Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-16 Thread linux

This arrived today: July 16th. (but I also receive older messages;
oldest is from july 4th)

Looking at the headers of the messages it always appears to be the last step
that is delayed. (that is the delivery to my local mail server).

Example below:

Received: from viadoos.rzuiderven.nl ([unix socket])
 by viadoos.rzuiderven.nl (Cyrus v2.1.18-IPv6-Debian-2.1.18-5.1) with
LMTP; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:14:06 +0200
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from lists.digium.com (lists.digium.com [216.207.245.17])
 by viadoos.rzuiderven.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5538685766
 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:14:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=INXS.digium.internal)
 by lists.digium.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 id 1I8Ywl-0006nM-E0; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:57:23 -0500


I did look in the mail log files to see if I could find indications where
delivery was delayed too much. Either it is not logged, or there is no
local problem (or I don't know what I am looking for). I will try to
increase the logging level of Postfix (I trust that that is possible).

I am located in the Netherlands.

Hans Feringa

 On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:37:29 +0200, Christian Victor wrote
 I have the same problem. My mail sent yesterday around 20:00h and it
 still
 not arrived at the list. Sent from germany by the way.

 Christian

 email delays here are about 8 days. I don't expect to see this until 19th
 July

 --
 Bill Maidment
 Maidment Enterprises Pty Ltd
 www.maidment.vu


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-15 Thread Bill Maidment
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:57:05 +1000, Bill Maidment wrote
 On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:37:29 +0200, Christian Victor wrote
  I have the same problem. My mail sent yesterday around 20:00h and it still
  not arrived at the list. Sent from germany by the way.
  
  Christian
 
 email delays here are about 8 days. I don't expect to see this until 19th July
 
 --
 Bill Maidment
 Maidment Enterprises Pty Ltd
 www.maidment.vu
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Finally received it (a litle earlier than I'd anticipated). Please note I'm 
located in
Sydney, Australia so the time here is UTC+10.00

Here are the headers

From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 11 19:57:05 2007
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail2.maidment.vu (mail2.maidment.vu [192.168.2.6])
by mail1.maidment.vu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6FIWYjN013962
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 04:32:34 +1000
Received: from lists.digium.com (lists.digium.com [216.207.245.17])
by mail2.maidment.vu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6FIWMYl019169
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 04:32:29 +1000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=INXS.digium.internal)
by lists.digium.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 1I8Ywl-0006nM-E0; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:57:23 -0500
Received: from exprod8mx66.postini.com ([64.18.3.166] helo=psmtp.com)
by lists.digium.com with smtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1I8Ywd-0006nG-8i
for asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:57:15 -0500
Received: from source ([150.101.116.251]) by exprod8mx66.postini.com
([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:57:13 PDT
Received: from mail1.maidment.vu (mail1.maidment.vu [192.168.2.8])
by mail2.maidment.vu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6B9v8M8007038
for asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:57:08 +1000
Received: from mail1.maidment.vu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mail1.maidment.vu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6B9v5km020073
for asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:57:05 +1000
From: Bill Maidment [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:57:05 +1000
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: OpenWebMail 2.52 20060502
X-OriginatingIP: 192.168.2.119 (bill)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 () BAYES_00 from 192.168.2.8
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 () BAYES_00 from 192.168.2.6
X-Spam-Score: -4.4 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 from 192.168.2.6
X-Spam-Score: -4.4 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 from 192.168.2.8
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.62 on 192.168.2.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.62 on 150.101.116.251
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.62 on 192.168.2.6
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.62 on 192.168.2.8
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:66.28460/99.9 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108
M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 3 (1.:1.) s fc lc gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [db-null]
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] List delays
X-BeenThere: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
List-Id: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users.lists.digium.com
List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Archive: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users
List-Post: mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: R 

--
Bill Maidment
Maidment Enterprises Pty Ltd
www.maidment.vu


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-12 Thread Don Kelly
We haven't taken a poll, so I can't say that most users are having no
trouble, but I do know that several users have expressed concern about
delayed messages.

