Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design] - Or was it top posting?

2008-12-05 Thread Mr Gabriel


- Original Message - 
From: Mr Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com 
Sent: Friday, 5 December, 2008 13:58:09 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, 
Portugal 
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design] 



- Original Message - 
From: Andrew Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com 
Sent: Friday, 5 December, 2008 13:49:59 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, 
Portugal 
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design] 

Address added to spam filter. Please do NOT e-mail me again. 

-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir 
Cohen 
Sent: 05 December 2008 13:27 
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com 
Subject: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design] 

Top posting strikes again: 

On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:39:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Quote : Like I said earlier - the CDR's aren't 
 reliable enough for a billing platform (as you've 
 rightly pointed out) but are OK for very basic call 
 logging (something the customer can look at). 

Who wrote that? 

[snip the rest of the reply] 

 Andrew Thomas wrote: 

[snip] 

 Like I said earlier - the CDR's aren't reliable enough for a billing 
 platform (as you've rightly pointed out) but are OK for very basic 
call 
 logging (something the customer can look at). 

Why didn't you place your reply here? 

We have archives of the list. We can spot the original message. 

[snip more useless quoting resulted from top-posting] 

** SNIP ** 

Which address did you add to the spam filter? Was in the asterisk address? If 
you don't want to recieve any more mails from the list, then you should 
unregister, not add it to the spam list :) 

** SNIP ** 


I don't think this one was a TOP POST read the whole message! 
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design] - Or was it top posting?

2008-12-05 Thread Andrew Thomas
Thanks for that, it IS appreciated - but, everyone, can we please not argue 
this matter any more.  Some see it as top posting - some don't. I really don't 
care either way.

No if we could just get back to the subject in hand and not clog up this list 
with flames.

Thanks
Andy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mr Gabriel
Sent: 05 December 2008 14:05
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design] - Or was 
it top posting?



- Original Message -
From: Mr Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, 5 December, 2008 13:58:09 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, 
Portugal
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re:  CDR Design]

- Original Message -
From: Andrew Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, 5 December, 2008 13:49:59 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, 
Portugal
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re:  CDR Design]

Address added to spam filter.  Please do NOT e-mail me again.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir
Cohen
Sent: 05 December 2008 13:27
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

Top posting strikes again:

On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:39:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Quote : Like I said earlier - the CDR's aren't 
 reliable enough for a billing platform (as you've 
 rightly pointed out) but are OK for very basic call
 logging (something the customer can look at).

Who wrote that?

[snip the rest of the reply]

 Andrew Thomas wrote:

[snip]

 Like I said earlier - the CDR's aren't reliable enough for a billing
 platform (as you've rightly pointed out) but are OK for very basic
call
 logging (something the customer can look at).

Why didn't you place your reply here?

We have archives of the list. We can spot the original message.

[snip more useless quoting resulted from top-posting]

** SNIP **

Which address did you add to the spam filter? Was in the asterisk address? If 
you don't want to recieve any more mails from the list, then you should 
unregister, not add it to the spam list :)

** SNIP **


I don't think this one was a TOP POST read the whole message!

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users