Re: [asterisk-users] Stability..
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:26 PM, dotnetdub dotnet...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, what I meant was: server*CLI remove extension (hit tab) segfault.. 1.4.22 It could be an extension name Where is the error trapping if this is the case.. Who writes this shit? If you remove an extension that is being used, control could flow into the now non-loaded extension, and THAT is what caused your core dump. Don't do that. If you want to NEVER load extensions and also not crash asterisk, you're better off taking a look at modules.conf, particular making entries that begin with noload = You can also take a look at 1.6 and make menuconfig, and just not build modules that you don't want. Then they'll really never load at startup. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability..
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:26 PM, dotnetdub dotnet...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, what I meant was: server*CLI remove extension (hit tab) segfault.. 1.4.22 It could be an extension name Where is the error trapping if this is the case.. Who writes this shit? If you get hurt do you blame your Mama for having some fun in the past? I sure do now. On 28 November 2010 22:21, dotnetdub dotnet...@gmail.com wrote: Beautiful.. Asterisk 1.4.22 remove extension and hit tab from the CLI.. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability..
On 29 November 2010 18:52, C F shma...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:26 PM, dotnetdub dotnet...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, what I meant was: server*CLI remove extension (hit tab) segfault.. 1.4.22 It could be an extension name Where is the error trapping if this is the case.. Who writes this shit? If you get hurt do you blame your Mama for having some fun in the past? I sure do now. Apologies very long and bad day yesterday stuck on a customer site for 14 hours doing something that should take 1 hour 50 max but I'm not even going to go into it... Sorry for being an asshole. Regards On 28 November 2010 22:21, dotnetdub dotnet...@gmail.com wrote: Beautiful.. Asterisk 1.4.22 remove extension and hit tab from the CLI.. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Stability..
Beautiful.. Asterisk 1.4.22 remove extension and hit tab from the CLI.. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability..
Sorry, what I meant was: server*CLI remove extension (hit tab) segfault.. 1.4.22 It could be an extension name Where is the error trapping if this is the case.. Who writes this shit? On 28 November 2010 22:21, dotnetdub dotnet...@gmail.com wrote: Beautiful.. Asterisk 1.4.22 remove extension and hit tab from the CLI.. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability..
On 28 Nov 2010, at 22:26, dotnetdub wrote: It could be an extension name Where is the error trapping if this is the case.. Who writes this shit? A dedicated bunch of volunteers who don't appreciate you being a dick about bugs, which you report without so much as a log entry or a core dump. At least update to the latest version. HTH. S -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability..
Steve Howes wrote: A dedicated bunch of volunteers who don't appreciate you being a dick about bugs +1 Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability unmatched!
Gondar Monn wrote: That's what happens when illegal aliens, er, Undocumented Americans, do all your contracting work. Could it be that all fires that ever happened in the US were caused by those guys ? .. I guess 1+1=5 then . No, but being Houston, they must have far more unlicensed, illegal electricians in the contracting businesses than we see in these parts. It brings down the entire labor pool. That's why companies want to build there, the initial cost is far lower but the risks are higher that shoddy work was performed. Look at Las Vegas, I have never seen so many poorly constructed homes in my life. A four year old home is a fixer upper. No wonder they have among the highest default rate on mortgages in the country. -Ron ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Stability unmatched!
I never did solve my puzzle as to how to kill a Linux process that seems to be deadlocked in kernel space, but thought I would report to the list that the server did manage to stay up and continue to process several thousand calls per day: ast% uptime 11:49:37 up 1000 days, 16:30, 1 user, load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00 ast% Since for the past four weeks I have forced my poor users to endure infrequent audible issues associated with this event, it is now to time to finally reboot. 1000 days (almost 1001) and close to 100,000,000 calls processed! Eat that, Microsoft. j ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability unmatched!