Although Dimitri's plea to the 'Admin' may not have been carefully worded,
it would be nice to have some feedback on this issue. As far as I can tell,
there has been no response by moderators/admin to the messages regarding
list delays, including messages that I have sent directly to those
identified as list managers.

I've pasted the header for the message that I'm replying to. Although I'm
not qualified to interpret the header, it appears to have taken a couple
days from the time digium received it until digium sent it.

Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 5230 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2007 14:59:41 -
Received: from lists.digium.com (216.207.245.17)
  by lmerc.org with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 12 Jul 2007 14:59:41 -
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=INXS.digium.internal)
by lists.digium.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 1I893a-0004UJ-BE; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:18:42 -0500
Received: from exprod8mx6.postini.com ([64.18.3.106] helo=psmtp.com)
by lists.digium.com with smtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1I893R-0004Tz-9n
for asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:18:33 -0500
Received: from source ([206.168.222.161]) by exprod8mx6.postini.com
([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:18:32 PDT
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:18:32 -0600
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: Anthony Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
X-Mailer: IMail v8.15
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:66.50580/99.9 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108
P:95.9108
M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 3 (1.:1.) s fc lc gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [db-null] 
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] List delays
X-BeenThere: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
List-Id: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users.lists.digium.com
List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Archive: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users
List-Post: mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  --Don

Don Kelly
PCF Corp
Real Support for your Virtual Office
651 842-1000
888 Don Kell(y)
651 842-1001 fax

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Francis
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 1:19 AM
To: 
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

Most of the users using this list do not experience the issue you are
having, rather than insult the admins, please trouble shoot and if you
cannot, at least post headers so others can.
-- Original Message --
From: Dimitri Volski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date:  Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:32:49 +1000

There is definitely something wrong with this list.

I have my emails sorted by date, and every day, the emails do not just 
come on top, but get slotted in. Today (10 July 2007), I received about 
6 emails from 29th of June, couple from 30th, up until the 5th of July, 
nothing of today's, or, well, for the last 5 days.

Admin, get your act together !

;)



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Mail Call antivirus software, and is
believed to be clean.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 





Sent via the WebMail system at rockynet.com


 






Sent via the WebMail system at rockynet.com


 






Sent via the WebMail system at rockynet.com


 






Sent via the WebMail system at rockynet.com


 
   

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com

Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-12 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Don Kelly wrote:

 Although Dimitri's plea to the 'Admin' may not have been carefully worded,
 it would be nice to have some feedback on this issue. As far as I can tell,
 there has been no response by moderators/admin to the messages regarding
 list delays, including messages that I have sent directly to those
 identified as list managers.

We have been working on this issue as much as possible, and in fact the
list server was shut down intentionally yesterday (for nearly 24 hours)
in an attempt to clear the backlog of undelivered messages. There is
still more work to be done, and we haven't yet found the root cause of
the delays, but it does appear to be a large number of subscriber
addresses that fail to resolve via DNS (but 'soft failures' (timeouts),
not hard failures).

As we get through the backlog of queued messages and the mail server
rejects these addresses, Mailman will unsubscribe those users and the
problem will begin to clear up, but I expect it will take a few days
before things have returned to any sort of normalcy.

-- 
Kevin P. Fleming
Director of Software Technologies
Digium, Inc. - The Genuine Asterisk Experience (TM)

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-12 Thread Walt Reed
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 09:34:51AM -0600, Stephen Bosch said:
 Walt Reed wrote:
  No, as I explained before with the reasons why, please don't post them
  here. Send them DIRECTLY to the list admins.  It is 100% off topic to
  keep discussing a list administration / mail delivery problem here. 
  
  List USERS can not help you. 
  
  Considering that the vast majority of users do not experience such
  delays, and that it's HIGHLY unlikely that Digium maintains a list of
  who to delay mail for, the problem is 99% likely to be something
  wrong with the recipient's system. It could be DNS,  routing problems,
  anti-spam mechanisms (greylisting, active sender verification, dspam,
  SA, etc.) or timeouts caused by slow responses due to said anti-spam
  mechanisms, etc.
 


 I don't buy this. This problem did not appear until Digium changed list
 servers.

