Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
Somewhat off-topic, but I'll mention briefly that it's a multi-city service and you can get more info at http://www.trafficondemand.ca/ I believe that it's still considered beta for non-Toronto. You have Kitchener/Waterloo! Yay dials Oh. No traffic. Boo-urns. Hehe...working on it ;) I'd definitely like to know when you start populating the traffic part of K/W (and separate out london, it's a poor choice to group. Kitchener/Wwaterloo/Cambridge sure... but London? That's a common Torontonian thing to do. :-) Agreed. I advised the client against that, during design, but here we are. Hopefully he requests us to change this soon. On an unrelated note, I always find the Toronto is the centre of the universe attitude quite amusing. Some clients who call us for DSL qualifications, when asked Where are you located? respond with Bathurst Shephard. No sir, what city and province? -- Erik Caneris Tel: 647-723-6365 Fax: 647-723-5365 Toll-free: 1-866-827-0021 www.caneris.com ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
On December 2, 2008 07:55:00 pm Erik (Caneris) wrote: Nuance would say no :) I'd say maybe. Call up +14164854854, it's a recent project we did for a That's pretty cool! Is there any SIP or IAX access to this (aside from dialing a POTS number) ? -A. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival (MRCP)
John: However, that doesn't mean that it shouldn't be implemented. This is an area in which I think there is a disproportionate amount of non- discussion, since many people who would use or be interested in MRCP simply don't participate in the Asterisk project because it doesn't meet their needs out of the gate. Therefore, we see few people asking for it, in a self-fulfilling loop. Is MRCP something that is significantly lacking in Asterisk? Is it a difficult protocol to implement? Is there anyone here on -dev with the experience to do it? I don't know whether it's significantly lacking nor how difficult it is to implement, but it's certainly nice to have. It would increase the appeal of Asterisk to those used to working with MRCP-compatible resources in other platforms. That said, it can be argued that it's best to keep Asterisk simple and free of extra features. If its core purpose does not consist of interfacing with ASR and TTS engines, then some would argue that it's best to keep such features to a separate platform. Regards, -- Erik Caneris Tel: 647-723-6365 Fax: 647-723-5365 Toll-free: 1-866-827-0021 www.caneris.com ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
Thanks. Unfortunately no SIP/IAX access at this time, only by dialing one of the TNs. However, I'll bring it up with the client and see if they'd want us to configure that. Somewhat off-topic, but I'll mention briefly that it's a multi-city service and you can get more info at http://www.trafficondemand.ca/ I believe that it's still considered beta for non-Toronto. Regards, -- Erik Caneris Tel: 647-723-6365 Fax: 647-723-5365 Toll-free: 1-866-827-0021 www.caneris.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 10:43 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival On December 2, 2008 07:55:00 pm Erik (Caneris) wrote: Nuance would say no :) I'd say maybe. Call up +14164854854, it's a recent project we did for a That's pretty cool! Is there any SIP or IAX access to this (aside from dialing a POTS number) ? -A. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
On December 4, 2008 02:14:52 pm Erik (Caneris) wrote: Thanks. Unfortunately no SIP/IAX access at this time, only by dialing one of the TNs. However, I'll bring it up with the client and see if they'd want us to configure that. Definitely would be cool, you don't lose any ad revenue and I don't have to use up my minutes. Somewhat off-topic, but I'll mention briefly that it's a multi-city service and you can get more info at http://www.trafficondemand.ca/ I believe that it's still considered beta for non-Toronto. You have Kitchener/Waterloo! Yay dials Oh. No traffic. Boo-urns. I'd definitely like to know when you start populating the traffic part of K/W (and separate out london, it's a poor choice to group. Kitchener/Wwaterloo/Cambridge sure... but London? That's a common Torontonian thing to do. :-) -A. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival (MRCP)
