[asterisk-users] Setting the TOS using IPtables screws up the DSCP field

2008-05-07 Thread Vikas
Concise summary: When I set the TOS to Minimize-Delay the DSCP field
in the packet changes from Expedited Forwarding to Unknown

Here are the details:

Scenario 1: IpTables is not used to set the TOS

This is what the packet looks like using wireshark:
Internet Protocol, Src: 59.93.192.xx (59.93.192.xx), Dst:
64.62.134.yyy (64.62.134.yyy)
Version: 4
Header length: 20 bytes
Differentiated Services Field: 0xb8 (DSCP 0x2e: Expedited
Forwarding; ECN: 0x00)
1011 10.. = Differentiated Services Codepoint: Expedited
Forwarding (0x2e)
 ..0. = ECN-Capable Transport (ECT): 0
 ...0 = ECN-CE: 0


Scenario 2: IpTables is used to set the TOS

Output of $/etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables status
Table: mangle
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
num  target prot opt source   destination

Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
num  target prot opt source   destination

Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
num  target prot opt source   destination
1TOSudp  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   udp
dpts:5060:5069 TOS set 0x10
2TOStcp  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   tcp
dpts:5060:5069 TOS set 0x10
3TOSudp  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   udp
dpts:1:2 TOS set 0x10

This is what the packet looks like using wireshark:
Internet Protocol, Src: 59.93.192.xx (59.93.192.xx), Dst:
64.62.134.xxx (64.62.134.xxx)
Version: 4
Header length: 20 bytes
Differentiated Services Field: 0xb0 (DSCP 0x2c: Unknown DSCP; ECN: 0x00)
1011 00.. = Differentiated Services Codepoint: Unknown (0x2c)
 ..0. = ECN-Capable Transport (ECT): 0
 ...0 = ECN-CE: 0


I have no idea what am I doing wrong.

Here is some reference reading I did:
http://www.tucny.com/dscptos

Any pointers in the right direction will be very much appreciated.

Thanks for your time,

Sysadmin
http://www.debtconsolidationcare.com
Internets First get out of debt community

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Setting the TOS using IPtables screws up the DSCP field

2008-05-07 Thread Guilherme Loch Waltrick Góes
This happens because the TOS and DSCP are the same field. TOS is the first
implementation of QoS on the IP header, DSCP is it's evolution and uses the
same field on the IP header, you can use only one of the two at the same
time.
Best Regards,

On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Vikas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Concise summary: When I set the TOS to Minimize-Delay the DSCP field
 in the packet changes from Expedited Forwarding to Unknown

 Here are the details:

 Scenario 1: IpTables is not used to set the TOS

 This is what the packet looks like using wireshark:
 Internet Protocol, Src: 59.93.192.xx (59.93.192.xx), Dst:
 64.62.134.yyy (64.62.134.yyy)
Version: 4
Header length: 20 bytes
Differentiated Services Field: 0xb8 (DSCP 0x2e: Expedited
 Forwarding; ECN: 0x00)
1011 10.. = Differentiated Services Codepoint: Expedited
 Forwarding (0x2e)
 ..0. = ECN-Capable Transport (ECT): 0
 ...0 = ECN-CE: 0


 Scenario 2: IpTables is used to set the TOS

 Output of $/etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables status
 Table: mangle
 Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
 num  target prot opt source   destination

 Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
 num  target prot opt source   destination

 Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
 num  target prot opt source   destination
 1TOSudp  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   udp
 dpts:5060:5069 TOS set 0x10
 2TOStcp  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   tcp
 dpts:5060:5069 TOS set 0x10
 3TOSudp  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   udp
 dpts:1:2 TOS set 0x10

 This is what the packet looks like using wireshark:
 Internet Protocol, Src: 59.93.192.xx (59.93.192.xx), Dst:
 64.62.134.xxx (64.62.134.xxx)
Version: 4
Header length: 20 bytes
Differentiated Services Field: 0xb0 (DSCP 0x2c: Unknown DSCP; ECN:
 0x00)
1011 00.. = Differentiated Services Codepoint: Unknown (0x2c)
 ..0. = ECN-Capable Transport (ECT): 0
 ...0 = ECN-CE: 0


 I have no idea what am I doing wrong.

 Here is some reference reading I did:
 http://www.tucny.com/dscptos

 Any pointers in the right direction will be very much appreciated.

 Thanks for your time,

 Sysadmin
 http://www.debtconsolidationcare.com
 Internets First get out of debt community

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




-- 
Guilherme Loch Góes

Visite nossa loja virtual: http://www.shopvoip.com.br

Notícias e Fórum sobre VoIP com software livre:
http://www.asteriskexperts.com.br
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Setting the TOS using IPtables screws up the DSCP field

2008-05-07 Thread Matt Watson
Why are you trying to change the ToS from 46 (0x2e) Expedited for the RTP/RTCP 
packets to 16 (0x10)?

I mean... these values really only need to be meaningful to yourself, your 
switches, your routers etc however

ToS 46 (0x2e) is the standard value for RTP / RTCP as it is basically the 
highest priority value you can assign to something... ToS 46 is basically 
suppose to indicate that it trumps all other traffic and should be send before 
anything else (Which is a good thing for the RTP traffic)

The SIP Signalling traffic is a little less important and its standard ToS 
value is 26 (0x1a).

You also don;t need to use IPTables to set these values... Asterisk will do it 
for you as long as you have installed libcaps (I believe its required for it).

And I don;t know what phones you are using... but your phones are probably also 
setting these values for you I know the Aastra phones have QoS/ToS settings 
under Options - Network - Type of Service

--
Matt

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vikas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 7:59 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Setting the TOS using IPtables screws up the DSCP 
field

Concise summary: When I set the TOS to Minimize-Delay the DSCP field
in the packet changes from Expedited Forwarding to Unknown

Here are the details:

Scenario 1: IpTables is not used to set the TOS

This is what the packet looks like using wireshark:
Internet Protocol, Src: 59.93.192.xx (59.93.192.xx), Dst:
64.62.134.yyy (64.62.134.yyy)
Version: 4
Header length: 20 bytes
Differentiated Services Field: 0xb8 (DSCP 0x2e: Expedited
Forwarding; ECN: 0x00)
1011 10.. = Differentiated Services Codepoint: Expedited
Forwarding (0x2e)
 ..0. = ECN-Capable Transport (ECT): 0
 ...0 = ECN-CE: 0


Scenario 2: IpTables is used to set the TOS

Output of $/etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables status
Table: mangle
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
num  target prot opt source   destination

Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
num  target prot opt source   destination

Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
num  target prot opt source   destination
1TOSudp  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   udp
dpts:5060:5069 TOS set 0x10
2TOStcp  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   tcp
dpts:5060:5069 TOS set 0x10
3TOSudp  --  0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   udp
dpts:1:2 TOS set 0x10

This is what the packet looks like using wireshark:
Internet Protocol, Src: 59.93.192.xx (59.93.192.xx), Dst:
64.62.134.xxx (64.62.134.xxx)
Version: 4
Header length: 20 bytes
Differentiated Services Field: 0xb0 (DSCP 0x2c: Unknown DSCP; ECN: 0x00)
1011 00.. = Differentiated Services Codepoint: Unknown (0x2c)
 ..0. = ECN-Capable Transport (ECT): 0
 ...0 = ECN-CE: 0


I have no idea what am I doing wrong.

Here is some reference reading I did:
http://www.tucny.com/dscptos

Any pointers in the right direction will be very much appreciated.

Thanks for your time,

Sysadmin
http://www.debtconsolidationcare.com
Internets First get out of debt community

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users