So you don't believe that the new servers may have shorter timeouts
than the old and that recipient configuration has no impact?


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-12 Thread Razza
Kevin P. Fleming on 12 July 2007 19:52 wrote:
8 SNIP! 8-
 we haven't yet found the root cause of
 the delays, but it does appear to be a large number of subscriber
 addresses that fail to resolve via DNS (but 'soft failures' (timeouts),
 not hard failures).
 
 As we get through the backlog of queued messages and the mail server
 rejects these addresses, Mailman will unsubscribe those users and the
 problem will begin to clear up

8 SNIP! 8-

Are you saying that that if your mailman server fails to deliver to a
'subscribers' email addy for whatever reason (i.e. googlemail throws a
spanner for a couple of seconds), those 'subscribers' will be permanently
unsubscribed from the list?


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-12 Thread Stephen Bosch
Walt Reed wrote:
 On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 09:34:51AM -0600, Stephen Bosch said:
 Walt Reed wrote:
 No, as I explained before with the reasons why, please don't post them
 here. Send them DIRECTLY to the list admins.  It is 100% off topic to
 keep discussing a list administration / mail delivery problem here. 

 List USERS can not help you. 

 Considering that the vast majority of users do not experience such
 delays, and that it's HIGHLY unlikely that Digium maintains a list of
 who to delay mail for, the problem is 99% likely to be something
 wrong with the recipient's system. It could be DNS,  routing problems,
 anti-spam mechanisms (greylisting, active sender verification, dspam,
 SA, etc.) or timeouts caused by slow responses due to said anti-spam
 mechanisms, etc.
 
 
 I don't buy this. This problem did not appear until Digium changed list
 servers.
 
 So you don't believe that the new servers may have shorter timeouts
 than the old and that recipient configuration has no impact?

The delivery delay is demonstrably in Digium's network, so no, I don't.
Recipient configurations have no impact on that.

The new servers may indeed have shorter DNS timeouts, but again --
that's a list server administration issue.

-Stephen-

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-12 Thread Alex
 Most of the users using this list do not experience the issue 
 you are having, rather than insult the admins, please trouble 
 shoot and if you cannot, at least post headers so others can.



Received: from lists.digium.com ([216.207.245.17]) by
nlpiport01.prodigy.net.mx
 with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:12:49 -0500

Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=INXS.digium.internal)
by lists.digium.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 1I893a-0004UJ-BE; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:18:42 -0500

Received: from exprod8mx6.postini.com ([64.18.3.106] helo=psmtp.com)
by lists.digium.com with smtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 id 1I893R-0004Tz-9nfor asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; Tue,
 10 Jul 2007 01:18:33 -0500

Received: from source ([206.168.222.161]) by exprod8mx6.postini.com
([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:18:32 -0600


No mail system guru here, but it would seem lists.digium.com is indeed
holding on to email for 2 days.  It looks like those of us that are not in
the U.S. seem to have a problem with delays.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-11 Thread Bill Maidment
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:37:29 +0200, Christian Victor wrote
 I have the same problem. My mail sent yesterday around 20:00h and it still
 not arrived at the list. Sent from germany by the way.
 
 Christian

email delays here are about 8 days. I don't expect to see this until 19th July

--
Bill Maidment
Maidment Enterprises Pty Ltd
www.maidment.vu


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-11 Thread Jared Smith
On 7/11/07, Bill Maidment [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 email delays here are about 8 days. I don't expect to see this until 19th July

When you do get the message, please reply with the email headers, so
we have some chance of tracking down the problem.  For example, below
are the headers from your post as the message came to me.  If my math
is right, it shows about a sixteen minute delay from the time you send
the message to the list to the time I got it.  Without seeing the
headers though, it's going to be difficult (if not impossible) for the
Digium IT team to be able to see if the problem is on their end, or
somewhere else in between.