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote: I never did solve my puzzle as to how to kill a Linux process that seems to be deadlocked in kernel space, but thought I would report to the list that the server did manage to stay up and continue to process several thousand calls per day: ast% uptime 11:49:37 up 1000 days, 16:30, 1 user, load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00 ast% Since for the past four weeks I have forced my poor users to endure infrequent audible issues associated with this event, it is now to time to finally reboot. 1000 days (almost 1001) and close to 100,000,000 calls processed! Eat that, Microsoft. Pah! I take your 1000 days and raise you: % uptime 18:18:11 up 1146 days, 5:20, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.03, 0.01 Other than as a test-bed some months back, this isn't an asterisk server though. Like me, you'll likely get whinged at: OMG!!! You've not updated/patched the kernel in all that time, you're so vulnerable, etc., blah Gordon ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability unmatched!
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Gordon Henderson wrote: Pah! I take your 1000 days and raise you: % uptime 18:18:11 up 1146 days, 5:20, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.03, 0.01 Other than as a test-bed some months back, this isn't an asterisk server though. No fair! Must be a server in active use for a true comparison. Curse you, anyway, for deflating my dreams of a record breaking uptime :) Like me, you'll likely get whinged at: OMG!!! You've not updated/patched the kernel in all that time, you're so vulnerable, etc., blah All of which are of course true and deserved. In fact a few months back we were actually hacked and pwned - root access achieved no less! For several days a battle of wits involving on both sides hidden directories full of RPMs and sshd's run on odd ports hiding themselves in the process list, killing processes as fast as they could be spawned, etc. In the end the intruders finally gave up and ran out of holes, at least as far as I know :):) j ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability unmatched!
The 100,000,000 calls without a crash are more impressive to me than the 1000 days of uptime. Mine crashes on crazy things like dynamic conferences, etc. :( -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff LaCoursiere Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 12:52 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Stability unmatched! On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Gordon Henderson wrote: Pah! I take your 1000 days and raise you: % uptime 18:18:11 up 1146 days, 5:20, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.03, 0.01 Other than as a test-bed some months back, this isn't an asterisk server though. No fair! Must be a server in active use for a true comparison. Curse you, anyway, for deflating my dreams of a record breaking uptime :) Like me, you'll likely get whinged at: OMG!!! You've not updated/patched the kernel in all that time, you're so vulnerable, etc., blah All of which are of course true and deserved. In fact a few months back we were actually hacked and pwned - root access achieved no less! For several days a battle of wits involving on both sides hidden directories full of RPMs and sshd's run on odd ports hiding themselves in the process list, killing processes as fast as they could be spawned, etc. In the end the intruders finally gave up and ran out of holes, at least as far as I know :):) j ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability unmatched!
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Danny Nicholas wrote: The 100,000,000 calls without a crash are more impressive to me than the 1000 days of uptime. Mine crashes on crazy things like dynamic conferences, etc. :( To be upfront the system is only running a prepaid AGI app and routing calls for post-paid customers. Can't vouch for more complex setups - all other full fledged PBX systems I have installed go down for other reasons like power. This box has been hosted by The Planet in Dallas, which I cannot recommend enough (no affiliation - just a happy customer). It is using the full suite of protocols (IAX, SIP, H323) and doing a lot of codec translation though. j ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability unmatched!
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Danny Nicholas wrote: The 100,000,000 calls without a crash are more impressive to me than the 1000 days of uptime. Mine crashes on crazy things like dynamic conferences, etc. :( To be upfront the system is only running a prepaid AGI app and routing calls for post-paid customers. Can't vouch for more complex setups - all other full fledged PBX systems I have installed go down for other reasons like power. This box has been hosted by The Planet in Dallas, which I cannot recommend enough (no affiliation - just a happy customer). That much uptime at The Planet in Dallas? I guess you're lucky: http://www.thewhir.com/marketwatch/060208_The_Planet_Explosion_Causes_Outages.cfm http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/06/01/explosion-at-the-planet-causes-major-outage/ -- Kristian Kielhofner http://blog.krisk.org http://www.submityoursip.com http://www.astlinux.org http://www.star2star.com ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability unmatched!
