough for this kind of setup?

 I am using Asterisk 1.6.0.3-rc1 with dahdi-*-2.1.0 on Ubuntu Server 8.10.

 Thanks,
 Zsolt


Hi,

What is needed is that the Asterisk box should either :
- forward incoming call to the right endpoint, using a single channel,
- open a second channel and remain in media path till it ends.

I'm not an authority on this topic, but I would say that, as OXE and
asterisk are connected through an E1/T1 link,
- you must upgrade OXE and Asterisk to Q.SIG to get forwarding option (and
check asterisk's QSIG supports Call Deflection),
- casual PRI is enough if you stick with 2 channels option.

If you don't expect to get more than 15 (or 12) calls at a time, I don't see
any real downside to use option 2.




 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Alcatel OXE + Asterisk as external IVR

2008-12-17 Thread Artifex Maximus
Hi all!

Is anyone using the $subject setup?

What I would like to do the following setup:
1. OXE is setup for receiving calls, handling Agents
2. Asterisk as external IVR on extension 9xxx connected with ISDN (Q.931) PRI

The incoming calling route:
1. OXE handles incoming calls, answer
2. Transfer to extension 9xxx
3. Asterisk answer (using one channel)
4. IVR is handling calls
5. If needed IVR transfer back to specified Pilot in OXE with Dial
(using two channels)
6. Asterisk hangup (free both channels)
7. OXE connect the PSTN incoming line with Pilot as extension transfer does

I've talked with support person at Alcatel and he said that Q.931
cannot handle this situation because after calls leave OXE it does
not know anything so I cannot hangup in Asterisk and call will use two
channel. Is it right? He said that ABCF2 or Q.SIG is able handling
this situation because Q.SIG is an extension to Q.931. I take some
search on topic and find out that Asterisk's Q.SIG not fully
implemented. Is Asterisk implementation enough for this kind of setup?

I am using Asterisk 1.6.0.3-rc1 with dahdi-*-2.1.0 on Ubuntu Server 8.10.

Thanks,
Zsolt

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users