On Dec 2, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Erik (Caneris) wrote: Erik - Have you found RealSpeak to be worth the cost? Actually my last note was probably a bit misleading because in the particular cases I mentioned RealSpeak, the platform wasn't Asterisk and Cepstral wasn't even on the radar. Can Cepstral, with the hourly $ spent on tuning, be made to be a reasonable substitute? Nuance would say no :) Of course, and perhaps they're right in some circumstances. But I don't think I'd be able to predict in what percentage of cases that's true. I'd say maybe. Call up +14164854854, it's a recent project we did for a client using Asterisk, Cepstral, and a lot of custom code. It's a free phone-in service that allows folks to get local traffic, weather, news, commuter transit, border crossing wait times, and more. There's obviously quite a bit of domain-specific, dynamic, constantly changing text, so this is certainly an example of pushing it to the max. Just think of all the street names it has the potential to mispronounce. It's a work in progress, but it's very promising. Definitely an example of a lot of hourly $ spent on tuning as you put it. Sounds decent. Some inter-word delays might be in order, but I'm sure that's how you're earning your keep. My results: The RealSpeak sample was more clear than the Cepstral. Depends on what you mean by more clear. As Brent Davidson mentions, make sure you're comparing 8khz to 8khz, or similar. If you mean it pronounces things better, then I agree. Of course, my test was hardly scientific. But I re-tested at 8khz for both voices, and both myself and someone else in the room (a non- expert) were not overwhelmed with the quality difference between the two voices. Totally subjective, but an apples-to-apples comparison. That being said, I'd really be interested in hearing if anyone has done a RealSpeak-to-Asterisk conduit. I wasn't able to quickly uncover how they interact with third-party systems - is it VoIP? A C library? Some sort of HTTP socket? The more methods we can get working with Asterisk, the better, because not every implementation of a voice system has the same requirements... MRCP is the standard for interfacing with ASR and TTS engines (including RealSpeak) in other platforms. Brief Googling reveals a previous flame war on asterisk-dev regarding MRCP. I have no idea if it's implemented in Asterisk now. No, it is not currently implemented. Note, though, that someone in another post mentioned that they had built an app_realspeak, and I'll try to follow up with that. However, that doesn't mean that it shouldn't be implemented. This is an area in which I think there is a disproportionate amount of non- discussion, since many people who would use or be interested in MRCP simply don't participate in the Asterisk project because it doesn't meet their needs out of the gate. Therefore, we see few people asking for it, in a self-fulfilling loop. Is MRCP something that is significantly lacking in Asterisk? Is it a difficult protocol to implement? Is there anyone here on -dev with the experience to do it? JT --- John Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]+1-256-428-6083 Asterisk Open Source Community Director ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
I'm about to begin working on an ivr project to do database backed scheduling. I would like to use text to speech in some places. What are the differences in using festival vs. Cepstral? How are they similar, how are they different? Is one really better than the other? How and Why? Thanks, Eric ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
Which non-english language do you have in mind ? Both should differ on this. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
In my experience cepstral has always had much nicer sounding voices, but I haven't tinkered too much with either. There is a reason one is pay and one free though J I believe cepstral is still offering demo's, I'd download each and see which one gives you the performance you're looking for. Thanks, Matt G : http://www.voipphreak.ca http://www.voipphreak.ca : http://www.ratemydialplan.com http://www.ratemydialplan.com : http://www.asterisk-jobs.com http://www.asterisk-jobs.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fort Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 3:53 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival I'm about to begin working on an ivr project to do database backed scheduling. I would like to use text to speech in some places. What are the differences in using festival vs. Cepstral? How are they similar, how are they different? Is one really better than the other? How and Why? Thanks, Eric ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