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: That much uptime at The Planet in Dallas? I guess you're lucky: http://www.thewhir.com/marketwatch/060208_The_Planet_Explosion_Causes_Outages.cfm http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/06/01/explosion-at-the-planet-causes-major-outage/ The explosion was apparently in Houston... ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability unmatched!
Kristian Kielhofner wrote: That much uptime at The Planet in Dallas? I guess you're lucky: http://www.thewhir.com/marketwatch/060208_The_Planet_Explosion_Causes_Outages.cfm http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/06/01/explosion-at-the-planet-causes-major-outage/ That's what happens when illegal aliens, er, Undocumented Americans, do all your contracting work. I saw a nasty electrical fire at a shopping center where illegals accidentally hit a clearly marked underground conduit running through a parking lot during a demo of a part of a building as part of a renovation. The electrical switching room no longer existed after the explosion/fire that followed, even the telephone pole with the cans on it burnt to a crisp. The insurance company wasn't too pleased with Undocumented Americans working on the site and initially refused to pay. They did pay but ended up putting the general contractor out of business in the end after the lawsuits. It was one of the most impressive events I've ever seen. -Ron ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability unmatched!
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, RE Kushner List Account wrote: That's what happens when illegal aliens, er, Undocumented Americans, do all your contracting work. But they taste like chicken! :) ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability unmatched!
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: That much uptime at The Planet in Dallas? I guess you're lucky: http://www.thewhir.com/marketwatch/060208_The_Planet_Explosion_Causes_Outages.cfm http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/06/01/explosion-at-the-planet-causes-major-outage/ The explosion was apparently in Houston... Oops! I don't know how I got that confused... Shame on me, and I was just in Texas last week! My apologies. -- Kristian Kielhofner http://blog.krisk.org http://www.submityoursip.com http://www.astlinux.org http://www.star2star.com ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability unmatched!
That's what happens when illegal aliens, er, Undocumented Americans, do all your contracting work. Could it be that all fires that ever happened in the US were caused by those guys ? .. I guess 1+1=5 then . On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Kristian Kielhofner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: That much uptime at The Planet in Dallas? I guess you're lucky: http://www.thewhir.com/marketwatch/060208_The_Planet_Explosion_Causes_Outages.cfm http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/06/01/explosion-at-the-planet-causes-major-outage/ The explosion was apparently in Houston... Oops! I don't know how I got that confused... Shame on me, and I was just in Texas last week! My apologies. -- Kristian Kielhofner http://blog.krisk.org http://www.submityoursip.com http://www.astlinux.org http://www.star2star.com ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability unmatched!
Hello Friends, Sorry to hijack the thread,but i am Asterisk beginner and am facing problem with eyebeam getting registered. If i am selecting Domain with register and receive incoming calls then i am not able to get register but if i remove the tick then i am able to register with the server but the other user cannot call me as i cannot receive incoming calls. Moreover what should i select for Send Outbound Via: I selected target domain. The other user gets registered at other place and can send and receive calls. If i dont put the tick for incoming calls i get register and can make outbound calls but in that too the other user can listen my voice but i cannot listen his voice. Is that a problem with voice settings in my laptop. The server is remotely located and has vicidialnow installed on it. Kindly solve my querry. Regards, Asterisk Beginner. On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I never did solve my puzzle as to how to kill a Linux process that seems to be deadlocked in kernel space, but thought I would report to the list that the server did manage to stay up and continue to process several thousand calls per day: ast% uptime 11:49:37 up 1000 days, 16:30, 1 user, load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00 ast% Since for the past four weeks I have forced my poor users to endure infrequent audible issues associated with this event, it is now to time to finally reboot. 1000 days (almost 1001) and close to 100,000,000 calls processed! Eat that, Microsoft. j ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability unmatched!