-Jared

Received: from lists.digium.com (lists.digium.com [216.207.245.17])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 18si30015978agb.2007.07.11.03.14.08;
Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] designates 216.207.245.17 as
permitted sender)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=INXS.digium.internal)
by lists.digium.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 1I8Ywh-0006nM-CV; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:57:19 -0500
Received: from exprod8mx66.postini.com ([64.18.3.166] helo=psmtp.com)
by lists.digium.com with smtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1I8Ywd-0006nG-8i
for asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:57:15 -0500
Received: from source ([150.101.116.251]) by exprod8mx66.postini.com
([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:57:13 PDT
Received: from mail1.maidment.vu (mail1.maidment.vu [192.168.2.8])
by mail2.maidment.vu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6B9v8M8007038
for asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:57:08 +1000
Received: from mail1.maidment.vu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mail1.maidment.vu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6B9v5km020073
for asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:57:05 +1000

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-11 Thread Walt Reed
No, as I explained before with the reasons why, please don't post them
here. Send them DIRECTLY to the list admins.  It is 100% off topic to
keep discussing a list administration / mail delivery problem here. 

List USERS can not help you. 

Considering that the vast majority of users do not experience such
delays, and that it's HIGHLY unlikely that Digium maintains a list of
who to delay mail for, the problem is 99% likely to be something
wrong with the recipient's system. It could be DNS,  routing problems,
anti-spam mechanisms (greylisting, active sender verification, dspam,
SA, etc.) or timeouts caused by slow responses due to said anti-spam
mechanisms, etc.

Many people fail to realize that high-volume mail servers (especially
for large mailing lists) don't have long timeouts and therefore can't
tolerate slow recipient servers. It takes too many resources. Make sure
that you whitelist list mail at all phases of your protection systems.
Make sure you are NOT doing sender callouts, running every message
through spamassassin, greylistging, etc. for list mail.

Lastly, there is nothing Digium is going to be able to do if your DNS
servers are flakey, or route path is.

Headers just tell you that there is a delay. We already know this. Only
the sending AND receiving server logs can tell you WHY, and then you may
only know if the session was run in debugging mode.

On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:33:43AM -0400, Jared Smith said:
 On 7/11/07, Bill Maidment [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  email delays here are about 8 days. I don't expect to see this until 19th 
  July
 
 When you do get the message, please reply with the email headers, so
 we have some chance of tracking down the problem.  For example, below

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-11 Thread David Boyd
Walter,

I know you just said that list users can not help with this problem,
however I must beg to differ with you. The information that you just
provided is a big help, if people take your advice about the
configuration of their internal systems. So in one way it is off the
topic of Asterisk, but is on target for helping people solve their
issues if they interact more efficiently with the list and the resources
that it provides.

IMHO,

Dave

On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 08:47 -0400, Walt Reed wrote:
 No, as I explained before with the reasons why, please don't post them
 here. Send them DIRECTLY to the list admins.  It is 100% off topic to
 keep discussing a list administration / mail delivery problem here. 
 
 List USERS can not help you. 
 
 Considering that the vast majority of users do not experience such
 delays, and that it's HIGHLY unlikely that Digium maintains a list of
 who to delay mail for, the problem is 99% likely to be something
 wrong with the recipient's system. It could be DNS,  routing problems,
 anti-spam mechanisms (greylisting, active sender verification, dspam,
 SA, etc.) or timeouts caused by slow responses due to said anti-spam
 mechanisms, etc.
 
 Many people fail to realize that high-volume mail servers (especially
 for large mailing lists) don't have long timeouts and therefore can't
 tolerate slow recipient servers. It takes too many resources. Make sure
 that you whitelist list mail at all phases of your protection systems.
 Make sure you are NOT doing sender callouts, running every message
 through spamassassin, greylistging, etc. for list mail.
 
 Lastly, there is nothing Digium is going to be able to do if your DNS
 servers are flakey, or route path is.
 
 Headers just tell you that there is a delay. We already know this. Only
 the sending AND receiving server logs can tell you WHY, and then you may
 only know if the session was run in debugging mode.
 
 On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:33:43AM -0400, Jared Smith said:
  On 7/11/07, Bill Maidment [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   email delays here are about 8 days. I don't expect to see this until 19th 
   July
  
  When you do get the message, please reply with the email headers, so
  we have some chance of tracking down the problem.  For example, below
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-11 Thread Stephen Bosch
Walt Reed wrote:
 No, as I explained before with the reasons why, please don't post them
 here. Send them DIRECTLY to the list admins.  It is 100% off topic to
 keep discussing a list administration / mail delivery problem here. 
 
