Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.comwrote: Jonathan Thurman wrote: Any chance that 64 bit Linux will be supported? There is a small chance; I've done some work in the past week while traveling to attempt solve the 64-bit problems, and I fixed some of them but not all of them, so it still won't successfully FAX on a 64-bit machine. I'll be continuing to work on it while traveling home, and hopefully we'll have some beta-quality releases along with the 32-bit releases next week. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kpflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com www.asterisk.org ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users I'm getting this error (can't indicate condition 19) on a fresh install of asterisk 1.6.1.11 with the res_fax / res_fax_digium downloaded on Friday of last week. Any update on when the newest FFA modules will be released, or if there is any way I can help to test the new modules? -- Thanks, --Warren Selby http://www.selbytech.com ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 9:03 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19? Any update on the new FFA modules, as this was two weeks ago? Yeah... AstriCon got in the way :-) This is on my agenda for this afternoon, so hopefully we'll see some progress shortly. Any progress on new Fax for Asterisk modules? Last update here was October 19 as quoted above; Original discussion is now over six weeks old. FAA Download Selector still shows modules for 1.6.1.4 as the latest available. Thanks. sl ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
Scott L. Lykens wrote: Any progress on new Fax for Asterisk modules? Last update here was October 19 as quoted above; Original discussion is now over six weeks old. FAA Download Selector still shows modules for 1.6.1.4 as the latest available. Yes, there has been progress. The new modules are undergoing testing in Digium's Product Quality department and (should they not have any regressions) will be released next week. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kpflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com www.asterisk.org ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com wrote: Scott L. Lykens wrote: Any progress on new Fax for Asterisk modules? Last update here was October 19 as quoted above; Original discussion is now over six weeks old. FAA Download Selector still shows modules for 1.6.1.4 as the latest available. Yes, there has been progress. The new modules are undergoing testing in Digium's Product Quality department and (should they not have any regressions) will be released next week. Any chance that 64 bit Linux will be supported? -Jonathan ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
Jonathan Thurman wrote: Any chance that 64 bit Linux will be supported? There is a small chance; I've done some work in the past week while traveling to attempt solve the 64-bit problems, and I fixed some of them but not all of them, so it still won't successfully FAX on a 64-bit machine. I'll be continuing to work on it while traveling home, and hopefully we'll have some beta-quality releases along with the 32-bit releases next week. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kpflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com www.asterisk.org ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
Scott L. Lykens wrote: -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 10:21 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19? Any update on when the new FFA modules will be out? Still working on fixing bugs. Hopefully tomorrow. Any update on the new FFA modules, as this was two weeks ago? Yeah... AstriCon got in the way :-) This is on my agenda for this afternoon, so hopefully we'll see some progress shortly. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kpflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com www.asterisk.org ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 10:21 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19? Any update on when the new FFA modules will be out? Still working on fixing bugs. Hopefully tomorrow. Any update on the new FFA modules, as this was two weeks ago? Thanks. sl ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming I am working on getting this situation resolved and should have new releases of FFA out at the end of this week, but in the meantime if you want to use FFA with T.38 support you'll have to use one of the versions of Asterisk listed on the download selector page. Any update on when the new FFA modules will be out? Thanks. sl ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
Scott L. Lykens wrote: -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming I am working on getting this situation resolved and should have new releases of FFA out at the end of this week, but in the meantime if you want to use FFA with T.38 support you'll have to use one of the versions of Asterisk listed on the download selector page. Any update on when the new FFA modules will be out? Still working on fixing bugs. Hopefully tomorrow. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kpflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com www.asterisk.org ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of David Backeberg Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 10:42 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19? On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:26 PM, sean darcy seandar...@gmail.com wrote: In my attempts to set up digium fax I get an odd warning: -- Executing [...@capture-fax:2] ReceiveFAX(SIP/173-b53023e8, /var/spool/asterisk/fax/20090921_1806.tif) in new stack -- Channel 'SIP/173-b53023e8' receiving fax '/var/spool/asterisk/fax/20090921_1806.tif' [Sep 21 18:06:37] WARNING[5149]: chan_sip.c:5561 sip_indicate: Don't know how to indicate condition 19 -- Channel 'SIP/173-b53023e8' fax session '7' started Is there some list of these conditions? Should I care? I get a lot of fax messages that seem extraneous so I usually ignore them. There is already an open ticket want an SVN fix for one that I found particularly annoying. I'm talking about one that repeatedly talks about a missing segment or something like that, and it happens a gazillion times per fax. A gazillion being way more than I want it to. Did the fax come through okay? If yes I recommend ignoring the error unless you want to be particularly diligent and dig through the bug tracker to see if it's already been fixed. I am getting the same error as the OP when trying to receive a fax with a T.38 capable provider. The fax never comes through and usually fails with No Carrier from the sender. There does not appear to be a relevant bug in the tracker. As we are eliminating our PRI soon I am trying to get faxing via T.38 working properly. I'm not interested in running Callweaver next to Asterisk just to support fax. :/ Any insight into this error would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! sl ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