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 12:45:47PM +0530, amit mehta wrote: Hello Friends, Sorry to hijack the thread, So don't. Post a new message to the list rather than replying to an existing one. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Stability problems in Asterisk 1.4.18 (and other 1.4.xx versions)
I have several asterisk servers running a couple of different versions of 1.4. One of our severs in California is running 1.4.18 with the Dial Plan in Realtime mySQL. This server is storing voicemails in the database connecting via odbc. There are approximately 900 sip users registered at any given time. All of the SIP users are in the sip.conf file, which is extracted from the database. Any time this server gets to around 90 simutaneous calls (180 channels), the server is completely unstable. On some occasions, the asterisk process has continued to run, but is not processing any calls or registrations. On most occasions, the asterisk process crashes, restarts, crashes again, etc. During periods of lower traffic, the system appears to be stable.Going back to version 1.4.8 or 1.4.11 seems to be stable, but there is clearly a problem with 1.4.18 in this particular configuration. The OS is 64 bit debian. Has anyone seen something similar? _ Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Live. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093185mrt/direct/01/___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Stability problems in Asterisk 1.4.18 (and other 1.4.xx versions)
On Sep 4, 2008, at 4:12 AM, z_gringo wrote: I have several asterisk servers running a couple of different versions of 1.4. One of our severs in California is running 1.4.18 with the Dial Plan in Realtime mySQL. This server is storing voicemails in the database connecting via odbc. There are approximately 900 sip users registered at any given time. All of the SIP users are in the sip.conf file, which is extracted from the database. Any time this server gets to around 90 simutaneous calls (180 channels), the server is completely unstable. On some occasions, the asterisk process has continued to run, but is not processing any calls or registrations. On most occasions, the asterisk process crashes, restarts, crashes again, etc. During periods of lower traffic, the system appears to be stable. Going back to version 1.4.8 or 1.4.11 seems to be stable, but there is clearly a problem with 1.4.18 in this particular configuration. The OS is 64 bit debian. Has anyone seen something similar? We would be happy to help figure out what's going wrong on your system. However, the first step will have to be running the latest version. So, please give 1.4.22 a try. Then, please gather details and post them to http://bugs.digium.com/. If you'd like to discuss what you need to do to create the bug report, join #asterisk-bugs on the freenode IRC network. -- Russell Bryant Senior Software Engineer Open Source Team Lead Digium, Inc. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: RE : [Asterisk-Users] Stability of Asterisk with 2 x TDM400P cards (6analogue lines)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Jump to a TDM2402E for 6 POTS lines with hardware echocan. Only one IRQ used, and easy future extensions by adding modules. Have anyone here used a clone i.e. A1200P-01 (A1200P + 1 FXO100 module) ? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stability of Asterisk with 2 x TDM400P cards (6 analogue lines)
I have a client with an installation with 3 TDM400P cards. 6 FXO, 6FXS ports. I followed the txgain/rxgain instructions and now have no echo problems. The only problem I have now is the flaky network the SIP phones are accessing asterisk with. (you should see the wiring there, ugh). It's in a dell p4 desktop system. I don't recall the model, but I can find out when I give them a visit next (or if you'd like lspci output I can do that now..) Mike Jared Davison wrote: I would like to hear from anyone good or bad as what their experience has been in recent times with STABILITY of current builds of Asterisk and drivers for TDM400P. The sort of configuration is: 6 incoming POTS lines. ie. 2 TDM400P cards. I am not concerned with: price points, or the advantages or disadvantages of using POTS vs ISDN technology, but simply RELIABILITY stability of the Asterisk system associated interface hardware and drivers. Do people need to reboot their systems regularly? Thanks in advance. Jared ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE : RE : [Asterisk-Users] Stability of Asterisk with 2 x TDM400P cards (6analogue lines)