 List USERS can not help you. 
 
 Considering that the vast majority of users do not experience such
 delays, and that it's HIGHLY unlikely that Digium maintains a list of
 who to delay mail for, the problem is 99% likely to be something
 wrong with the recipient's system. It could be DNS,  routing problems,
 anti-spam mechanisms (greylisting, active sender verification, dspam,
 SA, etc.) or timeouts caused by slow responses due to said anti-spam
 mechanisms, etc.

I don't buy this. This problem did not appear until Digium changed list
servers.

If there's a DNS problem, it's probably with the list server configuration.

-Stephen-

PS: Did they name the Army Medical Center after you?

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-10 Thread Anthony Francis
Most of the users using this list do not experience the issue you are having, 
rather than insult the admins, please trouble shoot and if you cannot, at least 
post headers so others can.
-- Original Message --
From: Dimitri Volski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial 
Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date:  Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:32:49 +1000

There is definitely something wrong with this list.

I have my emails sorted by date, and every day, the emails do not just 
come on top, but get slotted in. Today (10 July 2007), I received about 
6 emails from 29th of June, couple from 30th, up until the 5th of July, 
nothing of today's, or, well, for the last 5 days.

Admin, get your act together !

;)



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Mail Call antivirus software, and is
believed to be clean.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 





Sent via the WebMail system at rockynet.com


 






Sent via the WebMail system at rockynet.com


 






Sent via the WebMail system at rockynet.com


 






Sent via the WebMail system at rockynet.com


 
   

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-10 Thread Walt Reed
No, please don't post headers. Headers tell us nothing. They don't tell
us such things such as DNS resolution problems, routing problems, if the
recipient's server is tempfailing, etc.  The ONLY thing really useful
are the mail logs from the list server. The only people that have access
are Digium employees.

I encourage everyone who is having delays to visit
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users and look at the
bottom of the page. 

The link to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the other two
addresses listed are the ONLY addresses that should be notified of list
problems / delivery issues.

Considering that so Very Very few subscribers are having delays, there
is a 99% chance that you have something messed up on your side - DNS
reliability, your network, one or more of your MX servers, some goofy
anti-spam scheme, etc.

In this case:
dig mx mailcall.com.au
;; ANSWER SECTION:
mailcall.com.au.60  IN  MX  100 mx2.zoneedit.com.
mailcall.com.au.60  IN  MX  0 email.mailcall.com.au.

Connection attempts to mx2.zoneedit.com were taking well over a minute
to get the 220 mx2.zoneedit.com ESMTP Postfix response. Most
high-volume list servers won't wait that long. I strongly suggest you
find a better backup mail relay service, or don't even list a second MX.
Once ALL your MX servers (no matter what priority they are listed at)
are working quickly and correctly, THEN contact the list admins for
further help.


On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 12:18:32AM -0600, Anthony Francis said:
 Most of the users using this list do not experience the issue you are having, 
 rather than insult the admins, please trouble shoot and if you cannot, at 
 least post headers so others can.
 -- Original Message --
 From: Dimitri Volski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial 
 Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Date:  Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:32:49 +1000
 
 There is definitely something wrong with this list.
 
 I have my emails sorted by date, and every day, the emails do not just 
 come on top, but get slotted in. Today (10 July 2007), I received about 
 6 emails from 29th of June, couple from 30th, up until the 5th of July, 
 nothing of today's, or, well, for the last 5 days.
 
 Admin, get your act together !
 
 ;)
 
 
 
 -- 
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by Mail Call antivirus software, and is
 believed to be clean.
 
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Sent via the WebMail system at rockynet.com
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Sent via the WebMail system at rockynet.com
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Sent via the WebMail system at rockynet.com
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Sent via the WebMail system at rockynet.com
 
 
  

 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-10 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:32:49AM +1000, Dimitri Volski wrote:
 There is definitely something wrong with this list.
 