Scott L. Lykens wrote: As we are eliminating our PRI soon I am trying to get faxing via T.38 working properly. I'm not interested in running Callweaver next to Asterisk just to support fax. :/ Any insight into this error would be greatly appreciated. This is occurring because the current versions of Asterisk have an updated T.38 API that the current res_fax/res_fax_digium modules do not yet support (this is why the current versions of Asterisk are not listed on the Fax For Asterisk download selector page yet). I am working on getting this situation resolved and should have new releases of FFA out at the end of this week, but in the meantime if you want to use FFA with T.38 support you'll have to use one of the versions of Asterisk listed on the download selector page. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kpflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com www.asterisk.org ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
Kevin P. Fleming wrote: I am working on getting this situation resolved and should have new releases of FFA out at the end of this week, but in the meantime if you want to use FFA with T.38 support you'll have to use one of the versions of Asterisk listed on the download selector page. A note somewhere would have been nice explaining this. I recently tried the Digium Fax to determine if a client should buy some licenses, but after seeing it reject invites for T.38 on incoming calls and never try to switch for outgoing, I figured it was just broken in that regard. Regards, -- Trevor Peirce Digital Conceptions Canada http://www.digitalcon.ca 1-888-606-3030 / 250-391-7822 ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
Trevor Peirce wrote: A note somewhere would have been nice explaining this. I recently tried the Digium Fax to determine if a client should buy some licenses, but after seeing it reject invites for T.38 on incoming calls and never try to switch for outgoing, I figured it was just broken in that regard. Where would you suggest this note be placed? We've tried to make our documentation as clear as possible that the download selector is the canonical place to get the proper FFA modules for any given version of Asterisk, and the fact that the newer versions of Asterisk are not listed there should have raised a red flag in people's minds that they might not be supported. I'm open to suggestions on how to make this better, but it should (hopefully) be a one time occurrence caused by the major changes we had to make in T.38 support to fix a number of issues. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kpflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com www.asterisk.org ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Where would you suggest this note be placed? We've tried to make our documentation as clear as possible that the download selector is the canonical place to get the proper FFA modules for any given version of Asterisk, and the fact that the newer versions of Asterisk are not listed there should have raised a red flag in people's minds that they might not be supported. I'm open to suggestions on how to make this better, but it should (hopefully) be a one time occurrence caused by the major changes we had to make in T.38 support to fix a number of issues. Yes, I was concerned when I noticed my version of asterisk was not listed. However, I took a leap of faith that if it supports some 1.6.1.x releases, it would support them all. My assumption was that they were simply not released when the most recent Fax app was released. Usually minor version releases don't break APIs :) Adding an option to the selector for the more recent asterisk versions and then displaying a note indicating that the G.711 functionality is working but the T.38 support is temporarily broken would have been an excellent place to clear up the issue. Thanks for caring :) -- Trevor Peirce Digital Conceptions Canada http://www.digitalcon.ca 1-888-606-3030 / 250-391-7822 ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
In my attempts to set up digium fax I get an odd warning: -- Executing [...@capture-fax:2] ReceiveFAX(SIP/173-b53023e8, /var/spool/asterisk/fax/20090921_1806.tif) in new stack -- Channel 'SIP/173-b53023e8' receiving fax '/var/spool/asterisk/fax/20090921_1806.tif' [Sep 21 18:06:37] WARNING[5149]: chan_sip.c:5561 sip_indicate: Don't know how to indicate condition 19 -- Channel 'SIP/173-b53023e8' fax session '7' started Is there some list of these conditions? Should I care? sean ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] digium fax: can't indicate condition 19?
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:26 PM, sean darcy seandar...@gmail.com wrote: In my attempts to set up digium fax I get an odd warning: -- Executing [...@capture-fax:2] ReceiveFAX(SIP/173-b53023e8, /var/spool/asterisk/fax/20090921_1806.tif) in new stack -- Channel 'SIP/173-b53023e8' receiving fax '/var/spool/asterisk/fax/20090921_1806.tif' [Sep 21 18:06:37] WARNING[5149]: chan_sip.c:5561 sip_indicate: Don't know how to indicate condition 19 -- Channel 'SIP/173-b53023e8' fax session '7' started Is there some list of these conditions? Should I care? I get a lot of fax messages that seem extraneous so I usually ignore them. There is already an open ticket want an SVN fix for one that I found particularly annoying. I'm talking about one that repeatedly talks about a missing segment or something like that, and it happens a gazillion times per fax. A gazillion being way more than I want it to. Did the fax come through okay? If yes I recommend ignoring the error unless you want to be particularly diligent and dig through the bug tracker to see if it's already been fixed. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
