Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8.0-rc5: Blind transfer failed, SIP REFER Method
Am Donnerstag, den 21.10.2010, 16:27 +0200 schrieb Karsten Wemheuer: Hi, I setup an asterisk system (version 1.8.0-rc5). While using a SIP only environment I discovered a problem using blind transfer. The phones are SNOM or Aastra and are using the SIP REFER Method. The following is working: User A calls user B, B accepts the call, user A than transfers to user C The following is NOT working: User A calls user B, B accepts the call, user B than transfers to user C The call is terminated by asterisk without any warnings or error message in the CLI. Looking at Events on AMI, I can see in the first case an Event Newchannel with a Channel: AsyncGoto... followed by an Event Masquerade in prior to the Transfer. These events are missing in the second case. Is this a new bug or do I something wrong? Shall I open an issue on the tracker? for the archives: This behavior is still the same in 1.8.0. There is a workaround available (issue #18185) Karsten -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8.0-rc5: Blind transfer failed, SIP REFER Method
Hi, I setup an asterisk system (version 1.8.0-rc5). While using a SIP only environment I discovered a problem using blind transfer. The phones are SNOM or Aastra and are using the SIP REFER Method. The following is working: User A calls user B, B accepts the call, user A than transfers to user C The following is NOT working: User A calls user B, B accepts the call, user B than transfers to user C The call is terminated by asterisk without any warnings or error message in the CLI. Looking at Events on AMI, I can see in the first case an Event Newchannel with a Channel: AsyncGoto... followed by an Event Masquerade in prior to the Transfer. These events are missing in the second case. Is this a new bug or do I something wrong? Shall I open an issue on the tracker? Thanks for any hints, Karsten -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users