 I have my emails sorted by date, and every day, the emails do not just 
 come on top, but get slotted in. Today (10 July 2007), I received about 
 6 emails from 29th of June, couple from 30th, up until the 5th of July, 
 nothing of today's, or, well, for the last 5 days.
 
 Admin, get your act together !

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users shows:
asterisk-users list run by malcolmd at digium.com, kpfleming at
digium.com .

I saw a comment on #asterisk  (from russelb?) that the problem is
basically known and is being tracked or whatever. So Admin: what kind
of information would you find useful from those users who notice a
delayed delivery?

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen   
icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-10 Thread Ira
At 02:22 AM 7/10/2007, you wrote:
Considering that so Very Very few subscribers are having delays, there
is a 99% chance that you have something messed up on your side - DNS
reliability, your network, one or more of your MX servers, some goofy
anti-spam scheme, etc.


Or maybe it's just a VERY VERY few who are complaining. I posted a 
message on the 6th that I'm still waiting to see, but others show up 
in minutes.

Ira 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-09 Thread Doug Lytle
John Faubion wrote:
 Is it just me?  After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
 time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days.  The Dev
 

 I've seen several people mention it taking a few days to send messages. I've
 usually seen mine in a few minutes. We'll see about this one... sent July
 4th at 09:54 CDT (15:54 UTC)
   

Received July 9th, 11:01 EST

Doug


-- 
 
Ben Franklin quote:

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary 
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-09 Thread Don Kelly
I received your message just a few minutes after you sent it; however, it
sometimes takes 3-4 days before I see messages I post coming back to me on
the list.

  --Don

Don Kelly
PCF Corp
Real Support for your Virtual Office
651 842-1000
888 Don Kell(y)
651 842-1001 fax

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Faubion
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 9:58 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

Is it just me?  After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days.  The Dev

I've seen several people mention it taking a few days to send messages. I've
usually seen mine in a few minutes. We'll see about this one... sent July
4th at 09:54 CDT (15:54 UTC)

John


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-09 Thread Hans Witvliet
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 09:57 -0500, John Faubion wrote:
 Is it just me?  After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
 time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days.  The Dev
 
 I've seen several people mention it taking a few days to send messages. I've
 usually seen mine in a few minutes. We'll see about this one... sent July
 4th at 09:54 CDT (15:54 UTC)
 
 John
 
Received july the nineth!
(unlike msg's from the suse-lists or aurora-lists, that do arive within
minutes...)

hw
-- 
pgp-id: 926EBB12
pgp-fingerprint: BE97 1CBF FAC4 236C 4A73  F76E EDFC D032 926E BB12
Registered linux user: 75761 (http://counter.li.org)

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-09 Thread Dimitri Volski
There is definitely something wrong with this list.

I have my emails sorted by date, and every day, the emails do not just 
come on top, but get slotted in. Today (10 July 2007), I received about 
6 emails from 29th of June, couple from 30th, up until the 5th of July, 
nothing of today's, or, well, for the last 5 days.

Admin, get your act together !

;)



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Mail Call antivirus software, and is
believed to be clean.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-05 Thread Anselm Martin Hoffmeister
Am Mittwoch, den 04.07.2007, 11:00 -0400 schrieb Noah Miller:
  Is it just me?  After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
  time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days.  The Dev
  list seems fine!
 
 I'm getting new messages within a matter of minutes.  I dunno.

As this topic is mentioned, I have similar problems. I often get
messages in the wrong order, like this one: I got the reply (from Noah),
but the original message will probably arrive tomorrow or so, if at all.

No, it is not my spamassassin eating those - that will be invoked
_after_ asterisk-users mails already sorted into the proper folder for
the rest of incoming mails.

This is extremely annoying when discussion thread view stops working.
With a volume like that of asterisk-users, discussion threading is a
feature worth using, but it breaks when the original message comes long
after the reply to it.

For some reasons, two mails I sent seem not to have gone through. Or
will do so some day now...

BR
Anselm


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-04 Thread Doug Lytle
Is it just me?  After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery 
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days.  The Dev 
list seems fine!

