Re: [asterisk-users] CDR Rewrite -- Questions to the users (Steve Murphy)
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 17:08 -0200, David fire wrote: > > > 2009/1/12 Russell Brown > Quoth Steve Murphy... > >Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:51:03 -0700 > > > >QUESTIONS: > > > >Which of the two would you see being useful to you? > > Obvious comment really but given LEG based CDR, one can > determine the > 'Simple' data but you can't work it the other way. > > I'd therefore find LEG based CDR more useful as the > granularity (time on > Hold, in Queue, Waiting on pre-xfer ring etc etc) would be > good. > > > -- > Regards, > Russell > > hi > one question, i will need to rewrite all my apps that use the cdr? > and the queue_log will be rewrited? > thanks > Well, the wish/plan/whatever, if followed thru, would require people who have software that works with the existing CDR's, to tweak their code to work with the new regime. I don't think the queue_log stuff will need to be modified, at least with respect to CDR's, as all they do is reference the uniqueID... there may be other reasons pertaining to enhancements, etc. that might demand some code update there, but that's not in the realm of CDRs. By "tweak their code", is might involve a few lines of update, or a total rewrite, I don't know. But the idea is make the specs for the new system as public and known as possible in advance of a new implementation. The period of time during which the old code would still exist would be an entire release, so that gives you probably about 2 years... in the meantime, we'll probably want to cease maintaining the old code. That should mean that the old code should actually become more stable, because so far, it's very difficult to change ANY aspect of the current CDR system without introducing new regressions. Given the fact that the current implementation has serious problems, holes and gaps wrt to parking, xfers, etc, and is so hard to maintain in its current format, the long-term goals of reducing the cost of maintenance, and getting higher reliability, hopefully will make the effort of recoding worth that effort. murf -- Steve Murphy Digium smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] CDR Rewrite -- Questions to the users (Steve Murphy)
David fire wrote: > > > 2009/1/12 Russell Brown mailto:russ...@lls.lls.com>> > > Quoth Steve Murphy... > >Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:51:03 -0700 > > > >QUESTIONS: > > > >Which of the two would you see being useful to you? > > Obvious comment really but given LEG based CDR, one can determine the > 'Simple' data but you can't work it the other way. > > I'd therefore find LEG based CDR more useful as the granularity > (time on > Hold, in Queue, Waiting on pre-xfer ring etc etc) would be good. > > > -- > Regards, > Russell > > > hi > one question, i will need to rewrite all my apps that use the cdr? > and the queue_log will be rewrited? > thanks > I have found that it is easier to use queue events rather than the queue log, I have my own custom build of asterisk in which I send everything that would be written to the queue log to the AMI, and then I use a perl script that watches for those events and writes them to a DB. I would recommend doing something similar as it makes adapting to changes in the structure easier. Anthony ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] CDR Rewrite -- Questions to the users (Steve Murphy)
2009/1/12 Russell Brown
> Quoth Steve Murphy...
> >Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:51:03 -0700
> >
> >QUESTIONS:
> >
> >Which of the two would you see being useful to you?
>
> Obvious comment really but given LEG based CDR, one can determine the
> 'Simple' data but you can't work it the other way.
>
> I'd therefore find LEG based CDR more useful as the granularity (time on
> Hold, in Queue, Waiting on pre-xfer ring etc etc) would be good.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Russell
>
> | Russell Brown | MAIL: russ...@lls.com PHONE: 01780 471800 |
> | Lady Lodge Systems | WWW Work: http://www.lls.com |
> | Peterborough, England | WWW Play: http://www.ruffle.me.uk |
>
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
hi
one question, i will need to rewrite all my apps that use the cdr?
and the queue_log will be rewrited?
thanks
--
(\__/)
(='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(")signature to help him gain world domination.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] CDR Rewrite -- Questions to the users (Steve Murphy)
Quoth Steve Murphy... >Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:51:03 -0700 > >QUESTIONS: > >Which of the two would you see being useful to you? Obvious comment really but given LEG based CDR, one can determine the 'Simple' data but you can't work it the other way. I'd therefore find LEG based CDR more useful as the granularity (time on Hold, in Queue, Waiting on pre-xfer ring etc etc) would be good. -- Regards, Russell | Russell Brown | MAIL: russ...@lls.com PHONE: 01780 471800 | | Lady Lodge Systems | WWW Work: http://www.lls.com | | Peterborough, England | WWW Play: http://www.ruffle.me.uk | ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
