Re: [asterisk-users] Bristuffed asterisk 1.2.10 on Suse 10 - problemwith module versionmagic

2006-09-20 Thread Paul Hewlett
On Monday 18 September 2006 21:08, Robert Rozman wrote:
 - Original Message -
 From: Paul Hewlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 3:34 PM
 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Bristuffed asterisk 1.2.10 on Suse 10 -
 problemwith module versionmagic

  On Saturday 16 September 2006 20:35, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
  On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 02:58:02PM +0200, Robert Rozman wrote:
   I'm banging my head on compiling bristuff modules for Suse 10.0 with
   kernel
  
  
   Linux laps1 2.6.13-15.11-smp #1 SMP Mon Jul 17 09:43:01 UTC 2006
   x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
  
  
   and Asterisk 1.2.10-BRIstuffed-0.3.0-PRE-1s.
  
   I get this :
  
   laps1:~/Voipy/Bristuff/bristuff-0.3.0-PRE-1s/zaptel # modprobe zaphfc
   FATAL: Error inserting zaphfc
   (/lib/modules/2.6.13-15.11-smp/misc/zaphfc.ko): Invalid module format
  
   and this in dmesg :
  
   zaphfc: version magic '2.6.13-15.11-smp gcc-4.0' should be
   '2.6.13-15.11-smp SMP gcc-4.0'
 
  This means you built zaptel with the wrong kernel headers. Is there a
  SUSE power user in the crowd?
 
   From memory as I do not use SUSE anymore..
 
   Suse already has the zaptel modules in its kernel under the (IIRC) the
  extra
  directory (instead of misc) . you end up with 2 sets of zaptel modules in
  the
  linux module tree and modprobe then gets confused as to which to load.
 
  Look for a directory /lib/modules/2.6.13-15.11-smp/extra
 
  You must (again from memory) delete the old modules abd rerun depmod or
  rebuild your asterisk

 Thanks for the hint. I already did that. To me it seems that something is
 messed up with settings, so zaphfc compiles with slightly different version
 magic - note that the problem lies only in 'SMP'   : '2.6.13-15.11-smp
 gcc-4.0'  vs '2.6.13-15.11-smp SMP gcc-4.0'

 That's weird for me

 Any further help ?

  No sorry - I gave up on suSE at version 9.3...

Paul
 Thanks in advance,

 regards,

 Rob.

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Bristuffed asterisk 1.2.10 on Suse 10 - problemwith module versionmagic

2006-09-18 Thread Robert Rozman


- Original Message - 
From: Paul Hewlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Bristuffed asterisk 1.2.10 on Suse 10 - 
problemwith module versionmagic




On Saturday 16 September 2006 20:35, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:

On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 02:58:02PM +0200, Robert Rozman wrote:
 I'm banging my head on compiling bristuff modules for Suse 10.0 with
 kernel


 Linux laps1 2.6.13-15.11-smp #1 SMP Mon Jul 17 09:43:01 UTC 2006 x86_64
 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux


 and Asterisk 1.2.10-BRIstuffed-0.3.0-PRE-1s.

 I get this :

 laps1:~/Voipy/Bristuff/bristuff-0.3.0-PRE-1s/zaptel # modprobe zaphfc
 FATAL: Error inserting zaphfc
 (/lib/modules/2.6.13-15.11-smp/misc/zaphfc.ko): Invalid module format

 and this in dmesg :

 zaphfc: version magic '2.6.13-15.11-smp gcc-4.0' should be
 '2.6.13-15.11-smp SMP gcc-4.0'

This means you built zaptel with the wrong kernel headers. Is there a
SUSE power user in the crowd?


 From memory as I do not use SUSE anymore..

 Suse already has the zaptel modules in its kernel under the (IIRC) the 
extra
directory (instead of misc) . you end up with 2 sets of zaptel modules in 
the

linux module tree and modprobe then gets confused as to which to load.

Look for a directory /lib/modules/2.6.13-15.11-smp/extra

You must (again from memory) delete the old modules abd rerun depmod or
rebuild your asterisk

Thanks for the hint. I already did that. To me it seems that something is 
messed up with settings, so zaphfc compiles with slightly different version 
magic - note that the problem lies only in 'SMP'   : '2.6.13-15.11-smp 
gcc-4.0'  vs '2.6.13-15.11-smp SMP gcc-4.0'


That's weird for me

Any further help ?

Thanks in advance,

regards,

Rob. 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users