Festival is a free voice that sounds like a machine. Cepstral is a fee based human voice ($30 USD per voice per CPU). They are similar in that they both produce mechanically timed output. IMO, you should use festival if this isn't a customer based interface. If it is a CBI, use cepstral and if you don't like it, recreate the wav files it plays (The English language is only based on about 1700 sounds). Cepstral is your choice if your IVR is going to be asterisk interlaced since all asterisk voices are Cepstral Allison out of the can. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fort Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 2:53 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival I'm about to begin working on an ivr project to do database backed scheduling. I would like to use text to speech in some places. What are the differences in using festival vs. Cepstral? How are they similar, how are they different? Is one really better than the other? How and Why? Thanks, Eric ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
Festival sucks. Cepstral sucks less. The End. In my experience, it depends on the specific app, who's paying, and who's going to be the victim, err...user listening to it. This is the difference between domain/context specific phrases/words to pronounce vs. general stuff, a client on a tight budget or not, the users being internal vs. customers/public, and so on. Cepstral is a $30 TTS engine. It's not too bad, but you'll find mostly things like Realspeak deployed in large scale professional deployments, such as those used by the big boys, telcos/banks/airlines. We deployed Cepstral recently for a client, for a phone-in service used by the general public, and I can tell you that there was quite a bit of work in teaching it with SSML how to pronounce stuff. Again, it really depends on your specific situation. You should definitely try out those two at least and also ensure that the client/stakeholders are aware of limitations. There's a certain expectation of it will speak perfectly these days, followed by disappointment and blame when reality hits them. Regards, -- Erik Caneris Tel: 647-723-6365 Fax: 647-723-5365 Toll-free: 1-866-827-0021 www.caneris.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fort [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 3:52 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival I'm about to begin working on an ivr project to do database backed scheduling. I would like to use text to speech in some places. What are the differences in using festival vs. Cepstral? How are they similar, how are they different? Is one really better than the other? How and Why? Thanks, Eric ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fort Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 3:53 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival I'm about to begin working on an ivr project to do database backed scheduling. I would like to use text to speech in some places. What are the differences in using festival vs. Cepstral? How are they similar, how are they different? Is one really better than the other? How and Why? On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Matt Gibson wrote: In my experience cepstral has always had much nicer sounding voices, but I haven't tinkered too much with either. There is a reason one is pay and one free though J I believe cepstral is still offering demo's, I'd download each and see which one gives you the performance you're looking for. Way back in the day, festival was awful and Cepstral as almost acceptable. Now, especially with their Allison font, Cepstral is good enough than you can't always tell the difference -- even without using their markup language. The fit with the live Allison's prompts included with Asterisk is great. It's fantastic for demos. You can refine the wording of your prompts before committing to live talent. You may decide that the tts prompts are good enough. I invoke swift (Cepstral's command line tts tool) to create my prompts from my makefile so it's easy to make changes and everything is documented. Thanks in advance, Steve Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000 ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
On Dec 2, 2008, at 9:41 AM, Erik (Caneris) wrote: Festival sucks. Cepstral sucks less. The End. In my experience, it depends on the specific app, who's paying, and who's going to be the victim, err...user listening to it. This is the difference between domain/context specific phrases/words to pronounce vs. general stuff, a client on a tight budget or not, the users being internal vs. customers/public, and so on. Cepstral is a $30 TTS engine. It's not too bad, but you'll find mostly things like Realspeak deployed in large scale professional deployments, such as those used by the big boys, telcos/banks/ airlines. We deployed Cepstral recently for a client, for a phone-in service used by the general public, and I can tell you that there was quite a bit of work in teaching it with SSML how to pronounce stuff. Again, it really depends on your specific