Doug

-- 
Ben Franklin quote:

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary 
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-04 Thread Noah Miller
 Is it just me?  After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
 time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days.  The Dev
 list seems fine!

I'm getting new messages within a matter of minutes.  I dunno.


- Noah

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-04 Thread Christian Victor

I have the same problem. My mail sent yesterday around 20:00h and it still
not arrived at the list. Sent from germany by the way.

Christian
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-04 Thread John Faubion
Is it just me?  After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days.  The Dev

I've seen several people mention it taking a few days to send messages. I've
usually seen mine in a few minutes. We'll see about this one... sent July
4th at 09:54 CDT (15:54 UTC)

John


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-04 Thread Stephen Bosch
Doug Lytle wrote:
 Is it just me?  After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery 
 time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days.  The Dev 
 list seems fine!

Mine arrive instantly.

-Stephen-

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-04 Thread John Faubion
Is it just me?  After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days.  The Dev

I've seen several people mention it taking a few days to send messages.
I've
usually seen mine in a few minutes. We'll see about this one... sent July
4th at 09:54 CDT (15:54 UTC)

And received at 10:58 CDT (16:58 UTC)... May have more to do with where it
is sent from than the list itself.


John


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-04 Thread Drew Gibson

John Faubion wrote:

Is it just me?  After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days.  The Dev
  

I've seen several people mention it taking a few days to send messages.


I've
  

usually seen mine in a few minutes. We'll see about this one... sent July
4th at 09:54 CDT (15:54 UTC)



And received at 10:58 CDT (16:58 UTC)... May have more to do with where it
is sent from than the list itself.
  
If you view the full headers, it shows the time received at each hop 
from original sender, through the mailing list to the recipient (you). 
This should help figure out where the delay is.


regards,

Drew

--
Drew Gibson

Systems Administrator
OANDA Corporation
www.oanda.com

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-04 Thread Doug Lytle
  Is it just me?  After the mail list server upgrade, the average 
delivery
 time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days.  The Dev
 list seems fine!


Interesting, since I am only able to see the replies from the archives, 
I took note of the headers as Drew Gibson suggested.

Looks like mail is getting held up between INXS.digium.internal and 
lists.digium.com

INXS.digium.internal received it the first of July, lists.digium.com 
received it on the 4th.

drdos.info (ME) received it from lists.digium.com on that same day (Today).



   Attached:

 From - Wed Jul 04 14:19:03 2007
X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 86007
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 
X-Mozilla-Keys: 

Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from lists.digium.com ([192.168.145.1])
by drdos.info
with hMailServer ; Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:11:14 -0400
Received: from lists.digium.com ([216.207.245.17] helo=lists.digium.com) by
ASSP-nospam; 4 Jul 2007 14:12:33 -0301
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=INXS.digium.internal)
by lists.digium.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 1I53rV-0005GQ-A7; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:09:29 -0500
Received: from exprod8mx6.postini.com ([64.18.3.106] helo=psmtp.com)
by lists.digium.com with smtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1I53rM-0005Fx-Sc
for asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:09:21 -0500


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-04 Thread Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling
John Faubion wrote:
 Is it just me?  After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
 time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days.  The Dev
 
 I've seen several people mention it taking a few days to send messages. I've
 usually seen mine in a few minutes. We'll see about this one... sent July
 4th at 09:54 CDT (15:54 UTC)

Read the message headers.  They tell you exactly what time and by what 
host the message was received at.  There is no mystery here, it is all 
in the message headers.  If your e-mail program does not allow you to 
view the headers then get an e-mail client that does not suck.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-04 Thread Stephen Bosch
Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
 John Faubion wrote:
 Is it just me?  After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery
 time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days.  The Dev
 I've seen several people mention it taking a few days to send messages. I've
 usually seen mine in a few minutes. We'll see about this one... sent July
 4th at 09:54 CDT (15:54 UTC)
 
 Read the message headers.  They tell you exactly what time and by what 
 host the message was received at.  There is no mystery here, it is all 
 in the message headers.  If your e-mail program does not allow you to 
 view the headers then get an e-mail client that does not suck.

APPLAUSE

-Stephen-

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users