This card doesn't permit to support Mark Spencer's company and project. This card has no hardware echocan and use only the X100M and S110M clones modules. This two reason are sufficient for me. -Message d'origine- De : Krzysztof Drewicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 27 mars 2006 21:45 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: RE : [Asterisk-Users] Stability of Asterisk with 2 x TDM400P cards (6analogue lines) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Jump to a TDM2402E for 6 POTS lines with hardware echocan. Only one IRQ used, and easy future extensions by adding modules. Have anyone here used a clone i.e. A1200P-01 (A1200P + 1 FXO100 module) ? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stability of Asterisk with 2 x TDM400P cards (6 analogue lines)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am currently running asterisk 1.0.9 on a system with 2 TDM400P... I have had fairly good success with it across the board... my only issue is that I have monkeys who move stuff around and things get unplugged ;) Jared Davison wrote: I would like to hear from anyone good or bad as what their experience has been in recent times with STABILITY of current builds of Asterisk and drivers for TDM400P. The sort of configuration is: 6 incoming POTS lines. ie. 2 TDM400P cards. I am not concerned with: price points, or the advantages or disadvantages of using POTS vs ISDN technology, but simply RELIABILITY stability of the Asterisk system associated interface hardware and drivers. Do people need to reboot their systems regularly? Thanks in advance. Jared ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEI/COy9wPyZpnL2URAivDAJ4gbItZzCEbdT0K6Id8r6gCMTaGagCcC0k4 6Rsop4mQtvqsQr1pAcQtj+Y= =TZpG -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stability of Asterisk with 2 x TDM400P cards (6 analogue lines)
Jared Davison wrote: I would like to hear from anyone good or bad as what their experience has been in recent times with STABILITY of current builds of Asterisk and drivers for TDM400P. The sort of configuration is: 6 incoming POTS lines. ie. 2 TDM400P cards. I am not concerned with: price points, or the advantages or disadvantages of using POTS vs ISDN technology, but simply RELIABILITY stability of the Asterisk system associated interface hardware and drivers. Do people need to reboot their systems regularly? There are a number of folks that have reported using two TDM400's reliably, and a few that have indicated three working. One of the primary issues with using either two or three cards is finding a motherboard that allows the two cards to use different interrupts (to avoid shared interrupt issues). A second motherboard issue tends to be oriented around motherboards (mostly older ones now) that have a poor pci implementation (eg, north/south bridge chips on the motherboard). Alternatives to two TDM400's include using the TDM2400 or Sangoma A200D where only a single pci slot is used for 1 to 24 fxo's and/or fxs's. As of this moment, I have a single (low volume) system with both a TDM04b and A200D installed which will be used to compare the cards and provide a eval document addressing the advantages and disadvantages of each in certain production environments. The TDM2400 will be included in the mix when all the necessary cables and components are here. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE : [Asterisk-Users] Stability of Asterisk with 2 x TDM400P cards (6analogue lines)
Hi, Jump to a TDM2402E for 6 POTS lines with hardware echocan. Only one IRQ used, and easy future extensions by adding modules. Best Regards, Francois BERGERET, France. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Jared Davison Envoyé : vendredi 24 mars 2006 05:26 À : asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Objet : [Asterisk-Users] Stability of Asterisk with 2 x TDM400P cards (6analogue lines) I would like to hear from anyone good or bad as what their experience has been in recent times with STABILITY of current builds of Asterisk and drivers for TDM400P. The sort of configuration is: 6 incoming POTS lines. ie. 2 TDM400P cards. I am not concerned with: price points, or the advantages or disadvantages of using POTS vs ISDN technology, but simply RELIABILITY stability of the Asterisk system associated interface hardware and drivers. Do people need to reboot their systems regularly? Thanks in advance. Jared ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stability and motherboard questions with TE406P and TE410P