situation. You should definitely try out those two at least and also ensure that the client/stakeholders are aware of limitations. There's a certain expectation of it will speak perfectly these days, followed by disappointment and blame when reality hits them. Regards, -- Erik Caneris Tel: 647-723-6365 Fax: 647-723-5365 Toll-free: 1-866-827-0021 www.caneris.com Erik - Have you found RealSpeak to be worth the cost? Can Cepstral, with the hourly $ spent on tuning, be made to be a reasonable substitute? It's been a while since I did a head-to-head comparison between Cepstral and (anything else) so I did a quick demo of the RealSpeak Host-based telecom app: http://www.nuance.com/realspeak/demo/ (contact data required) and the Cepstral demo: http://www.cepstral.com/demos/ I used the Jill (default - 8khz) for RealSpeak and Allison (default) for the tests, and played back the same phrase: Congratulations. You have successfully installed and executed the Asterisk open source PBX. My results: The RealSpeak sample was more clear than the Cepstral. But by how much? I should probably test with more than just that one phrase, but I can't say I'd prefer RealSpeak significantly over Cepstral in this extremely limited case. Does RealSpeak get better long-term test results and comprehension/retention? I know that Cepstral is $50/port - the RealSpeak pricing is un-findable, which tells me that it's significantly higher than Cepstral. (Personal peeve: at least put your list pricing on the website! grumble) That being said, I'd really be interested in hearing if anyone has done a RealSpeak-to-Asterisk conduit. I wasn't able to quickly uncover how they interact with third-party systems - is it VoIP? A C library? Some sort of HTTP socket? The more methods we can get working with Asterisk, the better, because not every implementation of a voice system has the same requirements... JT --- John Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]+1-256-428-6083 Asterisk Open Source Community Director ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
John Todd wrote: Erik - Have you found RealSpeak to be worth the cost? Can Cepstral, with the hourly $ spent on tuning, be made to be a reasonable substitute? It's been a while since I did a head-to-head comparison between Cepstral and (anything else) so I did a quick demo of the RealSpeak Host-based telecom app: http://www.nuance.com/realspeak/demo/ (contact data required) and the Cepstral demo: http://www.cepstral.com/demos/ I used the Jill (default - 8khz) for RealSpeak and Allison (default) for the tests, and played back the same phrase: Congratulations. You have successfully installed and executed the Asterisk open source PBX. My results: The RealSpeak sample was more clear than the Cepstral. But by how much? I should probably test with more than just that one phrase, but I can't say I'd prefer RealSpeak significantly over Cepstral in this extremely limited case. Does RealSpeak get better long-term test results and comprehension/retention? I know that Cepstral is $50/port - the RealSpeak pricing is un-findable, which tells me that it's significantly higher than Cepstral. (Personal peeve: at least put your list pricing on the website! grumble) That being said, I'd really be interested in hearing if anyone has done a RealSpeak-to-Asterisk conduit. I wasn't able to quickly uncover how they interact with third-party systems - is it VoIP? A C library? Some sort of HTTP socket? The more methods we can get working with Asterisk, the better, because not every implementation of a voice system has the same requirements... JT --- John Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]+1-256-428-6083 Asterisk Open Source Community Director This may not be a perfectly fair comparison. Looks like you're comparing the RealSpeak 8khz voice to the Cepstral default Allison which is NOT 8khz. If you look on the Cepstral site you'll see Desktop Voices and Telephony Voices. The Cepstral Telephony voices are 8khz, and I suspect their quality is on par with RealSpeak. I recently licensed the Allison-8Khz voice for some of the admin functions on my companies phone systems where I didn't want to record prompts and Flite was too robotic sounding. The Allison-8khz voice is virtually indistinguishable from the pre-recorded Allison prompts, except for maybe some minor differences in inflection. I was thoroughly impressed with the quality though. For the most part it sounds like you've hired Allison to record custom prompts. The Allison Desktop voice is OK, but sounds sort of like Allison is taking through a spinning fan blade. When you're doing TTS comparisons be sure you're comparing apples to apples and not peaches to apricots. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Todd a écrit : My results: The RealSpeak sample was more clear than the Cepstral. But by how much? I should probably test with more than just that one phrase, but I can't say I'd prefer RealSpeak significantly over Cepstral in this extremely limited case. Does RealSpeak get better long-term test results and comprehension/retention? I know that Cepstral is $50/port - the RealSpeak pricing is un-findable, which tells me that it's significantly higher than Cepstral. (Personal peeve: at least put your list pricing on the website! grumble) For French language, I find the quality of RealSpeak to be very good. Festival was unusable (for French); I tried Cepstral but was deceived. The price of RealSpeak is not far from an order of magnitude higher compared to Cepstral. That being said, I'd really be interested in hearing if anyone has done a RealSpeak-to-Asterisk conduit. I wasn't able to quickly uncover how they interact with third-party systems - is it VoIP? A C library? Some sort of HTTP socket? The more methods we can get working with Asterisk, the better, because not every implementation of a voice system has the same requirements... That's a C library. I bought RealSpeak SDK, and developed app_realspeak for Asterisk (1.2, then ported to 1.4). I've been using it since 2005 for my IVR projects, including telcos/banks/airlines :) Regards, - -- Jean-Denis Girard SysNux Systèmes Linux en Polynésie française http://www.sysnux.pf/ Tél: +689 50 10 40 / GSM: +689 79 75 27 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAkk10kAACgkQuu7Rv+oOo/gK2ACfXedtJ8k7cmVRpOqTU+rYpbVy PcIAnjbXbDPuicE29673TQY3CritOksQ =vvB7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This has been an interesting discussion about cepstral. My question is why it doesn't appear to be available for 1.6 yet? This thread has piqued my interest in the product but a visit to Digium's website seems to point to it being a product for Asterisk 1.6. Barry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJNdMwCFu3bIiwtTARAqqQAJ9mXLMyUCzI+UCiF3/1j4kuGE32ewCgpS2r 8IwCpap3Q1puuP4LZScVV00= =4Cdn -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
Jean-Denis Girard wrote: The price of RealSpeak is not far from an order of magnitude higher compared to Cepstral. Only an order of magnitude? They've reduced it a lot then. :-) Steve ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
Erik - Have you found RealSpeak to be worth the cost? Actually my last note was probably a bit misleading because in the particular cases I mentioned RealSpeak, the platform wasn't Asterisk and Cepstral wasn't even on the radar. Can Cepstral, with the hourly $ spent on tuning, be made to be a reasonable substitute? Nuance would say no :) I'd say maybe. Call up +14164854854, it's a recent project we did for a client using Asterisk, Cepstral, and a lot of custom code. It's a free phone-in service that allows folks to get local traffic, weather, news, commuter transit, border crossing wait times, and more. There's obviously quite a bit of domain-specific, dynamic, constantly changing text, so this is certainly an example of pushing it to the max. Just think of all the street names it has the potential to mispronounce. It's a work in progress, but it's very promising. Definitely an example of a lot of hourly $ spent on tuning as you put it. My results: The RealSpeak sample was more clear than the Cepstral. Depends on what you mean by more clear. As Brent Davidson mentions, make sure you're comparing 8khz to 8khz, or similar. If you mean it pronounces things better, then I agree. That being said, I'd really be interested in hearing if anyone has done a RealSpeak-to-Asterisk conduit. I wasn't able to quickly uncover how they interact with third-party systems - is it VoIP? A C library? Some sort of HTTP socket? The more methods we can get working with Asterisk, the better, because not every implementation of a voice system has the same requirements... MRCP is the standard for interfacing with ASR and TTS engines (including RealSpeak) in other platforms. Brief Googling reveals a previous flame war on asterisk-dev regarding MRCP. I have no idea if it's implemented in Asterisk now. Regards, -- Erik Caneris Tel: 647-723-6365 Fax: 647-723-5365 Toll-free: 1-866-827-0021 www.caneris.com ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] cepstral vs festival
2008/12/3 Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jean-Denis Girard wrote: The price of RealSpeak is not far from an order of magnitude higher compared to Cepstral. Only an order of magnitude? They've reduced it a lot then. :-) 1 order of magnitude = x10 Then, shall we say 500$/simultaneous voice ? Steve ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