Wow, no responses in favor of either the TE406P or the TE410P w/ a motherboard recommendation. That's not a great sign for this endeavor. :(Thanks,KyleOn 3/22/06, George Pajari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kyle Sexton wrote: TE406P: - PRIs will go from up and working fine, to Provisioned, Down, Active after the server has been up for around 10 minutes, this may be related to rxfax and txfax being installed?Has anyone had an issue with this specific card?We have had this experience across multiple motherboardsEl Flynn wrote: While my reply probably doesn't help you any, I just want to say that I've been experiencing the same sort of problem. I've got a TE410P on a server with an Intel SE7210TP1-E Entry level server motherboard...We're running a TE406P in an IBM xSeries 330 and while we have not had system stability problems (system has crashed once in six months --gamma rays?), we are on our fourth card in about six months.Card 1 failed outright after a couple of monthsCard 2 never reliably handled DTMF unless vpmdtmfsupport was disabled and ran for a couple of months before it started screwing up DTMFdetection regardless of vpmdtmfsupportCard 3 seemed to be working fine for almost a month but now the talk-offis bad regardless of vpmdtmfsupport Card 4 is a newer version of the TE406 which is supposed to address theDTMF problems -- will be shutting down our server at midnight tonight toinstall the new TE406.If Card 4 doesn't do the trick we'll probably drop the idea of using TE4xx boards altogether and use Patton SmartNode 2400 PRI gateways instead.--George Pajari, netVOICE communications604 484 VOIP (484 8647 x102)Open Source VoIP/Telephony Specialists1 877 NET VOIP (638 8647 x102) www.netvoice.cawww.ip-centrex.cawww.digium.ca www.grandstream.ca www.sipura.ca www.snom.ca___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stability and motherboard questions with TE406P and TE410P
So what motherboard/card combos do people use for high volume asterisk servers that are stable? What I'd need would be a 4-port PRI card, preferebly with echo cancellation, and a motherboard/system that works well with that card. ---Thanks,KyleOn 3/23/06, Kyle Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow, no responses in favor of either the TE406P or the TE410P w/ a motherboard recommendation. That's not a great sign for this endeavor. :(Thanks, KyleOn 3/22/06, George Pajari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kyle Sexton wrote: TE406P: - PRIs will go from up and working fine, to Provisioned, Down, Active after the server has been up for around 10 minutes, this may be related to rxfax and txfax being installed?Has anyone had an issue with this specific card?We have had this experience across multiple motherboardsEl Flynn wrote: While my reply probably doesn't help you any, I just want to say that I've been experiencing the same sort of problem. I've got a TE410P on a server with an Intel SE7210TP1-E Entry level server motherboard...We're running a TE406P in an IBM xSeries 330 and while we have not had system stability problems (system has crashed once in six months --gamma rays?), we are on our fourth card in about six months.Card 1 failed outright after a couple of monthsCard 2 never reliably handled DTMF unless vpmdtmfsupport was disabled and ran for a couple of months before it started screwing up DTMFdetection regardless of vpmdtmfsupportCard 3 seemed to be working fine for almost a month but now the talk-offis bad regardless of vpmdtmfsupport Card 4 is a newer version of the TE406 which is supposed to address theDTMF problems -- will be shutting down our server at midnight tonight toinstall the new TE406.If Card 4 doesn't do the trick we'll probably drop the idea of using TE4xx boards altogether and use Patton SmartNode 2400 PRI gateways instead.--George Pajari, netVOICE communications604 484 VOIP (484 8647 x102)Open Source VoIP/Telephony Specialists1 877 NET VOIP (638 8647 x102) www.netvoice.ca www.ip-centrex.cawww.digium.ca www.grandstream.ca www.sipura.ca www.snom.ca___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Stability and motherboard questions with TE406Pand TE410P
If you want stable use external gateways and two servers set up to fail over to each other. Second best is two two T1 cards so you have something leftwhen one of them fails. If you want to bet your job ona 4 T1 card, Sangoma has excellent echo cancellation and a million hour MTBF. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle SextonSent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 3:09 PMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stability and motherboard questions with TE406Pand TE410P So what motherboard/card combos do people use for high volume asterisk servers that are stable? What I'd need would be a 4-port PRI card, preferebly with echo cancellation, and a motherboard/system that works well with that card. ---Thanks,Kyle On 3/23/06, Kyle Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow, no responses in favor of either the TE406P or the TE410P w/ a motherboard recommendation. That's not a great sign for this endeavor. :(Thanks, Kyle On 3/22/06, George Pajari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kyle Sexton wrote: TE406P: - PRIs will go from up and working fine, to "Provisioned, Down, Active" after the server has been up for around 10 minutes, this may be related to rxfax and txfax being installed?Has anyone had an issue with this specific card?We have had this experience across multiple motherboardsEl Flynn wrote: While my reply probably doesn't help you any, I just want to say that I've been experiencing the same sort of problem. I've got a TE410P on a server with an Intel SE7210TP1-E Entry level server motherboard...We're running a TE406P in an IBM xSeries 330 and while we have not had system stability problems (system has crashed once in six months --gamma rays?), we are on our fourth card in about six months.Card 1 failed outright after a couple of monthsCard 2 never reliably handled DTMF unless vpmdtmfsupport was disabled and ran for a couple of months before it started screwing up DTMFdetection regardless of vpmdtmfsupportCard 3 seemed to be working fine for almost a month but now the talk-offis bad regardless of vpmdtmfsupport Card 4 is a newer version of the TE406 which is supposed to address theDTMF problems -- will be shutting down our server at midnight tonight toinstall the new TE406.If Card 4 doesn't do the trick we'll probably drop the idea of using TE4xx boards altogether and use Patton SmartNode 2400 PRI gateways instead.--George Pajari, netVOICE communications604 484 VOIP (484 8647 x102)Open Source VoIP/Telephony Specialists1 877 NET VOIP (638 8647 x102) www.netvoice.ca www.ip-centrex.cawww.digium.ca www.grandstream.ca www.sipura.ca www.snom.ca___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Stability of Asterisk with 2 x TDM400P cards (6 analogue lines)
I would like to hear from anyone good or bad as what their experience has been in recent times with STABILITY of current builds of Asterisk and drivers for TDM400P. The sort of configuration is: 6 incoming POTS lines. ie. 2 TDM400P cards. I am not concerned with: price points, or the advantages or disadvantages of using POTS vs ISDN technology, but simply RELIABILITY stability of the Asterisk system associated interface hardware and drivers. Do people need to reboot their systems regularly? Thanks in advance. Jared ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stability of Asterisk with 2 x TDM400P cards (6 analogue lines)
We ran a system at one site with 2 TDM400's in it to hook up to 8 analog mobile phone gateways. Asterisk was much more reliable than the analog phone gateways, but we still rebooted it once a week. Running on a dual athlon 1800 we picked up very cheaply. regards, Paul Hales Technical Manager AsteriskIT Jared Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to hear from anyone good or bad as what their experience has been in recent times with STABILITY of current builds of Asterisk and drivers for TDM400P. The sort of configuration is: 6 incoming POTS lines. ie. 2 TDM400P cards. I am not concerned with: price points, or the advantages or disadvantages of using POTS vs ISDN technology, but simply RELIABILITY stability of the Asterisk system associated interface hardware and drivers. Do people need to reboot their systems regularly? Thanks in advance. Jared ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Stability and motherboard questions with TE406P and TE410P
I am having a problem with asterisk not being stable enough for production use. I have two cards, the digium TE406P, and the TE410P. The TE410P is the primary card that I am using but I would like to move to the TE406P for the echo cancellation and more flexibility of PCI slots available. General config info:3 PRIs, configured as such:span=1,2,0,esf,b8zsspan=2,0,0,esf,b8zsspan=3,1,0,esf,b8zsspan=4,0,0,esf,b8zsI have modified the 2 and 1 timing source declarations to several different configurations but am unsure what the proper way to configure that is. Is my current setup correct? Both span one and span three have timing on the line from the carrier. Rundown of issues seen with these cards:TE410P:- zttest will never report 100% for me across different motherboards (Supermicro P8SCT, Dell 850)- Crash/instability of about once per two weeks where I have to power cycle the server, i.e. phone calls stop working and a reboot fixes itTE406P:- zttest runs flawlessly on this card, 100% across the board- PRIs will go from up and working fine, to Provisioned, Down, Active after the server has been up for around 10 minutes, this may be related to rxfax and txfax being installed? Has anyone had an issue with this specific card? We have had this experience across multiple motherboards. After working with two different cards and across multiple motherboards I am starting to lose faith on the stability of the Asterisk platform, but I know others are having lots of success. My boss is looking for something that says With the TE406P, we have had zero issues on X motherboard, does anyone have any recommendations? Has anyone else had stability issues with the digium 4 port cards? Thanks,Kyle ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stability and motherboard questions with TE406P and TE410P
Kyle Sexton wrote: TE410P: - zttest will never report 100% for me across different motherboards (Supermicro P8SCT, Dell 850) - Crash/instability of about once per two weeks where I have to power cycle the server, i.e. phone calls stop working and a reboot fixes it TE406P: - zttest runs flawlessly on this card, 100% across the board - PRIs will go from up and working fine, to Provisioned, Down, Active after the server has been up for around 10 minutes, this may be related to rxfax and txfax being installed? Has anyone had an issue with this specific card? We have had this experience across multiple motherboards. After working with two different cards and across multiple motherboards I am starting to lose faith on the stability of the Asterisk platform, but I know others are having lots of success. My boss is looking for something that says With the TE406P, we have had zero issues on X motherboard, does anyone have any recommendations? Has anyone else had stability issues with the digium 4 port cards? Kyle, While my reply probably doesn't help you any, I just want to say that I've been experiencing the same sort of problem. I've got a TE410P on a server with an Intel SE7210TP1-E Entry level server motherboard; we're connecting the card to four Rhino T1 channel banks. I'm also experiencing the random crash issue, albeit perhaps not as frequent. Some symptoms: - server hangs and is generally bogged down. Even when I'm at the console in front of the server typing one key on the keyboard takes 4-5 seconds to get a response - random noise, echo and badness starts to appear on the phones connected to the channel banks. This is because something's eating up the CPU processing power and the server isn't able to service the 1k interrupts the zap card requires One of the things I've had to do, as a jerry-rig type of fix is to have Asterisk restart every day at 3am. This has lengthened the duration in-between server crashes, but isn't really a good solution. What we're going to do is to scrap the TE410 and use Sangoma's A104 card. In the same installation, we've got a server (same _identical_ specs as the one above) with one A104 -- two incoming PRIs and two outgoing to an Avaya PABX. This one has not crashed since it went into production last august. This is probably just a rant, but I thought you'd like to know that you're not the only one struggling with the TE410 cards. Hope you'll be able to get your setup fixed soon, good luck. Cheers, Flynn ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stability and motherboard questions with TE406P and TE410P
Kyle Sexton wrote: TE406P: - PRIs will go from up and working fine, to Provisioned, Down, Active after the server has been up for around 10 minutes, this may be related to rxfax and txfax being installed? Has anyone had an issue with this specific card? We have had this experience across multiple motherboards El Flynn wrote: While my reply probably doesn't help you any, I just want to say that I've been experiencing the same sort of problem. I've got a TE410P on a server with an Intel SE7210TP1-E Entry level server motherboard... We're running a TE406P in an IBM xSeries 330 and while we have not had system stability problems (system has crashed once in six months -- gamma rays?), we are on our fourth card in about six months. Card 1 failed outright after a couple of months Card 2 never reliably handled DTMF unless vpmdtmfsupport was disabled and ran for a couple of months before it started screwing up DTMF detection regardless of vpmdtmfsupport Card 3 seemed to be working fine for almost a month but now the talk-off is bad regardless of vpmdtmfsupport Card 4 is a newer version of the TE406 which is supposed to address the DTMF problems -- will be shutting down our server at midnight tonight to install the new TE406. If Card 4 doesn't do the trick we'll probably drop the idea of using TE4xx boards altogether and use Patton SmartNode 2400 PRI gateways instead. -- George Pajari, netVOICE communications604 484 VOIP (484 8647 x102) Open Source VoIP/Telephony Specialists 1 877 NET VOIP (638 8647 x102) www.netvoice.ca www.ip-centrex.ca www.digium.ca www.grandstream.ca www.sipura.ca www.snom.ca ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Stability with the Supura SIP Units
Hi, I would like to know if those using the Sipura SIP units with Asterisk have found them to be stable. I ask because the Grandstream units simply have not improved their stability considerably, and we are now in search of an alternate to the ATA186. We want to know if anybody has seen the sipura unit stop registering (like what happens with the Grandstream phones). We have ordered some sipura units for lab testing but would also like some feedback from those on the list. Feel free to answer directly if you feel this discussion is not appropriate here. Thanks, Andres
